Paper ID #37250Preparing the Future Civil Engineer: ASCE’s Proposed Revision of theABET Civil Engineering Program Criteria – Implementation ToolsDr. David A. Dzombak, P.E., Carnegie Mellon University David Dzombak is Hamerschlag University Professor Emeritus in Civil and Environmental Engineering at Carnegie Mellon. His professional focus is on water quality engineering, environmental restoration, and energy-environment issues.Wayne R. Bergstrom Dr. Bergstrom is a Principal Engineer and Fellow at Bechtel Infrastructure and Power Corporation.Dr. Jay A. Puckett, P.E., University of Nebraska, LincolnDr. Stephen J. Ressler, P.E
Paper ID #34223First-time Academically Suspended Engineering (FASE) UndergraduateOutcomes: Two Engineering Undergraduate Programs Examining Trends ofOver and Underrepresentation at the Intersection of Ethnicity and SexMrs. Lisa Lampe, University of Virginia Lisa Lampe is the Director of Undergraduate Education in the University of Virginia’s School of Engi- neering and Applied Science, joining UVA in January 2014. Prior to that, she served in many roles that bridge student affairs and academic affairs including Student Services Specialist and Residence Dean at Stanford University, as well as Hall Director and Interim Area
. (2012). The Informed Design Teaching and Learning Matrix. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4).[13] Moje, Elizabeth & Collazo, Tehani & Carrillo, Rosario & Marx, Ronald. (2001). “Maestro, what is ‘quality’?”: Language, literacy, and discourse in project-based science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 38. 10.1002/tea.1014.[14] Vygotsky, L. S. (1934, 1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. (Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner, S. & Souberman, E., Eds.) Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.[15] Sandoval, W.A., Bell, P., Coleman, E., Enyedy, N., & Suthers, D. (2000). Designing knowledge representations for learning epistemic practices
address both analytical skill-building and contextual awareness.Biomedical engineering in particular has been constrained by the cost and scale of existingmanufacturing techniques; although the variability of the human body has long been recognized(Tilley & Henry Dreyfuss Associates, 2002), customized equipment and medications havehistorically been labor-intensive and therefore expensive. With the advent of personalizedmanufacturing and medicine, the technical limitations prohibiting this kind of work are startingto dissolve. Engineering habits of mind must shift to take this into account, and engineeringeducators have a role to play in making students aware of historical and existing biases in modelsand designs so that they do not perpetuate
2001 American Society for Engineering Education AnnualConference & Exposition, 2001.[2] C.A. Whitfield, R.J. Frueler, Y. Allam, E.A. Ritter. “An Overview of Highly Successful First-year Engineering Cornerstone Design Projects.” Proceedings of the 17th International Conferenceon Engineering Education, 2011.[3] N.R. Sattele, K.M. Kecskemety, K.A.A. Parris, “Analysis of the Entrepreneurial Mind-setElements in Established First-year Engineering Labs: Analysis Process and Lessons Learned andChanges for the Future.” Proceedings of the 2019 American Society for Engineering EducationAnnual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[4] K. Crittenden, D. Hall, P. Brackin. “Living With the Lab: Sustainable Lab Experiences forFreshman Engineering Students
Education Lab advised by Prof. Sheri Sheppard. Her work focuses on fostering mindful awareness, empathy and curiosity in engineering students. Beth completed a BS in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Virginia in 2010 and a MS in Mechanical Engineering from Stanford in 2012.Dr. Tua A. Bj¨orklund Dr. Bj¨orklund focuses on supporting idea development efforts in product design, entrepreneurship and teaching in higher education. She has been a part of creating the Aalto University Design Factory, an experimentation platform for students, teachers, researchers and practitioners in Finland. Currently Dr. Bj¨orklund is a visiting Fulbright scholar at Stanford University, working at the Center for Design Research
AC 2008-1926: ALIGNING STUDENT LEARNING, FACULTY DEVELOPMENTAND ENGINEERING CONTENT: A FRAMEWORK FOR STRATEGICPLANNING OF ENGINEERING INSTRUCTION AND ASSESSMENTArunkumar Pennathur, University of Texas-El Paso Arunkumar Pennthur is Associate Professor of Industrial Engineering at UTEP. He teaches work design, senior design and human factors engineering. His research interests are in virtual collaboration and problem representation in engineering education.Louis Everett, University of Texas-El Paso Louis Everett is Professor and Chair of Mechanical Engineering at University of Texas at El Paso. He teaches Dynamics and Controls. His research interests are in metacognition in engineering education
Paper ID #19194Graduate Automotive Engineering Education Innovation – Deep Orange Pro-gram Collaborative Industry Partnerships Enable System Engineering BasedApproach for Project-Focused LearningDavid Schmueser Ph.D., Clemson University David Schmueser joined CU-ICAR in August 2013 as Adjunct Professor of Automotive Engineering. He also is a consultant to the US University Program at Altair Engineering, where he served as University Program Manager, 2007-2015. He received his BS and MS degrees in Engineering Mechanics, and a PhD degree in Mechanical Engineering, all from the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor. Prior to
component, has further encouraged theintegration of engineering principles into the K-12 curriculum. Some would argue thatindividuals that have earned an engineering degree are in the strongest position to accuratelyintroduce K-12 students to engineering and encourage them to enter the field12. Students that areable to successfully complete an engineering degree from an accredited engineering programpossess the content knowledge to teach STEM subjects at the K-12 level and can help to removethe misconceptions in the minds of K-12 students about what engineers actually do. However,what these students typically lack is pedagogical content knowledge (PCK), a concept thatencompasses not only knowledge of one’s subject matter, but also knowledge of ways
and influential authors with historical developments that might have motivated them.As Philip Wiener put it in his preface to his five-volume Dictionary of the History of Ideas:Studies of Selected Pivotal Ideas (1973), “the historian of ideas makes his [sic] particularcontribution to knowledge by tracing the cultural roots and ramifications of the specializedconcerns of the mind” (p. vii).Search engines such as Google Scholar and databases of publications have made the quantitativeanalysis of large bodies of texts far less labor-intensive than it was in the days of card cataloguesand print bibliographic resources. Although it is possible to do sophisticated assessments of theimpact of publications, for this initial analysis we used
High School Students in IndianaAbstractProject Lead The Way is a pre-engineering program designed to prepare students forpostsecondary engineering and engineering technology courses. PLTW courses utilize project-and problem-based learning strategies that encourage students to apply what they learn to real-life situations. At the middle school level the program is called Gateway to Technology.Gateway to Technology is project-based and designed with all students in mind and addressesnational standards in math, science and technology. One of the goals of the middle schoolcurriculum is to increase interest and awareness of female and minority students in technologyand related careers. Gateway to Technology also encourages increasing numbers of
advisors reviewed the resulting student reports and comments wereaccepted. The utilization of industry advisors is vital to the success of this course as the originalpremise was to develop a course that would emulate industry as closely as possible. Theevolution of this course has already been described elsewhere 1,2,3,4.Setting The Stage - PreparationTo preserve and replicate a true engineering environment, students were divided into“engineering design teams” of no more than two students each. The entire class is then treatedthroughout the term as independent “engineering design groups” who have been hired to workfor “this author” who will act as their engineering department manager. The important thing tokeep in mind is that these groups must be
engineering degree programs or even creating a separate Department ofEnvironmental Engineering2, but many educators believe that environmental engineeringeducation should still be coupled with more traditional programs such as civil or chemicalengineering. With this in mind, in 2002-2003 the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineeringat the University of Cincinnati initiated a combined five-year BS and MS degree program inEnvironmental Engineering with cooperative and research experiences integrated with theeducation. This program, called the CEE ACCEND (for Accelerated Engineering Degree)Program, will allow our engineering students to obtain a BS degree in Civil and a MS degree inEnvironmental Engineering in a five-year time period
It is apparent that some shifts that have happened may have been due to students’perception changes. For instance, due to the sense of “self flagellation” felt in theclassroom due to human suffering, and engineers’ precipitation to that plight, a sense of“whistle blowers attitude” prevailed in the classroom as the responsibility of whistleblower and heroism prevailed over the young mind. Nothing more can be predicted,except that the students were positively affected by the design failure episode.* HUMANMETRICS OF THE ETHICS CLASS Jung-Typology Post-Test Averages of the class INFJ Introverted Intuitive Feeling Judging
making a better airbag.· The goal of engineering can be summed up in four words, “to make life better.”· Engineers have a social responsibility to provide safe solutions.· In short, engineering is devoted to making new, better, simpler, safer, easier to use solutions within a society with an endless need for such solutions.· Produce a better product for consumers; meanwhile, increasing profitability for your company.Roles and Responsibilities in Society· The public puts a great deal of trust into the designers and manufacturers of the products they use. It is the engineer’s duty to live up to this trust and constantly have the consumers safety in mind …· The role of the engineer in a society is to translate technical and complex ideas
us to think about as many problems that we would encounter as we could. Knowing where most of our problems would be caused us to brainstorm about how to solve those problems. Our brainstorming led us to the Internet and other sources such as facility services and animal experts to get more ideas and to polish up or throw away the ones we had. This project showed us how engineering works and it actually stimulated our minds. This is a great way to learn when compared to reading the same sort of thing from a book or mindlessly working problems over and over again.* Overall, I enjoyed and thought that the tiger project was a good idea for this class. I think this was a very difficult project though
Paper ID #42991Board 225: Collaborative Research: Research Initiation: Assessing GlobalEngagement Interventions to Advance Global Engineering Competence forEngineering FormationProf. Scott Schneider, University of Dayton Scott J. Schneider is an Associate Professor and the ETHOS Professor for Leadership in Community at the University of Dayton. Schneider is currently focusing his research in the areas of engineering education and community engaged learning.Prof. Erick S. Vasquez-Guardado, University of Dayton Erick S. Vasquez-Guardado (Erick S. Vasquez) is an Associate Professor in the Department of Chemical and
choice in rural Appalachia: Sparking and sustaining interest, International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 33, no. 1B, pp. 463-475. 7National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine (NASEM, 2018). How people learn II: Learners, contexts, and cultures. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/24783National Center for Education Statistics (NCES, 2016). Selected statistics from the public elementary and secondary education universe: School year 2014-15. Table 4. National Center for Education Statistics.National Research Council. (NRC, 2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National
privileges while teaching. As such, the courseis designed with various goals in mind. For instance, it allows participants to think reflectivelyand critically about their current teacher practices. It improves their understanding of advancedplacement and state standards. It facilitates the transformation of their teaching practices byexploring best practices in educational pedagogy. Moreover, by participating in the course,educators disseminate the Nanosystems Engineering Research Center for Nanotechnology-Enabled Water Treatment (NEWT) conducted at Rice University, Arizona State University, YaleUniversity, and the University of Texas at El Paso. Finally, participants are able to incorporateproject-based learning and engineering practices in their
ETD 505 Examining the Academic Success and Transition Experiences of Engineering Transfer Students: A Comparative Analysis of ETS- IMPRESS and Traditional Engineering Pathways Sarah (Yin Yin) Tan, Song-Lin Yang, David M. Labyak Michigan Technological UniversityAbstractAcademic and career success hinges on diverse factors including students’ perception of schoolreadiness and expectation. Previous studies have indicated that transfer students transitioningfrom a 2-year college to a 4-year university in engineering programs, specifically thoseparticipating
. Zastavker, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering Yevgeniya V. Zastavker, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor of Physics at Franklin W. Olin College of En- gineering. She earned her B.S. degree in Physics from Yale University in 1995 and her Ph. D. degree in Biological Physics from MIT in 2001. Dr. Zastavker’s research interests lie in the field of STEM educa- tion with specific emphasis on innovative pedagogical and curricular practices at the intersection with the issues of gender and diversity. Dr. Zastavker is currently working with Dr. Stolk on an NSF-supported project to understand students’ motivational attitudes in a variety of educational environments with the goal of improving learning opportunities for students
Paper ID #16796Promoting School Earthquake Safety through a Classroom Education Grass-roots ApproachDr. Lelli Van Den Einde, University of California, San Diego Van Den Einde is a Teaching Professor in Structural Engineering at UC San Diego. She incorporates education innovations into courses (Peer Instruction, Project-based learning), prepares next generation faculty, advises student organizations, hears cases of academic misconduct, is responsible for ABET, and is committed to fostering a supportive environment for diverse students. Her research focuses on engagement strategies for large classrooms and developing K-16
participants quoted in this paper were given anopportunity to review a draft of this paper prior to final submission for publication.The purpose of these interviews was to elicit pioneers’ views on their career trajectories, and inpart included questions about the contributions or impacts that participants felt they had had overthe course of their careers. This paper presents findings related specifically to that subset ofinterview data.Study participantsTo recruit study participants, we sought nominations from multiple communities related toengineering education: American Society for Engineering Education’s Educational Research and Methods Division (ASEE ERM), ASEE’s Minorities in Engineering Division (MIND), ASEE’s Women in Engineering
Paper ID #7390Use of Multimedia Case Studies in an Introductory Engineering Course atTwo Southeastern Universities: A Qualitative Evaluation StudyMs. Kimberly C. Huett, University of West Georgia Kim C. Huett is an instructor of technology integration at the University of West Georgia in Carrollton, Georgia. She holds an Ed.S. in Instructional Technology, an M.S. in Secondary Education, and B.A. degrees in English and Spanish from the University of Texas at Austin. Currently a doctoral student in School Improvement, Kim’s research interests include the design of distance learning environments, teacher education, and STEM
Paper ID #12261Fishing with Broken Net: Predicament in Teaching Introductory PhysicsDr. Yumin Zhang, Southeast Missouri State University Yumin Zhang is an associate professor in the Department of Physics and Engineering Physics, Southeast Missouri State University. His academic career started in China; in 1989 he obtained master’s degree on Physics from Zhejiang University and then was employed as technical staff in the Institute of Semi- conductors, Chinese Academy of Sciences. After receiving PhD degree on Electrical Engineering from University of Minnesota in 2000, he started to work as a faculty member in University of
Paper ID #34465WIP Knowing Engineering Through the Arts: The Impact of the Film Hid-denFigures on Perceptions of Engineering Using Arts-Based Research MethodsKatherine Robert, University of Denver Katherine is a doctoral candidate at the University of Denver’s Morgridge School of Education in the higher education department. In her dissertation research, she uses arts-based research methods, new materialist theory, and is guided by culturally responsive methodological principles to collaborate with underrepresented engineering students to uncover their experiences of socialization into the professional engineering culture
communication has beenintegrated into some of these courses, but has often played a subordinate role to writingpedagogy [18]. A truly integrated engineering and oral communication course has not previouslybeen thoroughly assessed.Complimenting previous work in CXC, identity-based motivation theory describes motivationand goal pursuit, explaining when and how individuals’ identities motivate them [19], [20]. Thetheory suggests that people prefer to make sense of situations and act in identity-congruent waysconsistent with their self-perceptions. This happens in a context specific manner, where thecontext shapes what identities come to mind. It is reasonable to suspect that offering students acontext that connects communication skills to their
comprehensivewriting-across-the-curriculum program): (1) large lecture format required “core” courses and (2)traditional technical electives. Our initial focus is large sophomore- and junior-level lectureformat courses, while subsequent work will broaden and adapt our approach to technicalelectives. The types of courses that we have in mind cover topics such as statics, dynamics andmechanics, fluid mechanics, materials, surveying, linear circuit analysis, and thermodynamics.These courses are typically required for undergraduate engineers and taught in a traditional largelecture format. Unless mandated by the individual department or school, instructors are unlikelyto implement writing in these types of courses because of the large numbers and
compromise in some areas. We used our funds judiciously, working toward creatingspecializations within the MDE program that would reflect the comparative strengths of theuniversity. Lesson 4: Consider ABET accreditation from the beginning.ABET accreditation is a key component in any engineering program, and the design of thecurriculum of each specialization and sequencing of classes within the MDE program should befocused on fulfilling and reinforcing any given School of Engineering's commitment to ABET'soverall educational objectives. Our program was built with ABET accreditation in mind from theearly planning stages. We ensured that our core degree choices would meet the requirements forthis accrediting body, and our assessment plan was integral
Paper ID #36481The Green Escape Room: Part 2 - Teaching StudentsProfessional Engineering Ethics by Applying EnvironmentalEngineering Principles and Deciphering Clues and PuzzlesKathryn Blair Newhart (Assistant Professor) Dr. Kate Newhart is an Assistant Professor of Environmental Engineering at the United States Military Academy. She earned her B.S. (2016), M.S. (2018), and Ph.D. (2020) in Civil and Environmental Engineering from Colorado School of Mines. Dr. Newhart’s research focuses on big data applications for engineered environmental systems, as well as modern engineering education topics such as digital