Engineering department at Rochester Institute of Technology in ROchester, NY.Dr. Cristian A. Linte, Rochester Institute of Technology Cristian A. Linte is an Assistant Professor in Biomedical Engineering at Rochester Institute of Technology. He also holds a joint faculty appointment in the Chester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Work-in-Progress: Development of Interactive Didactic Modules for Biomedical Engineering: Bridging Fluid Mechanics and Systems Physiology Michael Kormos1, Alan Man2 and Cristian A. Linte1 1 Biomedical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester NY USA
Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014.2. Prince, M.J., et al., Use of research-based instructional strategies in core chemical engineering courses. Chemical Engineering Education, 2013. 47(1): p. 27-37.3. Froyd, J.E., et al., Estimates of use of research-based instructional strategies in core electrical or computer engineering courses. IEEE Transactions on Education, 2013. 56(4): p. 393-399.4. Borrego, M., J.E. Froyd, and T.S. Hall, Diffusion of engineering education innovations: A survey of awareness and adoption rates in U.S. engineering departments. Journal of Engineering Education, 2010. 99(3): p. 185-207.5. Association of American Universities. AAU Undergraduate STEM Education
engineering societies to ask, “Whatdoes ASEE think?” Although research is very important at Research-1 universities, the public ismore and more demanding an emphasis on good teaching. This is especially true at publicuniversities, where state legislators and parents are demanding this, as the cost of highereducation rises. We know that decreasing financial state support is a factor in this, but we canstill work to provide good return on investment. ASEE can play a major role in this.This next year it would be good to concentrate on expanding our value to faculty at two-yearinstitutions and thereby increasing their membership, which is currently only 4% of our total.The cost of education at two-year institutions is much less than at four-year ones, in
address a particular course learning outcomethat in turn is linked to a program learning outcome. This practice is often used toevaluate the effectiveness of a course as well as to identify any need for coursemodifications and improvements. When assessment is in the form of a test, then theadministration, collection and the final aggregate report generation becomes a timesconsuming task that often introduces delays in planning. In this paper we present a web-based software tool that is primarily designed and developed for automating the courseassessment process. It automates the test creation, grading and the final reportgeneration that can help save time, reduce errors and produce variety of reportsummaries for better decision making.1
introductory computer science courses (CS1).1. From writing-to-learn (WTL) to writing-to-learn-to-program (WTLTP)WTL strategies arose from the writing across the curriculum (WAC) movement, which can betraced back to the 19th century in the U.S. It describes programs that emphasize the connectionbetween writing and learning, but the term also refers to the pedagogical theories that supportthis connection. In the following sections, the history and influence of WTL are discussed as thefoundation for WTLTP.1.1. History of WTL Page 26.1779.2David Russell’s history7 of the WAC movement traced the cultural changes in the U.S. that ena-bled the movement’s
of K-12 education.1 While some schools havechosen to offer specialized engineering courses, this is not possible at all schools. Even wherespecific engineering courses are an option, students with already full schedules may not be ableto devote an entire term to exploring what it means to be an engineer. While it could not take theplace of a dedicated course, a more realistic option for schools in those situations might be toincorporate engineering activities into existing science courses.2 This can strengthen theconnections between science and engineering. Additionally, this approach has the benefit ofreaching students who may not initially be interested in engineering, potentially opening them upto new possibilities for their futures
enough to meet the demand of firms competing in the globaleconomy19-25. All learning modules developed in these five years of work are available free to all USAengineering educational institutions on http://sites.google.com/site/finiteelementlearning/home.Initially, we developed FE learning modules in six engineering areas: (1) structural analysis, (2)mechanical vibrations, (3) computational fluid dynamics, (4) heat transfer, (5) electromagnetics,and (6) biometrics. To evaluate these "Proof of Concept" modules, they were integrated intoexisting courses in the corresponding subject areas. Faculty and students initially assessed theireffectiveness at three higher educational institutions. We included student demographic data,learning style
learning the basics of how to program robotic arms. More detailed informationon each element of this project is contained in the following sections.MechatronicsAccording to a Manpower Group survey of nearly 42,000 employers across 42 countries,technicians, production operators, and engineers are both listed among the top ten jobs that arecurrently the most difficult to fill on a global scale5. Within the Americas specifically, each ofthese positions are also listed among the top ten, with the notable addition of skilled tradesworkers coming in at the #1 most difficult position to fill5. Furthermore, a 2015 report by theAssociation for Talent Development found that employers spent an average of $1,229 peremployee on training in 20141, while the
millions ofcomputing devices many of which are located internationally 1. Our forces need to be prepared toface ever-aggressive enemies in this new warfighting domain.It has come to the attention of the international community that a proactive approach toprotecting cyber assets is necessary, and many nations have published publicly available cyber-strategy documents outlining their approach to cyber-defense. 2. U.S. executive order 13636 wasgiven in February 2013 by President Barack Obama who addressed the need for “ImprovingCritical Infrastructure Cybersecurity” emphasizing the need for a collaborative and incentivizedframework to be adopted in government and commercial entities understanding that we areseverely underprepared for the threats that
. Results and Successes of the PartnershipsIn fall 2013, a total of 113 students enrolled in the Texas A&M engineering co-enrollmentprogram known as TEAM-E (See Table 1). The Texas A&M University Office of Admissionsidentified academically talented freshman applicants who, due to capacity, could not be offered aspace in the CoE taking all their courses on the Texas A&M University campus. These studentswere offered an alternative admission that provided enrollment in general studies at Texas A&MUniversity with access to engineering courses previously reserved for students with fulladmission to the CoE. Admission required the students to be co-enrolled with Blinn College-Bryan. Additional components of the co-enrollment model included
case study exercise. The full text of the casestudy is included as an appendix.IntroductionSince ABET’s 2000 requirement for an ethics component in engineering education,1 instructionin ethics is now commonplace in engineering curricula. The 2015 Volkswagen diesel scandal,however, has sparked calls for moving away from “this compliance mindset” in ABET accreditedschools to one in which ethics instruction is integrated more effectively and thoroughly into theengineering curricula.2 There is considerable debate about the most effective way to incorporateethics instruction in the classroom, whether as a stand-alone course or as incorporated throughoutthe engineering curriculum (or both). There have also been calls for greater emphasis on
Engineering Education, 2016 The Converged Classroom: A follow-up studyIntroductionLearning new ways to utilize technology is a common challenge 1. Distance learning has beenwith us for over 100 years. With changes in technology, distance learning has steadily changedto more closely resemble traditional face to face instruction. First, paper based correspondencecourses were supplemented by lectures recorded on video tape. Later, computer based trainingprovided the first elements of interaction. With the spread of the internet, materials moved fromthe computer to web pages. There were discussion boards where students could interact withinstructors and other students. Finally, there came the advent of real time class meetings
decisions about accreditation standards to ABET itself, each constituency of ABET hasto be able to read these implications through a better understanding of the process.While this detailed understanding of process is the major objective of the study that we have yet to amassdata for, we can at least demonstrate the consequence of a difference in process by comparing the twoversions of the proposed changes that we have seen so far. An initial reading of TF-3’s original “1-6”Criterion 3 student learning outcomes that the task force put forward as an alternative to “a-k” reveals thefollowing commitments:11 A strong linear model of applied science A tendency to view engineering as an experimental, laboratory-based discipline. The
leadership and teamwork11.Developmental bibliotherapy (guided reading) is a tool that uses fictional written stories to helpdevelop social, emotional, or psychological growth at all levels of development12-13. In 1949,Shrodes identified four stages of developmental bibliotherapy: 1) identification - where thereader identifies with a character in a story; 2) catharsis - when a reader is able to experience theemotions of the character of the story; 3) insight – a deeper understanding which is achievedthrough reflection on the identification that the reader makes with the characters and situations ofthe story; and 4) universalization - when a reader is able to apply the insights the reader hasgained through reflection to situations they encounter in
is that many engineering faculty havelittle or no knowledge of practitioner standards6 and that training them to recognizestandards value is time consuming,11 while textbooks and handbooks are quickly out of datesince standards are reaffirmed or revised every five years.6 Moreover, the development ofnew courses or the changing of curricula is a challenging process.11That is why the USSS recommends a concerted effort for identification of new ways toteach about standards, both from the universities and SDOs.1 Following this directive, manySDOs have developed a plethora of online training materials. However, these are difficult todiscover, difficult to understand, and many times they are not available for free.6 Otherinitiatives include
by (1) integrating new student orientation with math assessment and learning, (2) linking STEM faculty educational training with STEM freshman learning communities and with orientation, and (3) integrating and expanding, based on research best practices, existing programs such as learning communities, undergraduate research, and faculty development. The program targets all first year students for success and is expected to have a significant impact on at-risk students. Students at-risk for not earning or completing a STEM degree include those who are underprepared in math, those with financial need, Hispanic students, women, and students with low self-efficacy.”The grant was motivated by significant
conceptualunderstanding.IntroductionEvaluating a student's understanding of the concepts presented in an undergraduate engineeringcurriculum is a significant challenge but “understanding conceptual knowledge is critical to thedevelopment of competence in engineering students and in practicing professionals”1.Researchers of conceptual change argue that the manner in which conceptual knowledge iscategorized is indicative of a problem solver’s ability and, additionally, that the verycategorization of that knowledge effects the solver’s ability to effectively represent a problem 2.An instructor's role includes facilitating student knowledge acquisition and also aiding thatstudent in effectively organizing it. A student may not have the ability to effectively relate newmaterial to prior
designed to be used as material that supplements the learning of topics in signalprocessing.1. Introduction With the continuously growing popularity of the internet has come a new era of learningand communicating. Information is now conveyed in a more visual manner. This has trainedyoung minds to grasp concepts more effectively when presented in a way they could visualize[1]. Techniques similar to the ones discussed in this paper have been explored by otherresearchers and educators. A TED Talk was given by Tyler DeWitt, a PhD student at MIT andbiology middle school teacher, on how he was able to improve the learning experience formiddle school students [2]. DeWitt implemented a visual and intuitive approach to teaching thestudents in
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 1 Factors influence data management model selection: IT Expert testimonies Gholam Ali Shaykhian, Ph.D. Mohamed Abdelgadir Khairi, Ph.D. Jinan Ziade, ABDAbstractThis paper examines the IT Expert testimonies perspectives to determine which factors(cost, schedule, performance, efficiency, limitations, risk, training, operations,compliances, deployment, security, accessibility, dependability, data quality, stability,maintainability, reliability, availability
accommodatedwithin the context of the traditional four-year baccalaureate degree”1. An earlier NAE reportconcluded that “...if the engineering profession is to take the initiative in defining its own future,it must ... agree on an exciting vision for the future; transform engineering education to helpachieve the vision”2….Recently the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) organized a task committee to studythe “equivalent 30” concept. Meanwhile, the Education Committee of the National Council ofExaminers for Engineering and Surveying (NCEES) has been actively working on a conceptwhereby a practice-oriented pathway could be an acceptable alternative to the “equivalent 30”.Initially it was considered that a master’s degree in engineering could compensate
Page 26.11.2indicated that it was inappropriate to leave out one of the five most common disciplines, and thelatter because its enrollments and pathways are sufficiently interrelated with those of MechanicalEngineering students that studying some outcomes require the consideration of both disciplines.Major activitiesSince September 1, 2013, the project team has been productive working together well andmaking progress on all planned tasks from the proposal. We are publishing in other disciplinaryvenues as we build on our success in being recognized for the best paper in the IEEETransactions on Education in 20111 for the first of our disciplinary studies and with the BettyVetter Award for Research from the Women in Engineering ProActive Network
anddeveloped roller coasters that were good first approximations to something that might be realizedat a theme park. An example of a student-designed coaster is shown in Figure 1.Figure 1: A student-designed roller coaster as rendered in the NoLimits software.Student FeedbackAt the end of the project, students were asked to provide feedback about the project via a set ofquestions rating certain aspects on a five-point scale and via questions open to free-formcomments. The feedback form used is documented in Appendix A. Twenty-one of the twenty-four students enrolled in the class completed a form. Overall, the students responded veryfavorably to the project and felt it helped them better understand concepts from the course aswell as developing analysis
pertinentcode compliance interpretation. Then entrepreneurial thinking is also incorporatedto expand the project scope to a BIM/game engine prototype development thataims to provide practical solutions improve design communication betweenprofessionals and clients. The paper shares the initial findings and showcases theprototype under development. Page 26.461.2IntroductionRapid adoption and implementation of Building Information Modeling (BIM) in the constructionindustry urges colleges to adopt this emerging trend and integrate BIM education in theircurricula. Literature [1] has shown that various pedagogical models have been introduced atdifferent levels of commitment
26.520.31969, the first commercially successful PLC was made in 1973 by Michael Greenberg. PLCsfunction with one of the following, but not limited to programming languages, Ladder Logic,ASEE Annual Conference, 2015Function Block Logic, and Structured Text (1). These are accessed by either the LED screen orcomputer interface. The interface may be an LED display on the front of the device. While thismay seem similar to a VFD, there are several differences. The primary difference is that PLCsare not limited to just motors. Through a MODBUS cable PLCs can send and receive data fromdifferent machines (2). This difference combined with equipment like occupancy sensors allowsfor a higher level of customization of building and machining equipment.In our case
Department of Labor, the job outlook is on the rise and willcontinue to expand for at least the short- to medium-term future [1]. To respond to the industry Page 26.549.3needs for FPGA design skills, universities are updating their curriculum with courses inhardware description languages and programmable logic design. Although most traditionalelectrical and computer engineering programs have updated their curriculum to include topics inhardware description language and programmable logic design (FPGA/CPLD), only 19.5 % of 4-year and 16.5 % of 2-year electrical and computer engineering technology programs at USacademic institutions currently have a
protocol documents the first day ofclass and any mention of active learning practices to be used throughout the term. Afterwards,the daily classroom observation protocol is completed for each instance of active learning thatoccurs during each of the class periods. This protocol documents several aspects of activelearning: 1) basic course details, including start and stop times for the activity, 2) informationabout each active learning instance, including the level of difficulty and novelty of the materialbeing discussed, 3) the type of active learning, 4) the degree of faculty participation in theactivity, 5) how the instructor introduces the instance of active learning, and 6) student responseduring the activity.In order to ensure the reliability
skills in similar ways as researchexperiences.IntroductionRecent calls to improve science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) educationseek to produce graduates that are capable of adapting to rapidly advancing, multi-disciplinarychallenges 1–3. In order to be able to approach these challenges, students need to be able to thinkcritically, communicate effectively, and solve complex problems 4. Many of these skills can bedeveloped in a classroom environment; however, deeper learning has been seen when studentsparticipate in learning communities like undergraduate research experiences 5,6. Authenticresearch experiences have the opportunity to help students develop critical skills that will berequired of them in the workplace and/or
proposed new CEPC being approved on first reading by ABET/EAC (July 12,2014) and the ABET Board of Directors (November 1, 2014). Following ABET/EACprocedures, the proposed CEPC were published and open for public comment through June 15, Page 26.1626.22015 and, once approved on second reading by the ABET/EAC (July 2015) and ABET Board ofDirectors (October 2015), would go into effect for the 2016/2017-accreditation cycle.In the fall of 2014, the CEPCTC initiated a comprehensive effort to revise and update thecommentary for the CEPC. In December 2014, the CEPCTC released a draft of the newCommentary on the ABET Engineering Criteria for Civil and
experiences to help their graduates excel in their future workenvironment” [1]. Despite this need, only few students are able to or willing to have a studyabroad experience. The 2013 Open Doors report from the Institute for International Educationshows that nationally only 3.9% of engineering students studied abroad during theirundergraduate career [2]. In addition, despite the growing awareness of the benefits of studyabroad by students, the challenges preventing students from studying abroad are numerous andcomplex [2]. According to the IIE Generation Study Abroad White Paper Series, the primarychallenges for many U.S. students can be grouped into to three overarching categories: cost,curriculum and culture [2] .This paper contributes to the body
role of reflection in engineering education based on the number of researchpublications, the limited number does suggest opportunities for more investigation of the issue.”The analysis presented in this paper seeks to explore the extent to which engineering educationscholarship has highlighted reflection by seeking to answer the question: how much explicit,named attention has reflection received in engineering education scholarship and how do weinterpret these results? Our systematic literature review seeks to answer that question by (1)identifying the number of papers in the ASEE conference proceedings that mention reflection inengineering, and (2) determining the extent to which reflection is mentioned (the scope ofreflection) and