Paper ID #7433Adapted Physical Activity Design Projects: A Collaboration Between Kinesi-ology and EngineeringDr. Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University Dr Self has taught in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo since 2006. Prior to that, he worked in the Air Force Research Laboratories before teaching at the U.S. Air Force Academy for seven years. During the 2011-2012 academic year he participated in a professor exchange, teaching at the Munich University of Applied Sciences. His engineering education activities include collaborating on the Dynamics Concept Inventory
Centre for Design Re- search. Dr. Bennett obtained his B.A.I. Mechanical Engineering Degree in 1994 and his M.Sc. degree through research in 1996, both from the University of Dublin, T.C.D. In 1994 Dr. Bennett obtained a research fellowship to work in the national Nuclear and Technological Research Institute (I.T.N.) in Lis- bon, Portugal to carry out work in fluid elastic instability, vibration analysis and signal processing. After completion of his M.Sc., degree Dr. Bennett worked for a year in a national fluid mechanics research laboratory (L.E.G.I.) in Grenoble, France performing research in the area of Computerised Fluid Dy- namics (CFD) as applied to cavitational flows of turbine blades. On returning to Ireland
Movemaster RV-M1 User's Manual.[17] Hakan Gurocak "e-Lab: Technology-assisted Delivery of a Laboratory Course at a Distance"[18] Hugh Jack "A Virtual Manufacturing Laboratory"[19] Kevin Devine "Integrating Robot Simulation and Off-line Programming into an Industrial Robotics Course" ASEE Annual conference[20] Yang Cao "Learning Robotics through Developing a Virtual Robot Simulator in MATLAB" Page 23.159.14
3 4 BMET Elective 8 3 3 4 BMET Capstone Project/Internship 8 3 3 4Weekly lecture hours, laboratory hours, and total credit hours are also provided. Laboratoryexercises will be conducted for 12 out of the 16 weeks in each semester. The program will bestructured within the 130 credit-hour limit set by the Georgia Board of Regents (BOR). Theproposed curriculum will have Sixty (60) hours of Mathematics, Science, English, and SocialScience core courses along with Seventy (70) hours of Technical courses. Of the 70 Technicalcredits, Thirty Four (34) will constitute a core of ECET courses; Twenty Nine (29) hours will beBMET
increase retention of students by enabling them to build a community of learners(the opposite of a “weed out” course). Biological Engineering (BE) 1252: Biology inEngineering is a 2-credit hour (1 hour lecture, 3 hours laboratory per week) second semesterfreshmen core course. The description is as follows: effect of variability and constraints ofbiological systems on engineering problem solving and design; engineering units; engineeringreport writing; oral report presentation; laboratory demonstration of biological engineeringanalysis. The mean enrollment in this course is 50 students (enrollment has exceeded 60 studentsin the past four years).Because biological engineering students are interested in many different problems at theintersection of
excitinghands-on design challenges to analyze artificial organs. In more advanced core engineering courses andlaboratories, students will explore the function of artificial organs in the laboratory and investigate thevariables affecting their performance. The engineering goals of this project are: (1) to explore the function of human and artificial organs; (2)to apply current research methodology state-of-the-art medical devices for a hands-on investigation ofartificial organs; and (3) to introduce fundamental engineering principles through experiments with artifi-cial organs; (4) to investigate the factors affecting artificial organ performance and design criteria; and (5)to explore the complicated ethical issues regarding the technological
B.Sc. degree in Computer Science and Statistics from the University of Cape Town at South Africa, and his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Statistics from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. He has been a faculty member at Loyola University Maryland since 1986. He also works at the National Institute on Aging with researchers in the Laboratory of Cardiovascular Sciences. In 2010 he was elected as a fellow of the American Statistical Association. His area of interest in statistics is the linear mixed-effects model that is used to model longitudinal data. Page 23.1014.1 c American
was at the Computed Tomography Laboratory at GE’s Global Research Center for 8 years. She worked on several technology development projects in the area of X-ray CT for medical and industrial imaging. She is a named inventor on 9 patents. She has been active in the recruitment and retention of women and minorities in engineering and currently PI for an NSF-STEM grant to improve diversity at Rose-Hulman.Dr. Edward Wheeler, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Edward Wheeler is Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at Rose-Hulman In- stitute of Technology. His teaching and research interests include electromagnetics, signal integrity, mi- crowave devices, MEMS and the electrical and magnetic
in a pair of looselyconnected undergraduate Aerospace Engineering courses that integrate teaching and research.The first one-third of each course is devoted to conventional lectures and/or laboratory exerciseswith computer interfaced data acquisition systems. The latter two-thirds focus on design andresearch projects in Aerospace Engineering with a few lectures interspersed. The teachingmethod has some unique characteristics: i) Undergraduates gain a research experience byworking in small groups of two or three students supervised by a volunteer graduate studentresearch mentor, ii) The particular research project is developed by the course instructors and thevolunteer graduate student research mentor in advance of the course as one related
Paper ID #8119Research Experiences for Undergraduate Engineering StudentsDr. Sheng-Jen ”Tony” Hsieh, Texas A&M University Sheng-Jen (”Tony”) Hsieh is a professor in the Dwight Look College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. He holds a joint appointment with the Department of Engineering Technology and the De- partment of Mechanical Engineering. His research interests include engineering education, cognitive task analysis, automation, robotics and control, intelligent manufacturing system design, and micro/nano man- ufacturing. He is also the Director of the Rockwell Automation Laboratory at Texas A&M
students, especially women and underrepresented minority students, and her research in the areas of recruitment and retention. A SWE and ASEE Fellow, she is a frequent speaker on career opportunities and diversity in engineering.Dr. Armando A. Rodriguez, Arizona State University Prior to joining the ASU Electrical Engineering faculty in 1990, Dr. Armando A. Rodriguez worked at MIT, IBM, AT&T Bell Laboratories and Raytheon Missile Systems. He has also consulted for Eglin Air Force Base, Boeing Defense and Space Systems, Honeywell and NASA. He has published over 200 technical papers in refereed journals and conference proceedings–over 60 with students. He has authored three engineering texts on classical controls
the biodegradable polymers as a mechanism to deliver chemical oxidants to remediate chemical and bio- logical contaminants in wastewater and soil. She conducts educational research where she has creatively works to change educational instruction in laboratory courses by introducing topics in sustainability us- ing case studies. In 2010 she led the NCA&T team that developed the National 4-H Science Youth Day experiment which was used to teach millions of K-8 students about water quality, energy use, and global warming. Her work and research involvement includes over $2,000,000 of research funding. To date she has received a number of teaching and research awards including the 2005 National Women of Color in
. Page 23.1155.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Teaching Your First Large Lecture: Surviving with Attentive and Engaged StudentsAbstractThe usual and customary appointment for a graduate teaching assistant or even new instructor inengineering is a recitation, workshop, laboratory or small classroom of typically 30 students orless. Hence, most practical advice for promoting attentiveness and engagement centers on thattype of environment. In those environments, individual student-instructor interaction is easilypossible in order to keep students attentive and engaged. Although less common, some newinstructors are assigned to teach large lectures (>75
. John Barry DuVall, East Carolina University Dr. DuVall is a Full Professor and facilitator of TECS-TRAIN in the Department of Technology Sys- tems at East Carolina University in Greenville, North Carolina. DuVall currently teaches online classes to practicing professionals at the undergraduate, Master’s and PhD levels in areas such as strategies for technology management and communication and industrial supervision. He served as Director of a NSF/ARPA/TRP research project called The Factory as a Learning Laboratory – A Practice-Based M.S. Degree Program for Black and Decker (U.S.) associates and defense industry scientists and engineers. In 1994 this led to the development of the first Internet programs for East
design, open-ended problem solving, laboratory work, etc. As the learning styles ofstudents can vary considerably [1-7], achieving this goal can be very challenging even whenother variables which impact student learning are taken into account. Various teaching methodssuch as case studies, projects based learning, contexts based learning, computer based learning,etc, address the learning styles of different student populations [2], [8-11]. In this paper, weconcentrate on student populations who favor “learning by doing” [3], [6]. We will use the term“learning by doing” to refer to the approach of learning by solving many individual problems orthrough practice as opposed to studying the theory with which the problems are solved.The instructor of a
advection flows induced by surface waves or bed forms M.S. Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 2004 M.S.S. Software Engineering, University of St. Thomas, St. Paul, 2003 B.S. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, Nanjing University, China, 1994 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Assistant Professor, (06/2008 – Current), Lamar University, Civil Engineering, Beaumont, TX • Research Associate (01/2008 – 05/2008), University of Minnesota, Saint Anthony Falls Laboratory (SAFL) • Civil Engineer (08/2007 – 01/2008), HZ United, LLC, Plymouth, MN • Research/Teaching Assistant (01/2003 – 01/2008), University of Minnesota, Saint Anthony Falls Laboratory (SAFL), Department of Civil Engineering • Lab Assistant (02
Paper ID #7904Work-in-Progress: Design of an Online Learning CoachDr. Fred W DePiero, California Polytechnic State University Dr. Fred DePiero received his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Electrical Engineering from Michigan State Uni- versity in 1985 and 1987. He then worked as a Development Associate at Oak Ridge National Laboratory until 1993. While there he was involved in a variety of real-time image processing projects and several laser-based ranging systems. Dr. DePiero began working on his Ph.D. at the University of Tennessee while still at ORNL, and completed it in May 1996. His research interests include
importance of receiving guidance and assistance from a more experienced peer. Some graduate students might not be fully aware of what mentorship involves and the benefits that mentorship will provide to their professional development beyond the credit they will receive in the class for participating.Similar challenges were reported by Attarzadeh et al.19 while implementing a mentorshipprogram at the University of Houston where seniors were recruited to mentor students in lower-division laboratory courses. The authors proposed a set of strategies to improve the effectivenessof the program.Proposed StrategiesBelow are some of the strategies that will be implemented in our mentorship program based onour observations and suggestions by
of experiments steps andhad introduced some adjustments to their laboratory courses3, 6. As the group moved into thephase of formalizing a definition for these steps, each member shared what they did in their ownclasses. Group members critiqued each other’s laboratory assignments and had lively discussionsabout what really required students to “design” their experiments. Many discussions revolvedaround levels of proficiency for the rubric. For example for the “select the proper range ofindependent variables” step, the group discussed at great length the difference between“reasonable” and “optimal” ranges, giving examples from their own experiences. The resultingrubric was clearer and more generally applicable because of the input of this
“An Interdisciplinary Laboratory Sequence inElectrical and Computer Engineering Curriculum Design and Assessment Results” IEEETRANSACTIONS IN EDUCATION, VOL 43, 2 MAY 2000.[5] L. Barry, J. Ekstrom, S.Gorka, G. Hislop, R. Kimali, E. Lawson, et al., “CurriculumGuidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Information Technology”, Association forComputing Machinery (ACM), IEEE Computer Society, Information Technology, 2008.[6] www.acm.org.[7] Shiao-Li Tsao, “A Practical Implementation Course of Operating Systems: Curriculum Designand Teaching Experiences,” Shiao-Li Tsao, 14th IEEE International Conference on Parallel andDistributed Systems, 2008.[8] J. Rugelj, J. Marzo, S. Knockaert, R. Van, J Salonen, K Bjorn, K Vaz de Carvalho
California Institute of Technology, where he was an AT&T Bell Laboratories Ph.D. Scholar. Dr. Wood was formerly a Professor of Mechanical engineering at the University of Texas (1989-2011), where he established a computational and experimental laboratory for research in engineering design and manufac- Page 23.758.1 turing. He was a National Science Foundation Young Investigator, the Cullen Trust for Higher Education Endowed Professor in Engineering and University Distinguished Teaching Professor at The University of Texas at Austin. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013
in-depth project provided by the industrial mentor or communitypartner. The experience was enhanced through field trips to the industrial mentors’ sites, guestspeakers, laboratory experiences and tours, technical writing seminars, as well as history andethics of engineering innovation sessions. Additionally, the participants were guided through awell-structured curriculum writing experience modeled after that used for a highly successfulregional STEM teacher professional development program. Through this experience, the teamsmade use of a curriculum template that was developed to ensure that the resulting lessonsprovided high quality inquiry based STEM experiences for the students that included concepts ofengineering innovation and design
change biodiversity loss, energy poverty, water scarcity, foodscarcity, waste storage, health, or critical infrastructure, provides fresh and sustainable solutions.Concepts and characteristics of nature The world of biomimicry offers a new universe of discovery and one that opens the doorto a new world of innovation. Nature provides the largest laboratory ever created and provides Page 23.401.6the greatest knowledge base and opportunity for finding novel solutions to complex globalproblems. Unfortunately, scientists and engineers have, for the most part, only used conceptsand characteristics of nature to solve specific, single-focused
at MSU, including Pro- cess Control, Transport Phenomena, Reactor Design, Engineering Materials, Thermodynamics, both Unit Operations Laboratories and graduate courses in Advanced Thermodynamics, Transport Phenomena and Chemical Kinetics. He performs research in the areas of catalysis, fuel cells and nanocomposite materials.Dr. Larry Everett Pearson, Mississippi State University Page 23.468.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Efficient and Effective Instruction in Process Simulation across the Chemical Engineering CurriculumAbstractOne
inquiry learning approach in an introductoryphysics class resulted in higher student performance on concept inventory tests.9 In this study,students were asked to make predictions or define hypothesis, then they were able to view ormanipulate a laboratory demonstration. These research studies are only a few of the possibleevidence-based research that could be presented to new TAs. Other research describing thebenefits of active learning on retention, performance, and attitudes have also been considered for Page 23.136.4this overview. 4,13,23During the active learning presentation, the participants also watch a short video clip of a GSI orTA
Cairo Institute of Technology. Dr. Orabi has received a number of research awards from the state of Connecticut, Untied Technologies, and NSF. In 2010, he was awarded an NSF-grant proposal in collaboration with eight colleges to Improved Learning for Undergraduate Engineering Programs for $600,000. He has established two laboratories: the Materials Testing Laboratory sponsored by the National Science Foundation, and the Engineering Multimedia Laboratory funded by AT&T. Dr. Orabi was awarded the ASEE Instrumentation Division Best Paper Award in 2000. He was a visiting professor at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI) from 1996 to 1998. He is a member of ASME and ASEE.Dr. Firas Akasheh, Tuskegee
) suggests that in terms of student comprehension, using only a well designed fullyautomated online course is as effective as traditional classroom/textbook/lab instruction51. Theeffect size for future more advanced ITSs incorporating the above mentioned capabilities isexpected to equal or even exceed the effect size of one-on-one tutoring.Bloom’s effect size however does not take into account the much smaller cost of ITSadministered courses, nor does it take into account the fact that it requires on average less timefrom the student to go over an ITS course as compared to the total time required to travel toschool, attend lectures, perform laboratory experiments, do homework assignments, go to officehours, study for exams, take exams, and other
Auburn University. He is the co-founder and director of the NSF-funded Laboratory for Innovative Technology and Engineer- ing Education (LITEE). LITEE has recently been recognized by the National Academy of Engineering as one of the 29 programs in the country that have successfully infused real-world experiences into under- graduate engineering education. He is also the founder and director of the Auburn Engineering Technical Assistance Program (AETAP) Prior to coming to Auburn in 1984, Dr. Raju held faculty positions in sev- eral universities in India and visiting positions at the Catholic University of America, Purdue University and the Technical University of Berlin. Dr. Raju received his Ph.D. from the Indian
. Page 23.1368.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 What’s Trust Got to Do with It? Assessing a Research-Based Mentoring Program for Novice EngineersAbstractWhile the importance of trust has largely been explored in large business organizations, littleattention has been given to the role of trust in one-on-one mentoring relationships betweenengineers1. Trust has been relatively understudied in academic settings, especially in mentoringrelationships between undergraduate and graduate students in research laboratory settings. Byassessing ways of creating and maintaining trust in engineering relationships, we will be able tocreate more comprehensive guidelines on building