in Canada,” 2010. Retrieved from: http://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2012/rs gc-serc/NS3-46-2010-eng.pdf.[3] E.A. Cech, “Culture of disengagement in engineering education?" Science, Technology & Human Values vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 42-72, 2014.[4] W. Cummings, and O. Bain, “Where Are International Students Going?” International Higher Education, vol. 43, 2015.[5] R. Rockland, D. Bloom, J. Carpinelli, L. Burr- Alexander, L., Hirsch, and H. Kimmel, “Advancing the “E” in K-12 STEM education,” Journal of Technology Studies, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 53-64, 2010.[6] S. Catsambis, “Gender, race, ethnicity, and science education in the middle grades,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 32, no
. Atman, O. Eris, J. McDonnell, M. Cardella and J. Borgford-Parnell, “EngineeringDesign Education,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, Ed.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2016, pp. 201-226.[6] M. Zhang, F. Zhong and J. Yan, “Construction of the Course System for GasGeology Based on Training Objectives,” Education Teaching Forum, pp. 70-73, Jan.2019 (In Chinese).[7] X. Liu, S. Zhang, A. Chen, J. Li and B. Li, “Construction of Practical TeachingSystem for Resource Exploration Engineering in Kunming University of Science andTechnology,” Chinese Geological Education. vol. 27, pp. 32-35, 2018 (In Chinese).[8] S. Liu, J. Liu, W. Zhang and C. Chen, “Research on Problem and Strategy forChinese Engineering Practice Education
that faculty implementing active-learningmodules receive adequate training in classroom best practices.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank the Santa Clara University Office of Faculty Development forthe support of the Teaching with Technology grant to develop the course modules and hands-onactivities applied in this work and our two colleagues for their willingness to experiment and usethe developed teaching modules.Bibliography[1] S. Freeman, S. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt & M.P. Wenderoth, “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 11(23), 2014, pp. 8410- 8415. http://www.pnas.org/content/111/23
). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & society, 4(2), 139-158.Acker, J. (1992). Gendering organizational theory. Classics of organizational theory, 6, 450-459.Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & society, 20(4), 441-464.Adams, R., Evangelou, D., English, L., De Figueiredo, A. D., Mousoulides, N., Pawley, A. L., ... & Wilson, D. M. (2011). Multiple perspectives on engaging future engineers. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 48-88.Alinsky, S. D. (1989). Rules for radicals: A practical primer for realistic radicals. Vintage.Baillie, C., Ko, E., Newstetter, W., & Radcliffe, D. F. (2011). Advancing diverse and inclusive
East Carolina University, and Co-Director of ECU’s pan-institutional STEAM Education Research Cluster. His research focuses on the teaching and learning of earth and environmental science content, environmental education, and STEM instruction. He is a former high school earth science teacher who has served as PI, Co-PI, or Evaluator on NOAA, NSF, NIH, US Department of Education, IMLS, state, and foundation funded projects. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Using an Immersive Classroom Simulated Environment for Math and Science Discourse Development in Pre-service TeachersAn interdisciplinary team of researchers from East Carolina University (ECU)’s College
teams.References: [1] Rutar, T., & MS, B. S. (2011, June), A Modular Project Management Approach to Undergraduate Senior Design Projects Paper presented at the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC. https://peer.asee.org/17350 [2] Lawanto, O., & Cromwell, M., & Febrian, A. (2016, June), Student’s Self-Regulation in Managing Their Capstone Senior Design Projects Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. [3] Chen, Z. (2017, June), Applying Scrum to Manage a Senior Capstone Project Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. https://peer.asee.org/27605 [4] Porter, J., & Wright, G., & Morgan, J
ethical dilemmas." In Proceedings, 33rd Annual,Frontiers in Education Conference. 2003.[12] Shuman, Larry J., Mark F. Sindelar, Mary Besterfield-Sacre, Harvey Wolfe, Rosa L. Pinkus, Ronald L. Miller, Barbara M. Olds, and Carl Mitcham. "Can our students recognize and resolve ethical dilemmas." In Proceedings, 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Conference & Exposition. 2004.[13] Johnson, Deborah G. Ethical Issues in Engineering. Prentice-Hall, 1991.[14] Vesilind, P. Aarne, and Alastair S. Gunn. Hold Paramount: The Engineer’s Responsibility to Society. Nelson Education, 2015.[15] Holsapple, Matthew A., et al. "Framing faculty and student discrepancies in engineering ethics education delivery." Journal of
/or First Generation College Students at The University of Akron," Journal of STEM Education, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 14-20, 2005.[10] S. Lynch, T. Behrend, E. P. Burton and B. Means, "Inclusive STEM-focused high schools: STEM education policy and opportunity structures," in Annual conference of National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), Rio Grande, Puerto Rico, 2013.[11] National Research Council, "Successful K-12 STEM Education: Identifying Effective Approaches in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics," National Academies Press, Washington D.C., 2011.[12] S. L. Colby and M. Ortman Jennifer, "Projections of the Size and Composition of the U.S. Population: 2014 to 2060," US Census Bureau, 2015
support of NSF (DUE #1505066) and WSU VancouverResearch Mini-grant for this research project.References 1. Berthouex, P. (1996). Honing the writing skills of engineers. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 122(3), 107-110. 2. Donnell, J., Aller, B., Alley, M., & Kedrowicz, A. (2011). Why industry says that engineering graduates have poor communication skills: What the literature says. Proceedings of the 2011 American Society for Engineering Education Conference and Exposition. Retrieved from http://www.asee.org/public/conferences/1/papers/1503/view 3. Conrad, S., Kitch, W.A., Pfeiffer, T.J., Smith, T.R., and Tocco, J.V. (2015). Students Writing for Professional Practice: A Model
Hundigopal , Xiaoxin You, Increasing high school girls' self confidence and awareness of CS through a positive summer experience, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.36 n.1, March 20047 Rogers, S., S. Harris, I. Fidan, and D. McNeel, "Art2STEM: Building a STEM Workforce at the Middle School Level," ASEE Annual Conference, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2011.8 Inna Pivkina , Enrico Pontelli , Rachel Jensen , Jessica Haebe, Young women in computing: lessons learned from an educational & outreach program, Proceedings of the 40th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, March 04-07, 2009, Chattanooga, TN, USA9 Tyler-Wood, Tandra, et al. "Bringing up girls in science (BUGS): The effectiveness of an afterschool
undergraduate students” witha stated mission “to graduate engineers with an entrepreneurial mindset so they can createpersonal, economic, and societal value through a lifetime of meaningful work.” Including anentrepreneurial mindset in an engineering curriculum, discussed more completely in a paper byKriewall and Mekemson’s,9 is one where unmet customer needs are coupled with traditionalengineering approaches to problem solving and can lead to potential benefits to both individualstudents and to society as a whole. Similarly, presentations from 2015’s ASEE AnnualConference and Exposition concerning Epicenter10, the National Center for EngineeringPathways to Innovation showcased another inspiring example. Their stated mission “…is toempower U.S
learning in engineering andmedicine: determinants of students’ engagement and persistence. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 6(2), 8.[9] Bandura, A. Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior, 4 (pp. 71-81). New York: AcademicPress, 1994[10] Brown, J.S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(10),32-43.[11] Collins, A., Brown, J. S. & Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive Apprenticeship: Making Thinking Visible. American Educator, 15(3), 6-11, 38-46.[12] Dong, J., & Warter-Perez, N. “Project-Based Learning Using Tablet PCs: A Practice to Enhance Design Components inEngineering Instruction,” in Proceedings of the American
quality improvement systems of the program may well require acultural shift of the institution’s administrators and faculty.ConclusionsFor continuous improvement processes, ABET’s Criterion 4 focuses the primary mechanismprogram improvement on appropriate assessment and evaluation of student outcomes (whatstudents need to know and be able to do at the time of graduation), e.g., data driven improvementactions based on demonstrated student learning (or lack of such learning). The AUN-QA criteriahave a much broader focus on quality improvement, asking programs to use a wide variety ofinputs within their quality system. Some of the measures of quality included in the AUN-QAcriteria include traditional output measures, e.g., Criterion 10’s
Northridge were able to graduate as mechanical engineerstrained to think, design, and operate using system-level skills.Bibliography[1] Kirkpatrick, A., & Danielson, S., ASME VISION 2030’S RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MECHANICALENGINEERING EDUCATION. Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition[2] Youssef, G., & Kabo, J. M., Machine Design: Redesigned Paper presented at 2015 ASEE AnnualConference and Exposition[3] Katz, R., Integrating Analysis and Design in Mechanical Engineering Education Procedia CIRP, Volume36, 2015[4] Towhidnejad, M., & Hillburn, T., An Overview of GRCSE: Graduate Reference Curriculum for SystemsEngineering Paper presented at World Congress on Engineering Education 2013[5] Lee, T
[lesson]&[activity] Describe the campus - foot, bicycle, and vehicle Transport with case study of Highway funding issues in the traffic - identify problem areas, then Denmark/Sweden train/ferry government (postponed 36 times). use the engineering design process to transport; Kandersteg Switzerland car Then have teams of 2 or 4 develop and develop solution(s) (Liz Adams) transport on train
partnertwo-year institutions are confident in the opportunities the Engineering Academies present to thestudents and the potential to enrich the diversity of the engineering workforce in the State ofTexas and the nation.Bibliography[1] President’s Council on Jobs and Competitiveness Announces Industry Leaders’ Commitment to Double Engineering Internships in 2012 (PCJC) (2011). Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press- office/2011/08/31/president-s-council-jobs-and-competitiveness-announces-industry-leaders.[2] President’s Council of Advisors on Science Technology (PCAST). (2012). Report to the president, engage to excel: producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology
-analysis of properties of variables from the theory of planned behavior. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 159-156.Lapan, R. , Shaughnessy, P., & Boggs,K. (1996). Efficacy expectations and vocational interests as mediators between sex and choice of math/science college majors: A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49, 277-291.Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2002). Social cognitive career theory. Career choice and development, 4, 255-311.Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., Schmidt, J., Brenner, B., Lyons, H., & Treistman, D. (2003). Relation of contextual supports and barriers to choice behavior in engineering majors: Test of alternative social cognitive models. Journal of
. This diversity results in a datasetthat currently comprises twenty-five years of data that includes 1,014,887 unique undergraduate,degree-seeking students. Of those students 210,725 were ever enrolled in engineering. While theoriginal database contains only eleven institutions, the plan for MIDFIELD has always been toexpand the database to include all public institutions in the United States that offer undergraduateprograms in engineering. An award by the National Science Foundation (#1545667,$4,010,978.00, 03/01/16 to 02/28/2021) will support increasing the number of partnerinstitutions to 103. Students in the expanded MIDFIELD will comprise over half of theundergraduate engineering degrees awarded at U. S. public institutions and
Engineering Students.” Proceedings of the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition”, AC 2011-76112. Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Ozgur E., Frey D.D., and Leifer L. J., “Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching and Learning”, Journal of Engineering Education, January 2005 pp. 103-12013. Meyers, K., Uhran, J., Pieronek, C., Budny, D., Ventura, J., Ralston P., Estell, J., Hart, B., Slaboch, C., and Ladewski, R., “Perspectives On First Year Engineering Education”, Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition”, Session 122614. Allam, Y.,S., Whitfield, C.A., and Phanthanousy, J.H., “Scaffolding Provided to Engineering Students in Conerstone Design Project Scenarios Related to Practice of Expert Designers”, Proceedings of the
. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.[6] Business Roundtable, 2005, Tapping America’s Potential: The Education for Innovation Initiative. Business Roundtable: Washington, D.C.[7] Blue, C.E., Blevins, L.G., Carriere, P., Gabriele, G., Leader), S.K.G., Rao, V. and Ulsoy, G., 2005, The Engineering Workforce: Current State, Issues, and Recommendations. Final Report to the Assistant Director of Engineering. National Science Foundation: Arlington, VA.[8] Lang, J.D., Cruse, S., McVey, F.D. and McMasters, J., 1998, “Industry Expectations of New Engineers: A Survey to Assist Curriculum Designers.” Journal of Engineering Education. 88(1): p. 43-51.[9] Chubin, D.E., May, G.S. and Babco, E.L., 2005, “Diversifying the Engineering
attributes were developed.These attributes were then used to analyze several popular canvases to create a framework forcomparing and selecting canvases. This analysis reveals that these canvases have beendeveloped for different types of systems in different stages of their life cycle. Lastly wediscussed how our general canvas framework could be used to enhance student learning in aneducational context.ReferencesBlank, Steven G. (May 2013). "Why the lean start-up changes everything". Harvard BusinessReview 91 (5): 63–72.Blank, Steven G. & Dorf, Bob. The Startup Owner’s Manual: The Step-by-step Guide forBuilding a Great Company, K&S Ranch; 1 edition (March 1, 2012).Buede, Dennis M. The Engineering Design of Systems: Models and Methods, 3rd
] Gold, M. (2012). Debates in the Digital Humanities. University of Minnesota Press.[3] Kirschenbaum, M. (2012). “What is Digital Humanities and What’s It Doing in English Departments?” In Debates in the Digital Humanities, ed. Matthew K. Gold. University of Minnesota Press.[4] Mueller, M. (2014). “Shakespeare His Contemporaries: Collaborative Curation and Exploration of Early Modern Drama in a Digital Environment. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 8(3).[5] Engel, D. & Thain, M. (2015). “Textual Artifacts and Their Digital Representations: Teaching Graduate Students to Build Online Archives.” Digital Humanities Quarterly, 9(1).[6] Manzo, C., Kaufmann, G., Punjasthitkul, S., & Flanagan, M. (2015). “‘By the People, For the People
and industry mentors.Bibliography1. Miller, R. L. & Olds, B. M. A model curriculum for a capstone course in multidisciplinary engineering design. J. Eng. Educ. 83, 311–316 (1994).2. Hotaling, N., Fasse, B. B., Bost, L. F., Hermann, C. D. & Forest, C. R. A quantitative analysis of the effects of a multidisciplinary engineering capstone design course. J. Eng. Educ. 101, 630–656 (2012).3. Howe, S. & Wilbarger, J. National survey of engineering capstone design courses. in Proceedings of the 2006 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition 18–21 (2005).4. Lamancusa, J. S., Zayas, J. L., Soyster, A. L., Morell, L. & Jorgensen, J. 2006 Bernard M. Gordon Prize Lecture*: The Learning Factory: Industry-Partnered Active Learning. J
2012 and 857in Fall 2013. Because of a university-wide initiative, the President decided in Fall 2013 to admitmore students to the Colleges of Engineering and Business. The California State Universitysystem-wide placement testing program in basic reading, writing, and mathematics skills consistsof the English Placement Test (EPT) and the Entry Level Mathematics (ELM) examination.Students who do not earn a score that indicates they are ready for college level English mustenroll in the remedial course(s) as determined by their score. Placement into an English courseis based on the student’s EPT score as follows:EPT Scores First Semester Second Semester0-138 LLD 1 LLD 2 or English 1A139-146 LLD 2 English 1A147-180
pre- post anxiety treatment to improve academic performance for engineering students.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, pp. 3826-3830.7. Ferguson, C.W., Yanik, P.M., Chang, A. and Kaul, S. (2015). “Scholarship Program Initiative via Recruitment, Innovation, and Transformation.” Proc. 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, WA.8. Kaul, S., Chang, A., Yanik, P.M. and Ferguson, C.W. (2015). “Development of a Mentorship Program in Engineering and Technology.” Proc. 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, WA.
the E and ET academic career. At the end, I would like to mention that some of these suggestions will work while others may not, based on the faculty’s personality and way of implementation, but it’s always good to try. References Accreditation Criteria from Policy and Procedural Manual, www.abet.org. Adams, Robin S. and Felder, Richard (2008) “Reframing Professional Development: A Systems Approach to Preparing Engineering Educators to Educate Tomorrow ’s Engineers, Journal of Engineering Education, Pp.239-241. Austin, A. E. (2003). Creating a bridge to the future: Preparing new faculty to face changing expectations in a shifting context. Review of Higher Education, 26, 119-144. Boice, R. (1992). The New Faculty Member, San Francisco, CA
Workshop should have less speakers Other (please specifiy)Figure 2. Results from the panelist survey based on how the event could be improvedThe results of the attendee survey mirrored the panelists’ responses on the organization andlength of the workshop again noting that it was a well-organized event and the length wasappropriate, though a small percentage felt the event was somewhat long. In addition to thesequestions, the attendees were also asked to reflect on their thoughts regarding workshop content,suggestions for future events, if they would consider attending again and most importantly thebenefit(s) from attendance.The attendees overwhelmingly replied that the topic was of interest to them and that some
authorswish to express sincere gratitude for their financial support received the duration of the project.Bibliography1. Their Future Is Green: The Clean-Energy Economy Promises An Engineering Jobs Bounty – Training GraduatesWith Right Skills, American Society for Engineering Education PRISM, pp. 38-41, 4/2010.2. Blue Green Alliance | Clean energy assembly line report: Environment, Development and Growth: U.S.-MexicoCooperation in Renewable Energies, ISBN: 1-933549-78-5, December 2010, Duncan Wood, Woodrow WilsonInternational Center for Scholars.3. U. S. Energy Information Administration, Annual Energy Review, 2013http://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/index.cfm?page=renewable_home4. Annual Energy Outlook 2013 with Projections to 2050 (Early Release
university for six courses which were part of two tracks: a common introductorysequence and a sequence for honors students.3 Professors and teaching assistants of these coursesclassified their respective section(s) of “Introduction to Engineering” and generally hadagreement in most areas within each of the eight main outcomes; however, discrepancies intopics were discovered within sections covered by each outcome.In the self-study, the results were organized by main outcome where a three-color coding systemwas used to show the level of agreement between instructors.3 An outcome marked as greendenoted that the outcome was covered in each section of one or more courses. An outcome
4institutions. To assess whether the program content matched the interests of the participants,participants were asked to indicate the type of institution(s) to which they plan to apply.Institutions were categorized into four groups: research intensive, research and teachingintensive, teaching intensive, and community college. Participants were also asked to indicate ifthey were interested in tenure or non-tenure track positions. As shown in Figure 2, participants’interests shifted throughout the program. Although no conclusive tends were observed with theparticipants’ change in the type of institution to which they were interested in applying, this datadoes reflect the sentiment of indecision that was observed in the post program interviews