Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Noemi V. Mendoza Diaz, Texas A&M University; So Yoon Yoon, Texas A&M University; Jacques C. Richard, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

external evaluator or advisory board member on several NSF-funded projects (CA- REER, iCorps, REU, RIEF, etc.).Dr. Jacques C. Richard, Texas A&M University Dr. Richard got his Ph. D. at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 1989 & a B. S. at Boston University, 1984. He was at NASA Glenn, 1989-1995, worked at Argonne National Lab, 1996-1997, taught at Chicago State University, 1997-2002. Dr. Richard is a Sr. Lecturer & Research Associate in Aerospace Engi- neering @ Texas A&M since 1/03. His research is focused on computational plasma modeling using spectral and lattice Boltzmann methods for studying plasma turbulence and plasma jets. His research has also included fluid physics and electric propulsion using

Conference Session

PSW Section Meeting Papers - Disregard start and end time - for online paper access only

Collection

2019 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting

Authors

Farbod Khoshnoud; Dario Robinson; Bruno Marco Quadrelli; Clarence W De Silva

Tagged Topics

Pacific Southwest Section Meeting Paper Submissions

University, Fresno, December 2006.[14] C. Fiorentino, B. Boone, Service-Learning community collaboration and Partnership Planner, California State University, Fresno, 2014.[15] A. O. Brown, J. J. Rencis, D. D. Jensen, P. H. Schimpf, R. H. Crawford, I. I Orabi, K. A. Watson, J. Liu, K. S. Jackson, M. Bhattacharyya, K. LeighWebster Jr., C.-C. Chen, F. Akasheh, Active Engineering Education Modules: Summary Paper of Five Years of Incremental Improvements to the Modules, American Society for Engineering Education, 123rd Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, L, June 26 - 29, 2016.[16] H. Singer, International Students’ Authorship, Blended Learning In Practice, July 2010, pp. 8-26.[17] National Academy of Engineering Grand

Collection

2019 ASEE PNW Section Conference

Authors

Samantha Schauer, Boise State University; Krishna Pakala, Boise State University; Kim MB Tucker

communities where students take a commoncourse(s), participate in extracurricular activities with one another, and live in the same residencehall. This literature review examined relevant published work on 1) What impacts do LLCs havefor all students who live in an LLC; 2) What are the impacts on first-year engineering collegestudents living in an LLC, and 3) What theoretical frameworks are used in literature whenexamining the impacts an LLC has on first-year engineering college students.IntroductionTwo of every three students in Singapore, and one out of every two students in China obtaindegrees in science or engineering. In the United States, that statistic is less than one in sevenstudents who earn degrees in science or engineering [1]. Given the

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 21: Student Grades and Feedback

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Wan Kyn Chan, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Edward J. Berger, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

engineering students, the possible implementation of acontinuous scheme—although complicated--should not be discounted.References[1] C. Wagner, “High GPA leads to interview; Good interview leads to job,” Marketing - Miami University, 22-Jul-2015. [Online]. Available: http://miamioh.edu/news/top- stories/2015/07/gpa-interview-job.html. [Accessed: 25-Mar-2018].[2] S. Adams, “Do Employers Care About College Grades?,” Forbes, 08-Jul-2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.forbes.com/sites/susanadams/2015/07/08/do-employers-care-about- college-grades/. [Accessed: 25-Mar-2018].[3] L. D. Edgar, D. M. Johnson, D. L. Graham, and B. L. Dixon, “Student and Faculty Perceptions of the Plus/Minus Grading System,” PsycTESTS Dataset, 2014.[4] H. Altaf

Collection

2019 Fall Mid Atlantic States Conference

Authors

Marvin Gayle, Queensborough Community College of the City University of New York; Dugwon Seo, Queensborough Community College; Danny Mangra, Queensborough Community College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

student retention oncethey enroll in one of our Engineering Technology programs.KeywordsSTEM, Diversity, Robotics, 3D Printing, Women in Technology.IntroductionUnderutilized Science and Engineering [S&E] human resources can have a negative impact on asociety’s ability to innovate and find creative solution to challenges. The stories of KatherineGoble, Mary Johnson, Dorothy Vaughan, and JoAnn Morgan who all worked in the STEM fieldsat NASA in the 1960’s serve to illustrate this point. A society is more successful when it finds away to harness the contribution of a diverse workplace.Queensborough Community College [QCC] of the City University of New York [CUNY] has amultifarious student population. QCC is located in one of New York City’s most

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chaoyi Wang; Michael Frye, University of the Incarnate Word

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

. Students were going to 6th grade (40.2%), 7th grade (31.5%), 8th grade (28.3%) duringthe summer. Additionally, the researchers randomly selected one or two students from eachgroup/table in camp 1 to 4. A total of 22 students presented their groups/tables to conduct in-depth interviews with us on the last day of each camp. Of the 22 interviewees, six were fromcamp 1, seven were from camp 2, five were from camp 3, and four were from camp 4. Allstudents and their guardians were required to sign consent letters.Instruments The instrument used in this study was the Middle/High School Student Attitudes towardSTEM (S-STEM) survey. This instrument was a useful tool in the evaluations of the university’soutreach projects and K-12 STEM initiative [46

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christian Schnell, Stanford University; Johann Elmar Nordhus gen Westarp, Technical University of Munich (TUM); Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

findings, Barba-S´anchez et al. [33] identified Financial Motivation as one of the leadingmotivational factors for industrial and computer engineering students. They further elaborate thatmoney is seen as a synonym for well-being, and reflects safety and a good standard of living forthe society. Having the power to act seems to be a strong factor for engineering graduates. Thegraduates value the power to make their own decisions but also to take responsibility. Previousresearch from Barba-S´anchez (2012)[12] identified ”do things my way” as one of the factors, rep-resenting the possession and execution of power. The participants talked about the reputation ofstarting a company and could appreciate additional visibility. A similar factor has been

Conference Session

Mechanics Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Allen Evenhouse, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Nick Stites, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Amy K. Dunford, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Rohit Kandakatla, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Jeffrey F. Rhoads, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Edward J. Berger, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Jennifer Deboer, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

resource-rich contexts.AcknowledgementsThis study is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under GrantNo. 1525671. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF. This workwas conducted with oversight provided by the PUWL Institutional Review Board.References:[1] Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105.[2] Gurmak, S., & Glenn, H. (2014). Barriers and enablers to adoption and diffusion of eLearning : A systematic review of the literature – a need for an integrative approach

Conference Session

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Benjamin David Lutz, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Nathan E. Canney, CYS Structural Engineers Inc.; Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

Conference Session

DISTINGUISHED LECTURE: 2018 Best PIC and Zone Paper Presentations

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Diane Constance Aloisio, Indiana-Purdue University

Tagged Topics

ASEE Board of Directors

Systems Engineering Failures Finding(s) Causal Action Discussion/Explanation The mine operator Pike River Mine explosion: “The original mine plan specified decided to change an two main fans located on the mountainside next to a ventilation aspect of the ventilation shaft. Two planning changes were made. Pike decided to relocate system design

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division: Design Methodology

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kathryn W. Jablokow, Pennsylvania State University; Aditya Vora, Pennsylvania State University; Daniel Allen Henderson, Pennsylvania State University; Jennifer Bracken, Pennsylvania State University; Neeraj Sonalkar, Stanford University; Stephen Harris, Community College of the Air Force

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

interpret the combined graphs effectively. To address this issue,the handwritten key milestones were typed and arranged for legibility using Adobe Photoshoptools (Figure 6). In addition, to make each individual’s emotional state curve and key milestonesmore readily distinguishable from each other, and to enable us to explore the relationship betweencognitive style and emotional state, each individual curve was colorized based on the individual’scorresponding KAI score, as shown in Figure 6. The 10-point ranges were chosen based on the 10-point just-noticeable-difference for individual KAI scores3,23. Figure 6: Team 3’s combined graph with typed milestones and colorized curves (by KAI)3.4.2 Emotional State Graph Milestones and SegmentationAfter

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division: Design Teams

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Behzad Beigpourian, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Daniel M. Ferguson, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Frederick C. Berry, Purdue Polytechnic Institute; Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Siqing Wei, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

. 2nd 1st Peer Peer Num SRM SRM Rating Rating ber of Model Model PRO PRO team Rater Target Psychologica BLEM BLEM Mem Varianc Varianc l Safety =< Satisfac Conflict > Cohesiven TEAM TEAMS bers e >70% e 4.7 tion < 4.0 1.6 ess < 4.0 S 1 5 10 30 5 4.4 1.4 4.18 2 3 No SRM No SRM 5.62

Conference Session

Innovation and Fun in the Civil Engineering Classroom

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anthony Battistini, Angelo State University

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

Work? A Review of the Research,” Journal ofEngineering Education, July 2004.[4] S. Freeman, S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, and M. P.Wenderoth, “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, andmathematics,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,vol. 111, no. 23, June 10, 2014.[5] K. A. Smith, S. D. Sheppard, D. W. Johnson, and R. T. Johnson, “Pedagogies ofEngagement: Classroom-Based Practices,” Journal of Engineering Education, January 2005.[6] M. D. Svinicki and W. J. McKeachie, McKeachie’s Teaching Tips, 14th Ed. Belmont, CA,Wadsworth, Cengage Learning, 2014.[7] S. A. Ambrose, M. W. Bridges, M. DiPietro, M. C. Lovett, and M. K. Norman

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica Ohanian Perez, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Underserved Students in the CSU Moving Beyond Race and Economic Status to Close Equity Gaps. Rethinking the Gap. [online] Long Beach, CA: CSU, pp.1-12. Available at: http://www.dashboard.csuprojects.org/rethinkingthegap/Historically-Underserved-Student- Factor-Model.pdf [Accessed 30 Jan. 2019].[4] French, B. F., Immekus, J. C., & Oakes, W. (2003, November). A structural model of engineering students’ success and persistence. In Frontiers in Education, 2003. FIE 2003 33rd Annual (Vol. 1, pp. T2A-19). IEEE.[5] Lichtenstein, G., McCormick, A. C., Sheppard, S. D., & Puma, J. (2010). Comparing the undergraduate experience of engineers to all other majors: Significant differences are programmatic. Journal of Engineering

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division: Design Teams

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hadi Ali, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Micah Lande, South Dakota School of Mines & Technology

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

prototypes created by the users.One view of technological development assumes that new ideas present themselves with apredictable, self-determining trajectory—the ideology of technological determinism. However,the new trends of empathy and human-centeredness of design convince us that human choice,not technology, moves history. Lo-fi prototypes, therefore, should be built with an explicitemphasis on having an element of understanding the impact on human users, both directly andindirectly.Consider the impact of automation trends in the 1970’s on the labor market [37]. Theintroduction of numerically-controlled machines, for example, has had social impacts onworkshops floor workers, who viewed the new technology as a threat to their jobs

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division: Design Methodology

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Waddah Akili, Iowa State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

,  Be familiar with relevant background and technical knowledge that lead to successful design.The starting point of any design project, irrespective of the object or nature of the project, is theproblem definition phase characterized by: asking relevant questions and attempting to findplausible/realistic answers. No sooner has a client or professor defined a series of objectives for adesign project than the designer- whether in a consulting office or in a classroom- want to findout what the customer really wants. Questions such as: what is an economic project? How doyou define the best design? What is a safe design? What are the factor(s) that will affect thedesign the most? Phrasing it differently, knowledge resides in the questions

Conference Session

Faculty Development Medley

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lindy Hamilton Mayled, Arizona State University; Lydia Ross, Arizona State University; James Collofello, Arizona State University; Stephen J. Krause, Arizona State University; Keith D. Hjelmstad, Arizona State University; Brent James Sebold, Arizona State University; Sarah Hoyt, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Constituent Committee

institutionalizing the entrepreneurial mindset (EM),improving and expanding evidence-based pedagogical strategies in capstone courses, andcreating a faculty Community of Practice. To effectively institutionalize the entrepreneurialmindset and expand evidence-based pedagogical practices in capstone courses, professionaldevelopment was provided in conjunction with coaching sessions. This format aimed to provideaccountability for faculty participants, offer opportunities to strategize how the innovation(s)would be implemented in a contextualized setting, and shift the attitudes and practices of thecapstone faculty.Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovation (DOI) outlines an individual change model that describes thefive stages individuals follow towards adoption of an

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yanjie Xie, Zhejiang University; Wei Zhang, Zhejiang University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

ecosystem.Reference[1] Acs, Z. J., Autio, E., & Szerb, L. (2014). National systems of entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications. Research Policy, 43(3), 476-494.[2] Zimmer, C. (1986). Entrepreneurship through social networks. The art and science of entrepreneurship. Ballinger, Cambridge, MA, 3-23.[3] Arruda, C., Nogueira, V. S., Cozzi, A., & Costa, V. (2015). The Brazilian entrepreneurial ecosystem of startups: an analysis of entrepreneurship determinants in Brazil and the perceptions around the Brazilian regulatory framework. In Entrepreneurship in BRICS (pp. 9-26). Springer, Cham.[4] Clark, B. K., & Bruno-Jofre, R. D. (2000). Creating entrepreneurial universities: organisational pathways of transformation

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 6 - Technology & Simulation

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Fadi Castronovo, California State University, East Bay; Dragana Nikolic, University of Reading; Silvia Mastrolembo Ventura, Politecnico di Milano & University of Brescia; Vrinda Shroff, California State University, East Bay; Anh Nguyen; Nguyen H.P. Dinh, Mission College; Semih Yilmaz, California State University, East Bay; Reza Akhavian, California State University East Bay; Cristian Gaedicke, California State University East Bay

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering

-Rached H, Furness TA. Effects of field of view on presence, enjoyment, memory, and simulator sickness in a virtual environment. Virtual Reality, 2002. Proceedings. IEEE, IEEE; 2002, p. 164–71.[5] Cavazza M, Charles F, Mead SJ. Developing re-usable interactive storytelling technologies. Building the Information Society, Springer; 2004, p. 39–44.[6] Computer Integrated Construction Research Program. BIM Project Execution Planning Guide - Version 2.0. University Park, PA, USA: The Pennsylvania State University; 2010.[7] Kumar S. Procedures to incorporate interactivity in virtual prototypes using a game engine environment. International Conference on Construction Applications of Virtual Reality, 2011, Weimar, Germany: 2011.[8

Conference Session

Best Practices in Research & Assessment Tools for Pre-College Engineering Education

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susheela Shanta, Governor's STEM Academy @ the Burton Center for Arts and Technology - Center for Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

integration andcollaboration.Further research needs to be conducted to follow up with developing better classroom-readyinstruments for classroom assessments in authentic problem solving challenges. In addition, alarger study that includes follow up of students’ performance post-graduation (from high school)to seek an understanding of the impact on their pursuit of STEM education (speciallyengineering) and careers would be recommended.References[1] Partnership for 21st Century Learning (2015). P21 Framework Definitions. P21: Washington, DC.[2] S. Haag, N. Hubele, A. Garcia, & K. McBeath, “Engineering undergraduate attrition and contributing factors,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol 23, no. 5, pp. 929- 940, 2007.[3] T

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 11

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James A. Mynderse, Lawrence Technological University; Liping Liu, Lawrence Technological University; Andrew L. Gerhart, Lawrence Technological University; Robert W. Fletcher, Lawrence Technological University; Hamid Vejdani, Lawrence Technological University; Wuming Jing, Lawrence Technological University; Kingman E. Yee, Lawrence Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

with CDS alumni and current students may reinforce these observations of the advisors.Nonetheless, continual improvement is being sought with regards to the entrepreneurial mindsetof the students, and improvement to assessment techniques will be sought to ultimately producebetter graduating engineers.AcknowledgmentsThe authors thank Dr. Arslan and Dr. Xie for their contributions as project advisors during thecourse of the work described. The authors also acknowledge support of this work at all levels ofadministration by Dr. Jawad, Dr. Grace, and Dr. Vaz.References [1] J. Mynderse, S. Arslan and L. Liu, "Using A Funded Capstone Project To Teach Fluid Power," ASME 2014 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, 2014.[2] J

Conference Session

Technical Session 12: Teaching and Learning

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nina Schiffeler, IMA - RWTH Aachen University; Valerie Stehling, RWTH Aachen University; Frank Hees, Cybernetics Lab IMA & IfU; Ingrid Isenhardt

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

effect of AR on these aspects. The focus of this paper, however, isthe examination of the effect(s) of the collaborative AR app developed on the process of theteamwork in terms of communication and interaction. It aims at understanding to whichextent AR changes the way people communicate in collaborative settings, i.e. when theypursue a common goal. Moreover, the results of the study aim at identifyingrecommendations for action (e.g. for university teachers) in terms of the design ofcollaborative (learning) processes that will be enriched by AR.Tags: collaboration, Augmented Reality, communication, interaction, team1. Augmented Reality in collaborative learning1.1. Augmented RealityIn higher education, modern technological trends often find

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 3: Working in Teams

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Saira Anwar, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Muhsin Menekse, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Asefeh Kardgar, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are thoseof the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of IES.References[1] X. Fan, W. Luo, M. Menekse, D. Litman, and J. Wang, “CourseMIRROR: Enhancing large classroom instructor-student interactions via mobile interfaces and natural language processing.” in Proceedings of ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2015), Seoul, Korea, 2015. pp. 1473–1478.[2] W. Luo and D. J. Litman, “Summarizing student responses to reflection prompts.,” in Proceedings of Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Lisbon, Portugal, 2015. pp. 1955–1960.[3] W. Luo, X. Fan, M. Menekse, J. Wang, and D. J. Litman

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 16: Faculty Development and Teaching Contexts

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cassandra Sue Ellen Woodcock, University of Michigan; Nicole Erin Friend, University of Michigan; Aileen Huang-Saad, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

traditional disciplines, including engineering and physical sciences,to perform research focused on the micro to macro-level fabrication and regeneration of tissues.While this field has continued to grow since the 1970’s [6], it faces challenges shared by otherinterdisciplinary fields when trying to develop and implement curriculum for interdisciplinaryprograms.Rapid growth in interdisciplinary fields and subsequently interdisciplinary academic programshas created programs with ill-defined disciplinary skills for students graduating from thoseprograms [7]. As a result, interdisciplinary engineering program graduates regularly pursuecareers outside of traditional engineering jobs [8], often making career trajectories unclear aftergraduation [9]. In an

Conference Session

Technical Session 3: The Best of Computers in Education

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alexander James Tuttle, University of Georgia; Siddharth Savadatti, University of Georgia; Kyle Johnsen, University of Georgia

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

bematched. As a result, this added another dimension to the study (collaborative vs. alone).Two similar (and typical) engineering staticsproblems were chosen for this study. Termedthe ‘hinge’ and ‘anvil’ problems (Figure 8),they each involved determining the momentproduced by a force about a specified axis ona 3D structure. Each of the 11 sessions (8collaborative, 3 individual) involved solvingboth problems. For each session, one of thetwo problems had its measurements visible,while the other had them hidden to force theparticipant(s) to make use of the virtualmeasurement tool. Between the order ofsolving the problems (first and second) andthe availability of measurements (visible andhidden), there were four possiblepermutations for any given

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dave Kim, Washington State University, Vancouver; Jong-Hoon Kim, Washington State University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

] university. University of This section (conclusion/summary) is a summary of In an online lab Minnesota the results and discussion from the report. It is still report writing Department of discussion, where you insert your opinion of the resource of a R1 Mechanical results. Report the key findings of the report here. It is university’s Engineering much like the results and discussion sections of the mechanical Student Writing abstract. Directly answer the report question here. Do engineering Guide [14] not be vague. program. Ringleb, S. I., Conclusions are logically tied to inquiry findings and In an engineering

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert C. Martin, Texas A&M University; Cynthia Lang, Texas A&M University; Sin-Ning Cindy Liu, Texas A&M University; Carolyn L Sandoval, University of California, San Diego; Mindy Bergman, Texas A&M University; Jeffrey E. Froyd, Ohio State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

, “Development of a Classification System for Engineering Student Characteristics Affecting College Enrollment and Retention,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 361–376, October 2009.[7] M. Meyer, and S. Marx, “Engineering dropouts: A qualitative examination of why undergraduates leave engineering,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 103, no. 4, pp. 525-548, October 2014.[8] S. Haag, N. Hubele, A. Garcia and K. McBeath, “Engineering undergraduate attrition and contributing factors,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 929-940, October 2007.[9] K. L. Sutton, and C. Sankar, C, “Student satisfaction with information provided by academic advisors,” Journal of STEM Education

Conference Session

FOCUS ON EXHIBITS: Welcome Reception & NEW THIS YEAR! 2018 Best Division Paper Nominee Poster Session Sponsored by Engineering Unleashed

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert B Austin P.E., Bowling Green State University

Tagged Topics

ASEE Headquarters

development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469-480.3. Austin, R. B. (2017) Reengineering BGSU’s Construction Management Capstone, 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Columbus, OH4. Berg, D., Manib, H.S., Marinakis, Y., Tierneyc, R. and Walsh, S. (2015) An introduction to Management of Technology pedagogy (andragogy). Technological Forecasting & Social Change 100 1–45. Berg, T., Erichsen, M. and Hokstad, L.F. (2016) Stuck at the Threshold, Which strategies do students choose when facing liminality with certain disciples at a business school?6. Chan, S. (2010) Applications of Andragogy in Multi-Disciplined Teaching and Learning, Journal of Adult Education Volume 39, Number 2

Conference Session

Military and Veterans Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian J. Novoselich, U.S. Military Academy; Jakob C. Bruhl, U.S. Military Academy; Matthew Scheidt, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Christina Nicole Willis, University of Utah; Michael Scott Sheppard Jr., Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Military and Veterans

education.References[1] National Center for Veterans Analysis and Statistics, “Education program beneficiaries,” 2014.[2] ABET, “Accreditation policy and procedure manual (APPM), 2016 – 2017,” 2016.[3] J. B. Main, M. M. Camacho, C. Mobley, C. E. Brawner, and S. M. Lord, “Using focus groups to understand military veteran students’ pathways in engineering education,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2016, pp. 1–9.[4] US Department of Veterans Affairs, “Office of Public and Intergovernmental Affairs,” 2018.[5] K. McBain, L.; Kim, Y.; Cook, B.; Snead, “From Soldier to Student II: Assessing Campus Programs for Veterans and Service Members.,” Washington D.C., American Council on Education, 2012.[6] R. Ackerman, R., Diramio, D

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division: Design Methodology

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shraddha Sangelkar, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Benjamin Emery Mertz, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Ashley Bernal, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Patrick Cunningham, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Academies Press Washington, DC, 2004.[3] J. Trevelyan, "Technical coordination in engineering practice," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 191-204, 2007.[4] S. Summers, R. Bercich, P. Cornwell, and J. Mayhew, "Technical Communications across the ME Curriculum at Rose-Hulman," 2018.[5] J. Chen, F. Damanpour, and R. R. Reilly, "Understanding antecedents of new product development speed: A meta-analysis," Journal of Operations Management, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 17-33, 2010.[6] R. G. Cooper and E. Kleinschmidt, "New product performance: keys to success, profitability & cycle time reduction," Journal of Marketing Management, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 315-337, 1995.[7] R. A. Guzzo and G. P