Design for Learning (UDL) framework,” in 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Covington, KY, USA, Oct. 2019, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028693.[A5] C. C. Hain, W. C. Turek, A. E. Zaghi, and A. Hain, “Board # 156 : Experiences of Pre- College Teachers Working with Undergraduate Engineering Students with ADHD in Research Laboratories,” presented at the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, Columbus, Ohio: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2017. doi: 10.18260/1-2-- 27786.[A6] M. Chrysochoou et al., “Redesigning Engineering Education for Neurodiversity: New Standards for Inclusive Courses,” presented at the 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, ASEE Conferences, Jul. 2021.[A7] A
accumulated knowledge may not favor just superposing theadditional knowledge to previous acquired knowledge. Furthermore, just adding security onexciting embedded systems is almost impossible. Therefore, there is a need for structural designof curriculum, which focuses security concepts on embedded systems design.This curriculum recognizes several challenges for effective undergraduate education of securityconcepts in Embedded Systems. These challenges include laboratory existing tools, classroom,and laboratory activities, and teaching large numbers of students from diverse backgrounds. Infact, we, like many embedded systems instructors, have noticed an increase in students’ interest inembedded systems design from various disciplines, especially
recognize thatnew ways of thinking and being will likely come from outside the academy and not from withinit [42]. Already, we have found commonality with and taken inspiration from education andresearch exemplars such as the Zapatista movement’s Escuelas Populares [47], the Science Shopmovement [48], Highlander Education and Research Center [21], and the Civic Laboratory forEnvironmental Action Research (CLEAR) [49]. Our goal is to define a set of practices, based onthe methods of these and other successful experiences, in order to help us manifest SE in theworld. As we share our stories, support one another through our weekly trials and triumphs, andparticipate in our own liberatory praxis, we become community to one another. We start to liveout
. 6. Nolte, H., Huff, J., & McComb, C. (2022). No time for that? An investigation of mindfulness and stress in first-year engineering design. 7. Tellez-Bohorquez, F., & Gonzalez-Tobon, J. (2019). Empathic Design as a Framework for Creating Meaningful Experiences.Cognition, Psychology 1. Alzayed, M. A., Miller, S. R., & McComb, C. (2021). Empathic creativity: Can trait empathy predict creative concept generation and selection? 2. Bellinger, D. B., DeCaro, M. S., & Ralston, P. A. S. (2015). Mindfulness, anxiety, and high-stakes mathematics performance in the laboratory and classroom. 3. Berenguer, J. (2007). The Effect of Empathy in Proenvironmental Attitudes and Behaviors 4
. Incandescent LED Figure 4: Pictures of heat dissipation from different lightbulbs.Survey resultsThis laboratory was tested in an introduction to electromagnetic fields course required for electricalengineering students. These students would typically have had a course in electric circuits and beable to understand the schematic diagram of figure 3. Students of other engineering courses suchas thermodynamics may find it useful as well. A survey was taken among undergraduate studentsin the introduction to electromagnetics course. The goal of the survey was to usefulness of thedemo in the student's learning process. The total number of participants from three consecutivesemesters was 38. Students were
collective impact activities that expand the national pipeline into STEM careers. College student development and Faculty career development are central themes across her body of work.Dr. David K. Pugalee, University of North Carolina, Charlotte Dr. David Pugalee is a full professor, and Director of the Center for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education (STEM) at UNC Charlotte. The recipient of millions of dollars in grant- funding, Dr. Pugalee has also published works on STEMPraveen Ramaprabhu Praveen Ramaprabhu is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering & Engineering Sciences at UNC Char- lotte, where he heads the Laboratory for Multiscale Computational Fluid Dynamics (LMCFD). Starting with his
his knowledge on simulation of multiphase flows while acquiring skills in high-performance parallel computing and scientific computation. Before that, Dr. Ayala held a faculty position at Universidad de Oriente where he taught and developed courses for a number of subjects such as Fluid Mechanics, Heat Transfer, Thermodynamics, Multiphase Flows, Hydraulic Machinery, as well as different Laboratory courses. Additionally, Dr. Ayala has had the opportunity to work for a number of engineering consulting companies, which have given him an important perspective and exposure to the industry. He has been directly involved in at least 20 different engineering projects related to a wide range of industries. Dr. Ayala has
Institutes of Health (NIH) recentlyintroduced similar programs called Innovation Corps (I-Corps), which are designed to lead smallteams through customer discovery and business model validation during a seven- to eight-weekbootcamp. Both programs are widely recognized as effective training camps that “preparescientists and engineers to extend their focus beyond the university laboratory” andcommercialize new technology faster [7]. These programs are primarily intended for graduatestudents and start-up business leaders, yet there is a need to engage students in entrepreneurialactivities sooner in their education [8]. One study by Pellicane and Blaho [8] adapted the I-Corpsmodel to an undergraduate course and found that students who participated had
the LTU Thermo-Fluids and Aerodynamics Laboratories, coordinator of the Certificate/Minor in Aeronautical Engineering, and faculty advisor of the LTU SAE Aero Design Team. Dr. Gerhart con- ducts workshops on active, collaborative, and problem-based learning, entrepreneurial mindset education, creative problem solving, and innovation. He is an author of a fluid mechanics textbook. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 A Mind Map for Active Learning TechniquesAbstractThis evidence-based practice paper describes the creation of and use of a mind map of popularactive learning techniques. When faculty members are learning about the implementation ofactive learning for the
providinginformation on what it is like to work at a shipyard.The guest lecture from the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) provides information onthe Federal Government’s role in military shipbuilding and naval systems. NAVSEA includessubordinate commands which include Supervisor of Shipbuilding, Conversion and Repair(SUPSHIP) which has a role similar to ABS as it relates to the design and construction ofmilitary ships. So, the role and activities at SUPSHIP is covered in this guest lecture. Further,the role of the Navy research and technology development laboratories is discussed as well as theactivities at the NAVSEA Headquarters office at the Washington D. C. Navy Yard. Somerecruiting information is also provided to allow students to learn what it is like
for other instructors to adopt in a futureso that this method can have as big as in impact as possible.Bibliography[1] W. Kersting and R. Kerestes, Distribution System Modeling and Analysis with MATLAB® and WindMil®, 5th ed. CRC Press, 2022.[2] J. D. Glover, M. S. Sarma, and T. Overbye, Power system analysis & design, SI version. Cengage Learning, 2012.[3] PowerWorld, “PowerWorld Simulator,” Apr. 17, 2023.[4] F. Milano, “Experience of Unix Terminal-based Labs for Undergraduate Modules on Power System Analysis,” in EDULEARN14 Proceedings, IATED, 2014, pp. 268–277.[5] G. M. Jónsdóttir and F. Milano, “Jupyter notebooks for computer-based laboratories on electrical energy systems,” in EDULEARN19
the mechanical engineering capstone projects, introducing non-profit partnerships related to designs for persons with disabilities, and founding the Social/Environmental Design Impact Award. He manages several outreach and diversity efforts including the large-scale Get Out And Learn (GOAL) engineering kit program that reaches thousands of local K-12 students.Dr. Elisabeth Smela, University of Maryland College Park Received a BS in physics from MIT and a PhD in electrical engineering from the University of Penn- sylvania. Worked at Link¨oping University in Sweden and then Risø National Laboratory in Denmark as a research scientist before joining Santa Fe Science and Technology as the Vice President for Research
normalize EBIP implementation in engineering courses • When developing an in-class activity for the first time, the need for a mentor is crucial to mustering support and confidence, especially for less experienced teachers • The availability of teaching tools (i.e. pedagogy courses) is critical to developing a broader and more interactive classroom environment • Organization of laboratory resources and logistics facilitates a means by which in-class demonstrations may become more realizable5. ConclusionInquiry about the familiarity, usage and experiences with resource-related barriers providedvaluable insights on ways to improve their reach and impact within their institution. Generalthemes included: poor faculty
. The traditional instructional model, often a large class sizeor laboratory setting, involves lecture-based content instruction with students completing workoutside of scheduled course time (6). This formal learning environment is ineffective for mostlearners (17). Students at risk of non-matriculation are especially disadvantaged with atraditional lecture-based content delivery format (18, 19, 20). Students at risk of non-matriculation in engineering degree programs include students whose GPA is less than 3.0 andincludes individuals identifying as an underrepresented minority, or first-generation collegestudents. (21). As self-efficacy and academic success, including spatial visualization skills, play anessential role in engineering
., Alaraje, N., “Promoting robotics education: curriculum and state- of-the-art robotics laboratory development”, The Technology Interface Journal, Vol. 10, #3, 2010. 7. A. Ng, Online courses at https://deeplearning.ai 8. https://learn.turtlebot.com/2015/02/03/1/ © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023
Paper ID #39232Development of a SimEvents Model for Printed Circuit Board (PCB)Assembly ProcessesSiqin Dong, Old Dominion UniversityDr. Mileta Tomovic, Old Dominion University Dr. Tomovic received BS in Mechanical Engineering from University of Belgrade, MS in Mechanical Engineering from MIT, and PhD in Mechanical Engineering from University of Michigan. Dr. Tomovic is Professor of Engineering Technology, and Mechanical and AerDr. Krishnanand Kaipa, Old Dominion University Dr. Krishnanand Kaipa is an Assistant Professor and director of the Collaborative Robotics and Adaptive Machines (CRAM) Laboratory in the Department of
adjusted manually.Figure 3. Mechanical system (A picture on the left, the motorized light on the top right, and the placement on a cart on the bottom right) For the further testing, this test chamber may need to placed outside of the laboratory. For thisreason, this instrumentation was designed to be mobile by placing on a cart as shown bottomright of Figure 3. This placement on a cart is effective since it can be easily relocatable as 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Expositionneeded. There are two tires placed inside the chamber, and this specific dimension of thechamber was optimized up to two tires.C. Software design Software architecture is shown in Figure 4. For the BeagleBone Black
research includes alternative grading, entrepreneurial mindset, instructional laboratories, and equity-focused teaching. She teaches biomedical instrumentation, signal processing, and control systems. She earned a Ph.D. in Systems Engineering from the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, an M.S. in Electrical Engineering from Iowa State University, and a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology.Arijit BanerjeeYi Zhou, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Yi Zhou is currently pursuing the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering with the University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.Prof. Katie Ansell, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Katie Ansell is a Teaching
gifts of autism, ADHD, dyslexia, andother brain differences: ReadHowYouWant. com; 2010.11. Hain CC, Turek WC, Zaghi AE, Hain A, editors. Board# 156: Experiences of Pre-College TeachersWorking with Undergraduate Engineering Students with ADHD in Research Laboratories. 2017 ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition; 2017.12. Hain A, Zaghi AE, Taylor CL, editors. Promoting Neurodiversity in Engineering throughUndergraduate Research Opportunities for Students with ADHD. 2018 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition; 2018.13. CEOSE. Biennial Report to Congress 2017-2018. In: Engineering TCoEOiSa, editor. Investing inDiverse Community Voices: National Science Foundation; 2019. p. 10.14. Taylor CL, Zaghi AE, Kaufman JC, Reis SM, Renzulli JS
.2005.1567584.[2] L. Guo, “Design Projects in a Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) Course in ElectricalEngineering Technology,” Technol. Interface J., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1523–9926, 2009.[3] R. V. Krivickas and J. Krivickas, “Laboratory instruction in engineering education,”Glob. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 191–196, 2007.[4] “Arduino.” [Online]. Available: https://store-usa.arduino.cc/products/arduino-uno-rev3 .
weldmentsfeatures were more likely to mention application to their hobbies (i.e. roll cages for race cars,Baja, etc.), whereas students selecting sheet metal modeling were often motivated by a positiveexperience bending metal in a manufacturing laboratory course. Figure 5: Student selected their exploration topic for a variety of reasons.Overall AssessmentStudent performance was tracked for each project and is shown in Table 8. Additionally, a post-course survey was administered by the instructor on the last day of the semester (Friday of Week15). The students were asked to rate their competency with the course objectives on a Likertscale where Strongly Disagree corresponded to a score of 1 and Strongly Agree corresponded toa score of 5. Overall
. Thisproject will provide the provide a visual, hands-on education that will provide students withexposure to complex parts and provide a foundation to improve their creativity in future projectdesigns.Mechanical dissection projects have been done several times and the product that has beendissected has ranged from simple children’s toys to more complex items such as engines [2, 3,4]. Commonly, the limiting factors to conducting a product dissection is the cost of the product,the laboratory/institute constrains on space and safety, and the handling of the waste once thedissection of the product has occurred [5,6]. Some of these issues can be addressed by obtainingsmall items that are meant to be assembled and disassembled multiple times. However
the past worked as an assis- tant researcher in the group of educational Technologies at Eafit University in Medellin, Colombia. His research area is the online Laboratories ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Learning Outcomes as a Self-evaluation Process Catalina Aranzazu-Suescun, Ph.D.1 and Luis Felipe Zapata-Rivera, Ph.D.2 1 Assistant Professor, Department of Cyber Intelligence and Security 2 Assistant Professor, Department of Computer, Electrical and Software Engineering Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Prescott CampusAbstractLearning outcomes are measurable statements that can be used to
working in the energy sector.Secondly, efforts will be made to expand student participation through research. This can includeproviding opportunities for students to conduct independent research projects related to energyconversion.Thirdly, the course will feature more projects with collaboration from local industry and fellowfaculty members. These projects will be designed to offer a wide variety of learningopportunities and to enable students to engage with the practical applications of energyconversion.Fourthly, the course will feature more hands-on learning opportunities. This can include the useof computer simulations, laboratory experiments, and other tactile learning methods. Thesemethods will be designed to allow students to gain
2006 JEE special reports ”The National Engineering Education Research Colloquies” and ”The Research Agenda for the New Discipline of Engineering Education.” He has a pas- sion for designing state-of-the-art learning spaces. While at Purdue University, Imbrie co-led the creation of the First-Year Engineering Program’s Ideas to Innovation (i2i) Learning Laboratory, a design-oriented facility that engages students in team-based, socially relevant projects. While at Texas A&M University Imbrie co-led the design of a 525,000 square foot state-of-the-art engineering education focused facility; the largest educational building in the state. Professor Imbrie’s expertise in educational pedagogy, student learning, and
industry is a key concern inengineering education.Compounding this preparedness problem is the COVID-19 pandemic, which prompted rapidchanges to the higher education system and caused significant disruptions to both teaching andlearning. During this period, most institutions shifted to emergency remote learning whichaffected both how academics taught and how students learned. Studies have shown that this shiftto online instruction disrupted in-person laboratory courses, causing engineering students to loseopportunities for hands-on learning [10]. Moreover, some instructors were faced with a need toremove content from their courses in order to adjust to lost instruction time [10]. These COVID-related challenges lead us to believe that the pandemic
Polytech- nic State University, San Luis Obispo. He received his Ph.D. in 1994 from Stanford University and has served as a Fulbright Scholar at Kathmandu UniversityDr. Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Brian Self obtained his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Engineering Mechanics from Virginia Tech, and his Ph.D. in Bioengineering from the University of Utah. He worked in the Air Force Research Laboratories before teaching at the U.S. Air Force Academy for sev ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 [Work in Progress] Intelligence is Overrated: The Influence of Noncognitive and Affective Factors on Student PerformanceAbstractWhen
] System Advisor Model Version 2022.11.21 (SAM 2022.11.21). National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Golden, CO. Accessed February 15,short circuit current of the PV module. Hence, the maximum 2023. sam.nrel.govcurrent of the source circuit for this project is 13.5 x 1.25 = [6] N. P. DeGuglielmo, S. M. S. Basnet and D. E. Dow, "Introduce Ladder16.88 A since each string will be connected to the inverter Logic and Programmable Logic Controller (PLC)," 2020 Annualinput. As per NEC 2020 690.8(A)(1)(e), the maximum current Conference Northeast Section (ASEE-NE), Bridgeport, CT, USA, 2020,for the continuous output of the inverter is
and FarmBots will be repeated in the future. The experience gathered by theproject team and the observations documented throughout the growth cycle of the plant will allowthe project team to lay out logistics and implementation details in a more informed way.5.0 Student learning outcomesThe graduate student leading the project has indicated that for the engineering and other STEMundergraduates, it took some time to become comfortable with the demands of the field efforts butthey eventually worked well together. The out-of-classroom experiences are not limited toproblem-solving from textbooks, structured laboratory studies, or even open-ended design projectsthat are constrained by compartmentalization of knowledge in academic disciplines, and
results regarding the effectivenessof extra credits and their impact on the quality of students' outcomes in respective courses.For students' participation, most studies examined the use of extra credits in different academicdisciplines[20-22]. For example, a study by Parikh and colleagues[23] underlined the usage ofextra credit activities to foster students' interest and engagement in an introductory heat transfercourse for undergraduate students. Apart from three regular course components, i.e., in-classactivities, at-home assignments, and laboratory experiments, they included the use of extra creditassignments. They collected data on student engagement, where students self-reported the timespent completing these assignments. Results showed