beenutilizing these resources to develop unit and lesson plans and to share with their peers so thatmore educators and their students are positively impacted. Besides contributing to the workforcedevelopment needs in areas of critical importance, the BEAT program efforts are enhancingawareness of sustainable practices such as reducing waste, promoting recycling, and advancingthe green initiative on campus as well as on the lower Eastern Shore. Sustainable approaches todeal with issues related to energy, the environment, and agriculture are prominent in the grandchallenges of the 21st Century as identified by the National Academy of Science and the NationalAcademy of Engineering (http://www.engineeringchallenges.org)10. The activities in theprogram are
meaningful purpose for their life, the ability to operate without knowing exactly what their future holds, and learn self-respect and responsibility. The mentors and mentees will be provided an opportunity to share their personal stories and extend this activity by establishing choices that can develop their total person. This activity will assist students in developing a plan for action that they can apply to their current lives. • Technical Skills: A robotic arm will be programmed to relate this idea to kinematics. Students will also relate software programs to a step-by-step process. They will learn programming principles in detail and be introduced to structures in the LabVIEW programming
integration skills right along. Students learn better, and teaching becomes moreeffective when the technology is planned right into the lessons. To train engineers of the future,faculty members need to be technology advocates.In the developing world, there are many reasons for the lack of deeper knowledge of technologyintegration by faculty members. These include but are not limited by teacher apathy, budgetlimitations, lack of leadership, and lack of availability of training. Teachers’ knowledge of theengineering software application is limited, which consequently limits the meaningful learningexperience in the classroom. This process needs direction and support and must be acollaborative effort using the combined knowledge base of the faculty
indicated by Zoe’s description, engineers not only worked building stuff or in constructionbut they also were described as males wearing hard hats and “bright” jackets. Her description ofan engineer was similar to that described by other participants. Nonetheless, her descriptionchanged and during her final interview she indicated that engineers “would probably set up aplan first, or set up a layout of what they are going to do, like their ideas, and then probably gofrom there.”Throughout the duration of the study, the participants had an opportunity to learn about theengineering design model. Zoe changed her perception of what engineers do and describedengineers as individuals that created a plan to provide solutions to problems. Her description
ADAGE25 ) to track specific meaningful behaviors such as thenumber of times a player clicks the query button for objects (information gathering to define theproblem and plan) or to capture the rapid acceleration of object placement that could indicate the“aha moment” of insight in discovering the solution and quickly implementing. By pairing suchdata with think-aloud interviews, we can corroborate or refute such coding in order to exploremetacognitive activity in problem solving. That is, through such procedures we hope to not onlyobserve and document specific strategies being used, or to hear the participant claim to use suchstrategies, but to see if and when both happen together.InterviewsThe semi-structured interviews were designed to get a
and/or sciences completed Pre-requisite classes completed Attendance at all internship No overall GPA requirements Writing intensive designation meetings - Oct, Feb, & May Preliminary evaluation – Training plan Application packet completed & submitted by April 1st Industry Supervisor & Student Weekly summary reports Midterm & Final evaluations – Repeatable for credit Summary
students from their labs or thelabs of their colleagues. At this time, graduate student volunteers who previously volunteered arecontacted and invited to participate. Past volunteers are also asked to suggest names of othergraduate students who may be interested in volunteering. Ideally, this results in a group of four tosix dedicated graduate student volunteers who will work together to plan the outreach event. Onthe first day of the conference, the conference organizers also make an announcement asking foradditional volunteers. Graduate students who volunteer the day of the event take on a smallerrole of escorting students between sessions or helping with the design and build activity. A set ofprofessional volunteers is required for a Faculty
planned. Issues that arenot able to be resolved are assumed, perhaps implicitly, to remain intractable due to lack ofsufficient resources, failure to engage needed actors, or the inability (as of yet) to articulate avalid solution path. The role of the change agent is that of an engineer or manager.In contrast Theory B views issues as tensions between portions of the system and/or multipleactors that represent a dynamic equilibrium within the system. This equilibrium is the state ofthe system as it currently exists and the state in turn is defined by the existence of tensions. Thetensions do not exist by design, rather they arise almost coincidentally from rational ordefensible positions taken by actors or organizational units within the system
York: Basic Books.26. Quental, D., C. Reidsema, and L. Kavanagh. Fostering ownership of learning in engineering education. in 25th Annual Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education: Engineering the Knowledge Economy: Collaboration, Engagement & Employability. 2014. School of Engineering & Advanced Technology, Massey University.27. Milner-Bolotin, M., The effects of topic choice in project-based instruction on undergraduate physical science students' interest, ownership, and motivation. 2001, The University of Texas at Austin.28. Downie, M. and P. Moore, Closing the Gap: Schools Forge a Bridge to Community--In California: Comprehensive Services and Realistic Planning
asreports from the National Research Council and the National Science Foundation), websites,scholarly articles, and popular media to understand how NGSS fits within common culturalconstructions of the purposes and goals of science and engineering education.FindingsThe Appendix D case study designed to assist teachers of “economically disadvantaged students”is presented as a vignette. This means that it is not a full transcript of the associated videofootage that the authors viewed for comparative purposes. The vignette summarizes oneteacher's lesson plans that NGSS presents as exemplary for its attention to student “culture,”“sense of place,” and “funds of knowledge.” The vignette specifically calls out several instances,which allege to embody the
graduation.Tracey…has had a lifelong interest in electronics which led him to study engineering and toeventually be a lead participant in SPU’s robotics club. Tracey has a learning disability which isan impediment and necessitates that he set aside more time for assignments than his peers. Hehas learned to compensate, however, and is making solid progress toward his engineering degree.He plans to attend an engineering conference this year or next to make more connections withother engineers in robotics. His path has been a bit jagged, but he expects to graduate a yearfrom now.Discussion – lessons learnedAs the vignettes illustrate, ECASE students can have significant financial need, significant family responsibilities, limited effective study habits, and
Engineering Education Studies looking into the reasons students complete or leave a major, indicated students wholeft STEM-related majors had negative learning experiences, whereas students with intentions topursue a career in science persisted despite the negative experiences [19].MyCollegeOptions.com, a popular free college-planning program, did a survey of high schoolstudents that showed increased interest in STEM. Since 2007, White, Hispanic and NativeAmerican interest has increased while African American has remained constant and AsianAmerican interest has gone up and down. Figure 4 shows percentage of interested parties bygraduating classes from 2007-2016. As interest in STEM increases, the hope is more URMs willcontinue to pursue their
audience of CS2is underclassmen who are planning to pursue a major in Computer Science and Engineering.Other popular majors of CS2 students include Business Administration, Economics and Statistics,as well as others working towards a Computer Science Minor. The only enforced prerequisite forthe class is an introductory programming course taught in C++.CS2 focuses on core computer science concepts and covers four major topics. First, functionalabstraction, including specification, recursion, iteration, and functional generalization. Second,data abstraction, including types, type hierarchies, abstract data types, abstraction andpolymorphism. Third, dynamic resource management, including creation, deletion, andinteraction with containers. Finally
. Faculty perceptions seem to begenerally positive from the Calculus I reform1 and we will continue to monitor this. We willcontinue to rigorously analyze student performance by looking at course grade performance andpost-requisite course performance. We plan to also begin to monitor student performance incertain engineering courses for which Calculus I or II are prerequisites (Statics and Dynamics).AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantNos. DUE-0856815 (Idaho STEP), DUE-0963659 (I^3), and DUE-1347830 (WIDER). Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those ofthe author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science
additional affirmation that responses will not impact grade) probe: How could the course have improved to meet those expectations?Describe your experiences with engineering before this course. probe: Remind interviewee that talking with engineering majors about their major is anexperience with engineering.How has your engineering literacy changed through this semester, especially regardingengineering knowledge, attitude, and abilities? probe: Negative change is okayHow do you see engineering as a component of your life outside of academic circles? prompt: How to you plan to use what you’ve learned in this class later? What area(s) of life does/might it appear?
, instructors will beable to have a concise and easy implementation plan to improve student satisfaction andmotivation in the classroom, creating a better educational experience for both the students andthe instructor. Once the factors that most significantly influence student motivation andsatisfaction were identified, an implementation model was created and tested. The “Interact,Cultivate, and Deliver” method, also known as the “I-C-D” method, implements the elevensignificant factors found across the three ordinal logistic regression models in a succinct mannerfor instructors. A pilot study of this method was implemented into an IE classroom and it wasfound that when the significant factors were implemented into the classroom, the satisfaction
with LEGO Mindstorms software and Excel. Thesoftware allowed the teams to program the robots, collect the data, plot a graph and come upwith a hypothesis about the time the robot would require to traverse an arbitrary distancespecified by the faculty and/or an undergraduate student leader. The teams who did the mostaccurate predictions won prizes. After the competition ended time was allotted to reflect on theexercise and the lessons learned.In the last part of the orientation, students watched some highlights from videos related to robotapplications previously collected by the faculty and the undergraduate students planning theorientation. A magazine article15 related to humans and robots interaction was provided as areading. Freshman engaged
other departments (especially computer science and mathematics) to meet the teaching objectives.Main Step 2. Research and Development: Fault analysis is an active sub-variant for side-channel attacks. In such implementation attacks, faults are injected maliciously (attackers want toinject transient faults not to break the system, so their plan is intentionally injecting faults intothe architectures of crypto-systems to retrieve as much leaked sensitive information as possible).With respect to IWMDs, for instance, a pacemaker containing an embedded hard processor, hightemperature, unsupported supply voltage or current, excessively high overclocking, strongelectric or magnetic fields, or ionizing radiation, are all the ways to
engineering.Samuel Lozano, Oregon Institute of Technology Civil Engineering student at the Oregon Institute of Technology (OIT) with a primary interest in trans- portation and transportation structures. Is planning on attending graduate school at OIT, studying struc- tural health monitoring of bridges. Has previously worked on projects involving strain testing of a light rail bridge at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and a streetscapes redesign project for the city of Klamath Falls, OR at OIT.Dr. Sean St.Clair, Oregon Institute of Technology Sean St.Clair is a Professor and Chair of the Civil Engineering Department at Oregon Tech, where he teaches structural engineering courses and conducts research in engineering education
key questions raised in the Drucker reading about the kinds of organizations that bring out your best capabilities. Specific issues to address here include: What kind of career do I want and why? How does this career align with my values, strengths, and other skills outlined above? What kind of organization do I want to work for to begin this career? How does this kind of organization align with my strengths? XI. My development plan. The previous sections of the paper provide an honest appraisal of “who I am” and “who I can become”. This section addresses the question, “what I am going to do get
all of those aero classes on top of each other.Miguel goes on to describe how financial obligations forced him to work during undergradinstead of getting recommended volunteer experience in his field: Once I determined that it was going to be my major I knew what classes I needed to take, I knew what courses I needed to pass and what grades I needed to get to graduate really – that was the plan. The only kind of confusion that I had which I am currently figuring out now is the route of medical school versus graduate school. That’s the big decision as an undergrad I didn’t make right away and after I graduated I worked for a couple of years, now I’m back deciding really what I want to do for the rest of my
the community, includingfaculty and peers, was welcoming and supportive, which helped them deal with the difficulty ofthe curriculum and the program workload. In contrast, several negative responses from women,people of color, and/or international students about the social climate demonstrated that there isstill work to be done to make the community in the program more inclusive to traditionallyunderrepresented students. This is in line with the finding in the quantitative analysis that womenrated their peer relations somewhat lower than men; those that rated their peer groups moresupportive were more likely to report identification with engineering and plans to persist.Peer relationships was the largest sub-category within the community
Planning, Developing Research Report, and Understanding School Culture. During these years, he has taught construction courses in several technical schools. Mr. Beigpourian currently works in the CATME project, which is NSF funding project, on optimizing team- work skills and assessing the quality of Peer Evaluations.Dr. Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Matthew W. Ohland is Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He has degrees from Swarthmore College, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and the University of Florida. His research on the longitudinal study of engineering students, team assignment, peer evaluation, and active and collaborative
); ethical in its conductand implications (Walther, Pawley, & Sochacka, 2015); as well as a carefully-planned researchdesign that responds to the research questions, whereby the generation of data enables theresearchers to make supported claims. Although rigor is bound up in all aspects of a study—fromits level of cultural responsiveness to communication with internal and external stakeholdersthroughout the research process—our definition of rigor is narrower than our definition ofquality. Specifically, we understand rigor to mean that a study’s claims and implications havebeen carefully supported with data, and that alternative explanations have been considered andaddressed throughout the research design.Validity and reliability have
written by veterans; not necessarily the best paper about veteran issues. • Host veteran social/service events that also involve non-veterans. One idea that gained much support during the discussion was creating events that bring veterans and non- veterans together. Rather than planning a mixer, it was emphasized that these events be focused on community service because this provides an opportunity for these two populations to work together to achieve something purposeful. • Have an ASEE presence within service member transition programs (e.g., SEP/TAP). All service members attend a transition program prior to exiting the military. These programs are often supported by colleges and universities
. [8]; Ibarra [9]) and may includework-related and/or social relationships. Informal professional networks are essential for careerdevelopment and job effectiveness (Ibarra [9]). Rankin and Caccamise [10] have presented anintervention model to achieve equity in the STEM fields and have recommended some concreteaction plans to achieve the desired outcome in regard to reducing gender gap. Gallagher, et al. [6]used the intervention model to show that the number of female faculty in Geotechnical Engineeringin the entire United States increased from 8 in 1989 to about 80 in 2017, which is believed to beabout approximately 25% of the total number of Geotechnical Engineering faculty in the nation
. Byxbe, "Community colleges under the microscope: An analysis of performance predictors for native and transfer students," Community College Review, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 27-42, 2000.[2] R. Mullen and M. T. Eimers, "Understanding transfer success revisited: Transfer students—Who are they and how successful are they," in MidAIR Fall Conference, Earth City, MO. https://uminfopoint. umsystem. edu/media/fa/planning/degrees/understandingtransferstudents successrevisitedpaper. pdf, 2001.[3] L. S. Hagedorn, H. S. Moon, S. Cypers, W. E. Maxwell, and J. Lester, "Transfer between community colleges and 4-year colleges: The all-American game," Community College Journal of Research and Practice, vol. 30, no. 3, pp
should be given, and equations should be applied consistently using the convention indicated in your diagram. All symbols need to be defined, including those given as initial conditions in the problem statement or new ones that are needed for the problem solution. A free body diagram will be included when appropriate. You may need more than a single figure for more complicated problems.5) Algebraic solution. Start by stating the general equations you plan to use for the solution, which should also clearly relate to your stated known and unknown variables listed from your problem statement and diagrams. An algebraic solution of the problem (i.e. in symbolic format, no numbers plugged in) should be given
keep the focus of the changes on students’backgrounds and desires. The new program structure consists of a base of six courses for allstudents in the program, followed by primary and secondary concentrations (seven courses andthree courses respectively) from a variety of technical specialties in ECE. Students will also havethe option defining their own secondary concentrations rather than choosing one of the definedsecondary concentrations. At the time of this writing (January 2018), the new program structurehas been approved by the faculty, the paperwork for university approval of the structure is beingprepared, and planning is underway for implementing the changes in the fall semester of 2018.More information about this project is available
yourself make you like an engineer? and, (4) What characteristics ofyourself make you unlike an engineer? These questions were developed to explore students’feelings of belongingness within the field of engineering and how they conceptualized theiralignment with the role of an engineer in their communities of practice. Due to the semi-structured nature of the interviews, the order of presentation varied and each of these fourbelongingness questions were not asked in every interview. For this analysis, only the directresponses to these four belongingness questions were investigated. Table 1—Participant Information Institution Pseudonym Gender Race/Ethnicity Planned major at time