pathway for senior projectselection for students pursuing this are of specialization and not only.References [1] Howe, S., Rosenbauer, L., & Poulos, S. (2017). The 2015 capstone design survey results:current practices and changes over time. International Journal of Engineering Education, 33(5),1393.[2] Dutson, A. J., Todd, R. H., Magleby, S. P., & Sorensen, C. D. (1997). A review of literatureon teaching engineering design through project‐oriented capstone courses. Journal ofEngineering Education, 86(1), 17-28. [3] Savage, R., Chen, K., & Vanasupa, L. (2008). Integrating project-based learning throughoutthe undergraduate engineering curriculum. Journal of STEM Education, 8(3).[4] Stone, W. L., & Hugh Jack, P. E. (2017). Project
. Egyptian Informatics Journal, 20(3):193 – 204, 2019. ISSN 1110-8665. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eij.2019.05.001. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110866518302603. [9] Visualize code execution learn python, java, c, c , javascript, and ruby. URL http://www.pythontutor.com/.[10] Raghvinder S. Sangwan, James F. Korsh, and Paul S. Lafollette. A system for program visualization in the classroom. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 30(1):272–276, 1998. doi: 10.1145/274790.274311.[11] Nouf M. Al-Barakati and Arwa Y. Al-Aama. The effect of visualizing roles of variables on student performance in an introductory programming course. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 41(3):228, 2009. doi: 10.1145/1595496.1562949.[12] Zhang Jinghua
from populationsunderrepresented in engineering. In the 1990’s UC San Diego had a Minority EngineeringProgram that provided community and mentorship to underrepresented students. The NationalSociety of Black Engineers (NSBE), Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers (SHPE), andSociety of Women Engineers (SWE) were also longtime, active chapters at UC San Diego. Inaddition, multiple diversity and inclusion initiatives began to develop across campus within afew years of the IDEA Center, including the establishment of the Office of the Vice Chancellorfor Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion and the Black Resource Center.4.2 Start-up Stage: Early Activities“An organization that is in the beginning phase of operation.” [1]4.2.1 StrategyThe original
Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2021,” Alexandria, 2021.[2] I. Villanueva, M. Di Stefano, L. Gelles, K. Youmans, and A. Hunt, “Development and assessment of a vignette survey instrument to identify responses due to hidden curriculum among engineering students and faculty,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 1–21, 2020.[3] S. Nieto, Affirming diversity : the sociopolitical context of multicultural education. Longman, 1992.[4] I. Villanueva, M. Di Stefano, L. Gelles, P. V. Osoria, and S. Benson, “A race re-imaged, intersectional approach to academic mentoring: Exploring the perspectives and responses of womxn in science and engineering research,” Contemp. Educ. Psychol., vol. 59, p. 101786, Oct
) insufficient good Research Quantity of prior research No Little Some Large amount of Potential experience in academic experience experience experience experience (CV) and beyond Quality of prior research No Time spent in a Secondary Peer-reviewed experience in academic experience lab with no author on conference and beyond demonstrated publication(s) presenter, first- outcomes and/or prior author
," Social and Personality Psychology Compass, vol. 13, no. 3, Mar 2019, Art no. e12436, doi: 10.1111/spc3.12436.[2] W. Ng, S. M. Ware, and A. Greenberg, "Activating Diversity and Inclusion: A Blueprint for Museum Educators as Allies and Change Makers," Journal of Museum Education, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 142-154, 2017, doi: 10.1080/10598650.2017.1306664.[3] M. A. Craig, V. Badaan, and R. M. Brown, "Acting for whom, against what? Group membership and multiple paths to engagement in social change," Current Opinion in Psychology, vol. 35, pp. 41-48, Oct 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.002.[4] H. R. M. Radke, M. Kutlaca, B. Siem, S. C. Wright, and J. C. Becker, "Beyond Allyship: Motivations
nuance of community cultural wealthdimensions, counterspace processes, and misalignment between assets and institutional policies.The findings below are focused around passages in the data that were coded as both a type ofCCW and either a counterspace process or misalignment.FindingsPreliminary findings from our analysis of interview data align with Margherio et al.’s [6]research highlighting the interplay between CCW and counterspaces. Students who havepersisted in STEM into their Junior or Senior year describe LSAMP as a resource that helpedthem both activate existing forms of capital/cultural resources they possessed entering collegeand develop skills and networks that contributed to continuing success. Further, examination ofchallenges
] National Academy of Engineering, “Engineering technology education in the United States,” Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. 2016.[2] The Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System, (IPEDS), “Data on engineering technology degrees,” Washington, DC, 2014.[3] About Us. National Institute for Certification in Engineering Technologies, Sept 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.nicet.org/about-us/[4] Strada Education Network (US) Lumina Foundation for Education, “Certified value: when do adults without degrees benefit from earning certificates and certifications?” 2019.[5] O’NET online quick search for engineering technology. O’NET, Feb 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.onetonline.org/find/result?s=%22engineering
Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2007.[2] E. Martin, “Egg and sperm: A scientific fairy tale,” in Gender and Scientific Authority, Barbara Laslett, Ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 324-339, 1996.[3] M. Upchurch, & S. Fojtová, “Women in the brain: A history of glial cell metaphors,” NWSA Journal, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 1-20, 2009.[4] L. Schiebinger, Has Feminism Changed Science? Harvard University Press, 2001.[5] M.A. Cannady, E. Greenwald, and K.N. Harris, “Problematizing the STEM Pipeline Metaphor: Is the STEM Pipeline Metaphor Serving Our Students and the STEM Workforce?” Science Education Policy
Paper ID #30335The Challenge of Preparing iGen Students for Engineering and ComputerScienceDr. Kenneth W. Van Treuren, Baylor University Ken Van Treuren is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering at Baylor University. He received his B. S. in Aeronautical Engineering from the USAF Academy in Colorado Springs, Colorado and his M. S. in Engineering from Princeton University in Princeton, New Jersey. After serving as USAF pilot in KC-135 and KC-10 aircraft, he completed his DPhil in Engineering Sciences at the University of Oxford, United Kingdom and returned to the USAF Academy to teach heat transfer and
. Using the data from the pre and post survey responses from 2017 and 2018(n=230), the four survey items that yielded the highest Cronbach’s alpha for internal consistencyfor each scale (as calculated in SPSS) were used on the 2019 survey.Table 2. Survey Instrument Aspect Definition Reference(s) # items 2017+ # items 2019 2018; alpha survey, alpha Course Feeling comfortable, supported, and accepted 40 4; .993 4; .993 Belonging in the course / classroom College Belonging at the campus, engineering college 41, 42 6; .760 4
, students indicated whether they had no computer science,introductory computer science, or advanced/PA computer science and if they had taken the APComputer Science A or Computer Science Principles and/or IB Computer Science exams andtheir score(s). For Physics, …. Students in both courses indicated their highest level of highschool mathematics (algebra; geometry; trigonometry/pre-calculus; calculus; advanced calculusor higher) and whether they had taken an AP examination in Calculus and/or an IB exam inMathematics and their score(s). Participants then completed the measures of efficacy, mindset, belongingness, and goalaffordances described above. 2) Post-exam survey. Participants who had completed the intake survey received anemail
memberships.” The boundaries being drawn here are quite clear:politics do not belong in the IEEE, and LGBTQ individuals are ontologically political. It isinteresting that the latter two posters assumed the proposer(s) of the new language were LGBTQ(must be outsiders!), when in fact there was an organized response from the few out LGBTQIEEE members to alter the proposed wording before adoption of the proposed changes, as theproposed language was not truly inclusive of the LGBTQ community.Sexual orientation is private/doesn’t belong in the workplace: A slightly different (thoughrelated) boundary was drawn between professional and private spheres when frequentcommenter Luke Burgess (relation to Barry Burgess unknown) suggested that sexual
engineering. Paper presented at the 6th International Conference CDIO, Montreal, Canada.[15]. Harden, R. (2002). Developments in outcomes-based education. Medical teacher, 24(2), 117–120.[16]. Harden, R. (2007). Outcomes-based Education: The future is today. Medical teacher, 29(7), 625–629[17]. Gardiner L. F. (2002). Assessment essentials: Planning, implementing, and improving assessment in higher education (review). J. Higher Education, 73(2), 302–305.[18]. Dew, S. K., Lavoie, M., & Snelgrove, A. (2011, June). An engineering accreditation
a coherent grouping of similar ways of experiencing thephenomenon among (typically) more than one individual.For Zoltowski et al.’s study, analysis of the data yielded seven qualitatively different ways inwhich the students experienced human-centered design (categories) within the context of“designing for others”. An overview of the categories of description is given in Table 1. Table 1. Categories of Description of Students' Experience of Human-Centered Design10 Category of Description (Human-Centered Design Summary is...) Design is not human-centered, but technology-centered design. The focus of the design is on the technology and solving the technical
: New expectations for undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. National Science Foundation, 1996. [5] N. R. Council et al., “From analysis to action: Undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology,” 1996. [6] N. R. Council et al., Transforming undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. National Academies Press, 1999. [7] S. Hurtado, N. L. Cabrera, M. H. Lin, L. Arellano, and L. L. Espinosa, “Diversifying science: Underrepresented student experiences in structured research programs,” Research in Higher Education, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 189–214, 2009. [8] N. W. Moon, R. L. Todd, D. L. Morton, and E. Ivey, “Accommodating
defense to the findings of this study, attention is drawn to thedefinition of shame here operated within. The term “perceived” is essential in depicting the truenature of shame. Expectations are interpreted by the individual. Nicole recognized multiple timesthat her perception of expectations may not be absolutely identical to reality. However, despitelogical recognition of reality, her emotional experiences still operate within forms ofexpectations that are interpretations determined by the self.AcknowledgementsThis work was supported through funding by the National Science Foundation (NSF EEC1752897). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do
2014 he was awarded by FAPESP with a post-doctoral research at the Centre for Ethics, Law and Public Affairs at the same university. His research focus relies on Engineering and Community Services; Socio-Legal Studies, Science and Technology Studies, Political philosophy, Sociology of Environment and Intellectual Property Rights.Dr. Cristiano Cordeiro Cruz, Aeronautics Technological Institute (Brazil) I currently develop a post-doctorate research at the Aeronautics Technological Institute (ITA) with a schol- arship from FAPESP (#2018/20563-3). I hold a PhD degree in Philosophy (University of S˜ao Paulo, 2017), a bachelor degree in Philosophy (Jesuit Faculty of Philosophy and Theology, 2008), a master degree in
faculty teach new concepts in programming,design, microelectronic control and graphical communication in relation to needing such skills inorder to solve a problem related to their Cornerstone theme. We see firsthand the positiveoutcomes of this approach in both student and faculty satisfaction and will continue to refine ourcourses based on feedback and research.References[1] First Year Engineering Learning & Innovation Center, Northeastern University, 2018.[2] National Academy of Engineering. Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2005.[3] S. Ambrose and C. Amon, "Systematic Design of a First-Year Mechanical Engineering Course at Carnegie
self-motivated andheld high self-efficacy in teaching. Having teachers with above average motivation may havecaused a deeper learning of engineering design, which resulted in high scores and holdinginformed NOE views.AcknowledgementsOpinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of theauthor(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Thismaterial is based upon work that was partly funded by the National Science Foundation undergrant number IIA1301726.References[1] National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices,crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.[2] National Research Council. (2006). America's lab
establish a clear purpose for mixing,with Kajfez and Creamer calling upon the engineering education community to clearly explainhow mixing aligns with the research question(s) [18].Heeding these calls from literature, our mixed methods study uses a fully-integrated approach toexamine the complex experiences of students in a global engineering program. By using anunderexplored mixed methods approach to data analysis, we respond to Bryman’s request thatthe community more broadly incorporate mixing strategies in data analysis [19]. We also followKajfez and Creamer’s suggestions by making explicit our purpose for mixing, emphasizing thealignment between this mixed methods approach and our research questions [18].BackgroundThe Rising Sophomore Abroad
individuals in the future. Students embraced the potential of growthmindset to lead to more productive reactions and behaviors both in their academic and personallives. This indicates a need for additional work to understand concrete strategies for individualswho have learned about growth mindset to begin to implement such productive practices intotheir everyday habits. Future work should also capture the ways in which the culture(s) ofundergraduate engineering education can be shifted to develop and sustain growth mindset.Appendix: Focus Group Prompts Used to Solicit Student Reflections, Adopted from [19]Chapters 1 and 2 1.1. Think about someone you know who is steeped in the fixed mindset. Think about how they're always trying to prove
(ENGR101), was specifically designed and offered during the fall quarter of the 2015-16 school year asa part of a NSF S-STEM grant, Program for Engineering Excellence for Partner Schools(PEEPS). PEEPS is a cohort scholarship program that provides engineering students withfinancial, academic, and social support3. ENGR 101 was developed by two engineering faculty, aVISTA member, and supported by a curriculum expert, to expand the benefits of PEEPS to alarger number of students and to establish interventions and practices in engineering classroomsthat better support diversity on our university’s campus. The specific course goals were todevelop and enhance students’ engineering identity and sense of belonging within the College ofEngineering in order
follow-up interview researchfor the next five years. The overarching goal of the study is to better understand what kinds ofvariables seem to motivate middle and high school boys and girls in the U. S. South to pursuecomputer science education as well as what kinds of variables seem to influence educationalpersistence and successful entry into the computing workforce. The purposes of our largerresearch project are multiple: (1) To assess the effectiveness of a project-based camp curriculum that integrates digital composing, rhetoric, and design with computer science and engineering education; (2) To better understand the dynamics of collaborative/team-based and competitive projects in groups of middle and high school boys and