involving students in curriculum development and teaching through Peer Designed Instruction.Mr. Luis Miguel Procter, University of Texas, El Paso Luis M. Procter is currently pursuing a B.S. degree in engineering leadership with the University of Texas at El Paso, where he is an undergraduate Research Assistant.Anita D. Patrick, University of Texas, Austin Anita Patrick is a STEM Education Doctoral Student in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction, and Graduate Research Assistant in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at The University of Texas at Austin. She received her BS in Bioengineering from Clemson University where she tutored undergraduate mathematics and science courses, and mentored undergraduate
. Whenthis tool is properly integrated with effective pedagogies of engagement (like problem-basedlearning, or experiment-based learning), it can enhance students’ achievement of learning goalsand the development of essential skills such as teamwork, creativity, and digital skills. Also,online collaboration can facilitate peer assessment and peer learning. While it was found thatMiro was an effective learning tool in an engineering laboratory-intensive course, the smallsample size makes for the fact that these results cannot be generalized. A follow-up study withmore participants is required.ConclusionOur study confirms that Miro can be easily employed to facilitate effective online collaboration,thus enhancing student engagement. This is deemed to
was to a site where a couple of prototype systems had been installed. One of theprototypes was an aquaculture hoop house (which provided a great analogy for how greenhousegases work) that was used to grow both plants and fish. The energy needs of the system’s fans,pumps, etc. were met by a nearby photovoltaic array. In addition to the traditional photovoltaicarray, there was also a building integrated photovoltaic prototype which enabled the students tolearn more first-hand about utilizing different parts of the solar spectrum for different uses (e.g.electrical energy vs. thermal energy). The second tour was of a local 30 MW hydroelectric plant.Students were able to view the several spare turbines as well as the generators and
the considerableeffort of actually preparing and refining one. Furthermore, since such competitions are extra-curricular in nature, only a small percentage of undergraduate engineering students elect toparticipate: engineering coursework does not lend by itself to the practice of elevator pitching,and a crowded curriculum may not allow for engineering students to take business classes at all,or opt into elevator pitch competitions [9].Thus far, we have found that the University of Rhode Island has introduced an elective courseavailable for engineering students that is similar in nature to the one we offer at Stevens Instituteof Technology (Stevens) in that it requires an elevator pitch competition as an outcome of thecourse. At the University
of professional development workshops for industry and academia using blended instructional tools.Idalis Villanueva, University of Florida Dr. Villanueva is an Associate Professor in the Engineering Education Department at the University of Florida. Her multiple roles as an engineer, engineering educator, engineering educational researcher, and professional development mentor for underrepresented populations has aided her in the design and integration of educational and physiological technologies to research ’best practices’ for student profes- sional development and training. In addition, she is developing methodologies around hidden curriculum, academic emotions and physiology, and engineering makerspaces
Foltz, Rochester Institute of Technology Franz Foltz is an associate professor with dual appointments in the Departments of Science, Technology and Society and Public Policy at the Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT), Rochester, NY. He is the Director of the Graduate Program in Science, Technology and Public Policy. At RIT, he teaches under- graduate and graduate courses in Science and Technology Policy, Research Design, and Policy Analysis.Dr. James E Moon, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE) James Moon, Rochester Institute of Technology James Moon is a Professor in the Electrical and Mi- croelectronic Engineering department. He was a recipient of the 2009 Eisenhart Award for Excellence in Teaching. At RIT
in Puerto Rico. Her primary research interests include investigating students’ understanding of difficult concepts in en- gineering sciences, especially for underrepresented populations. She also works in the development and evaluation of various engineering curriculum and courses at UPRM applying the outcome-based educa- tional framework.Dr. Nayda G. Santiago, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus Nayda G. Santiago is professor at the Electrical and Computer Engineering department, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus (UPRM) where she teaches the Capstone Course in Computer Engineer- ing. She received an BS in EE from the University of PR, Mayaguez in 1989, a MEng in EE from Cornell University in
Paper ID #22439Flipped Classroom and Emotional Learning in an Engineering LeadershipDevelopment CourseDr. Dean H. Lang, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Lang is the Associate Director of the Engineering Leadership Research Program at Penn State Uni- versity. She holds a BS in Mechanical Engineering from West Virginia University, an MBA from Johns Hopkins University, and a PhD in Kinesiology with a focus on Biomechanics from Penn State University. Dr. Lang’s previous professional experiences and research interests range from mechanical engineering facilities design to research that applied engineering
-Piñera, et al., “Design and integration of a problem-based biofabrication course into an undergraduate biomedical engineering curriculum”, J Biol Eng 10, 2016, 10.[3] A.B. Abell, “Embracing Ambiguity: A Framework for Promoting Iterative Design Thinking Approaches in Open-Ended Engineering and Design Curricula”, 2017.[4] S. R. Daly, C. M. Seifert, S. Yilmaz, R. Gonzalez, "Comparing Ideation Techniques for Beginning Designers", ASME. J. Mech. Des. October 2016; 138(10): 101108.[5] T.C. Davies, J. Manzin, M. Meraw, et al., “Understanding the Development of a Design Thinking Mindset During a Biomedical Engineering Third-Year Course”, Biomed Eng Education 2023, 3, pp.123–132.[6] A. S. T. Wong, & C
] curriculum. While in public schools some teachers might get away with not finishing the curriculum…they are more lenient than the private schools.He also explained that class sizes could be smaller in private schools, particularly as studentsbegan to take electives in high school. As an example, Titan stated that his smallest class was hisCalculus course, in which only three students (including him) were enrolled. Titan commented that his classes were “really hard” in The Gambia. He remarked abouttaking courses that “prepared [him] really [well] because [he] had more opportunities…and then[he] took international exams, which [he] passed real[ly] [well].” Whereas Ben and Goku didnot feel very challenged or motivated by some of the
enjoyment, greater sense of creativity, greater teamwork skill development, greaterpreparation to their future as an engineering, and preparation for the spring semester projectcompared to those who completed the IR project.IntroductionThe use of games as an instrument of educational instruction is not new. Games have often beenused throughout history as a tool to teach students important skills such as reading, logic, andmathematics; therefore, it logically follows that computer games can be utilized as an effectivetool for teaching students programming skills1. There is evidence that programming computergames as a method to teach programming skills has an integral place within the curriculum. Theuse of game development in programming courses in
Electrical and Computer Engineering from 1999 to 2004, and associate dean for student affairs and curriculum at the college from 2004 to 2018. Dr. Perry’s research interests include semiconductor device modeling, embedded systems design, and engineering education. He is an electrical and computer engineering program evaluator for ABET, Inc, a senior member of the IEEE, and a member of ASEE.Dr. Charmane V. Caldwell, Florida A&M University/Florida State University Dr. Charmane V. Caldwell is the Director of Student Access at the FAMU-FSU College of Engineering (COE). As Director, Charmane leads a comprehensive effort to increase the number of underrepresented undergraduate minorities and women in engineering. She has
Paper ID #19498What is the Relationship between Mindset and Engineering Identity for FirstYear Male and Female Students? An Exploratory Longitudinal StudyMs. Heather Lysbeth Henderson, West Virginia University With a background in English, philosophy, science, and all levels of education, Heather is currently a doc- toral student in curriculum and instruction and educational psychology. She is interested in psychological barriers affecting retention and success for students. Having been raised by an engineer, this project is close to her heart.Dr. Karen E Rambo-Hernandez, West Virginia University Karen E. Rambo-Hernandez
resultshave direct implications for engineering curriculum design and teaching practices; in short, it iscritical that students are given reasonably difficult tasks that incorporate physical testing, aregiven time for multiple iteration cycles, and are supported as they design.IntroductionEngineering educators seek to engage learners in authentic engineering practices, includingtesting and iterating on designs (NAE and NRC, 2009). Failure is an integral part of the iterationcycle in the engineering design process; designs often fail, that is, do not meet all criteria andconstraints, and a central disciplinary practice in engineering is interpreting this failure asfeedback on those designs (Lottero-Perdue & Parry, 2014; Cunningham & Carlsen
paper will discuss thedevelopment, implementation, and results of EDC 2022: Eagle-3D.Keywords3D printing, design, challenge, high school.IntroductionThe recent 3D Printing revolution has introduced several low-cost 3D printing systems 1.Integrating low cost 3D printers into the K-12 curriculum is a simple way to teach the NextGeneration Science Standards (NGSS) 2. The subsequent advancements in open-source 3Dprinting software has also propagated this revolution in the availability of these systems to alarger audience. Many high schools have access to a 3D Printer and use it for projects or embedits utilization in their curriculum. However, teachers continue to lack adequate training in 3Dprinting systems 3.There are several outreach activities
underrepresented groups in the technology industry. The New YorkJobs CEO Council aims to support faculty in local community colleges to expand and strengthenapprenticeship programs in the New York City area [3]. These programs can help reduce the skillgap, particularly for underrepresented students. The author has received funding from the PerkinsGrant department to support its apprenticeship program, which helps students gain professionalexperience and refine their program applications.The apprenticeship program emphasizes situated learning in professional communities ofpractice to maintain alignment between education and industry. It has been integrated withtraditional college coursework, leading to an exploration of teaching methods that better
product development in an engineering context, with an industry- based project, and integrated leadership labs. Incoming students have an average of five years of industry experience.Iowa State Iowa State University offers university-wide Certificates and MinorsUniversity (2009) in Leadership. These include a series of linked 1-credit courses, a project and leadership electives. Engineering students have access to both, and take the same core courses but have engineering specific leadership course electives. Leadership is also explicitly integrated into the graduate attributes of the Construction Engineering program.Southern SMU’s
American Society for Engineering Education, 2016Restructuring Digital Design Courses in Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology Programs, Preparing the Engineer of 2020AbstractAs the complexity of microelectronic systems is steadily increasing, universities must updatetheir curriculum to cope with the increased demands of the industry. New technologies and toolsare frequently introduced into the engineering workplace, and educational programs must find away to integrate many of these into their offerings. In the areas of digital system design, theindustrial use of programmable logic devices (FPGA, CPLD), associated EDA tools and HDLlanguages is increasing rapidly and consequently the demand for highly qualified engineers withthis
Paper ID #17044Developing a Creative K-12 Manipulative: An ECECS CapstoneDr. Mike Borowczak, Erebus Labs Mike is the chief scientist and founder of Erebus Labs - a Hardware Security and Engineering Outreach company located in Laramie, WY. He is also the Senior Data Scientist at a recently acquired startup. He has worked with university faculty to promote and extend K20 STEM outreach in Ohio, Oregon, Texas and Wyoming. He also has over a decade of industry and research experience - mostly revolving around the semiconductor and bio-informatics industries - with specific experience at Texas Instruments, Intel and
in Engineering Education, vol. 5, no. 3, Fall 2016.29. C. Bell-Huff, T. Fernandez, K. Morgan, P. J. Benkeser, & J. M. Le Doux, “A vertically integrated portfolio process to foster entrepreneurial mindset within an undergraduate biomedical engineering curriculum,” in Proceedings of the 2020 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, ASEE2020, Virtual.30. A. Finley & T. McNair, Assessing underserved students’ engagement in high-impact practices, Washington, D. C.: American Association of Colleges & Universities, 2009.31. V. Braun & V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77-101, 2006.32. C. J. Bryan, G. M
workforce; and does not directly promote diversity.At UM, we have completed exploratory studies through focus groups with undergraduateengineering students and analysis of student transcripts, as well as a review of curriculuminnovations implemented at other institutions. These suggest the importance of both (1)providing students with an early integrative foundation to allow them to make informeddecisions in choosing an engineering discipline and to effectively navigate through their degreeprogram and (2) offering more complex, hands-on experiences that are aligned with solvinghigh-impact problems. Introducing these changes in the curriculum is expected to both providestudents with the tools needed to address tomorrow’s cross-disciplinary global
Paper ID #33978Work in Progress: Promoting Equitable Team Dynamics in an IntroductoryBiomedical Engineering CourseDr. Jennifer H. Choi, University of California, Davis Jennifer Choi is currently an Associate Professor of Teaching in the Department of Biomedical Engineer- ing (BME) at UC Davis. In addition to teaching core undergraduate courses, Jennifer is aimed at integrat- ing engineering design principles and hands-on experiences throughout the curriculum, and playing an active role in the senior design course. She has interests in engineering education, curricular innovation, as well as impacting the community through
research interests focus on the relationship between group learning modalities and creativity performance. Dr. Tsakalerou is active in international forums (such as the OECD Idea Factory, the European Innovation Summit, the Joint Institute for Innovation Policy, and the European Higher Education Society) and a contributor to the Asia-Europe Foundation’s Education Hub.Michalis N. Xenos, University of PatrasMs. Semira Maria Evangelou, University of Patras I hold a diploma (5 years Engineering degree with an Integrated M.Sc.) from the Department of Computer Engineering & Informatics at the University of Patras. I also completed a master’s degree in the Human-Computer Interaction field. During my master’s studies, I
, ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Mobile learning in STEM - A case study in an undergraduate engineering courseIn order for educational outcomes to improve and expand in the modern era, a student-centerededucational system is needed. Technology enabled pedagogy has helped immensely during thepandemic times when a rapid transition to remote learning was essential. This poster describes thepreliminary findings from a quasi-experimental mixed methods study on implementing mobiledevices (iPad and Pencil) and a technology-enhanced curriculum in a foundational undergraduateengineering class. The technology-enabled curriculum was fully integrated in a thermal-fluidscourse to deliver content and
individuals who strongly identify withthese disciplines tend to be more motivated to pursue careers in these areas and confrontchallenges with greater confidence [11] [12. Moreover, various studies highlight the importanceof belonging in making students feel welcomed by the institution, thereby enhancing self-efficacy [11], [13].Hence, incorporating a gender perspective in higher education institutions, especially inengineering schools dominated by men, becomes relevant. Higher education institutions shouldrecognize that a gender perspective should be an integral part of the institution. This perspectiveinvolves not only considering the concerns and experiences of women and men but also takingspecific actions oriented toward achieving gender equality
suited forchemical engineers. In short, as engineers we are relatively late to the makerspace movement,likely due to the complications of incorporating wet chemistry with process design, and a studentbody that is not often trained on machining tools or expected to develop CAD skills. Regardless,the advances we have made as an engineering discipline in this area could use additional scrutinyto discern what has worked for a chemical engineering population and what has not.In this work I describe the design and impacts of a makerspace at the University of Utah, createdspecifically for chemical engineering curriculum. Results are compared from a first-yearchemical engineering design course taught both in a traditional unit operation laboratory
foundation for entry into most STEM-related occupations, and interventions in earlyeducation are seen as a promising avenue to move girls towards careers in engineering.Compared to classroom teaching, afterschool programs are unique in their ability to offer moretime-flexible, hands-on activities that advance student-centered learning, which is crucial inSTEM education [2] - [4]. Linking Engineering to Life (LEL) is an afterschool, experientialengineering curriculum launched in the fall of 2020 by Vermont Afterschool, a statewidenonprofit dedicated to strengthening programs, empowering youth, and expanding access toafterschool and summer programs so that all Vermont youth are active, engaged, connected, andheard. LEL’s goal is to overcome barriers
EngineeringAbstractThe Texas A&M Engineering Academy program is the first engineeringtransition program of its kind in the United States. Unlike traditional transferprograms, students admitted into an Academy are admitted to Texas A&M andbegin earning Texas A&M transcribed credit from semester one. Students enrollin math, science and core curriculum courses through the partner college andenroll in Texas A&M engineering courses taught by Texas A&M faculty face-to-face on the partner college campus. Students spend one to two years co-enrolled at the community college before transitioning full time to Texas A&MUniversity in College Station to finish their bachelor’s degree. Academystudents save on average $4,100 per semester on tuition fees
a robust collaborative environment, especially amongPrincipal Investigators.While social interactions were divided into two larger groups, the network’s expansion from fourto sixteen members indicates an evolving collaborative landscape. In addition, participants in theresearch team exhibited high team effectiveness and psychological safety ratings, fostering anenvironment of trust and effective collaboration. The core members’ strong professional andsocial relationships demonstrate the evolution from professional to social connections, especiallyamong peers. The survey results suggested that new members gradually integrate into the team,particularly in learning and seeking advice.Figure 3. All research ties, Year 2 Figure 4. All
course outcomes, and posted on the department’s front page onthe Web. This is a plan we see as our new departmental identity and one that will enable us toweather the demographic cliff and other big challenges facing academia in the United States.University-level RRC Curriculum PrioritiesSeattle University launched a multi-year effort to comprehensively reimagine and revisecurriculum with a call to integrate practices that would make the education we offer distinctlyunique and relevant to global challenges. Reimagine and Revise the Curriculum (RRC) wasenvisioned to be an initiative that is led by faculty within their own undergraduate and graduateprograms and departments, with programmatic support offered at the university level through1 from