Paper ID #25454Lessons Learned Creating a BSET with a Regional Campus ModelAimee T. Ulstad, Ohio State University Aimee Ulstad, P.E is an Associate Professor of Practice in the Integrated Systems Engineering Department at The Ohio State University. Prior to joining the faculty at Ohio State, Aimee was an industry professional in various field in engineering for over 30 years. Aimee received her degrees in Mechanical Engineering and Masters in Business Administration from Ohio State. She began her career as a packaging equipment engineer at Procter and Gamble, then moved to Anheuser-Busch where she worked for over 27
Educational Activities Board (EAB) Faculty Resources Committee (FRC). The mission of the EAB FRC is ”to promote the continued evo- lution of engineering education and the career enhancement of Engineering, Computing and Technology (ECT) faculty through quality programs/products/services designed to advance innovation in educating engineers”. She is an Associated Editor in IEEE Transactions on Education. She collaborates regularly with many technical universities in Europe, Latin America and USA. Her research interests include math- ematical modeling, system dynamics, control theory, and educational methods in automation, robotics, and in engineering in general.Dr. Phillip Albert Sanger, Purdue University Dr. Sanger is
predictor of programgraduation [3]. Although many factors have been reported to contribute to the successfulcompletion of an engineering degree, a model has not been developed to allow at-risk students tobe identified for early intervention. The objective of this study was to discover the parametersthat are most sensitive and predictive of success in a key course in the electrical engineeringdegree program at our university and to utilize these parameters to construct such a model.Any engineering discipline requires several semesters worth of calculus-based mathematics andphysics prerequisites. It is obvious to hypothesize that the academic performance of studentsduring the first few semesters of their college career must have an impact on their
systems and power generation industry prior to academic career. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Computational Instruction through PLCs in a Multi-Disciplinary Introduction to Engineering CourseAbstractThis paper is focused on the inclusion of hardware-based Programmable Logic Controllers(PLCs) in a first-year engineering introduction course, Engineering Methods, Tools, & PracticeII, at the University of Louisville’s JB Speed School of Engineering. Each academic year, morethan 500 first-year engineering students are exposed to this interactive course, which introducesstudents to fundamental engineering skills – including teamwork, design, project management
] {Level 2 “comply”} Construct Survey Item Cronbach’s Alpha SE I would prefer to learn about sustainability engineering applications more 0.671 Affect than many other engineering concepts If income was not a factor, I would prefer a job related to sustainble development over other types of engineering positions Practicing sustainability is a behavior that is a part of my everyday life My future career will likely involve solving local or global problems that may involve social, economic, and environmental issues
performance in engineering programs. Toaid in the retention and success of all students, many first year programs have special classes forstudents who many need additional math skill development. Math skills are recognized as essential tothe success of future engineers. However, other skills are integral to the engineering career path.Within industry, it is communication skills that often make or break careers. Technically capableengineers will find their careers stagnating without well-developed communication skills, which are anessential part of engineering work. In fact, it has been shown that engineers spend over half theirworking days (55-60%) communicating both orally and in writing [1]. When engineers were surveyedabout the most important
Paper ID #24806Board 21: Representation of Engineering Concepts in Academic and En-gineering Workplace Settings: How Situated are Engineering Concepts inThese Contexts?Dr. Shane A. Brown P.E., Oregon State University Shane Brown is an associate professor in the School of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Oregon State University. His research interests include conceptual change and situated cognition. He received the NSF CAREER award in 2010 and is working on a study to characterize practicing engineers’ under- standings of core engineering concepts. He is a Senior Associate Editor for the Journal of Engineering
be self- directed in their educational planning process and overall academicsuccess. One of the major components of FESP is a required engineering orientation course that istitled ENGR100.ENGR100 is a required course for all incoming first year students to the COE at the University ofIllinois at Chicago. It acclimates students to university support programs such as tutoring centersand career services, while at the same time introducing them to industry leaders and engineeringprofessional societies. In addition to ENGR100, S-STEM Scholars were also required to take acomplementary course to ENGR100, ENGR194.ENGR194, as part of FESP, was offered for the first time in the Fall of 2018. This course wasopened to all engineering students, including
learning scientists in twouniversities has been working on a collaborative grant project funded by the Department ofEducation for the purpose to enhance the student diversity in STEM fields. In this project, weaimed at (1) contextualizing the student learning experience in STEM fields, and (2)implementing an integrated STEM education approach to teach the skills and knowledge that arenecessary to be competent in engineering and technology careers in 21st century. The researchobjective of the present study is to investigate the effectiveness of evidence-based instructionalstrategies and the integration of the maker culture on students’ problem solving and life-longlearning skills. Specifically, we introduce evidence based pedagogy together with
broaderaudience nationally, and 4) help fill the skills gap in U.S. manufacturing and prepare high schooland college students for undergraduate studies and/or careers in manufacturing. Both internal andexternal evaluations of the learning outcomes are ongoing and assessment results are presented.1. IntroductionThe U.S. manufacturing sector is important for the nation’s economy and workforce. It is soenormous that if it were a country by its own, it would rank as the tenth largest world economy[1]. Since the industrial revolution, U.S. manufacturing has contributed to higher exportpotential, better standards of living, and more jobs. Furthermore, manufacturing has a strongmultiplier effect on the broader economy. Every dollar spent in manufacturing adds
recently Dr. Dean was on the Headquarters Staff the American Society of Naval Engineers. He received his Ph.D. from the Department of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering, and a B.S. in Nuclear Engineering Technology, from the Batten College of Engineering and Technology at Old Dominion University. Additionally, Dr. Dean received an MBA from the College of William and Mary. Prior to is academic career Dr. Dean was Director of Operations and Business Development for Clark-Smith Associates, P.C., and served as an Electrician in the US Navy aboard the USS South Carolina and the USS Enterprise.Dr. Kim Bullington Sibson, Old Dominion University Dr. Sibson is an experienced and accomplished leader in higher
teaching and doing research.Dr. Marisa K. Orr, Clemson University Marisa K. Orr is an Assistant Professor in Engineering and Science Education with a joint appointment in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Clemson University. Her research interests include student persistence and pathways in engineering, gender equity, diversity, and academic policy. Dr. Orr is a recipient of the NSF CAREER Award for her research entitled, ”Empowering Students to be Adaptive Decision-Makers.”Dr. Richard A. Layton P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Richard Layton is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. He received a B.S. from California State University, Northridge, and an M.S. and
Diversity in Engineering) research group at Purdue. His research interests include survey development, narrative methodologies, and supporting military veteran student success.Dr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering fos- ter or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in
Undergraduates to Engage in Cross-Disciplinary ResearchIntroductionActive participation in undergraduate research has been shown to play a valuable role inenhancing the educational experience of undergraduate science and engineering majors. Inaddition to providing training in laboratory techniques, undergraduate research can facilitatedevelopment of higher thinking skills, expose students to the excitement of scientific discovery,immerse undergraduates in the culture of laboratory research, and contribute to preparingindividuals for careers in the professional workforce [1], [2]. The American Society forBiochemistry and Molecular Biology (ASBMB) recognizes research as an essential curricularfeature of recognized undergraduate biochemistry programs [3
-funded project addressing the needs of theregional advanced manufacturing industries and began with an inventory of both non-technicaland technical skills required by graduates (NSF Award 1601487). The focus on AdvancedManufacturing led to the development of a Mechanical Engineering Technology (MET) pathwayfrom Associate degree to Baccalaureate degree, along with the creation and strengthening of ananalogous Electrical Engineering Technology (EET) pathway. These academic disciplines andeducational pathways are expected to provide meaningful career opportunities for graduates asthe US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) indicates a positive job outlookfor MET careers that is expected to grow approximately 5% for the ten-year
Paper ID #27114Assessing the Effectiveness of a Large, Open-Ended Design Project in a Junior-Level Engineering Technology CourseDr. Robert Scott Pierce P.E., Western Carolina University Robert Scott Pierce is an Assistant Professor of Engineering and Technology at Western Carolina Univer- sity. He received his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Georgia Tech in 1993. Prior to his teaching career, he spent 14 years in industry designing automated equipment.Dr. Wesley L. Stone, Western Carolina University Dr. Wes Stone is an associate professor in the School of Engineering and Technology at Western Carolina University in
teaching strategies for K-12 STEM educators integrating engineering design and the development of engineering skills of K-12 learners. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Becoming in Action: An Autoethnography of My Professional Identity Development During the Rising Engineering Education Faculty Experience (Research)AbstractOn the road to obtaining a graduate degree in engineering education, graduate students havelimited opportunities to develop a comprehensive toolbox required for a future career as anengineering education faculty member. The current professional development trajectory focuseson acquiring technical knowledge through required courses and research
. Camacho is Professor of Sociology at the University of San Diego. She began her career at UC San Diego in 1999 as a postdoctoral fellow at the Center for US Mexican Studies, and later as a UC Faculty Fellow in Ethnic Studies. In 2015-16, she returned to UC San Diego as a fellow of the American Council on Education. As a bilingual/bicultural Latina, Camacho has 30 years of experience in higher ed- ucation advocating for underrepresented groups and first generation college students. For over a decade, her work on institutional transformation has received funding from the National Science Foundation to examine and address inequities in higher education, specifically as they relate to Science, Technology, Engineering and
-context and for the development of important skills tied to college and career readiness (Shafferet al., 2014; Alves et al., 2012; Fleming 2010). Students’ involvement in research projects isattracting more attention in the last decade (Shaffer et al., 2010; Harrison et al., 2011; Gavin2011). The literature review indicates that project-based learning offer several advantages overtraditional courses by enhancing self-efficacy and preparing a unique opportunity for students toput their knowledge into practice (Shaffer et al., 2014; Tamim and Grant 2013). Such experienceallows students and instructors to collaboratively bridge the research and classroom and provideresearch experiences for students relative to traditional individual mentored
enrichment programemphasizing active learning with an aim of exposing high school students to eight commonSTEM disciplines (math, chemistry, biology, physics, computer science, civil engineering,mechanical engineering, electrical engineering), along with industry, in hopes of solidifying theirlove for a particular field or opening their eyes to a new field of study. A major goal of thisprogram has been to increase interest and diversity in STEM by giving students hands-onexperience in these fields. This paper will discuss the growing interest for such a program alongwith future plans. Additionally, this paper presents data from 2017 program participantsincluding an update of their education/career plans.Introduction:With the continued growth in STEM
: Job/Career/ case 1-b 29 25 25% Opportunities CASE 1-B 21 29 case 1-c 13
strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 10 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research expertise includes using motivation and related frameworks to study student engagement in learning, recruitment and retention in engineering programs and careers, faculty teaching practices and intersections of motivation and learning strategies.Dr. Gwen Lee-Thomas, Quality Measures LLC Dr. Gwen Lee-Thomas is the CEO of Quality Measures, LLC, a Virginia-based consulting firm special- izing in program and project evaluation, team-building, and capacity
College in Escanaba, MI. He has successfully received over $2 million in grants throughout his career, which have been used to transform the technical education his institution provides. Most recently, Mark successfully authored an OER Degree Initiative grant through Achieving the Dream to develop a complete degree pathway using nothing but open educational resources. Mark also served on the development committee for the Voluntary Framework of Accountability, an initiative of the American Association of Community Colleges. Mark has a passion for rural education and completed his dissertation on the roles of rural educators and rural community colleges, and believes this is an underrepresented segment of our national
income distribution are ten timesas likely to become inventors as those from below-median income families [5, 6]. By 8th grade,half of students will have given up on STEM as a career [7]. Only 69.7% of high school graduatesattend college [8], and more than half of college students who declare in a STEM field will changemajors or drop out of school entirely, meaning 11% of HS graduates become qualified STEMprofessionals, and the deficit would not be met if 100% of STEM students graduated. Table 1: PISA Results for U.S. Students compared to the International Median since 2000.There are significant socio-economic barriers to growing and diversifying the STEM workforce,and outcomes highly correlate to income, educational access, race, and gender
data mining, and the modeling and analysis of manufacturing systems. She holds a bachelor’s degree in Bioengineering and graduate degrees in Industrial Engineering, all from Arizona State University.Dr. Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University Dr. Samantha R. Brunhaver is an Assistant Professor within The Polytechnic School, one of six schools in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. She is a mixed-methods researcher with focus on the preparation and pathways of engineering students. Her specific research interests include engineering student persistence and career decision-making, early career engineering practice, faculty pedagogical risk-taking, and entrepreneurial mindset
particularlyinterested in conducting an intersectional analysis of the survey data to determine which funds ofknowledge are most relevant to first-generation college students based on demographiccharacteristics, such as race/ethnicity, socioeconomic class, and gender, and other descriptors, i.e.,transfer student status, language spoken at home, and career expectations to name a few.Understanding the funds of knowledge of first-generation college students in engineering has thepotential to benefit both these students and their continuing generation peers. First, these can serveas inspiration for culturally-relevant pedagogy that would enhance first gen student learning andinterest in engineering. We echo the sentiments of Wilson-Lopez et al.’s [2] ethnographic
, Colorado Christian University After earning my B.S. in Engineering Science at Penn State University (2007), I began working as an audio-video engineer/designer. I then made a career transition to teach high school physics. Having sparked my love for education, I went back to school to earn my M.S. in Industrial & Systems Engineering (2015) and my Ph.D. in Engineering Education (2016). My first faculty job was at Rowan University in southern New Jersey, where I had the honor of helping develop their first-year engineering and B.S. in Engineering Entrepreneurship programs. I’m now blessed to be at CCU contributing to what God’s doing through our Industrial & Systems Engineering program and university.Dr. Cheryl A
curriculum included (a) STEM hands-on activities focused on mathematicsand engineering (including mathematical visualization, engineering design process throughtowers and chain reaction machines, explorations with arduinos and circuits, and mathematicalthinking through folding), and (b) World of Work activities that centered on self- and career-exploration experiences (including career cards, games, virtual reality experiences, conversationswith and presentations from STEM professionals). The first week of the summer program thestudents focused on introductory STEM activities and explorations and alignment of their currentinterests and abilities to career pathways leading to STEM. In the second week, these activitieslaid the foundation for students
recently taught in the classroom. Therefore solvers are notrequired to demonstrate the metacognitive processes involved in recognizing, recalling, andselecting discipline-specific content knowledge related to the problem. Within Tech-EDclassrooms, students are assessed using competencies defined in the Career and TechnicalEducation curriculum framework which typically do not focus on assessing students in solvingauthentic problems.In this paper, the design, methods, analysis of data, and results of a research study to evaluate theperformance of high school pre-engineering students (completing their fourth and final year inthe program) in solving an authentic engineering design-based problem outside the context of aclassroom are described
uniquestructure recognizes that early career design is beneficial for students. All ABET-accrediteduniversities maintain a design requirement per ABET learning outcomes B and C for the 2018-2019 requirements [1]. However, our emphasis on design is focused to obtain early engineeringprinciples such as hands-on understanding of force, energy and motion. We believe that thesethree principles are one of the most significant topics to cover at an early stage, as instruction inthese areas can lay the foreground to higher levels of Mechanical Engineering concepts such asstress, strain, tension, torsion, and more - all of which are implemented in the upper-level designcourses at NMT.Course Structure RedesignThe introduction to Mechanical Engineering course was