industry. Making matters more complicated is the fact that manyprograms focus on teaching engineering fundamentals and leave “soft skills” to otherdepartments. Given this environment, an approach tailored to engineering communication isneeded to meet the unique requirements for engineers in industry.The purpose of this paper is twofold. 1) examine various forms of communication engineersmust possess and their importance, and 2) describe the design, implementation, and assessmentof a new senior-year and first year graduate ECE course which is specifically aimed atdeveloping the critical communication skills for engineers in industry. For the first part we useda survey of managers and executives at Intel Corporation to determine the most important
John Gero is Research Professor in Computer Science and Architecture at UNCC He was formerly Re- search Professor in Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study, and Research Professor in Computational Social Science at George Mason University and Professor of DesPaulo Ignacio Jr. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Measuring the “thinking” in systems thinking: Correlations between cognitive and neurocognitive measures of engineering studentsIntroduction and backgroundSystems thinking is a critical skill for engineering students to solve complex and ill-structureddesign problems [1]. Concept mapping is a tool for systems thinking [2]. It involves
Association (SEIA), the cumulative solar PV installationsin the United States increased from just 2.5 GW in 2010 to over 100 GW in 2020, representing anannual growth rate of over 40% [1]. Such massive growth has been driven by a combination offactors, such as declining module costs, supportive policies, and increasing awareness and demandfor renewable energy. The sharp growth of the PV industry is expected to continue in the comingyears, with the SEIA projecting that the U.S. will surpass more than 300 GW of installed solarcapacity by 2030, which is three times more than the capacity in 2020 [2]. This growth will bedriven by mass deployment of utility-scale and distributed solar installations, as well as due to theincreasing adoption of energy
engineering programs among selected groups ofstudents.Survey DesignThe survey initial survey instrument was largely comprised of widely used population-scalemeasures of mental health. Modules from the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) were used tomeasure rates of depressive, anxiety, and eating disorders [1]. The PC-PTSD was used to screenfor incidence of PTSD-like disorders among engineering students [2], [3]. The actual conditionsmeasured are summarized in Table 1. Mental health conditions screened.. The Kessler 6instrument was used to measure moderate-to-major psychological distress among respondents[4], [5]. Demographic questions were added to allow us to study whether and to what extentmental health disparities exist among different student
overnight. Faculty faced many challenges relatedto ensuring effective learning in different modes of instruction. The problems were faced by thefaculty who had no prior experience in teaching the hybrid and online classes and had onlytaught traditional face-to-face (F2F) courses, as well as the faculty who had prior experienceteaching online courses. At the same time, challenges were also faced by the students in learningthe material effectively due to the loss of motivation for various reasons. This posed a massiveproblem for the universities and faculty, inspiring the present study which had earlier designedan effective course structure for hybrid courses in AY 2020-21 [1]. Since the higher educationinstitutions moved towards fully F2F
ultimate goal of this project is to benefit students and faculty through well-definedand systematic interventions across the curriculum.IntroductionAcademic under-preparedness and student mental health are growing concerns for engineeringfaculty and staff [1]. Continued fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated previoustrends [2], [3]. As an illustrative example, Figure 1 shows midterm distributions fromsophomore-level thermodynamics and senior-level controls classes in Summer and Fall of 2021(both hybrid synchronous). A third of theclass scored over 85%, demonstrating thatstudents had been taught the technicalcontent and that the exam was of reasonabledifficulty and length. However, anabnormally high fraction of the class scoredin D-F
intelligence. Technology-enabledlearning aims to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of education by providing newopportunities for engagement, personalization, and collaboration [1]. The use of advancedtechnologies in education has grown dramatically over the past few years, with LearningManagement System (LMS), social media, interactive simulations, and game–based learningplatforms. Integrating educational technologies in training programme provides the facility torecord the learning process in the form of data. The potential aspect of data collection on differentaspects of learning engagement and experiences have increased the usage of technology. Toprovide a better learning experience through technology, the domain of learning analytics can
need for transformativemindsets and complementary tools for student-centred learning and related teachingopportunities. Engineering and science students need to develop a range of competencies beyondsimply technical skills to address the complexity of societal challenges often referred to as“wicked” problems. Recognizing that students in science, technology, engineering, andmathematics (STEM) fields require complementary skills such as communication, collaboration,and creativity to engage meaningfully with stakeholders and address a challenge within a givencontext is the first step; learning how to effectively teach these skills (i.e., competency-basededucation) is a wicked problem in and of itself [1], [2].In addition to effectively
to facilitate student engagement with the content, instructor, andfellow students. This approach leveraged the social-constructivist learning theory: a connectedcommunity of learners with classroom peers and co-construction of knowledge where theinstructor’s role is that of a subject matter expert who facilitates learning. To examine the impactof mobile devices on student learning in this two-year study (year one fall 2021 - spring 2022), thefollowing research questions were addressed, hypothesizing improvements in the areas ofengagement, enhancement of learning outcomes, and extension of learning to real-life engineeringscenarios: (1) Does mobile device use facilitate engagement in thermal-fluid science coursecontent? (Engagement), (2) Does
, partnerships only work ifthere is sufficient trust, which comes from knowledge of and engagement with one another.IntroductionThe Inclusive Engineering Consortium (IEC) is a collaboration of 21 Electrical and ComputerEngineering (ECE) programs from Minority Serving Institutions (MSIs) and similar programsfrom several Predominantly White Institutions (PWIs), along with several industrial partners.Established in 2019, IEC aims to improve the diversity and preparedness of Electrical andComputer Engineers by fostering collaboration among its member institutions. The IEC wasborn from a successful NSF-funded project that aimed to implement Experiment CentricPedagogy (ECP) in 13 HBCU ECE programs [1]. The participants in this project realized
EngineeringCapstone Design Project Dr. Alexis Ortiz-Rosario1 1Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus OH, USA AbstractThe traditional idea of capstone teams is assigning a project to a group of students which willbe tackled throughout an academic term. The team can comprise students from a single majoror multi-disciplinary (e.g., multiple majors). The project can span one or two semesters; in someexceptions, new teams are tasked with further project phases for the following years [1]. Thiswork aims to present a novel approach to structuring capstone teams. By deconstructing asingle project into multi-deliverable components (e.g., heart rate
course in the PFE sequence are shown in Figure1. PFE 1 PFE 2 PFE 3Figure 1. Professional Formation of Engineers Course ObjectivesIn addition to supporting professional growth, the PFE courses are the mechanism through whichEE undergraduates develop a Qualification Plan. In their Qualification Plans, students commit torequired and elective PFE activities during their sophomore year in order to be fully prepared forthe eventual job market. Students choose four focus skills from among the following: careermanagement, communication, teamwork, professionalism, leadership, critical thinking,technology, and global citizenship, amongst others. Students develop these skills throughrequired and elective PFE activities. These required and elective
issues their programs had to deal with duringCOVID-19 as solved and the forces for change gone. Based on ideas that have been receivedfrom the ECE community, RECET is now in the process of pivoting so that the lessons learnedduring the pandemic can eventually lead to a true new normal. Project RECET - Remote ECE TeachingIntroductionOnline and online compatible techniques for teaching Electrical and Computer Engineering(ECE) at the undergraduate and continuing education levels have been developed and researchedfor years [1], but prior to COVID-19 they were not widely deployed across ECE Departments inthe US. This was also the case more generally for applying the results from Discipline BasedEducation Research (DBER) [2
peaked at 27,020 members in 2008. Currently, there are 22,053 members,a decline of 18% from the peak. Membership in the Civil Division of ASEE peaked at 680members in 2008. In 2023, the Civil Division reported 450 members, a decline of 34% from thepeak. This decline is less than the decline seen in related divisions (Figure 1 and Table 1). TheCivil Division is part of a Professional Interest Council (PIC). Prior to 2020, the Civil Divisionwas in PIC 1, which experienced a decline of 29% between 2008 and 2020. Currently, the CivilDivision is part of PIC IV, which experienced a decline of 21% between 2021 and 2023. 1200 6000 Number
, University of Missouri, Kansas City Dr. Michelle Maher explores student research, teaching, and disciplinary writing skill development and higher education access and equity issues. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Reaching Consensus: Using Group Concept Mapping in an S-STEM Research TeamAbstractThis study was done to explore Group Concept Mapping (GCM) as a method to reach consensusfor data collection using document analysis in an S-STEM research team. The team wascomprised of five members and the GCM approach was made up of six steps: (1) Preparation,(2) Generation, (3) Structuring, (4) Analysis, (5) Interpretation, and (6) Usage. The members ofthe
engineering programs and professionals in theengineering workforce do not accurately represent the general population. For example, despitemaking up 50 percent of the population, women represented only 24 percent of engineeringbachelor’s degrees conferred in 2021 [1]. Furthermore, although 12.1 percent of the USpopulation is Black only 4.7 percent of engineering bachelor’s degrees conferred were to Blackstudents. Research suggests that earlier exposure in K-12 programs to STEM active learningexperiences encourages greater participation in STEM amongst women and UnderrepresentedMinority (URM) students [2], [3]. As such, it is vital that K-12 districts introduce students to andinterest students in STEM fields and careers. An effective strategy
collaborationbetween two labs within the University of Nebraska-Lincoln Biomedical Engineering REU.MethodsInterdisciplinary Team Research ProjectDr. Greg Bashford’s lab specializes in research and development involving diagnostic ultrasoundimaging, with a particular focus on transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD), a type of ultrasoundspecialized for monitoring blood flow in the major arteries of the brain [1]. Dr. Eric Markvicka’slab specializes in designing and manufacturing stretchable electronic devices for wearablebiomonitoring. The two PIs leveraged their areas of expertise to identify a cutting-edge researchtopic: wearable ultrasound devices [2]. The goal for the summer was to create a wearable TCDdevice. Before the 10-week REU program began, the two
projects to other students, as students needed to learn EOPtechniques like environmental sustainability and life cycle analysis that are not directly related tothe focus of Chemical Process Control. Additional instruction videos/materials on EOP may behelpful. In addition, there should be multiple courses in the curriculum to introduce EOP mindset.It is challenging to convince students to learn and use EOP skills just in one course.Introduction Global warming has been a significant threat to humans living on the earth. Extensive researchhas been conducted on switching fossil energy to renewable energy, as this is regarded as been oneof the potential solutions to the global warming threat [1], [2]. For example, California will ban thesale of new
creativity through assessment; however, theirapproach was in terms of individuals in the general population. Engineering students andpractitioners may exhibit different levels of creativity when working individually versus whenthey work in a team setting. In this study, we use the idea of promotion of creativity throughassessment and use it to purposely develop creativity in engineering students. A creativityassessment rubric developed and validated by previous research (CASPER, see Figure 1) hasbeen implemented in facilitated developmental experiences in several cohorts of freshmen andseniors in general design courses as well as technical design courses.Figure 1: The Creative Solution Process Rubric (CASPER)To determine the impact of purposeful
Many students pursue undergraduate and graduate degree programs to enhance their jobprospects [1]. For many, this is the primary driver influencing their decision to continue theirstudies after high school [1]. In the United States, higher education is increasingly expensive [2].To justify the expense, many students likely increasingly want assurance that their professionalsuccess will be enriched, financially and in other ways. Despite professional success being a primary driver of students attending highereducation, engineering courses often still focus on theory [3]–[5]. Students complete homeworkand maybe in-class problems. There is likely an assumption (often implicit, in my experience)that these problems are relevant to the
; Vigeant et al.]. These courses value curiosity as one of thecomponents of an entrepreneurial mindset, but the primary emphasis is not on increasingcuriosity are it relates to engineering. The KEEN-affiliated programs typically teach in thecontext of working on real-world design projects, which is resources intensive and often limitedto 1 or 2 such course in an undergraduate engineering curriculum.In this paper, the authors aim to develop methods for teaching curiosity in more traditional labsetting, where all students can work on the same prescribed assignments. These curiositybuilding activities are implemented before student tackle their 15 week real-world capstonedesign project. Accordingly, the ultimate objectives of the KEEN affiliated
employed a design-based research approach (DBR)with one baseline and two full enactment cycles. In each cycle, students are surveyed, and focusgroups are interviewed before and after implementation.In this paper, we will present the details of data collection, analysis, and findings from the resultsfrom all three semesters. The challenges and gains of adopting the approach and how to transferto other programs will be further discussed.IntroductionThe chemical engineering field has expanded, resulting in an increased gap between academiaand industry [1-3]. This gap was acknowledged by John Chen at the 2013 American Institute ofChemical Engineering (AIChE) Annual meeting, who highlighted that the areas of growth inengineering research and faculty
WorldInternational research collaborations provide important opportunities to support innovativeresearch and address the significant global challenges facing the world today. One way todevelop researchers who are both interculturally competent and able to navigate global researchnetworks within their field is to provide international research experiences for students. Priorwork has indicated that such experiences lead to a wide range of learning outcomes includingintercultural competence, research skills, personal development, and, importantly, a newperspective on their career goals and trajectory [1]–[6]. However, in the midst of the COVID-19pandemic, international collaborations and programs for students faced challenges in continuingtheir typical
, and ethically. “Whilethere is broad agreement as to the need to better prepare engineers for global practice, there ismuch less agreement as to what skills and abilities define global competence, what combinationand duration of international education and experiences best instill it and what means andmetrics should be used to judge whether students have attained it” (p. 129) [1].The goal of the present project is to integrate innovative technology into the petroleumengineering classroom using a global digital platform and automated assessments using machine-learning methods, in order to increase intercultural competencies in students. Currentdevelopment of the web platform, titled Petroleum Engineer, is through a required sophomore-level
corporations, this evolution redefines bothindustrial business model innovation and reforms the manufacturing sector by using big data todrive the manufacturing process and associated decisions. One of the most promising approaches,Model-Based Enterprise (MBE), has shown its potential to drive smart manufacturing (or Industry4.0) by linking all sources of digital data through the product lifecycle 1 . The global net valueof the MBE market has grown from $7.89 billion in 2017 2 to $9.94 billion in 2019 3 , andthe forecast for the future market performance is set at about $44 billion by 2027. Beyondupgrading manufacturing equipment, companies have sought to develop a digital model-basednetwork for higher production efficiency and a profitable return on
an opportunity for research that can guideimplementation of ungrading and thus enable other scholarship.With the above context in mind, this evidence-based practice paper asks: 1) how do educatorsimplement ungrading in engineering courses? 2) what do educators vary in order to adaptungrading to their unique educational contexts? 3) how can we characterize the pedagogicaldesign space of radical or non-traditional grading schemes? We ask these questions as we do inorder to situate our work as a research through design effort, specifically the approach advocatedby Gaver (2012) in which a set of design solutions are interrogated to determine their invariancesas well as the dimensions of variation. In framing our effort as research through design
Informatics programs at various public and private universities with more than 15 years of administra- tive experience as a chair/program director and 25 years of teaching, research, service, and industrial experiences. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Relationship between mindset and grit on undergraduate engineering student retentionIntroductionThe Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reports that employment in STEM occupations has grown79% since 1990, from 9.7 million to 17.3 million in 2018. Forty-five percent of STEMemployment is from information technology (IT) and 19% is related to engineering [1]. Theworkforce in IT and engineering is predominantly male
-funded project studies whether providing students with training and practicewriting questions about their confusions in an undergraduate engineering statics course supportsimproved course performance and metacognitive awareness. Data collection for the projectincludes assessing multiple measures of students’ metacognition, including metacognitivemonitoring during statics exams. In this current study, we focus exclusively on the monitoringdata collected thus far.Metacognitive monitoring is the process of observing one’s understanding and approach whilecompleting a learning task [1]. One way to assess students’ metacognitive monitoring is tomeasure students’ ability to accurately either predict or postdict their score on an assessment oftheir
theinclusion of this type of content into their construction courses or programs.IntroductionPrevious research argued that engineering students have a 'culture of disengagement' aboutsocietal issues [1]. Furthermore, recent work on engineering and technology students'perceptions of using new technology suggests an over-focus on technical aspects within thoseprograms, to the detriment of social implications [2].Considering the societal impact of the built environment on the population, this lag seemsunjustified and concerning. Furthermore, history has several examples that indicate the effect ofpoorly functioning construction and infrastructure on the deployment of unsatisfactory servicelevels, high operation and maintenance costs, and unjustified