Paper ID #34540Paper: A Review of Personality Type Theory in STEM Education andImplications for First-Year Engineering Teaching AssistantsAndrew H. Phillips, The Ohio State University Andrew Phillips graduated summa cum laude from The Ohio State University in May 2016 with a B.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering and with Honors Research Distinction and again in December 2018 with an M.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering. He is currently pursuing a Ph.D. in Engineering Education at The Ohio State University. His engineering education interests include teaching assistants, first-year engineering, systematic
Paper ID #33727Exploring Self-directed Learning Among Engineering Undergraduates in theExtensive Online Instruction Environment During the COVID-19 PandemicDr. Qin Liu, University of Toronto Dr. Qin Liu is Senior Research Associate with the Institute for Studies in Transdisciplinary Engineering Education and Practice, Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering, University of Toronto, Canada. Her research interests include engineering students’ competency development, learning assessment and career trajectories, and equity, diversity and inclusion issues in engineering education.Ms. Juliette Sweeney, University of Toronto
series of seminars as part of a newly formed learning community. Thecategorical topics are defined in TABLE 2.TABLE 2 Categorical Topics Pertaining to Engineering and Technology Connectedness Subscale Description Camaraderie Friendship and encouragement to other like-minded military veteran students. Career Navigating job and scholarship applications, identifying suitable engineering careers, meeting with working engineers. Engineering Identity Interacting with practicing engineers, attending field trips, listening to guest speakers (veterans). Professionalism Developing resumes, preparing for interviews, developing
category of studentgenerally experienced the largest shifts, and so for them it appears that this intervention was ableto somewhat open their minds beyond the immediate technical skills-building to longer termviews of what they can use engineering to effect around them.Prior to the intervention, some of the top challenges students perceived in doing engineeringwere related to negative perceptions and/or doubts in their own abilities. After the intervention,most of those internal concerns became less prevalent, and were overtaken by common dynamicsthat exist in successfully carrying out project work, i.e. teamwork, troubleshooting, etc. Thisprovides another indication that their self-efficacy has increased. It suggests that even a singlePjBL
have toldme in the past that it is hard for them to listen to a woman because ... ‘it’s like ... in my mind it’sstill set that I know what I’m doing because I’m the guy ...’” [10, p. 281]. While she successfullygraduated with a mechanical engineering degree, Sandra reflected, “I can understand where theyare coming from ‘cause maybe that’s the culture in his family and where he’s from” [10, p. 281].Put simply, Sandra’s friend had deeply held beliefs that women were less knowledgeable thanmen; nevertheless, her male friend’s beliefs were his issues alone and not a reflection of her orwomen as engineers. The idea that to belong in engineering is to be male is embedded in the fielddue to the historical traditions of being a masculine-oriented
for decades to come.ENGINEERING FOR ONE PLANET FRAMEWORKThe Lemelson Foundation and VentureWell have led the development of the Engineering forOne Planet (EOP) framework. This framework was created with the input of hundreds ofstakeholders involved in engineering education, practice, and policy [2]. The EOP initiativeseeks to create systemic change by establishing environmentally sustainable engineering as acore tenet of engineering curricula. The framework represents fundamental learningoutcomes and is designed for flexible adoption within higher education institutions,programs, and courses, such that “[a]ll engineers will be equipped to design, build, code andinvent with the planet in mind.” It suggests the role engineers will play in
Paper ID #34271Mentoring and Advising Students in an S-STEM Project: Strengths Trainingfrom a Social Justice Perspective in Engineering & Computer Science asContext – Initial ImplementationDr. Jane L. Lehr, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Jane Lehr is a Professor in Ethnic Studies and Women’s and Gender Studies and Director of the Office of Student Research at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. She is affiliated faculty in Computer Science and Software Engineering and Science, Technology and Society. She is also the Faculty Director of the California State University (CSU
: Seven Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching,” San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2010, ISBN: 978- 0-470-48410-4.[6] J. D. Bransford, A. L. Brown, & R. R. Cocking, (Eds). National Research Council. How People Lean: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded Edition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2000. https://doi.org/10.17226/9853.[7] National Research Council. Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2012. https://doi.org/10.17226/13362.[8] N. Kober, National Research Council. Reaching Students: What Research Says About Effective Instruction in Undergraduate Science
relationships among industrial distributors and distribution logistics. Her recent research focuses on engineering education and learning sciences with a focus on how to engage students better to prepare their minds for the future. Her other research interests include empirical studies to assess impact of good supply chain practices such as coordinated decision making in stochastic supply chains, handling supply chains during times of crisis and optimizing global supply chains on the financial health of a company. She has published her research in Journal of Business Logistics, International Jour- nal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management and peer-reviewed proceedings of the American Society for Engineering
Paper ID #35666Peer teaching research group model for upper level environmentalengineering class with student-led lectures and journal articlediscussionsDr. Thomas S. Soerens, Messiah University Thomas Soerens is Professor of Engineering at Messiah University. He teaches in Civil and Environmental engineering with specialization in storm water, ground water, and water treatment. He performs design and applied research in water systems in rural developing communities. He is a Professional Engineer and a Certified Ecological Designer. American c Society for Engineering
withhis mother and sister who stand in stark contrast with reality (see 3 in Table 2): “One of the things that comes into my mind is that I grew up in a household where my mom had a PhD. She was a professor. […] And so, the momentum thing is one of the things that I point to because, I think there were points in my life [his own higher education in STEM] where I was baffled by the fact that I wasn't seeing more women.”We classified Flynn’s relationship with his family as nonevidence because he cites thephenomenon (i.e., gender inequity in engineering) as evidence for his causal theory (i.e., themoment of the dominant group). His experience demonstrated that gender inequity is unjust, butit was unclear how he connected that
Paper ID #33597Exploring the Team Dynamics of Undergraduate Engineering Virtual TeamsDuring the Rapid Transition Online Due to COVID-19Miss Alexis Rae Walsh, University of Tennessee at Knoxville In May 2021, Alexis completed her fourth year at the University of Tennessee in Knoxville, earning a B.S. in Honors Industrial Engineering with a minor in Reliability & Maintainability Engineering. Beginning in July, Alexis will be starting her career as a Technical Solutions Engineer for Epic Systems.Ms. Sarah E. Norris, University of Tennessee, Knoxville I am majoring in Aerospace Engineering with course work in computer science
Paper ID #33020Having it All: Infusing Parallel Computational Thinking in theLower-level Computer Engineering Curriculum Using Extended LearningModulesMr. Zeran Zhu, University of Illinois at Urbana ChampaignDr. Ujjal K. Bhowmik, University of Illinois at Urbana ChampaignMs. Yue Wang, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign Graduate research assistant, Electrical & Computer Engineering, UIUC Master student, School of Labor and Employment Relations, UIUCDr. Zuofu Cheng, University of Illinois at Urbana ChampaignProf. Yuting W. Chen, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign Dr. Yuting W. Chen received the B.S. degree from
Paper ID #33078Beyond the Social License to Operate: Training Socially ResponsibleEngineers to Contend with Corporate Frameworks for Community Engage-mentDr. Greg Rulifson P.E., USAID Greg is currently a AAAS Fellow at USAID working to improve the environmental performance of hu- manitarian assistance. Greg earned his bachelor’s degree in Civil Engineering with a minor in Global Poverty and Practice from UC Berkeley where he acquired a passion for using engineering to facilitate developing communities’ capacity for success. He earned his master’s degree in Structural Engineering and Risk Analysis from Stanford University
Paper ID #34308Work in Progress: Measuring Stigma of Mental Health Conditions and ItsImpact in Help-seeking Behaviors Among Engineering StudentsMatilde Luz Sanchez-Pena, University at Buffalo Matilde Sanchez-Pena is an Assistant Professor in engineering education at University at Buffalo - SUNY. Her current research areas include (a) advancing institutional diversity, (b) cultures of health in engineer- ing education, and (c) data analysis skills of engineers. She aims to promote a more equitable engineering field in which students of all backgrounds can acquire the knowledge and skills to achieve their goals. She
identities. As such, generalizationsshould not be made as to why Asian students are more likely to endorse the NEP than their otherpeers. Future work should disaggregate racial/ethnic demographics further particularly for Asianstudents and to include Middle Eastern students. A final limitation to using the NEP Scale is thatalthough it is the most widely used measure of environmental worldview, recent studies havesuggested that the scale be further explored to more adequately capture the diversity of modernenvironmentalism [27]. With these limitations in mind, there is still much to glean from the implications of thisstudy for engineering research and practice. The data here indicates that the views of almost halfof White engineering students
there was less live attendance in online SI sessions, and somestudents expressed negative feelings about attending SI online [14]. Keeping these pastexperiences with online SI in mind, we explored the effectiveness of our online SI offerings.Study contextFirst-year engineering students entering Northeastern University in September 2020 encountereda profound change in instructional strategy compared to previous years in which all classes wereoffered in-person: during the Fall 2020 semester classes were offered under a hybrid learningmodel in which a limited number of students could attend each class meeting in-person and theremainder would attend only remotely, based in part on student preferences. This study focusedon assessing consequences of
linguistic, cultural, literacy, and educational backgrounds.The perspective of faculty members in engineering is often to conflate language and literacy withsimply needing to improve English grammar to become ‘good writers’ at the doctoral level.A question also remains whether graduate communication support designed with peercollaboration in mind—such as in the case of graduate writing centers and learningcommunities—can fully serve the diverse needs of those who enter programs with diverselinguistic, cultural, literacy, and educational backgrounds. Many multilingual doctoral studentsbring with them culturally specific academic, professional, and broader rhetorical strategies thatmay conflict with locally defined and field-specific conventions in
attitude toward diversity and inclusion, we expect them toacknowledge its current state as a problem and to believe that improving it will bring somepositive outcome. Generally, the ECE faculty interviewed did show evidence of such a positiveattitude, and their reasoning fell very consistently into two themes: (a) the importance ofdiversity for equality, and (b) the benefits for students of working with diverse groups of people.Importance of diversity for equality “Well, the first things that come to my mind [about diversity and inclusion] are minority students and women. Especially in an engineering program and in ECE where we don't have enough women.” – ElliottFaculty frequently began their discussion on diversity by
Paper ID #33970A Comprehensive Review of U.S. Minor Degrees in Aerospace, Aeronautical,and Astronautical Engineering and Unmanned Air SystemsDr. Thomas A. Ward, Cedarville University Dr. Tom Ward currently works at Cedarville University in the Mechanical Engineering department. He has worked at several universities in both the US and Southeast Asia, since shifting from federal employment as an aerospace engineer with the US Air Force in 2006. He is an experienced lecturer in aerospace and mechanical engineering, specializing in propulsion, thermofluids, design, and energy. He has served as associate dean, research director
Elizabeth Litzler, Ph.D., is the director of the University of Washington Center for Evaluation and Re- search for STEM Equity (UW CERSE) and an affiliate assistant professor of sociology. She has been at UW working on STEM Equity issues for more than 17 years. Dr. Litzler is a member of ASEE, 2020-2021 chair of the ASEE Commission on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, and a former board member of the Women in Engineering ProActive Network (WEPAN). Her research interests include the educational cli- mate for students, faculty, and staff in science and engineering, assets based approaches to STEM equity, and gender and race stratification in education and the workforce. She was awarded the 2020 WEPAN Founders Award
Paper ID #34426Lab Every Day!! Lab Every Day?? *&%#ing Lab Every Day!? ExaminingStudent Attitudes in a Core Engineering Course Using Hands-on LearningEvery Day of ClassDr. Erin A. Henslee, Wake Forest University Dr. Erin Henslee is a Founding Faculty and Assistant Professor of Engineering at Wake Forest University. Her research spans biomedical engineering, e-sports, and STEM education. Prior to joining Wake Forest she was a Researcher Development Officer at the University of Surrey where she supported Early Career Researchers. She received her BS degrees in Engineering Science and Mechanics and Mathematics from Virginia
Paper ID #34687Community Designers: A Pilot Virtual Community Codesign SymposiumIng. Pamela Cristina Silva Diaz, PamLab Design and Engineering Pamela Silva D´ıaz is a mechanical engineer with experience in appropriate technology, participatory de- sign and humanitarian innovation. She completed her bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2012 and obtained her Master of Science in the same field at the University of Michigan in 2014. Through her business, PamLab Design and Engineering, she blends strategic design facilitation with mechanical engineering services to co
central component of the value for the community partners. Thisdiffers from many of the early adopters of service-learning, where the service was typicallydefined as time spent within the community or in the partner organization [1]. Nearly 90% of thestudents studied in Where’s the Learning in Service-Learning [2] were from placement-basedapproaches. It is not surprising, therefore, that many of the models for community-engagedlearning were designed with placement-based approaches in mind. While such models can beuseful in engineering, they lack the context of the project experience that adds dimensions notaddressed in earlier models. A project deliverable is central to many engineering experiences,while the project process, including activities
solutions in the developing world. Mark has experiences as a teacher, researcher, engineer, social entrepreneur, and in higher education program management. He earned his PhD in Engineering Education at ASU and also has a BS/MS in Biomedical Engineering. Mark’s research interests revolve around developing engineers capable of leading and enacting positive change on their communities. His research explores the topics of entrepreneurial mindset, innovation, well-being, leadership, interpersonal skills, and other 21st century competencies. Mark has experiences in teaching and mentoring engineering students in human-centered design, social entrepreneurship, hu- manitarian engineering, leadership, and mindfulness
approach to inquiry.Five (5) male junior and senior electrical engineering students who had taken at least two electriccircuit courses participated in this study. The participants were asked open-ended questions viathink-aloud protocol to explain real-world electrical incidents. They were expected to verbalizetheir thought process and learning of circuit concepts. The analysis was guided by the skills aspectof the engineering habits of mind framework, where students use mental models and toolsnecessary to make educated choices and use approaches to thinking when solving problems insimilar or new contexts. All participants generally used mental tools associated with electric circuittheory, which indicated that students use mathematical models and
focus. Throughthis instructional culture, students are increasingly well equipped to tackle complex, ill-defined problems and to develop the mindsets necessary for making meaningfulcontributions to society as confident engineers.PurposeThis work communicates the contents and design of a preliminary instrument suite with apurpose of enhancing student learning and development as engineers as informed by data.The data will span student- and faculty-generated assessments with a mind towarddeveloping a holistic view of learning, development, and performance in engineering anddesign. Innovation stems directly from identifying problems without known solutions andin spaces with current solutions that aren’t acceptable. This is how engineers
Paper ID #28374Keep it Simple and Keep it Real: Creating Inclusive MakerspaceEnvironmentsProf. Jill Davishahl, Western Washington University Jill Davishahl is Assistant Professor and First Year Programs Director in the Engineering + Design de- partment at Western Washington University. Jill’s teaching, service, and research activities focus on en- hancing the engineering and design first year student experience by providing the foundational technical skills, student engagement opportunities, and professional skill development necessary to improve suc- cess in the major, with emphasis on supporting traditionally underserved
opportunities available to the instructor.Stanl~y B. Hamilton, in a paper read before the Newcomen Society, listedsix reasons engineers should study history (2): 1. The detective interest of tracing knowledge to its source. 2. The opportunity of sharing a disinterested companionship with others who are following kindred lines, as a member of such a body as our Society. 3. The broadening of interest in engineering from the purely technical to a humane and liberal field of study. 4. The light which the study of invention and discovery can throw on the working of the human mind. 5. The genuinely recreative form of relaxation which history provides. 6. The contribution which the
affordances of online digital tools in the facilitation of these experiences and in datacollection, and we make suggestions for other uses of this approach.Rationale Recent STEM education reforms have emphasized the importance of engaging studentsin the practices [1-2]; and habits of mind [3-5] of engineers in K-12 settings. In response toengineering standards at both the national and state levels [1,2,5], curricula have been developedto help teachers overcome their lack of experience with engineering. However, two importantaspects of teaching and learning engineering have been understudied: 1) the ways in whichteachers learn about engineering, and 2) how they transfer that learning to the classroom tosupport their students as engineers