support for students to succeed in research. The students completedweekly reports to keep them on task and allowed them to track their progress during the 10 weeks of theprogram. Questions included in the progress report were: • What did you do this week? • What is/are your research question(s)? • How have your research questions been developed or refined this week? • How is the research methodology being developed and why it is appropriate? • What literature did you find/explore this week and what was the most useful? • What data was collected this week? (Feel free to attach a few pictures or graphs of your data at the end of this document.) • Problems or potential problems this week? • Questions or
, and C. Funk. “STEM jobs see uneven progress in increasing gender, racial and ethnic diversity: Higher education pipeline suggests long path ahead for increasing diversity, especially in fields like computing and engineering,” Pew Research Center. 2021 [Online]. Available: https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2021/04/01/stem-jobs-see-uneven-progress-in -increasing-gender-racial-and-ethnic-diversity/[3] P. Baxter and S. Jack (2008). “Qualitative Case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers,” The Qualitative Report [Online]. 13(4), 544-559. Available: http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR13-4/baxter.pdf[4] V. Braun and V. Clarke (Dec. 2006). “Using thematic analysis in psychology
] T. Hunt, R. Carter, L. Zhang, and S. Yang, “Micro-credentials: the potential of personalizedprofessional development,” Development and Learning in Organizations: An InternationalJournal, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 33-35, 2020.[2] B. Hoanca, B. and B. Craig,. “Invited Paper: Building a K-16-Industry Partnership to TrainIT Professionals,” Journal of Information Systems Education, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 232–241, 2019.[3] L. Wheelahan and G. Moodie, “Gig Qualifications for the Gig Economy: Micro-Credentialsand the ‘Hungry Mile’,” Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher EducationResearch, vol. 83, no. 6, pp. 1279–1295, 2022.[4] NIST Computer Security Resource Center. Nice Framework Competencies: AssessingLearners for Cybersecurity Work (2nd
/B split, where we randomlyassign the students with similar demographics to the control and the test group. This will enableus to compare performances on the same exam with or without anonymous grading. The authorsare applying for IRB approval for conducting the surveys and focus groups.AcknowledgmentsA part of the work is supported by the Hrabowski Innovation Fund Award, which supportsinitiatives to enhance teaching and learning at UMBC.References1. Addy, Tracie Marcella, et al. What inclusive instructors do: Principles and practices for excellence in college teaching. Stylus Publishing, LLC, 2021.2. Malouff, John M., Ashley J. Emmerton, and Nicola S. Schutte. "The risk of a halo bias as a reason to keep students anonymous during
Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review*,” 2003.[4] K. Ayebi-Arthur, “E-learning, resilience and change in higher education: Helping a university cope after a natural disaster,” E-Learning and Digital Media, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 259–274, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1177/2042753017751712.[5] A. T. Le, “Support for doctoral candidates in Australia during the pandemic: the case of the University of Melbourne,” Studies in Higher Education, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 133–145, 2021, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2020.1859677.[6] S. Duchek, “Organizational resilience: a capability-based conceptualization,” Business Research, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 215–246, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s40685-019-0085-7.
university (current retention of 2020participants is higher than institutional averages), and for the institution as a recruiting andstudent preparation tool” [22]. These processes can be completed for a reasonable number ofstudents beginning in the fall of 2023 when participants from 2020 will have had three yearsto transition to or continue at the university and persist in study and those from 2021 will havehad two years.This work was funded by the National Science Foundation Award #1928611. Any opinions,findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of theauthor(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] A. Enriquez, Langhoff, N., Dunmire, E., Rebold, T., Pong
. 72(1), pp. 187–206, 2001.[3] H. McNeill & D. Polly, “Exploring Primary Grades Teachers’ Perceptions of Their Students’Mathematics Self-Efficacy and How They Differentiate Instruction,” Early Childhood EducationJournal, vol. 51(1), pp. 79–88, 2023[4] S.O. Bada & S. Olusegun, “Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching andlearning,” Journal of Research & Method in Education, vol. 5(6), pp. 66-70, 2015.[5] H. Hedges, J. Cullen, & B. Jordan, “Early years curriculum: funds of knowledge as aconceptual framework for children’s interests,” Journal of Curriculum Studies, vol. 43(2), pp.185–205, 2011.[6] N. McCaughtry, M. Fahlman, J.J Martin, & B. Shen, “Influences of constructivist-orientednutrition education on urban
: Biomedical Engineering Clinical Correlates Taught by Physicians Matthew L. Moorman, MD, MBA, FACS, FAWM, FCCM Chief, Division of Trauma, Critical Care, and Acute Care Surgery University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center Cleveland, Ohio 44106 Matthew.Moorman@UHhospitals.org Jeffrey S. Ustin, MD, MS Assistant Professor in Surgery Adjunct Professor in Biomedical Engineering Case Western Reserve University Cleveland, Ohio 44106 Jeffrey.Ustin
swayed by characteristics andperceptions of students, instructors must approach the practice with a complete understanding ofwhat those ratings reflect. Establishing best practices for peer assessment in how it is conducted,determining the subject matter, and how it is reviewed is integral to the growth of small learningpractices and its positive impacts on the student experience.References[1] M. Donia, T. O’Neill, & S. Brutus. (2018). The longitudinal effects of peer feedback in the development and transfer of student teamwork skills. In Learning and Individual Differences, 61, 87-98.[2] C. Brooks & J. Ammons. (2003). Free riding in group projects and the effects of timing, frequency, and specificity of criteria in peer
. Slater, “Who Gets to Die of Dysentery? Ideology, Geography, and The Oregon Trail,” Children’s Literature Association Quarterly, vol. 42, no. 4, Winter 2017, pp. 374-395.[3] B. Bigelow, “On the Road to Cultural Bias: A Critique of The Oregon Trail CD-ROM,” Language Arts, vol. 74, no. 2, Feb. 1997, pp. 84-93.[4] S. Coffman-Wolph and J. K. Estell, “Playing in the Sandbox: Developing Entrepreneurial Mindset Communication Skills in Introductory Programming Students,” in Proc. 2022 ASEE North Central Sect. Conf., Pittsburgh, PA, USA, Mar. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/39256[5] J. K. Estell and D. Reeping, “Providing Authentic Experiences in the First Year: Designing Educational Software in Support of Service Learning
students receive.Additional data analysis from the third quarter will be appended to this study as they becomeavailable. Cross-quarter and cumulative data analysis will be performed to gauge whether therelationship between time on task and weekly/final scores become clearer and whethercumulative data would present methods that would allow the use of time on task as an effectivemonitoring tool. At such time, historical data on recurring projects will be reviewed to see if itprovides any additional information.References[1] Kemmer, G., Keller, S. Nonlinear least-squares data fitting in Excel spreadsheets. Nat Protoc5, 267–281 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2009.182Appendix A1. List of weekly assignments for Senior Project I (Fall Quarter
institutions can affect faculty diversity. In L. L. Espinosa, J. M. Turk, M. Taylor, & H. M. Chessman (Eds.), Race and ethnicity in higher education: A status report (pp. 273-279). The American Council for Education.Hokanson, S. C., & Goldberg, B. B. (2018). Proactive postdoc mentoring. In, A. Jaeger & A. Dinin (Eds.), The postdoc landscape: The invisible scholar (pp. 91-120). Elsevier.National Science Foundation. (2018). Building the future: Investing in discovery and innovation– NSF strategic plan for fiscal years 2018-2022. https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2018/nsf18045/nsf18045.pdfPyhältö, K. (2018). Function of supervisory and researcher community support in PhD and post- PhD trajectories. In E. Bizer, L
college. Based on the comments from the fourteen students, they believed that NSTI had animpact on the career choice. Therefore, NSTI offered at Rowan University continues to have a long-termimpact on the students.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTThe authors would like to acknowledge the USDOT, the Federal Highway Administration, and the NewJersey Department of Transportation/Division of Civil Rights for funding this study through the NationalSummer Transportation Institute.References1. Ali, A. Mehta, Y., Patel, S., Evaluation of the 2017 National Summer Transportation Institute Hosted atRowan University, Proceedings of the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Salt Lake City, UT.
, pp. 1–7, 2013.[2] S. Provasnik, A. KewalRamani, M. McLaughlin Coleman, L. Gilbertson, W. Herring, and Q. Xie, “Status of Education in Rural America,” Washington, DC, 2007.[3] J. J. Versypt and A. N. Ford Versypt, “Mapping Rural Students ’ STEM Involvement : Case Studies of Chemical En- gineering Undergraduate Enrollment in the States of Illinois and Kansas Mapping Rural Students ’ STEM Involvement : Case Studies of Chemical Engineering Undergraduate Enrollment in t,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2013.[4] L. Zahedi, M. Ross, and J. Batten, “Pathways and Outcomes of Rural Students in Engineering," no. June 2019.[5] K. M. Ganss, “The college transition for
participants, ten have transferred intoengineering majors at four-year universities (43%), two have transferred into other STEM majors(9%), eight continue to take transfer preparatory courses at CCC (35%), and the educationalstatus of three students is unknown (13%). Anecdotally, several of the transferred students haveindicated that they continued to seek out research opportunities after transferring.AcknowledgementsThis material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation S-STEM GrantNumber 1564587 and by the University of California at Davis AvenueE program.References[1] L. Fleming, K. Engerman, and D. Williams, “Why Students Leave Engineering: TheUnexpected Bond,” in 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, Illinois, USA
these aspects of the course. (Memory) In the box below, describe what you learned and indicate the most important thing(s) you took away.What the students reported learning is summarized in Table 1 and described in more detail withillustrating quotations below, either in the sub-sections that follow, or in Appendix B for thosethat are more mundane, less prevalent, and likely to be of interest to fewer readers.Table 1: Summary of All Themes Theme Description Prevalence (# of students) Roles indications of the roles of facilitator and/or
," [Online]. Available: http://www.aneaes.gov.py/v2/application/files/4215/3356/6368/Criterios_de_calidad_Ingenierias.pdf. [Accessed 2021].[2] Facultad de Ingeniería, BUAP, "Gruppo de Ciencas Espaciales," [Online]. Available: https://sites.google.com/site/gcespacialesfibuap/home/-que-son-las-ciencias-espaciales. [Accessed 2021].[3] C. P. S. U. Cal Poly, CubeSat Design Specification Rev. 13, San Luis Obispo, California: The CubeSat Program, 2014.[4] TWI Ltd, "TWI Global," [Online]. Available: https://www.twi-global.com/technical- knowledge/faqs/what-is-petg. [Accessed 2021].[5] J. Velásquez, "MyOpenLab Software," 2017. [Online]. Available: https://myopenlab.org/inicio
Rehabilitation, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY. Registered Professional Engineer (Ohio). Robinson’s ethics teaching style comes from an amalgam of academic, industrial (Bell Labs), governmen- tal (VA) and clinical experiences, plus an interest in ethics from his undergraduate days.Ms. Loretta Driskel, Clarkson University Since the late 1990’s Loretta’s passion has been to create engaging, diverse teaching and learning ex- periences for students and faculty. As the senior instructional designer at Clarkson University, she has presented at conferences such as the Online Learning Consortium and over the past two decades, she has also presented at a wide variety of other venues including ADEIL; Sloan-C
its firstyear of operation, we summarize the current state of the program and make some suggestionsabout the future of the program.Background and LiteratureThe term, data science, likely coined in 2001 by W. S. Clevland [2], has had a number ofdefinitions. For the purposes of this paper, we focus on considering data science as a disciplinethat combines the fields of computer science, mathematics, statistics, and information technologybut with a focus on the generation, organization, modeling, and use of data to make scientific andbusiness decisions. Needless to say, a distinguishing feature of data science is the centrality of‘data’ to the mission of the discipline and its professionals. Data science programs shouldproduce data scientists
assessments (i.e., particularexam questions pass rate, written reports, etc.). The report may not consider the learning processstudents had during their course(s) or throughout their undergraduate program. In other words,assessment-centric self-study reports are not concerned with existing pedagogical practices anddata on how and why engineering students achieve the desired competencies of the requiredoutcomes. Given the emphasis of ABET on continuous improvement, it is surprising, andantithetical to commonly accepted quality assurance and continuous improvement processes, thatABET processes do not formally require student perceptions of their achievement of the studentoutcomes. Although employers and faculty are both recognized as
responses? Analyze and code homework assignments for connection and curiosity. Correlate participants’ homework with the five curiosity factors.We also hope in the second iteration of the course to increase the sample size of the data set.References 1. Mahadevan-Jansen, A., & Rowe, C. (2004, June), Module Based Freshman Engineering Course Development Paper presented at 2004 Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah. https://peer.asee.org/13180 2. KEEN, https://engineeringunleashed.com/mindset-matters.aspx [accessed 1/20/2020] 3. KEEN,https://engineeringunleashed.com/searchresults.aspx?searchtype=allexemplarcard s, [accessed 1/20/2020] 4. Vernon
Education, Washington: National Center for Education Statistics. http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2011/2011236.pdf, retrieved by August, 2017.3. C. P. Lachapelle and C. M. Cunningham, “Engineering in Elementary Schools”, In book, Engineering in Pre- College Settings: Synthesizing Research, Policy and Practices, Editors: S. Purzer, J. Strobel and M. Cardella, Purdue University Press, 2014, pp. 66-88.4. J. M. Bystydzienski, M. Eisenhart, and M. Bruning, “High school is not too late: developing girls’ interest and engagement in engineering careers,” The Career Development Quarterly, National Career Development Association, vol. 63, March 2015, pp. 88-95.5. I. Cross, “Music, Cognition, Culture, and Evolution,” Annals of the New York
theory and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include exploring disciplines as cultures, liberatory maker spaces, and a RED grant to increase pathways in ECE for the professional formation of engineers.S Masters, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University S. Masters is a doctoral student and Graduate Research Assistant at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Masters received a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from University of Delaware and is currently pursuing a Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Masters’ research interests include equity and social justice in engineering with particular attention to the experiences of women & LGBTQ