8this lab applied to the overall research question at hand. Many examples of peer reviewedprofessional biomedical engineering society 1 page abstracts were provided to the students aspart of the introductory workshop on abstract writing. In addition, an abstract template wasprovided to assist the students in formatting and section descriptions. Refer to the Appendix toreview this abstract template. To remain consistent as possible with the evaluation of the writing of the students, abstractswere judged based on the rubric below. Upon evaluation, students were given assistance andsuggestions on areas which they could improve. The rubric also allowed students to self-evaluate efforts before submitting a completed assignment. The abstracts
into technical writing instruction.References[1] “Best Practices for Using AI When Writing Scientific Manuscripts: Caution, Care, andConsideration: Creative Science Depends on It” ACS Nano 2023, 17, 5, 4091–4093. 2023.https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.3c01544[2] Leung TI, de Azevedo Cardoso T, Mavragani A, Eysenbach G. Best Practices for Using AITools as an Author, Peer Reviewer, or Editor. J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 31;25:e51584. doi:10.2196/51584. PMID: 37651164; PMCID: PMC10502596.[3] J. Qadir, "Engineering Education in the Era of ChatGPT: Promise and Pitfalls of GenerativeAI for Education," 2023 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Kuwait,Kuwait, 2023, pp. 1-9, doi: 10.1109/EDUCON54358.2023.10125121.[4] A. Adkins, N. S
AC 2007-2210: PRACTICAL ENGLISH: TEACHING TECHNICALCOMMUNICATION ABROAD BASED ON A PREEXISTING TECHNICALWRITING COURSE IN MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY'S BAGLEY COLLEGEOF ENGINEERINGAlexis Powe, Mississippi State University Alexis D. Powe is a technical writing instructor for the Mississippi State University Bagley College of Engineering’s Shackouls Technical Communication Program. She received her B.A. in English from Mississippi State University in 2002, graduating summa cum laude with a minor in history, and her M.A. in English from Louisiana State University in 2004. She is a member of the American Society for Engineering Education and the Modern Language Association. Address: P.O. Box
engineering laboratory courses. Dr. Kim and his collaborators attracted close to $1M research grants to study writing transfer of engineering undergraduates. For the technical research, he has a long-standing involvement in research concerned with manufacturing of advanced composite materials (CFRP/titanium stack, GFRP, nanocomposites, etc.) for automotive, marine, and aerospace applications. His recent research efforts have also included the fatigue behavior of manufactured products, with the focus of fatigue strength im- provement of aerospace, automotive, and rail structures. He has been the author or co-author of over 200 peer-reviewed papers in these areas.Dr. Matt Frye, Oregon Institute of Technology Matt Frye is
that require them to write extensively, whether that be in industry or graduateschool. Additionally, the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) lists theability to communicate effectively an expected student outcome of accredited baccalaureateprograms. Because of insufficient writing requirements in undergraduate engineering curricula,however, many engineers are unprepared for the writing-demand necessary to convey their ownideas or understanding of ideas. More rigorous writing practices would not only improve effectivecommunication skills as undergraduate students pursue their education, it can also help studentsdevelop a deeper conceptual foundation of engineering topics. The writing pedagogy of interestfollows a
artificialhearts to rocket propulsion. Based upon these essays, student teams were formed aroundcommon interests, which set the general area of their papers. The selection of themes based uponstudents’ interests was aimed at increasing the students’ motivation to engage in the task, and theuse of teams was intended to provide a supportive environment for undertaking the self-directedlearning. The teams were charged with selecting a paper topic and writing a single term paperbased upon independent research. Three class periods were dedicated to this assignment: one forthe initial team meeting and selection of a topic, one for peer review and editing, and one forfinalizing their papers.Upon completion of the paper, the students were asked to reflect on
Session #3650 “Research, Report Writing, and Representation”: The Most Viable 3Rs for Critical Thinking and Effective Communication Skills in SMET Education. By Christopher C. Ibeh Director, PSU/NSF-REU Program Pittsburg State University, Pittsburg, KS 66762ABSTRACTThe use of research for the development of critical thinking and effective communication skills isa current trend in science, mathematics, engineering and technology (SMET) education. Thistrend is epitomized by the National Science Foundation (NSF
because studentswent through the process of critically evaluating writing with immediate feedback from peers(when students disagreed about feedback in class this gave the instructor the opportunity toweigh in and explain the good and not-so-good aspects of student’s opinions).The “Pop Quizzes” will be used again. The original approach proved quite effective, but thestudent suggestion of making corrections for full credit was excellent and will be incorporatedwhen the approach is used again. The efficacy of the exercise was improved by discussion ofissues with the Faculty Coaches Group in the Ralph E. Martin Department of ChemicalEngineering.11Bibliography 1. ABET, Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, Baltimore, MD, 2012, available
Paper ID #38622Board 216: Areas of Improvement and Difficulty with Lab Report Writingin the Lower-Division Engineering Laboratory Courses across ThreeUniversitiesDr. Dave Kim, Washington State University, Vancouver Dr. Dave Kim is Professor and Mechanical Engineering Program Coordinator in the School of Engineer- ing and Computer Science at Washington State University Vancouver. His teaching and research have been in the areas of engineering materials, fracture mechanics, and manufacturing processes. In par- ticular, he has been very active in pedagogical research in the area of writing pedagogy in engineering laboratory
Session # here Integrated Programs and Cultural Literacies: Using Writing to Help Engineering Students Transition to the Cultural Literacies of College Sarah Duerden, Jeanne Garland, Christine Helfers, & Ronald Roedel Department of English/Department of Electrical Engineering Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287Abstract As educators who work with first-year students, we are all well aware of how difficultsome students find the transition to college, particularly first-year engineering students. Ofcourse, some students fail because they are ill prepared for the courses they are
among four-year higher education institutioncampuses and while there are an increasing number of graduate writing centers nation wide, theyare not legion. The research has generally shown that the writing center peer tutoring model isnot only cost-effective, but also effective in helping students increase their writtencommunication abilities and in fostering the life-long learning skill of seeking feedback fromothers for continual improvement.75, 76Most undergraduate writing centers face the problem of overcoming a wide-spreadmisconception that such centers primarily provide proofreading and editing services, which mostcategorically do not. Rather, their primary purpose is to help the student understand the writingtask, its parameters, and how
Paper ID #38620Investigating Engineering Laboratory Course Assignments and Assessmentsacross Four Institutions and a Case Study on Their Impact on Students’Lab Report WritingDr. Dave Kim, Washington State University-Vancouver Dr. Dave Kim is Professor and Mechanical Engineering Program Coordinator in the School of Engineer- ing and Computer Science at Washington State University Vancouver. His teaching and research have been in the areas of engineering materials, fracture mechanics, and manufacturing processes. In par- ticular, he has been very active in pedagogical research in the area of writing pedagogy in engineering
Paper ID #37054Student Use of Artificial Intelligence to Write Technical EngineeringPapers – Cheating or a Tool to Augment LearningDr. Ronald P. Uhlig, National University From 2010-2014, Dr. Ronald P. Uhlig was Dean, School of Business and Management, National Univer- sity, La Jolla, CA. He returned to the engineering faculty in 2014 and is currently Chair, Department of Engineering, School of Technology and Engineering. During 2005-2010 he served in multiple positions including Chair of the Department of Computer Science and Information Systems, and Academic Pro- gram Director for the Master of Science in Wireless
Paper ID #36941Board 205: A Web-Based Writing Exercise Employing Directed Line ofReasoning Feedback for a Course on Electric Circuit AnalysisProf. James P. Becker, Montana State University, BozemanDr. Douglas J. Hacker, University of Utah Dr. Hacker is Professor Emeritus in the Department of Educational Psychology and participated in both the Learning Sciences Program and the Reading and Literacy Program.Christine Johnson ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Web-Based Writing Exercises for a Course on Electric Circuit AnalysisAbstractThe use of writing-based exercises in a circuit analysis
important reasonsfor engineering students to learn to use multiple mediums to communicate with the public. Forone, self-promotion; it is becoming more common for research journals to invite or requireauthors of peer-reviewed work to write summaries for the public. For instance, authors acceptedto PLOS journals are required to submit a non-technical summary of their work, and scientists’social media presence is increasingly recognized by university promotion and tenurecommittees29. Finally, there is an increased need for an informed and scientifically literatecitizenship in democratic societies due to the grand challenges of the 21st century24, and anincreasing expectation for scientists and engineers to take responsibility for contributing to
language in the learning process all place added emphasis on writing intoday’s engineering curricula. However, most instructors of engineering design believethemselves to be hard-pressed to incorporate additional writing assignments into courses alreadyfilled with content materials. Also, most engineering design instructors may not have either thetime or the expertise to provide commentary on student written work. Thus, the formativeassessment for these assignments, so critical to learning, doesn’t emerge, and the experience maydevolve into “busy work” in the eyes of the student. We report on early results from an NSF-funded1 study using Calibrated Peer Review (CPR) – a web-delivered, collaborative learningenvironment for writing assignments – in
they had done before in high school English, history, and other non-technical courses. Furthermore, they went through a writing revision process in which their paper went through three iterations of review: self, peer, and instructor review. All reviews were done prior to the final grading of the paper.• Individual Oral Presentation: The second project that was assigned early in the semester was an individual oral presentation (IOP) of the ITW paper. This project’s objective was to demonstrate effective oral communication of technical content. A lecture focusing on effective oral presentation techniques was presented to demonstrate effective oral presentations. Students presented their IOP in class. The presentations
Page 23.562.3emphasizing mutual interdependence among the members.”13 Below are the words of a group offive tenure track female professors who peer-mentored one another through the process of tenure,which best capture the spirit of group peer mentoring. The professors range in age from 37 to 62,were in different stages of the tenure process, and in different fields. Despite this variability, theycame together to write and develop as scholars for 14 months. Together they wrote an article onnavigating the tenure process, which included the following statement: Initially, mentoring focused on helping each peer develop as an individual agent for her own productivity. As time went on, however, the group itself became an object of agency
ideassolidified. Year 3 included seven new seminars and five new peer review sessions.The “Psychology of Research Statements” panel session was added to help participants begin tothink about the type of research they would like to conduct in the next phase of their careers.This session came about from a discussion with an Education professor on how writing aresearch statement for faculty positions is a different type of writing compared journal articlesand a dissertation that participants may be more familiar with.The “Brainstorming Research Ideas” session was added so that participants could hear fromfaculty on their process of generating new research ideas. A key question to motivate the sessionwas where does one’s creativity or inspiration for
students understand the importance ofexploring and using current and emerging tools as part of their lifelong education. The specifictools can vary a lot depending on individual classroom learning goals, resulting in a wide rangeof student-authored tutorials. Some examples from the author’s classes include: Setting up ChatGPT to help write code in Jupyter notebooks. Building and deploying your own Shiny App. Accessing the US census API in Python. Downloading and installing Seaborn to make more robust figures.Students are tasked with creating in-depth tutorials designed to help their peers learn to use thesoftware tools effectively. Creating successful tutorials requires that student authors bothunderstand the tools and
taught at Texas A&M University-Kingsville. She has been with Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi since fall of 2005. Dr. Mehrubeoglu's areas of research include machine vision and image processing applications (digital watermarking, degraded fingerprint recognition, object detection and tracking), applications in biomedical engineering, and effective teaching pedagogies. Page 14.44.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 A Lego Robot Project Using Concept Maps and Peer-Led Teams for a Freshman Course in Engineering and Engineering TechnologyAbstractIn this paper, the use of concept maps is
write a conference paper and get it accepted.After attending their first ASEE national conference, each new faculty member realizedmany ideas and opportunities for preparing papers of interest to the different divisions ofASEE.At UPJ, untenured faculty members have collaborated on education related papers andhave reviewed abstracts for each other. Peers have suggested which division might bemost appropriate for a given paper. There also has been collaboration with otheruntenured faculty outside of the engineering technology division.Professional development in the technical disciplines may be more difficult for untenuredfaculty at small teaching schools. Research possibilities are limited due to the heavyteaching loads and the lack of graduate
timeline: 2017-19 (pre-pandemic), 2020 (beginning of pandemic), and 2021 (mature phase ofpandemic). Students were enrolled in mandatory first-year engineering courses at the research site, wherestudents were systematically assigned to teams for learning and projects. Students were asked toparticipate in the survey four times per course, roughly at the stages of the beginning of the course, thebeginning, the middle and the end of the of the team final projects. Students were instructed to provideconstructive feedback in writing to themselves and teammates via CATME interfaces on their teamworkbehaviors.To analyze students’ peer comments on teamwork behaviors, we utilized natural language processing andmachine learning techniques, and qualitative
new research emerges [7 - 11].Deliverable #5: Professional Learning Finally, stEm PEER Academy’s fifth deliverable is a toolbox of resources that guides Fellows’ professional development such as developing Broader Impact identities, Broadening Participation efforts, proposal development, and writing research papers. For example, stEm PEER Academy prepared an NSF-aligned proposal guideline for Fellows to use for requesting implementation funding from Engineering PLUS to launch their own Implementation Projects. The purpose of this NSF-aligned proposal exercise was to provide Fellows with a more accessible and less intimidating proposal format for developing their Implementation Project, especially if they were navigating
Paper ID #33605Differential Effects of Bridge Program Participation on PerceivedBelonging and Peer Support for STEM Degree Seekers during the COVID-19PandemicMs. Megan McSpedon, Rice University Megan McSpedon is a graduate student in Industrial/Organizational Psychology at Rice University. Her research interests include the future of work, school to work transition, and learning throughout the lifes- pan.Dr. Margaret E. Beier, Rice University Margaret Beier is an Associate Professor of Psychology at Rice University in Houston, TX. She received her B.A. from Colby College, and her M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from the Georgia
Session 1392 Go With the Flow - A Student Leadership Opportunity Integrating K-12 Outreach, the Society of Women Engineers, Service Learning and Peer Mentoring Elizabeth Eschenbach, Eileen Cashman Environmental Resources Engineering Humboldt State UniversityAbstractThis paper describes a multi-year project that involved the Humboldt State University StudentSection of the Society of Women Engineers in a Service Learning project that now serves as acontinuous outreach project to young children in the community. The SWE club oversaw
Paper ID #12371Student Perceptions on the Impact of Formative Peer Team Member Effec-tiveness Evaluation in an Introductory Design CourseProf. Nathan Mentzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette Nathan Mentzer is an assistant professor in the College of Technology with a joint appointment in the College of Education at Purdue University. Hired as a part of the strategic P12 STEM initiative, he prepares Engineering/Technology candidates for teacher licensure. Dr. Mentzer’s educational efforts in pedagogical content knowledge are guided by a research theme centered in student learning of engineer- ing design thinking on the
Education, 2021 Peer teaching research group model for upper level environmental engineering class with student-led lectures and journal article discussionsAbstractAn upper level environmental engineering class focusing on hazardous waste and air pollutionwas organized to mimic a graduate school research group. It is an upper-level required class forenvironmental engineering majors. In most weeks of the MWF class, a different student eachweek prepared a lecture and taught that week’s material on Monday. On Wednesday the facultymember followed this up with more explanation and clarification. Friday was a class discussionof a journal article related to the topic. The student would prepare the lecture a week or so inadvance and faculty member
The Effects of Peer Interactions on the Development of Technological Fluency in an Early-Childhood, Robotic Learning Environment Kevin J. Staszowski, Marina Bers Tufts University/Tufts UniversityIntroduction Students interact in a classroom environment in a daily basis – interactingwith teachers, classmates, and even with technology. The effects that these peer interactionswithin the educational setting have been extensively studied in the field of education over thepast 20 years and have been shown to improve students self-esteem and attitude towards theeducational process.7 Beyond these general improvements in
Experience with the Use of Interactive Classroom Technologies for the Implementation of Problem-Based, Peer-Interaction Learning Environment in Civil Engineering Materials Jason Weiss, Farshad Rajabipour, Thomas Schmit, Sebastian Fait Purdue University, School of Civil EngineeringAbstractAre you a faculty member who is curious if the class is following what you are presenting?Have you ever been curious to know what the student in the third row is thinking while you aretalking? Do you spend many sleepless nights wondering how you will increase classparticipation? This paper describes the implementation of an interactive classroom technologythat was designed to