event a success. Many havecontinued to create additional opportunities for education, public dialogue, and impact in their respectiveenvironments. Considering these indications that the program was a success, this study’s research objectives aremeant to draw from that collective experience and provide insight for engineering educators designing similar skill-sharing events between engineers and students and professionals from other disciplines, especially those stemmingfrom a specific need to take a multi-sectoral approach. With that in mind, this study of that program, as well asreflections on this interdisciplinary collaboration and measures of the program’s impacts, was a valuable opportunityto examine our research questions and derive
Page 10.1162.13experiences [29, 30]. A subset of active learning is cooperative learning. Cooperative learning hasreceived significant attention both in practice and in the research, and is best understood when Proceedings of the2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2005, American Society for Engineering Educationcompared with two alternate modes of learning, competitive and individualistic. It is importantto note that cooperative learning is not simply putting students together in a group to worktogether. Specific characteristics of the group work must be present for it to be successful:positive interdependence of the group members; promotion of face-to
California, Santa Cruz. Beckett’s continuing dissertation research examines a community-university collaboration situated in a low-income, predominantly Latino community, that created and used digital stories as artifacts and learning tools to engage members of the community (parents, teachers, district officials, union leaders, students, non-profit service providers, etc.) in reflection and dialogue around the economic, social, and cultural barriers that constituents face when advocating for student academic achievement, and to identify the strengths and solidarities that can be created to change the school system to better serve the student body (Beckett, Glass, & Moreno, 2012). Beckett has presented her research at
ground their work in well-defined frameworks that include a collection of traitsdeveloped within the context. Although this perspective provides easily definable lenses foranalyzing identity, more research is needed into the factors that influence students’ identitydevelopment – particularly those that are within the control of engineering educators. This paperwill provide a review of an engineering identity study, explore the challenges and affordancesinherent in this work, and discuss the practical implications for engineering educators andscholars.IntroductionIn the early 17th century, the philosopher John Locke developed a theory of mind that advancedthe idea that individuals are born as tabula rasa, or blank slate: the mind arrives in the
data skills will offer insightsfor preparing the next generation of engineers to thrive in this era.Research underscores the importance of a strong engineering identity for student retention andsuccess [4]. Motivation is influenced by an individual's perceived value, expected outcomes, andpotential costs of fulfilling educational requirements [5]. The growing emphasis on data skillswithin engineering curricula makes exploring the relationship between data proficiency,engineering identity, and motivation crucial for maintaining a competitive workforce. This is thefocus of our ongoing research, seeking to bridge the gap between data skills and engineeringidentity development.Researchers have investigated how competencies like problem-solving
liberal arts discipline, similar to the natural sciences, socialsciences, and humanities (and the trivium, quadrivium, and natural philosophy of earlier times),by imbedding it in the general education requirements of a college graduate for an increasinglytechnology-driven and -dependent society of the century ahead.5. To achieve far greater diversity among the participants in engineering, the roles and types ofengineers needed by our nation, and the programs engaged in preparing them for professionalpractice.As described on the University website, “the Millennium Project is a research center at theUniversity of Michigan concerned with the impact of technology on our society, ourcommunities, our institutions, and our planet.”The report advocates
the development of programs that assist entering freshman engineering students, including academically disadvantaged students, succeed during their first year. Of particular note are the highly successful counseling and cooperative learning programs for first-year stu- dents that he created within the freshman engineering programs at Purdue University and at the University of Pittsburgh. Dr. Budny has numerous publications and presentations on engineering education. He is widely recognized for outstanding teaching, receiving awards at both Purdue and Pittsburgh Universities, plus national and international awards. Dr. Budny is very active in ASEE within the Freshman Programs and the Educational Research and Methods
performancewas particularly prevalent among collaborative and cooperative learning, with several referencesto group challenges with students ‘slacking off’ and being ‘free riders’ as well as ‘one studentdoing all the work’ and ‘dominating’ teams. In other words, faculty participants expressedchallenges with managing group dynamics and student relationships that consumed timeotherwise needed for coursework and inconsistent outcomes for students based on their roles intheir assigned groups. According to one participant describing challenges to collaborativelearning: “Group dynamics are always challenging, and a significant amount of time is spent with "relationship" work, and managing the collaboration, rather than with the assigned
(ESSAP) at Texas A&M University (TAMU). She grad- uated from TAMU with a bachelor’s of science degree in mechanical engineering. While obtaining her degree, Hodge was involved with several community service activities such as the Boys & Girls Club of Bryan, Help One Student To Succeed (HOSTS), and Habitat for Humanity. Upon graduation with her bachelor’s degree, she began work with International Paper Company and became active with the local College Bound Academy as an instructor. While employed with International Paper, Jacqueline obtained her M.S.B..A from TAMU, Texarkana. After seven years of service in July 2004, she decided to resign her post at International Paper to pursue a master’s degree in
, novelty, and heavy collaboration [2]. Hackathons have beenused to: Spur interest in computer science fields [3] [4] Create innovations within companies [2] [5], for governments [6], and for research projects [7] Provide applications of learning for undergraduate students both within the STEM fields [3] [8] [9] and in non-technical fields, such as marketing [10]Within an educational context, hackathons are very useful for stirring engagement and forcorrecting student perceptions of their program [3] [4] [10]. There is, however, limited literatureon hackathons being used in-class, with the “Markathon” [10] being one notable exception.Hackathons are usually, but not always, competitions [8]. Most
in Engineering Education, August 2017, at Purdue University under the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program. Within his graduate work, Justin plans to explore low socioeconomic high school students’ mathematics experiences and the affect they have on their choice of pursuing post-secondary engineering education.Dr. Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno Adam Kirn is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at University of Nevada, Reno. His re- search focuses on the interactions between engineering cultures, student motivation, and their learning experiences. His projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers, their problem
overabundance of low-quality homework canresult in student disengagement from school and exacerbate mental health issues, leading to itsrejection [50].Research objectiveThe main objective of this research is to understand and explore the effects of frequentunannounced evaluations on university students’ performance. Moreover, this research aims toexamine the pedagogical approach associated with frequent unannounced evaluations todetermine its effectiveness in fostering habits of academic integrity among students. Thisinvolves promoting positive study habits for genuine learning, as opposed to extended periodswithout learning that could potentially lead to temptations for cheating and other problemsassociated. The article presents the findings derived
as part of a dual level(undergraduate and graduate) elective course on science diplomacy.IntroductionScience diplomacy – the triune approach of: 1) scientists acting as diplomats; 2)diplomats facilitating scientific collaboration; and 3) cultural diplomacy via scientificgatherings and international exchange – is both a long-standing and a recently re-emergedaspect of international relations [1]. For example, the first Ambassador of the UnitedStates was inventor-scientist Benjamin Franklin, and the first Secretary of State wasfarmer-scientist Thomas Jefferson. More recently, in 1961, Article 3 of the ViennaConvention on Diplomatic Relations was written to highlight that, “the functions of adiplomatic mission consist, inter alia, in
. Kim received a Ph.D. from the USC, and a master’s and a bachelor’s degrees from the Seoul National University. Her current interests include pedagogical discourse analysis, human-computer interaction, social network assistance, and assessment of student collaborative online activities. She leads synergistic work among machine learning experts, educational psychologists, NLP researchers, and STEM instructors. She is the PI of five NSF projects including the CCLI/PedDiscourse, CCLI/PedWiki and NSDL/SocRecomm projects under the EHR Directorate and CreativeIT/PedGames and IIS/PedWorkflow projects under the CISE Directorate. Under the retired PedDiscourse effort, her team designed, deployed and evaluated software
students and a study of meaning-making language and behaviour in student design teams.Dr. Greg Evans, University of Toronto GREG EVANS is a Professor of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry and the Director of the Southern Ontario Centre for Atmospheric Aerosol Research at the University of Toronto. He is the Di- rector of the Collaborative Program in Engineering Education and Associate Director of the Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (ILead). He has been awarded the 2014 Allan Blizzard Award, the 2014 Faculty Teaching Award, the 2013 Northrop Frye Award for Linking Teaching and Research, the 2010 Engineers Canada Medal for Distinction in Engineering Education and the 2010 American Society for
for Penn StateKim Barron, Pennsylvania State University Kim Barron is a graduate student in Industrial Engineering at Penn State. Kim has a Bachelor's degree from Penn State in Industrial Engineering. Page 11.551.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Engineering Education and the Global Economy: The Search for PolicyAbstractEngineering education in the United States is confronted with some new realities, both real andperceived. Engineering is increasingly a globally distributed, cooperative activity and the USoutsourcing of research, design, manufacturing, and
students, which are included among necessary entrepreneurial skill sets, andunderstand how and why these skill sets change over their undergraduate matriculation.Our research will report on an initial study of the impact of first-year engineering courses on thechanges in entrepreneurial mindsets of first year engineering students. Entrepreneurial mindset inour study is operationally defined as a more growth orientated mindset versus a fixed orientatedmindset. This operational definition and the accompanying mindset measurement instrument wasdeveloped and validated by Carol Dweck of Stanford University. Based on Dweck‟s researchresults we assume a growth mindset is a reasonable surrogate for a student engineer‟s creativeand innovative or
, Texas A&M University Blaine is currently a graduate student earning his Ph.D. in Educational Psychology with an emphasis in Research, Measurement, and Statistics at Texas A&M. His research is primarily focused on issues of equity in STEM education.Camille S. Burnett, Prairie View A&M University Camille S. Burnett, Ph.D., ACUE, is Assistant Professor of Mathematics Education and Director of the SMaRTS (Science, Mathematics, Reading, Technology, and Social Studies) Curriculum Resource Lab in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction at Prairie View A&M University. She has almost 20 years of combined experience in the K-12 and higher education settings. She is also the principal investigator for
AC 2012-3970: 3RS FOR ENGINEERING SCHOLARS: RESPONSIBILI-TIES, REPERCUSSIONS, AND REMEDIES ASSOCIATED WITH PRO-FESSIONAL PLAGIARISMMs. Susan H. Sarapin M.A., Purdue University Susan Sarapin is a doctoral candidate in Purdue University’s Brian Lamb School of Communication Divi- sion of Media, Technology, and Society. She studies the effects of TV viewing on the public’s perceptions of and attitudes toward crime, criminals, and the justice system. This extends to the exploration of persua- sion in the courtroom and the lay public’s understanding of scientific concepts, statistics, and techniques. Sarapin intends to combine teaching, research, mentoring undergraduate and graduate research, and con- sulting
culture, some students were able to thrive, while others’ low levelsof self-efficacy prevented them from having successful experiences. Since most REU studentsworked individually, opportunities for mutual support among research teams were not developed.This project determined to create research experiences that would address these issues. With aPBL approach in mind, engineering faculty members recruited students with a variety of STEMbackgrounds to work collaboratively on a complex problem in transportation engineering. Theresearch was intended to be a collaborative effort among students to reach their common goal.This paper has described the REU as it has developed over two years.During the first year of the project (summer 2018), the eight
summer program at Carnegie Mellon) and currently sits on the Board of Di- rectors for the PGSS Campaign, a nonprofit that is responsible for raising the funds to finance and sustain the program.Sarah Marie Robb, Robert Morris University Sarah Robb is a graduate student at Robert Morris University in the Engineering Management MS pro- gram. She recently completed a BS in Engineering at Robert Morris with concentrations in mechanical and biomedical engineering. Graduating with honors, she has also successfully passed the Fundamen- tals of Engineering (EIT) exam. She has participated in summer research at Vanderbilt University and Worcester Polytechnic Institute, and most recently worked as a teaching assistant for the
Paper ID #242722018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29On Becoming a ”Transfer Institution”: Research on a Community Collegethat Supports Diverse Black Students in their Transfer AspirationsDr. Bruk T Berhane, University of Maryland, College Park Dr. Bruk T. Berhane received his bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from the University of Mary- land in 2003, after which he was hired by The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (JHU/APL) where he worked on nanotechnology. In 2005 he left JHU/APL for a fellowship with the
at the University of Waterloo. Currently, Chris is the Engineering Educational Developer with the Engineering Ideas Clinic, where he designs and implements real-world, hands-on design activities for undergraduate engineering students.Michael Lenover Graduate Research AssistantEugene Li (Mechatronics Engineer in Training)Sanjeev Bedi (Professor and Director) (University of Waterloo) Dr. Sanjeev Bedi, Professor in Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, Director of the Engineering Ideas Clinic: Sanjeev Bedi holds the Waterloo-NSERC Chair in Immersive Design Engineering Activities. He has extensive experience teaching engineering design and has focussed his teaching on improving student learning through introduction of
college undergraduates incomputational research techniques. In this program, learning outcomes focused on increasingparticipant familiarity with data science research methods (see Table 1). Participants formulatedindividual research questions within the broader research goals of their assigned team.In the initial weeks of the program, we reviewed quantitative skills in analyzing large-scalelanguage data, introduced design principles for data science analyses, and applied these newskills. Through guided collaboration sessions with graduate mentors, the participants gained Table 1: Program Learning Outcomes Objective Description Knowledge Gain knowledge and skills to analyze large-scale
underrepresentation of minoritizedwomen, including African American or Black, Hispanic or Latina/Latinx, and Native Americanor American Indian women. Therefore, the computing education research community (CER)have explored pedagogies to improve computing students' learning outcomes based on existinglearning theories. Few studies have reviewed pedagogies in the context of social constructivism.Social constructivism is a learning theory defined as the collaborative co-construction ofknowledge. Social constructivist pedagogies have enhanced learning outcomes for minoritizedwomen in other STEM fields, but their effects have not been studied extensively in CER. Wereference intersectionality theory to guide our search around gender/race/ethnicity, critique
social interaction problems nowadays, as research indicated“the majority of coursework in engineering education today focuses on technical knowledge and skills ofmathematics, science, and engineering as well as new graduates generally feel prepared for the technicalaspects of practice, but many have difficulty transitioning to the socio-technical practices and culture ofthe workplace[28] ”.Additionally, to explore the collaborative inquiry deeply, we conducted a longitudinal study for threeinnovative engineering design works (arc-path prediction, parallel design of robot structure andsymmetrical design for robots) in our research case “Robo”. It can be seen that the three dimensions ofcollaborative inquiry are significantly repeated in different
analysis uncovers whether team memberscorrectly perceive the relationships among their teammates. These initial findings openopportunities for future work on the role social network analysis can play in the analysis ofcollaborative learning.1. IntroductionReal world engineering design problems are frequently solved by teams; therefore, as educators,we are required, both by ABET and common sense, to give students the skills and attitudes thatenable them to work effectively in teams. One of the key skills is the ability to engage incollaborative learning with team members. In the process of acquiring the knowledge necessaryto solve the design problem, collaborative learning gives students the opportunity to both learnfrom and to teach their peers
vocations collaboration the authors along with aprofessor in mechanical engineering, led a student project last semester to assess the sentimenttowards ethics education among undergraduate engineering students and faculty at the Universityof Notre Dame. This student group was in our socially engaged computing projects class. Theyconducted interviews with key faculty members that were engaged in a variety of ethics andengineering endeavors.Outcomes from the faculty interviews:A group of undergraduate students interviewed a number of faculty in engineering andphilosophy.From the faculty interviews, some key concerns identified, which echoed what we had learnedfrom computing faculty interviews as well : • Time/limited resources for courses
engineeringtechnology students’ written communication skills at these participating campuses, it haspotential use for other institutions to positively impact their students’ written communication.This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantNos. 2013467, 2013496, and 2013541.IntroductionCommunicating content knowledge effectively in oral and written formats is important forengineering and engineering technology students. Additionally, it is essential for the ABET-accredited programs from which they graduate to ensure that students hone and demonstratethese skills [1]. Anecdotal observations by engineering and engineering technology instructorsand prior research have shown that this is not the outcome observed by
the problem. An analysis of two semesters of exams demonstrated that eighty-six percent of the students exhibited some form of model-based reasoning 16. • Alumna surveys: In a recent survey which yielded a 60% return of graduates from the program, many alluded to the value of this class in terms of their current positions. Many also commented on the need to talk across disciplinary boundaries and that they felt well prepared to do this. One alumna quipped, “I am not afraid of anything anymore.”The course assessment rubric for the course can be found at the end of this paper.Conclusion Classroom activities that challenge old norms and redefine what it means to be a 21st centuryengineer 17 should aspire to