literature review process Booth (2016), a set ofselected databases were queried using a nearly identical search string in order to capturearticles that would plausibly address the research question. Three databases were selectedfor this project: Education Source, ERIC, and Scopus. Education Source and ERIC aredatabases that contain sources related to education. These databases were selected toalign with the goal of the project to look into literature which is focused on engineeringmassive open online courses and their role in student learning, participation, andengagement. The final database, Scopus, is the largest source of peer-reviewed literature.Such a broad reach is important to address the overarching research goal because of thefield-spanning
Paper ID #28882Assessment of Learning Effectiveness in Online and Face-to-Face LearningEnvironment for Engineering EducationDr. Prabodh Panindre, New York University Prabodh’s scholarly focus includes fire science and firefighter safety research, online learning, heat trans- fer, nanotechnology, and microfluidics. His research group has received several grants (more than $6 million) from U.S. Department of Homeland Security for fire prevention and safety research. He led a team of NYU researchers on the ”Wind-Driven High-Rise Fires” project with Fire Department of New York (FDNY) and National Institute of Standards
Attack Generation Environment (ISEAGE) test bed project. He has given over 75 presentations in the area of computer security and has testified in front of the U.S. Senate committee of the Judiciary on security issues associated with peer-to-peer networking. He has served as an ABET program evaluator representing IEEE for 10 years. He is a Fellow of IEEE and received the IEEE Educational Activities Board Major Educational Innovation Award in 2012 for his work in teaching information assurance to students of all ages.Dr. Lisa M. Larson Ph.D., Iowa State University Dr. Larson is a professor in the department of psychology. She has examined Self Determination Theory as a framework to explain how the environment impacts
, basic circuits, 3D printing, subtractive approaches to prototyping, and digitalimage analysis. The course culminated in a closed-ended team-based design project with aphysical prototype due at the end.Both explicit and implicit measures were delivered through Qualtrics online survey software.This survey was delivered before the second class session of the semester, and again in the weekof final exams. The survey included: 1. The ability dimension of the engineering design self-efficacy instrument, described in [5]. This measures whether students believe they will be: a. Able, and b. Motivated to engage in engineering design tasks, whether they feel they will be c. Successful in doing so, and how
SLLO implementation is presented toshow the capabilities of this architecture.1. Context of Online LaboratoriesThis section presents some works that are part of the state of the art for online laboratories used ineducation, including virtual, remote and hybrid laboratory implementations.The Virtual Instruments Systems In Reality (VISIR) project [1] develops online laboratoriesspecifically in areas of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, including hands-on, virtual, andremote experiments. The VISIR experiments include: protoboards, sources, signal generators,meters, oscilloscopes and components (resistors, capacitors, inductors, diodes etc). All theexperiments can be remotely operated through the Internet. This characteristic allows
to determine the effectiveness of the workshops. The workshoptopics were focused on research and communication skills development as elements ofprofessional skills. The Engineer of 2020 Project centers on an effort to envision the future andto use that knowledge to attempt to predict the roles that engineers will play in the future[3][4][5]. The current study included engineering standards, lifelong learning in addition toresearch and communication skills as these are considered important professional developmentskills. Frankel described the discrepancy between how some criteria, like “an ability to identify,formulate, and solve complex engineering problems by applying principles of engineering,science, and mathematics”, receive most of the
. Specifically, this project isdesigned to address the following research questions: 1) What do students from differentinstitutionalized pathways into engineering believe about smartness and engineering? 2) How dothese students express their personal identities related to being smart and being an engineer?In order to answer our research questions over the scope of the full, three-year project, we willcollect and analyze a series of three interviews with 30 participants across six different first-yearinstitutionalized pathways into engineering: main campus-honors program, main campus-residential cohorts, main campus-standard program, main campus-alternative math starting point,regional campuses, and community college. The first interview is to establish
the extent to which creative ideation may be modulated by prior knowledge and training.Ms. Yushuang Liu, The Pennsylvania State University Yushuang Liu is a graduate student in Psychology and Language Science at Penn State. She is generally interested in natural speech processing using electroencephalogram. She has been actively involved in creativity projects examining how to facilitate divergent thinking abilities in engineering students.Dr. Danielle S. Dickson, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Dickson received her a Ph.D. from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 2016 with a dissertation examining the memory system’s representation of numerical information, using behavioral and electrophysiological
projects related to design, including an NSF Early CAREER Award entitled ”CAREER: Engineering Design Across Navajo Culture, Community, and Society” and ”Might Young Makers be the Engineers of the Future?,” and is a Co-PI on the NSF Revolutionizing Engineering Departments grant ”Additive Innovation: An Educational Ecosystem of Making and Risk Taking.” He was named one of ASEE PRISM’s ”20 Faculty Under 40” in 2014, and received a Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers from President Obama in 2017. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Engineering Connections in a Native American Community and CultureAbstractThis Research Work in Progress investigates
down to six students with MLD and four typically developing students. The agedistribution of participants was balanced as much as possible: five (50%) second-grade studentsand five (50%) third-grade students, six (60%) of whom were female and four of whom (40%)were male.3.2 Rooms and EquipmentThe study was conducted in two separate sessions. As a part of a National Science Foundation(NSF) funded project [10], students with MLD took the test in the school’s computer lab.Typically developing students worked with the computer program in a public library.Students worked one-on-one with the computer program on laptops with 25-inch displays. ATobii Pro X3-120 eye tracker (120HZ) was installed on the laptops to record students’ gazemovement and
collected however, the sample was approximately evenlydivided between men and women.Interns were recruited to participate in the interview by email invitation from the Director ofHuman Resources in the Product Development division. The purpose of the interview was tolearn more about the interns’ journey at the company, get their feedback with the intent ofimproving the internship experience, and to better understand the transition process between anacademic setting to a corporate environment. While all interns worked in product development,their internship assignments varied in level of technical focus, from projects focused onelectronics and programming to project management.The audio interviews were conducted over the phone and lasted
] hasset the standard and has become a leader in engineering service learning. The positive outcomesfor the students are clearly discussed, but the program is on a much larger and college-widescale. Though many lessons can be learned and adopted from this existing program, the model isout of reach for one faculty member working on their own. Another hallmark leader isUniversity of Massachusetts in Lowell [6], where they have a variety of examples and possibleapproaches outlined, after chronicling the positive outcomes for students. Many otheruniversities across the country are introducing service learning projects to better accommodate asense of student engagement into their curriculums as well. Universities with such programsinclude Virginia Tech
education, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 33–53, 2011. [2] S. Choy, “Nontraditional undergraduates: Findings from the condition of education 2002. NCES 2002-012.”, National center for education statistics, 2002. [3] W. J. Hussar and T. M. Bailey, “Projections of education statistics to 2022. NCES 2014-051.”, National center for education statistics, 2014. [4] H. G. Schuetze and M. Slowey, “Participation and exclusion: A comparative analysis of non-traditional students and lifelong learners in higher education”, Higher education, vol. 44, no. 3-4, pp. 309–327, 2002. [5] V. Johnson, “What works in improving retention”, Learning from the napier student retention project–napier university, UK, presented at southampton institute, UK, 25th
engineering, maintenance, oper- ations, financial, business planning and process safety management positions within the refinery. Cynthia then went on to work in the technology arena with the Chevron Energy Technology Company in 1998. She developed and managed Chevron’s technical competency development programs for new hires in refining and exploration & production roles. She also worked in the Process Planning Group and performed pro- cess modeling on large-scale projects. In her role as Organizational Capability Manager with the Process, Analytical and Catalysis Dept, she supported technical competency management, staffing/recruitment, new hire and competency development, and business planning. Cynthia
motivation, affects and learning associated with K-16 science concepts and various instructional contexts (e.g., small groups, project-based learning) utilizing mixed-methods approaches.Dr. Elizabeth McEneaney, University of Massachusetts Dr. McEneaney is Associate Professor in the Department of Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies at the University of Massachusetts - Amherst. She is a former high school mathematics and science teacher, and earned a Ph.D. in Sociology from Stanford University. An associate editor for the Journal of Curriculum Studies, she has research interests in equity and access to STEM Education, and the influence of globalization on STEM curricula. c American Society
daily Homework-12% assignments (short Free response Attendance- 3%(2003-2005) quizzes, assigned Final Exam- 25%Calculus 5th Edition problems, short(Stewart 2002) writing assignments, No additional problem passing conditions presentations, or projects)SCALE-UP (2006-2013)The SCALE-UP (student centered activities for large enrollment undergraduate programs)instructional model was implemented in Fall 2006. This method encourages active learning andminimizes lecture time in the classroom. Beichner et al. (2007
characteristics ofmachining, cutting parameters, tool life, surface quality and cutting fluid, with CNCprogramming, 3D printing thorough this “Learning-by-Doing” approach helped the students togain hands-on skills, retain theoretical knowledge and apply what they learnt in the classrooms atwork. It is evident from the assessment analysis that the knowledge retention had a significantimprovement using this approach. In addition to it, this approach has let the students learn thebasics of design of experiments for further scientific research. Students who learnt through thisapproach seemed more confident and used the workshop facilities independently for thefabrication part of their design project as well. 95% of the students enrolled for theManufacturing
of Cen- tral Florida. Dr. Ahmad has diverse expertise in human-computer interaction, quality engineering, and simulating manufacturing systems. Ali worked on projects related to transfer of training, user-centered design, process improvement, and virtual environments. Dr. Ahmad is a Certified Simulation Analyst and a Certified Six Sigma Black Belt.Dr. Willie Eugene Smith Sr., Louisiana Community and Technical College System Dr. Willie E. Smith has been working in the Louisiana Community & Technical College System (LCTCS) and colleges for the past 18 years. He currently serves as Vice President for Training and Business Part- nerships for LCTCS, and Acting Director for Baton Rouge Community College (BRCC). Most
3 - 2 Metrology & Quality 4 10 20 30 70 25 25 4 Control 4 - 2 5 ELECTIVE - - - 10 20 30 70 25 25 4 Tool Engineering 2 Automobile Engineering 2 Power Plant Engineering 2 Mechatronics 2 6 Industrial Project & - - 2 - - - - - - 2 Entrepreneurship Development Professional Practices – 7 - - 3
Paper ID #14471Automated Grading of Excel Workbooks Using MatlabDr. Curtis Cohenour Ph.D., P. E., Ohio University Dr. Cohenour is an Assistant Professor in the Ohio University Engineering Technology and Management Department, in Athens, Ohio. He received a Bachelor of Science degree from West Virginia Institute of Technology in 1980, a Master of Science degree from Ohio University in 1988, and a Ph. D. in Electrical Engineering from Ohio University in 2009. He is a registered professional engineer in West Virginia, and Ohio. Dr. Cohenour has worked in Industry as an electrical engineer and project manager. He joined Ohio
Paper ID #16076Capacity Building for Engineering Education in War-Affected CountriesBahawodin Baha, University of Brighton Dr Bahawodin Baha is a principal lecturer at University of Brighton in England since 1989, where he has been teaching and conducting research in electronic engineering. Besides his teaching in the UK, he has been helping Higher Education (HE) in Afghanistan since 2005 and has conducted many projects on improving higher education in Afghanistan. Recently, he was on sabbatical leave for two years and was technical advisor at the Ministry of Commu- nication and Information Technology (MICT) in
M.S. in Civil and Environmental Engineering at Stanford University. Prior to his doctorate, Gordon’s professional experience included construction management on projects ranging from $25 million to $2.5 billion and project management and product development for an early-stage start-up software company.Dr. Hasan Sevim, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville Dr. Hasan Sevim obtained his B.S. degree in mining engineering in 1974 from Istanbul Technical Uni- versity, Turkey, as the valedictorian of his class. He obtained his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in 1978 and 1984, respectively, from Columbia University, New York. In 1984, he joined the College of Engineering at Southern Illinois University, Carbondale as an
and engineering professions. Her current research projects focus on the recruitment and retention of women, racial/ethnic minority and LGBTQ individuals and the role of professional cultures in inequality in STEM.Prof. Tom J. Waidzunas, Temple University Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology, Temple UniversityDr. Stephanie Farrell, Rowan University Dr. Stephanie Farrell is Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University (USA) and was 2014-15 Fulbright Scholar in Engineering Education at Dublin Institute of Technology (Ireland). She obtained her PhD in Chemical Engineering from New Jersey Institute of Technology in 1996. Prior to joining the fac- ulty at Rowan in 1998, she was an Assistant Professor of
professors was not specifically identified, typical estimates are reflected by a recent publication by the National Society of Professional Engineers which stated that … “few engineering faculty today have practical experience in design, analysis, review, or management of engineering projects.”18 22% of authors represent university leadership institutes, indicating these organizations are playing a significant role in contributing to the scholarship in this field. Contributions from authors in nontraditional and nonacademic positions are also substantial with 38% of authors currently working in these areas. Again, this proportion is much higher than anticipated considering a recent study by the
Chemistry, Advanced Textiles and Design and Marketing. Head research and research member of several R&D projects, has presented as main author or co-author many dozens of scientific journal papers and communications in international conferences. President of the Pedagogical Council of the School of Engineering since 2011 and Vice-Dean of School of EngineeringDr. Magda Oliveira Pinheiro, University of Minho Magda Pinheiro is graduated in Portuguese (teaching), with specialization in Inclusive Learning Tech- niques with postgraduate education in the field of specialization in Assessment. Forming the School of Engineering, University of Minho and external forming the Technological Centre for the Textile and
% of their final course grade with homework and exams comprising the remaining 80%.Concept Quizzes were given to students as a typed question sheet and uniformly lasted 10minutes of class time. When giving a Concept Quiz to students, the instructor projected the quizcontent onto a screen in the classroom, read the questions to the class, and asked students for anyquestions about the quiz content before the beginning of testing; this process aimed to ensurethorough understanding of the questions for both domestic and ESL students. Student questionsduring the quiz were also answered by the instructor as necessary.After collecting students’ completed Concept Quizzes, the author presented correct responses tothe class. In the ensuing (and
andunderrepresented minority students, a lack of self-confidence to do engineering or computerscience3 plus the lack of foreseeable finances to attend a university, may well be enough for themto not consider going on for a Bachelor’s degree in these fields.The authors first worked with local CCs. With the assistance of liaisons at each CC, it wasrelatively easy to hold “Be an Engineer” workshops for an hour and get an audience of 75 to over100 students. The event would include engineering projects, a panel of professional engineers,and a panel of engineering students, plus information given by engineering faculty. CCinstructors assisted by dismissing a math or science class to allow the students to attend. Anincentive is very helpful to get the students to
. More recently, He has mentored numerous midshipmen through independent research projects and has directed two Tri- dent Scholars, the Naval Academy’s flagship research program. He has published over 50 journal and conference articles on these topics. Dr. Barton is actively involved in curriculum development and program assessment. He chairs ASME Committee on Engineering Accreditation. He serves a Commissioner for Engineering Accreditation Com- mission of ABET, Inc. and was a program evaluator for 6 six years prior to joining the commission. Dr. Barton holds a professional engineering license in the State Maryland. He is a member of the Board of Education, ASME.Dr. Kenneth S. Ball P.E., George Mason University
learning, and thus has also been used as an approach to retain students engineering.8Offering research assistantship/stipend through work in laboratories or research projects isanother approach that has been effective in retaining underrepresented minority students andstudents in general in engineering.8, 9 Students who participated in the lab or research projectsexpressed the sense of community, increased understanding of coursework, and became moreexcited and motivated by their experience in the research/projects. 8, 9This study focused on another type of financial support – a loan repayment award – and itsinfluence on undergraduate women’s academic achievement and completion in College ofEngineering at Kansas State University. Specifically, a
students based on theiracademic performance followed by four knockout rounds. The first round consisted of an onlineaptitude test of ninety minutes. It has ten minutes of email test that asks students to write emailsbased on a given situation and eighty minutes of numerical and logical ability test. The companyexempts top five rankers of the college from the logical and arithmetic part of the round. In thenext round, the company conducts technical interview to ascertain their basic technicalknowledge in their streams and performance in projects and seminars. In the third round, thecompany interviews students, with the help of case studies, to assess their situationcomprehension, decision making and work attitude skills. The fourth round informs