speaking, written language including reading, writing, and spelling,arithmetic including both calculations and mathematical concepts, and reasoning includingorganization and integration of ideas and thoughts. This source also presents functionallimitations that may present themselves in learning disabled students. They include auditoryperception and processing, visual perception and processing, information processing speeds,abstract reasoning, short and long term memory, spoken and written language, mathematicalcalculations, and executive functioning such as planning and time management. A typicalleaning disabled student may have more than one such limitations. They may actually have manyof them such as myself, which have about half of them to
diverseparticipants. Five separate respondents mentioned internships and co-op learning as part of theirmakerspace offerings, ranging from required co-op projects to summer internships. One EDresponded noted a particularly unique internship opportunity: A consulting engineer in the community came to [our makerspace] and asked if we could translate paper plans for an environmental site requiring decommissioning. We linked that person with a sophomore student to do the SolidWorks files and suggested [to the engineer that] they might want to do a 3D printed model that would allow them to ‘war game’ how the site would be dismantled. They hired the student who is doing this project for internship credit, has printed and laser
responded that CONSIDER provided thema better opportunity to learn than any other in-class or online activity. A very high number of par-ticipants said that the two unique features of CONSIDER approach –anonymity and rounds-basedstructure– helped improve the quality of discussion in their groups (83 and 75% respectively).Their text comments to the reflective questions highlight the importance of the unique features ofCONSIDER.We plan to further evaluate the efficacy of the features of CONSIDER by designing careful ex-periments in coming semesters and using the tool in different engineering classrooms. This setof experiments will help us evaluate the effectiveness of these features of CONSIDER. We wouldalso like to perform a detailed analysis on the
- prices-for-formic-acid-in-europe-and-in-the-americas/. [11] Office of the Federal Register, "The List of Extremely Hazardous Substances and Their Threshold Planning Quantities," 2008. [12] ScienceLab.com, "Acrylic Acid MSDS," 2013. http://www.sciencelab.com/msds.php?msdsId=9922794. [13] C. A. Quispea, C. J. Coronado and J. A. Carvalho Jr., "Glycerol: Production, consumption, prices, characterization and new trends in combustion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 27: 475-93, 2013. [14] S. N. Bizzari and M. Blagoev, "CEH Marketing Research Report: FORMIC ACID," Chemical Economics Handbook, 2010.[15] L. Terry, "Dow acrylic acid cuts seen as good first step," ICIS, 05 February 2016. http
understand the causes of the current state, theoppressed are not “things” anymore; they are the subject in the struggle for liberation. As aresult, the oppressed may find out who they really are, how oppressors use and abuse theoppressed and, arguably, how to begin imagining and planning alternatives to oppression.Even though the oppressed may “understand” and “discover” that they are oppressed, they can’tnecessarily reflect on a current state of oppression due to systematic undermining of their corevalues. That is, it takes persistent effort to believe oneself worthy of dignity and a share of socialinfluence when systems of oppression convince the oppressed to believe the contrary, that theydo not matter or deserve regard.45Moreover, the oppressed
, another class style needsto be developed which approximates the success of students in the flipped sections. Alternateformats which mandate and reward group performance may work. The balance between face-time and independent study will vary between groups of students.References1 NC State University Office of Institutional Research and Planning. (2016.) Spring 2016 Sophomore Survey. Retrieved from URL https://oirp.ncsu.edu/surveys/survey-reports/studentalumni-surveys/sophomore-survey.2 Lord, Susan M., et al. "Who's persisting in engineering? A comparative analysis of female and male Asian, black, Hispanic, Native American, and white students." Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 15.2 (2009).3
of the interventions they reviewed is a 1credit course that has been tried and tested over several years at Michigan TechnologicalUniversity (MTU) and emphasises mental transformation between 2 and 3 dimensionaldrawings in the style of isometric sketches, orthographic projections, coded plans andsectional drawings (Sorby, 2009). The course is attended by those who get a low score on aspatial test at orientation. It has been observed that completion of this course has led toimprovements not only in spatial test scores but also to grades in a wide variety of subjectssuch as fundamentals of engineering and pre-calculus (Sorby & Veurink, 2010). In addition,higher retention rates have been measured among those who enrol in the course with
school.38 In the context of vigorouslypromoting and implementing the “China Educating and Training Plan of Excellent Engineer”(CETPOE), it is necessary to focus on the quality culture which penetrates the practice ofengineering education within higher learning institutions, making “the pursuit of excellence”become habit and convention of university, and finally evolving into a culture.325.3. Scientific Construction of Management Mechanism5.3.1. Development of Quality Assurance PolicyColleges and universities should conduct a comprehensive reform of teachers, enhance theattractiveness of engineering education, improve cultivation model of engineering faculty,broaden the recruitment channels of engineering faculty, promote engineering faculty
applied theskills they were learning.Significance and implicationsStudents from underrepresented groups in CS as well as first-generation college students benefitfrom studying STEM in a computational modeling format that allows them increasing creativityand agency in defining and solving problems. This accessible approach helps students to investin their work, which as we argue here, leads to feelings of ownership and belonging. Theimportance of students having agency in designing their own projects was particularly evident inthe final modules. In future work, we plan to investigate ways to provide students with moreagentive opportunities in the Swarmathon. Affording students with leeway to define andsubsequently solve problems that they find
indicate the degree to which they agree with theaffirmation by selecting a value in a 6 point Likert-type scale. Eight of these items were selectedto evaluate subjective learning outcomes associated with each of the student types. The followinglist includes the selected items:FCQ selected items: 1) Hours per week spent on course, including class time (i1) 2) Intellectual challenge of the course (i2) 3) How much you learned in this course (i3) 4) Course overall (i4) 5) Instructor overall (i5) 6) This class improved my understanding of the profession I plan to practice. (i6) 7) My confidence to succeed as a student was enhanced. (i7) 8) This course prepared me for my chosen career. (i8)Subjective learning
. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basic of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing Grounded Theory. 2014: Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.19. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education Inc.20. Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition.21. Meyer, M., & Marx, S. (2014). Engineering dropouts: A qualitative examination of why undergraduates leave engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(4), 525-548.22. Bean, J., & Eaton, S. B. (2001). The psychology underlying successful retention practices. Journal of College Student
giving students a broad view ofhigher education and the practices necessary to modernize higher education for the 21st century.III.2. Global Perspectives Program: pre-trip meetings In addition to completion of the PFP and GEDI courses, students are required to enroll ina three-credit Study Abroad course and attend regular meetings throughout the spring semesterleading up to the GPP experience. During these meetings, students learn about and discuss topicsrelevant to understanding the educational structure in European institutions and the local cultureof the regions visited during GPP. The meetings also allow students to develop individualresearch topics related to higher education that they plan to investigate during GPP. For the
software improvements. Mark is the Co-Founder and Managing Director of One Page Solutions, a consulting firm that uses the OGSP R process to help technology and branded product clients develop better strategic plans. Mark is a member of The Band of Angels, Silicon Valley’s oldest organization dedicated exclusively to funding seed stage start-ups. In addition, he serves on the board of several technology start-up companies.Dr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education and work
engineering team. Keeping sizedown allowed everyone to get hands-on (Figure 3). At the most basic level they would comparethe assembled circuit to their designed layout or original circuit diagram. At a higher level theywould follow voltages/signals through the circuit with a multimeter or oscilloscope. Each of thefour oscillator circuits needed for pitch and volume heterodyning should produce a highfrequency output and many Theremin designs specify the typical frequency and voltage of thissignal. An oscilloscope was used to visualize the high frequency heterodyning process thatcreated the oscillation in the audible range. The voltage regulator could be checked for thecorrect DC voltage output. The students also planned the Theremin enclosure and the
-cultural dimensions of pre-college engineering education. She received her M.A. and Ph.D. in Educational Studies from Emory University.Dr. Meltem Alemdar, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Meltem Alemdar is Associate Director and Senior Research Scientist at Georgia Tech’s Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics, and Computing (CEISMC). Dr. Alemdar has experience evaluating programs that fall under the umbrella of educational evaluation, including K-12 educational curricula, K-12 STEM programs after-school programs, and comprehensive school reform initiatives. Across these evaluations, she has used a variety of evaluation methods, ranging from a multi-level evalua- tion plan designed to assess program
research (DBR) study[22], [23]. DBR is a method that allows researchers to test their hypotheses about how learningcan be supported by conducting iterative cycles of classroom-based study. In this method, thecourse instructor typically collaborates with a learning scientist to document and analyze theimpact of carefully planned instruction. Each cycle provides an opportunity to evaluate how theinstruction did or did not support learning as intended. This study, therefore, builds on findingsfrom the previous two iterations.Participants & settingThe participants included 56 students in 10 teams enrolled in a sophomore-level materials andenergy balances course, a core course in the chemical engineering program at a Hispanic-servingresearch
successful union of art into the sciences. The first showcase will be at the AmericanPhysical Society, Division of Fluid Dynamics, as an education symposia lecture. Another plan isto present this work as a workshop at Lilly Conferences that provides opportunities for thepresentation of the scholarship of teaching and learning. With more historical background, thiscould present the developments within fluid mechanics against the backdrop of scientificdevelopment.In April 2015, the University Faculty Senate (UFS) at Penn State University approved a newIntegrative Studies requirement within General Education; implementation details wereapproved in March of 2016. This requirement applies to students who start at Penn StateUniversity during or after the
, 66(6), pp.888~898.[21] China Ministry of Education official website http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A08/s7056/201803/t20180329_331767.html[22] Barriball K L, While A. Collecting data using a semi-structured interview: a discussion paper.[J]. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2010, 19(2):328-335.[23] Kolbe R H, Burnett M S. Content-analysis research: An examination of applications with directives for improving research reliability and objectivity.[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 1991, 18(2):243-250.[24] Zhang Lei, Wang Chen. A comparative study of public policy issues in urban planning between China and the United States based on content analysis [j]. Urban Development Research, 2011, 18(11): 33 - 38.[25] Miles M B
given a unique hint meant to simulate therole of different perspectives on problem solving. For example, one hint asked students toconsider the effect of the moving crane load on the maximum shear and moment experienced bythe crane rail. Another hint gave students design tables from the AISC Manual of Steel Designand guidance to help them pick an appropriate shape. Teams completed the assignment outsideof class as homework. Plan View (view from above) Section View (view from end) 35 ft. 35 ft. Hoist is free to move Hoist
. The child shows that he is planning to consider them and even restates some of thecriteria. He explores the loop and tries to assemble it to use it which also shows that he isconsidering the criteria; we consider this to be problem scoping rather than solution modelingbecause he seems to be engaged in exploring the problem criteria and materials available moreso than creating a specific solution. He realizes the constraint of having only one loop and healso seems to know that without the loop he cannot solve the problem as it is one of his criteria. Narrative 7. Mom tells John, “Think about the rollercoasters we have been on, how do they work?” John responds, “They always go up first and should start very high. All go very
well-educated workforce is progressively increasing in both academia and industry. Thus, being exposed to researchmechanisms during the delineation of engineering problems can assist undergraduate students to betterunderstand options for sustaining career vitality. Those who are more aware are able to make moreinformed decisions regarding future career plans in both academia and industry. Moreover, connectingthe course materials to the related state-of-the-art researches that are being conducted in the researchcommunity helps the students to comprehend the course fundamentals while getting familiar with thecontemporary outcomes of the concepts they have learned. It also aids the course instructors to keeptheir course material up-to-date. In
]. Strong interpersonal skills are essential for an individual working with people tocomplete tasks and achieve results. It takes more than technical skills to differentiate a mediocreemployee from an outstanding one. Soft skills complement hard skills and broader soft skillssuch as critical thinking and communication create commitment and reduce uncertainty [24].Burrell, et al. [14], Corona [19], Deari, Kimmel, and Lopez [23] argued that organizations needto continually identify, develop, nurture, and retain leaders as part of an ongoing talentdevelopment strategy. Creating personalized development plans to assess American businessleaders’ abilities against recognized cultural competencies and identifying competency gaps andrisks associated with
to understand the evolution ofstudents’ motivation. Most notably, the author plans to conduct a longitudinal study that repeatsthe survey for Study 2 at the conclusion of the Winter 2019 term so that the same cohort of studentsis evaluated at two times relative to the term. Additionally, the repeated study will allow for acloser comparison between the two groups of students (those enrolled during the Winter 2018 andWinter 2019 terms), to see if the student responses are still different at the same point in time.Alternatively, more qualitative information can be collected through short answer questions andfocus groups to elucidate students’ thought processes with regards to CMSE assignments. AsCMSE topics are added to the undergraduate
access technologies available to them, there is more workto be done.LimitationsThis study has a few limitations. Based on the answers from the survey CAT student employeestook, a few students did not complete some areas asking for more information. For instance, noteveryone typed in their age. It seems, the mobile survey, where it asks for the person to type ininformation, is not intuitive. In other words, user experience design for the survey needs morework.For the focus groups, the original plan for the two focus groups (n=10) to consist of: 1.) fivestudents who did not report to supervisors A or B during the AY 17-18 and 2.) five students whodid not report to supervisor C during the AY 17-18. N = 5 per focus group x 2 groups equal 10.However
experiences that other students do.Future work will involve disseminating this survey at the authors’ home institution, to gatherdata about the wide variety of project teams at the university. The findings from the firstdissemination of the survey will likely influence future research directions. One planneddirection is to use the findings of the survey to determine how to develop ways to better engagewith and encourage the teams that do appear to have poor team culture. By connecting teams thatare more welcoming with teams that are still developing ways to be more inclusive, we may beable to push project teams to adopt more inclusive recruitment and retention strategies.Another planned direction is to make the survey available for use at other
. Developing astrategy to approach this problem involves several aspects that need to be carefully considered ifwe are to understand, plan, and successfully achieve our goal.Such a journey is a call to us to explore what we know and what we need to know about climbingthe mountain. We have our preconceived notions and prior knowledge of climbing mountains, butwe are challenged to increase our consciousness about the problem so that we may take ownershipof the problem. We need to decide on how we will comprehend what we don’t know. Once, ourqualitative mindset can recall the references of our prior experiences in our structures ofassumptions. Then, we begin listing our ideas of possible ways to reach our goal.As the journey is set to be time-sensitive
of a patient are often more effective. Local solutions involvehorizontal innovation networks to create assistive technology that is modifiable by healthcareprofessionals and patients, not just the engineers that created the device. However, the ability tocommunicate between engineers, healthcare professionals, and patients requires empathy.A number of other researchers have investigated the importance of developing empathy in theirengineering courses. Mitchell and Light (2018) have incorporated initial challenger interviews,subject matter expert speakers or videos, stakeholder engagement plans, and reflection exercisesto help students develop empathy in “EPICS,” a first-year design course at Colorado School ofMines [2]. In another first-year
comprehensive school reform initiatives. Across these evaluations, she has used a variety of evaluation methods, ranging from a multi-level evalua- tion plan designed to assess program impact to methods such as program monitoring designed to facilitate program improvement. She received her Ph.D. in Research, Measurement and Statistics from the Depart- ment of Education Policy at Georgia State University (GSU).Benjamin Klein, Georgia Institute of Technology Benjamin Klein received his B.S.E.E. and M.S.E.E. degrees from the University of Wisconsin, Madison in 1994 and 1995, respectively, and his Ph.D. from the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign in 2000. From 2000-2003, Dr. Klein served as a postdoctoral fellow at the
portions of thebook itself. This multi-dimensional way of reading can be immensely helpful as we try toencourage students to create technological solutions for systems that may not even currentlyexist.AcknowledgementsThis paper features the work of undergraduate students Thomas Lopresto, Joshua Quire, andJohn Booker from Spring 2020 and Dakota Fannin from the Fall 2019 Network Switches &Routers course. Partial support for the educational resources related to the project was providedthrough the Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) Leadership Grant funding at Eastern KentuckyUniversity and is kindly acknowledged. Thanks to the reviewers for their careful review of thedraft and suggestions for improvement.References[1] Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L
educational website so that it doesn't need to retain and act upon a memory of user choices, inputs, and experiences (as occurs in the Trapped in Time learning adventure). This change resulted in greater robustness across a variety of platforms and simpler implementation for educators and children. The more dynamic approach to integrating the novel and website more than compensated for any loss in the dynamic nature of the user experience.Future DirectionsFuture research will focus on conducting a more rigorous assessment of applying ImaginativeEducation (IE) and transmedia in a controlled setting. In this research we plan to adapt ThroughMy Window to match the learning goals in a city school system in order to assess