persistence and graduation rates [1-2]. Manynon-traditional students in engineering majors face significant challenges including financialhardship and lack of institutional support networks, which may negatively affect their degreepersistence and graduation rates [2]. The term ‘career’ is defined as an occupation, which relatesto a range of aspects of an individual’s life, learning, and work and is undertaken for a significantperiod of a person’s life and with opportunities for progress [1-2]. In addressing the needs ofSCS engineering students in the context of workforce development, the present program,supported by NSF S-STEM, focuses on manufacturing of advanced materials (MAM) as one ofthe key driving factors for innovation and economic
from 1992 to 2011. We considered seven-year completion rates in ourmodels, since only 4% of participants remained in the program after seven years. We ran sixstep-wise logistic regression models predicting persistence in Years 3, 4, and 5 (Models 1 – 6),since doctoral students who drop out without receiving a PhD in these years have investedsignificant time and energy towards their degree. Additionally, we ran six step-wise logisticregression models predicting completion in Years 4, 5, and 6 (Models 7 – 12), which were themost common years of graduation for participants in our dataset. Predictors for both sets oflogistic regression models included funding type in a specific year, such as TA 3rd year orFellowship 4th year. Student funding
(NSF’s) prior investment in the Comprehensive Assessment of Team‐Member Effectiveness (CATME) system to measure teamwork [1]. The CATME system automates some of the data collection and feedback, providing input to some of the seven empirical studies required to explore these research questions. The entire research protocol is shown in Figure 1. The two outcomes measured in this research are team‐member effectiveness and the ability to evaluate the effectiveness of peers. Figure 1. Model for improving self‐ and peer‐evaluation skills and teaming skills. Progress on research protocol
in turn creates a respectful environment, and removes the barriers to cultivation ofdiverse student retention in engineering disciplines.1: IntroductionAccording to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, STEM occupations are expected to grow by8.8% from 9,708.3 (2018) to 10,566.8 (2028). This is a significant growth when compared to thepercent growth for all occupations (5.2%). There had been warning signs and continuing concernabout the shortage of qualified candidates from a diverse pool to fill these jobs. In this paper wediscuss retention in science and engineering, by focusing on specific predictors of persistenceincluding gender, student- instructor rapport, and year of study [1].1.1: Retention in Science and EngineeringIn a 2016 study
described here.Discourse AnalysisDiscourse analysis is a qualitative method that allows for systematic analysis of textualdocuments. Discourse refers to “certain ways of using language, acting, interacting, behaving,believing, using tools, sign systems, and so forth, which characterize a particular community”(Allie et al., 2009, p.361). It can be defined simply as “language in use to do something” (Jones,2012), where the meaning is derived from the social practices in which the discourse isembedded (Gee, 2004). Discourse conveys thought in a way that is “somehow prior and moreessential than language” (Lerman, 2009, p.1). Gee says that “words have histories” (2004, p.54),and their meaning in the present is an artifact of the past, an outcome of past
identifying novel drug targets and ascertaining the etiology of complex diseases suchas cancer and heart disease, but also for achieving truly personalized medical diagnostics,therapies, and surgical approaches toward treating these diseases [1-3]. Biological systems canbe defined and studied at multiple scales: the molecular scale (protein structure and folding), thepathway and cellular scale (network behavior and “emergent properties”), and the multicellular-to-population scales (tissue-, organ-, and population-level dynamics and interactions). Moreover,inherent biological complexity and high-throughput measurement approaches lead to massive“big data” sets, often with thousands of heterogeneous values [4]. The ability to apply rigorousand
the underlying factors of student motivation is likely key to improvingstudent performance.Poor performance in undergraduate chemistry courses is largely the result of affective,motivational challenges [1-4]. There are four factors affecting student motivation: purpose,competence, autonomy, and community [5, 6]. To improve student attitudes towardschemistry, all four of these aspects should be addressed. While teaching chemistry toundergraduate students is known to be a challenge, student performance improves whenstrategies to implement active-learning are used [7, 8]. Case studies are useful tools for engagingSTEM students in active-learning [9]. For example, an undergraduate green chemistry coursesuccessfully used several case studies
demonstrate the obtainment of student learning outcomes. A significant contributionof this work is our approach to, and the outcomes of, interdisciplinary collaboration for faculty-led travel courses. Further, through extensive reflections to transmute their travel experiences tolearning, the students uncovered valuable practices that have been consciously enacted into theirdaily lives at home.IntroductionExperiential learning, such as in a faculty-led trip, is regarded as a powerful high-impact practicefor student transformation. A faculty-led travel course is a relatively low-stress study-abroadactivity for students [1] where they travel with faculty and fellow students for a duration of oneto three weeks. Despite the short travel period, making
Environment,” co-authored with Dr. Karl Ottenstein. The paper was published in SDE 1, Proceedings of the First ACM SIGSOFT/SIGPLAN Symposium on Practical Software Development Environments, April 23-25, 1984. In addition to teaching at Michigan Tech, Dr. Ott taught advanced software engineering at Siberian State Aerospace University in Krasnoyarsk, Russia as a Fulbright scholar. She also taught Ethical and Social Aspects of Computing at Beijing Normal University, Zhuhai in Zhuhai, China. Dr. Ott is currently Michigan Tech’s lead person in the efforts to increase the number of female undergraduates in computing as a member of NCWIT’s Pacesetters program.Prof. Wendy PowleyDr. Andrea E Johnson, Spelman College Research is
started at four differentacademic institutions, but each followed unique pathways to achieve career goals. The contentof this paper was generated by collecting the individual responses of each panelist to a set ofprompts including: 1. Did you encounter a period in your career where you experienced reduced satisfaction with your work situation? What were the strategies you employed to move beyond this period and self-author the next phase of your career? 2. If you decided that a transition was needed, what resources did you seek to aid in your decision? 3. What other work/life factors affected your thought process and decision? 4. Did you decide to move from your institution? Why or why not? 5. How much of your
individual teachers, so attendance and all materials are free for educators. Since 2017,REACT has hosted ninety K-12 teachers from seventy different school districts. Similarworkshops are being developed at other universities based on REACT’s model. At times, thedistance between graduate school and K-12 education can seem very large, but as one REACTparticipant stated: “REACT has been an effective way to bridge the gap between the researchcommunity at the University and the education sphere.” I. Introduction & BackgroundWith the rising focus on engineering and inquiry-based science education, it is becoming morecrucial to incorporate real-world concepts and applications of science and engineering into theclassroom[1]. This need is heightened
better understand the problem itself. This study is aiming totake a close-up look at how engineering students distribute their time between in-class and out-of-class activities. Particularly, we will be looking at how students dedicate time to studying,how their time is spent in lectures and in labs, and how their time balances overall between in-class and out-of-class activities.Reviewing the literature to see how other researchers study students’ time revealed a couple ofstudies that particularly focus on students’ time management. Case studies [1], [2] were lookingat to what extent the students are able to manage their time and how that affects their academicperformance. Some other researchers focused on the time spent on various activities
Michigan Technological Univer- sity. She graduated in 2019 from Michigan Tech with a Bachelor of Science in Environmental Engineer- ing. Her current research focuses on perceptions of first year engineering students on the engineering disciplines as well as sustainable landfill design.Jason Mathews, Michigan Technological University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020Family Influence on First-year Engineering Major ChoiceAbstractThis complete research paper discusses parent and family influences on the selection ofengineering as a college major. The choice of a career or profession is a developmental process[1] that is influenced by a diverse set of factors including familial influences [1
contextualized totheir lived experiences to youth ages 10-14 who attend the partner churches.Research demonstrates that parental involvement is an important factor in education. Whenparents are involved in their children’s education, their children perform better academically andsocially [1][2]. Parents’ belief systems have an impact on their feelings about their role inshaping their children’s education [3]. These beliefs help them personally determine what isimportant and what their role can be in supporting the educational needs of their children. Theirown sense of understanding and comfort level in supporting their children can have a significantinfluence on their children’s educational success [4]. Actively engaging parents in theirchildren’s
a science methods class (n = 15). The paired classes collaborated inmultidisciplinary teams of 5-8 undergraduate students to plan and teach engineering lessons tolocal elementary school students. Teams completed a series of previously tested, scaffoldedactivities to guide their collaboration. Designing and delivering lessons engaged universitystudents in collaborative processes that promoted social learning, including researching andplanning, peer mentoring, teaching and receiving feedback, and reflecting and revising theirengineering lesson. The research questions examined in this pilot, mixed-methods research study include: (1)How did PSTs’ Ed+gineering experiences influence their engineering and science knowledge?;(2) How did PSTs
andpersonalities, while also placing some emphasis on the experience of populations historicallyunderrepresented in engineering and computer science and those who have been traditionallyunder-served by engineering and/or computing products.The project has a set of activities operating, with local variations, in most of the first-yearengineering courses at partner campuses [1], [2], [3]. During this year of the grant, emphasis hasbeen placed on maintaining and expanding activities implemented in sophomore, junior, andsenior level courses as well as crafting activities for computer science courses. Two key issuesthat have arisen for project personnel are (1) meaningful engagement, motivation, andprofessional development of faculty and other instructors; and
-based, inquiry-based, project-based, and problem-basedlearning”, the MUST students not only learned the course content, but enjoyed the process [9].MethodsOpening DayStudents were randomly assigned to teams of four students prior to the start of the course; thesame teams were maintained throughout the semester, although they had permission to request achange. Within five minutes of the very first class, the teams were given a hypothetical situationand a problem to solve. The hypothetical situation was that an unknown molecule was infectingstudents on campus with a deadly disease (which turned out to be eerily predictive of theCOVID-19 pandemic). Teams brainstormed methods to solve one of the following: (1) Diagnose/identify the
group of female junior faculty and professional staff affiliated with STEM fields atSyracuse University attended an honorary lecture by Mimi Koehl, UC Berkeley, which coveredboth academic topics and a description of a peer mentoring group which she had been part of formany years. The attendees were inspired to convene a peer mentoring group as Koehl describedand as outlined in the book Every Other Thursday: Stories and Strategies from SuccessfulWomen Scientists by Ellen Daniell[1].The group has a stable membership of ten women in the fields of aerospace engineering,architecture, biology, chemical engineering, chemistry, civil engineering, library science,mechanical engineering, physics, and psychology. At the outset, the group’s members
engineering research and holds seven U.S. patents.Mr. Ren Liu c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Phase One Research Results from a Project on Vertical Transfer Students in Engineering and Engineering TechnologyThis paper reports on the first phase of research on a scholarship program VTAB (VerticalTransfers’ Access to the Baccalaureate) funded by a five-year grant from the National ScienceFoundation (NSF) that focuses on students who transfer at the 3rd year level from 2-year schoolsto the engineering and engineering technology BS programs at our university [1]. The goals ofthe program are: (i) to expand and diversify the engineering/technology workforce of the future,(ii) to
Undergraduate Engineering Mentoring Program to Enhance Gender DiversityAbstractMany female undergraduate Engineering students struggle during their first and second years ofcollege with finding their place and questioning whether they belong in Engineering. It has beenshown that mentoring programs can help encourage women to stay in STEM. The purpose ofthis study is to implement a women in science and engineering mentoring program within theSTEM disciplines at the university. The focus of the initial pilot mentoring program includes:1) orientation to the program, networking, community building and defining the program’s goals;2) understanding the imposter syndrome and strategies for dealing with it; 3) networking withfemale
Synthetic Organic Chemistry, recently retired from the University of the West Indies where she was Pro-Vice-Chancellor, Graduate Studies, with responsibility for graduate education across all campuses of the university. Professor Jackson joined the UD ADVANCE institute at UD in September 2017. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Points of Departure: Understanding Gender Differences in Faculty Turnover at University of XI. IntroductionCareer disparities by gender in the STEM fields are well documented.1 Women are under-represented at most levels in mathematics, the physical sciences, and most fields of engineering[13], [23]. Even in fields where women are
leveland beyond. STEM lacks the gender and racial diversity that mirrors the American populationand there is an increasing need to fill engineering positions in the industry [1]. There have beenmany efforts to encourage K-12 students to pursue careers in STEM, creating a nationalmovement that includes summer camps, classes, and after school programs [2]. Higher educationis starting to look at the institutional level change needed to support D&I efforts in order toattend to the diversity of their student population [3]. While there is a focus in engineeringeducation research on best practices and a focus on change, there is limited scholarship focusedon understanding the “on-the-ground” work of engineering educators working to address D
this paper is to describe how a an NSF sponsored collaborative engineering educationprogram, Pre-Engineering Education Collaborative, PEEC [1, 2], operating on a number of triballycontrolled colleges and universities, TCU’s, across North Dakota may, through thoughtful application ofbest educational practices including a community-based approach, be seen as a tool that movesdecolonization within Native American communities and education systems forward. Put in terms of aresearch question: “How effective can PEEC be when considered as a method to move decolonizationforward in Native American engineering education and could it increase enrollment?”This PEEC which is been going on for the past 10 years and is soon to graduate its 10 th student
predictor of achievement, prior studies show conflicting results as to whether collegeentrance exams predict academic achievement in engineering, especially beyond students' firstyear of college [1-7]. Additional work suggests that HSGPA and college entrance exams predictpersistence in the first semester of college, but there is limited research examining how priorachievement relates to persistence towards degree completion [8]. Due to these mixed results, itis critical to understand not only whether students’ HSGPA and entrance exam scores bothpredict college achievement and persistence, but why they are or are not predictive. Furthermore,as universities use both criteria (HSGPA and entrance exam scores) for admission decisions [9],it is important
drop out before completing their degree, successful identification of students atrisk could result in a program of directed retention intercession services. The research questionis, what was the relationship between students’ commitment behavior, and family backgroundand retention. The approach of this quantitative study was pursuit of an understanding of thefactors identified in the literature of retention. The study showed number of class hours, financialsituations, lack of family emotional support, social life and institutional assistance wereimportant factors.Students’ retention in higher education has attracted the attention of college and universityadministrators for many years [1]. According to Bennett, Kottasz, and Nocciolino [2
clusters, one of which is clean energy. Inone state, this is due in part to the 2008 Global Warming Solutions Act (GWSA), whichmandates that greenhouse gases be reduced in the state to 25% below 1990 levels by 2020, and80% by 2050 [1]. To address the growing need for investment in job creation, a privateuniversity, an urban high school, and an industry partner collaborated to create a program forhigh schoolers to instill excitement in this growing field. Specifically, this program addressesthe increasing need for a diverse and highly skilled STEM (Science, Technology, Engineeringand Math) workforce with a focus on Clean Energy. The program was designed to: ● Offer an introductory engineering design course which used project-based learning
material is based upon work supported, in part, by National ScienceFoundation grant 1700581.IntroductionAdvanced manufacturing (AM) has played a crucial role in South Korea’s economy for pastseveral decades. It has led rapid economic development in South Korea and made the 12th largestin the world. AM also accounts for 4.5 million jobs, which is about 10% of South Korea’spopulation [1]. However, the era of the Industry 4.0 is transforming the nature of the workforcein advanced manufacturing industry. A lot of workers could lose their job to automation, but it islikely that they will also find new jobs in similar occupation. Thus, it will be crucial for variousstakeholders in the industry: employee, employers, educators, and policymakers to prepare
collaborating with international partners to enhance American engineering students’ global learning. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 1 Problem Reframing and Empathy Manifestation in the Innovation Process AbstractIn the innovation process, design practice involves multiple iterations of framing and reframingunder high levels of uncertainty and ambiguity. Additionally, as user desirability is a significantcriterion for innovative design, designers' empathy in the framing and reframing process isconsidered a critical user-centered design ability that
, real-life projects [1]-[4]. PBL allows learners toengage with complex problems which require them to use and develop problem-solvingstrategies in collaborative groups [5]-[7].Problem-based Learning is also a student-centered approach to learning [6], [8]. In the PBLenvironment, the instructor serves as a guide as opposed to the purveyor of knowledge. Aslearners work together in collaborative groups, the instructor supports and facilitates the learners’knowledge construction through the problem-solving process. This complex learning approach,rooted in solving authentic problems, promotes higher-order thinking skills, cooperativeproblem-solving, and has as its goal the transition of the learner from novice to expert [9]. Theliterature tells us
categorized as “learning by doing” [1]. The approach uses ill-structured problems toreflect realistic scenarios that students encounter when they become professionals, rather thantextbook-type problems with known solutions. Gallagher et al. [2] defined the role of the teacheras a facilitator and students as self-directed learners in this approach. The concept hinges onlearning occurring within small groups; and the given problems as the tool to enhance skills inproblem solving. The given problem is intended to stimulate self-directed learning [2]. Overall,the aims of problem-based learning include collaborative and interdisciplinary problem solving,critical thinking, active learning, and motivation for learning [1], [3].Though often interchanged in