has to be anotherway to meet this challenge. In conventional course occurrences, events like a midterm, final andassignments tend to overlap between classes, and can cause big spikes in student workload. Withan increased number of students in each class, students can also feel the pressure of increasedcompetition. These stresses’ on both faculty and students, negatively affect the positive outcomesdesired by both groups. This paper describes the formulation, design, and execution of twoplanning methods used to help balance the needs, workload, and time resources for both thefaculty and students in an Engineering curriculum. One approach compares weekly instructorworkload for the planning and delivery across three classes. Covering items from
just usingsoftware.Using BIM has major advantages for construction. It allows for an efficient construction processthat saves time and money and reduces the number of RFIs and field coordination problems,compared to traditional practices. Perhaps, the most important force driving the adoption of BIMis the ability to integrate all members of project teams together by communicating ideas moreeffectively, thereby providing a competitive advantage for innovative firms.12 Therefore, inincorporating BIM into the CEM curriculum, the main focus should be on fundamental BIMconcepts and processes, not on mastering BIM tools.13This paper proposes a holistic view of BIM education in post-secondary institutions. To addressthe question of “How and in what
teaching engineering solution approach involving concept generation,selection, prototyping and validation. In majority of cases, significant emphasis is put onteaching the engineering solution strategy for a specific problem statement that was introduced tothe students. Rarely is an emphasis placed on problem identification. Innovation often takes a bighit due to insufficient experience in identifying unmet needs, especially in the field ofBiomedical Engineering that fosters on the mission of improving society, human health andhealth care. This paper includes details of integrating clinic and classroom settings to teachBiomedical Engineering students about observation and identification of an unmet biomedicalengineering problem, followed by
Engineering program at Grand Valley State University is four years in length with an integrated cooperative education experience. The courses that directly address the Six Sigma criteria are required for all students. Each course is listed with course descriptions. The sequence of courses listed matches the order in the curriculum. EGR 106 Introduction to Engineering Design I A first course in the principles and practice of multidisciplinary engineering analysis, design, construction, and evaluation. Topics include graphical communication, solid modeling, computeraided manufacturing, computer programming fundamentals, structured programming, and principles of digital and analog electronics. Professional skills such
proposed Grand Challenges Scholars Program.OverviewThe undergraduate curriculum for the Construction Management program in the Lyles College ofEngineering at Fresno State was overhauled nearly three years ago. The unique features of therevised curriculum comprised an interdisciplinary approach with a business minor as an integralelement of the CM major. Service learning was incorporated at all levels in the form of “S”designated courses. At the freshman level, CM 1S, the orientation course; in the mid-level, CM7S, the construction materials and assembly course; and at the senior level, the capstone course,CM 180S provide the experiential learning opportunities with one or more community basedorganizations (CBOs) in the field of construction. Each
, administrators andtechnology facilitators [8]. The evolving technology is also creating other challenges for theteachers as they struggle to keep up with the speed of technology change. Professors today needto separate themselves from the past and accept technology as an integral part of the education ofstudents in the 21st century – so these students are capable to compete on the global level. Withthe ubiquitous computing resources exploding and availability of ideas, faculty members mustembrace the accessibility of information on the World Wide Web. Professors need to becomemore responsive to the resources available on the internet and its use in the classroom. They needto determine ways to connect the online and offline digital media to curriculum
interest is in the areas of embedded systems, robotics, computer vision, integrated circuit optimization, and engineering education. Dr. Yelamarthi is a member of the Tau Beta Pi engineering honor society and Omicron Delta Kappa national leadership honor society and a senior member of IEEE.Dr. Eron E. Drake, Central Michigan University Eron Drake received her Ed.D. degree in Education education with an emphasis on curriculum and in- struction from Central Michigan University in 2009. She also holds an M.B.A. from Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI. She is currently the Assistant Director of the Faculty Center for Innovative Teaching at Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, MI, and has over eleven years of
engineering degree, with the ultimate goal of broadening participation among those who attend engineering college. Sullivan was conferred as an ASEE Fellow in 2011 and was awarded NAE’s 2008 Gordon Prize for Innovation in Engineering and Technology Education.Dr. Derek T Reamon, University of Colorado, Boulder Derek Reamon is the Co-director of the Integrated Teaching and Learning Program (ITLP) and the Gen- eral Engineering Plus (GE+) degree program, and a Senior Instructor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering. As ITLP co-director, he coordinates 19-22 sections of First-year Engineering Projects, a course that has a proven benefit on retention within engineering and is also a nationally recognized model for
validate energy conservation.Students are often unable to understand potential and kinetic energy from a system’s perspective;for example, a system can contain both forms of energy simultaneously. This issue cannot beeasily addressed using traditional pedagogical techniques, however, by integrating roboticstechnology into the curriculum, teachers can create an engaging and visual representation of sucha system. Heron, Michelini, and Stefanel,20 support Carr and Kirkwood’s21 proposal that theteaching of energy concepts should be supported with examples in which observable changes areapparent, such as a suspended object falling from higher to lower positions. This avoidsmisunderstandings inherent in purely static20 examples. Brook and Wells22
™ iPad AppAbstract: Please provide a concise description that includes the workshop’s learning objectives(maximum 750 characters). The abstract is used on the ASEE website, program materials, andotherK-12 Workshop promotional activities.Spatial Visualization (SV) is the mental representation and manipulation of 2D and 3D shapes.Skills in SV and Freehand Sketching have been correlated to success in STEM, yet SV is notformally part of K-12 curriculum. An interactive SV drawing application (SpatialKids™) gearedtowards K-8 grades has been developed at UC San Diego using touchscreen interface technologyon an iPad. In this interactive workshop, teachers will learn 1) SV skills such as 2D rotations, 3Disometric views, and 2D orthographic projections; 2
summary of what occurred in 2014 and whatwe plan for 2015.How NSF I-Corps Has Influenced the Engineering Ambassador Network From January through February 2014, three members of the Engineering Ambassadorproject participated as an I-Corps team in the completion of the I-Corps curriculum. Serving asthe entrepreneurial lead was Kathryn Kirsch, a Ph.D. student in mechanical engineering fromPenn State. Dr. Joanna Garner, a faculty member in psychology from Old Dominion University, Page 26.612.2served as the mentor, and Michael Alley, a faculty member in engineering communication from Penn State, served as the principal investigator. The
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Using a Former Governor’s Archives as a Source of Scholarship in Engineering Technology Andrew T. Rose University of Pittsburgh at JohnstownAbstractThe archives of a former governor of Pennsylvania were utilized by an engineering technologyfaculty member to conduct research needed to develop curriculum materials for undergraduatecivil engineering technology students. The research was intended to assess how the Governor’sadministration addressed new dam safety laws and funded water infrastructure improvements inthe Commonwealth. The use of the archives was supported by a grant provided by a
describe the importance of service courses to an engineering curriculum andthe role that engineering service courses can play in a liberal arts curriculum. Several examplesare given as well as suggested opportunities for engineering departments to service theiruniversity through technical literacy courses. A specific example of a technical service course isa course taught by the author while on sabbatical at the USAF Academy. This course was anintroductory course in aeronautics required by all students at the USAF Academy. The author’ssection had 23 students from majors as varied as English and History as well as Chemistry andCivil Engineering. In the syllabus 50 points (out of 1000) were allocated to instructor points tobe used how the instructor
weekly and the solutions to the problems areprovided. Homework assignments are not graded, but must be worked thoroughly with thestudents to prepare for a follow up quiz given to the students in one week upon receiving therelated assignment. This approach of assessing student's knowledge has been tested for severalconsecutive years and proved to be very effective in student’s comprehension of a subject taught.The other assessment tools used in the EM course are the midterm and final examinations, andstudents’ presentations. To make students more well-rounded engineers, the development of thestudent soft skills is becoming an integral part of the curriculum in most universities. In most ofclasses offered in the School of Technology at Michigan
student project for an undergraduate controls curriculum. Additionally,through open access to the design files, control systems educators and students have theflexibility to customize the project to their individual needs. Student feedback is also presentedsupporting the efficacy of the system as an active learning tool.1. IntroductionThe inverted pendulum control experiment, in which a pendulum with a center of mass above thepivot point is mounted to a linear actuator and the actuator is moved to attain a balancedcondition (Figure 1), is a common example used in introductory feedback control systemscourses1, particularly in the design of the Proportional Integral Derivative (PID) controlalgorithm2. Since the inverted pendulum is inherently
Finding #2: Instructors in the study believe STSE is relevant to the engineering curriculum,although there is variance in the different components of STSE and beliefs vs. practices.When instructors were asked “who is responsible for STSE in the engineering curriculum?”, themajority agreed that instructors of a course in technology and society studies (93.9%), instructorsof a course in engineering ethics (95.7%) and instructors of engineering design courses (88.7%)were responsible. However, interestingly, when asked about instructors of courses in whichcontent is primarily mathematics, science or engineering science, 49.1% agreed that theinstructors were responsible for STSE (for example, “This should be an integrated part of theentire curriculum
approaches. Changing the sequence of topicsin engineering mechanics is one solution to create more integrity within the engineeringmechanics course4, 25, 26. Cornwell4 described the new distribution of topics in mechanics coursesand demonstrated the improvements made possible by a new sequence of curriculum. In an effortto span over freshman and sophomore years courses, Belytschko25 developed a curriculum byintegrating a subset of mathematics and science with engineering. It targeted engineering designto foster freshman year students through a four-course sequence called “Engineering Analysis”25.Nonetheless, changes in curriculum face two major challenges. First, it is difficult to assess theimpact of curricular changes in a short time, and no
skill development. In response to thischallenge, a collaborative partnership between the Psychology and Engineering department at theUniversity of Calgary has yielded a theoretical-based communication technique applied to theengineering curriculum in order to enhance team effectiveness.While teams stimulate an innovative environment, the interdependence of individuals leads to anincreased risk of conflict between members2. Teams literature has identified three types ofconflict that can arise3: task conflict (TC), relationship conflict (RC) and process conflict (PC).Briefly, TC involves contrary perspectives and opinions about the task, RC refers to perceivedinterpersonal incompatibilities (i.e., personality clashes), and PC involves discordant
is an ASEE Fellow.Ms. Elizabeth A Parry, North Carolina State University Elizabeth (Liz) Parry Elizabeth Parry is an engineer and consultant in K-12 Integrated STEM through Engineering Curriculum, Coaching and Professional Development and a Coordinator and Instructor of Introduction to Engineering at the College of Engineering at North Carolina State University. For the past sixteen years, she has worked extensively with students from kindergarten to graduate school, parents, preservice and in- service teachers to both educate and excite them about engineering. As the Co-PI and project director of a National Science Foundation GK-12 grant, Parry developed a highly effective tiered mentoring model for graduate
development, and applications of statistical signal processing.Dr. Michael R. Gustafson II, Duke University Dr. Michael R. Gustafson II is an Associate Professor of the Practice of Electrical and Computer Engi- neering at Duke University. He received a B.S.E. in 1993 from Duke University, majoring in Electrical Engineering and Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science. He continued on at Duke to earn his M.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science. His primary focus is on undergraduate curriculum and laboratory development, and he is responsible for the first-year Computational Methods in Engineering course required for all engineering students at Duke University.Dr. Joseph C. Nadeau P.E., Duke
technologies with power systems, probabilistic production simulations, and integrated resource planning. In recent years, he has authored a number of ar- ticles and has given numerous presentations on outcomes-based engineering curriculum development and the implementation of the ABET Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs. He has authored and/or co-authored over 45 articles, a textbook which has been translated into Chinese, 22 technical reports, 12 summary papers, and 15 discussions and reviews. His professional experience includes: (1) over 32 years of university administration, teaching, consulting and research, and (2) five years of full-time work in industry.Dr. Mojtaba B. Takallou P.E., University of Portland
attract a more diverse student body. At present,engineering in Western countries is an overwhelmingly male-dominated field. GalvanizeU/UNHaims to help reverse this trend, as well as support a greater number of students from differentbackgrounds, by offering scholarships from partner organizations with similar goals. Another of GalvanizeU/UNH’s core goals is to create a new path for how data scienceeducation is perceived and taught. To train a new class of data scientists, educators mustemphasize problem solving and design thinking over tools and technology. Its curriculum modelfeatures needs/competency-based, learner-centric and project-based instructional strategies, andincludes opportunities for industry partnerships and continuous
implementedcurriculum and the learned curriculum6. Each of these phases is a part of the research and designprocess for curriculum as it is created and used in classrooms. In a similar vein, Kelly examinesthe use of design-based research in education by describing an example of research-basedsoftware development in mathematics education and points to ways engineering educationresearch could adopt design research methodologies5 for iteratively creating and testinginnovative teaching methods. Design has been used in engineering education primarily from the point of view of developingstudents’ abilities as designers and considering their use of design processes in learning to beengineers 7 or from the perspective of design professionals8. We use “design research
received his B.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering from the University of Illinois, and an M.S.E. in Aerospace and Mechanical Sciences from Princeton. He has been on the faculty in the Department of Aerospace Engineering at Penn State since 1984. His research activities are analytical, experimental, and computational, and generally in the areas of aerodynamics, primarily aircraft and wind turbines, and aircraft design, flight mechanics, and stability and control. He has worked on aircraft designs with a number of companies, and has played a key role in the development of winglets for sailplanes and low-speed aircraft. He is actively involved in the American Institute of Aeronautics and
, stimulate their curiosity, and engage them in hands-on activities that are notlimited to the laboratory 1. This paper proposes the integration of an activity-based learning approach in the EEcurriculum with the use of Analog Discovery Boards (ADB) by Digilent Inc. This enhancementallows students to build, analyze and visualize circuits using the USB-powered AnalogDiscovery platform, a personal computer, and a basic analog parts kit. This opens the door for avariety of learning activities that include in-class experimentation, take-home exercises, groupactivity sessions, and design-and-learn projects among many others. Our work aims to create anenvironment for a student that is conducive to innovation and creative thinking; while providingan
visionary faculty champions makeefforts to integrate these 21st century skills into the curriculum in an incremental fashion(adding a course or launching an elective program). However, the partners involved withthe Epicenter project observed that deeper change and sustainability did not directlyfollow these efforts. Existing efforts to stimulate entrepreneurship had clearly had some Page 26.1401.2impact, but the overall landscape of engineering education had only shifted to a smalldegree.Pathways program development began with an independent literature review to identifypromising models and practices that could guide the design and implementation of
innovative curriculum activities thatcultivate inclusive engineering identities and demonstrate how the engineering professionbenefits from diversity. We intend to expand first-year engineering student perceptions aboutwho can be an engineer and what engineers do. This effort aims to create a cultural shift inengineering departments so students think beyond stereotypical perceptions of who belongs tothe engineering profession (White men) toward more expansive notions about how theengineering profession needs diversity to thrive. Arguably, inclusive engineering departmentswill contribute to the retention and success of students who are underrepresented in engineeringin terms of gender and race, but also in terms of backgrounds, talents, and
laboratory equipment has been found to be robust and durablegiven being subjected to undergraduate students performing hands-on experiments of complextheories often for the first time. An overview of some of the experiments which have been used Page 26.833.5in the curriculum in various course offerings is provided in Table 1. Table 1: ECP Systems Experiments [1-3] 205 210 220 System Identification X X X Rigid Body PD and PID Control X X X Disturbance Rejection
within its real-life context, especially when the boundariesbetween phenomenon and context are not clearly evident” (p. 18). For the present study,the case is defined as the work and experience of the student groups as they engage in thedata analysis tasks embedded in an integrated STEM unit.Setting. The students, teachers, and curriculum in this study were selected from teachersparticipating in the EngrTEAMS: Engineering to Transform the Education of Analysis,Measurement, and Science project. This project provides professional development andyear-long support to teachers as they first learn principles of effective STEM integrationand then develop their own integrated curriculum to be used in their classrooms. Forty to50 teachers per year
develop an outreach (a) curriculum around these LMT units and to also train middle-school teachers in the design, building and testing of LMTs. These efforts are aimed at ensuring wide-spread dissemination of these LegoTM-based manufacturing education modules. Our team is also currently working closely with local middle-school and high-school teachers to develop a LegoTM-based curriculum for manufacturing