: • Ethical responsibilities • Economic benefits • Health and Safety • Societal context • Environmental • Global effects • Detailed Design were addressed as applicable (As driven by type & nature of the design project) Systems Diagram (Interfacing, power, signals) Materials/Mechanical System Manufacturing & Process Planning System Simulation / Industrial System Thermal System Electrical System Computer System
attributes feeling supported and not marginalized as a Black, femaleengineering student to the fact that professors and peers know who she is personally, “becausethe program is so small, people know my ambitions, people know my work ethic, people knowhow much I can get done, people know how I think, people know what I say, people know what Iwear. People know me as a person regardless of if I show them or not.” Feelings of relatedness inthis engineering program are demonstrably generated both by the faculty and staff who havedesigned a program that facilitates community and by the students themselves who takeadvantage of these opportunities to become deeply engaged. The students interviewed for thisstudy crave relationships with their professors and
, we consider Hughes and Pennington’s (2016) relational ethics criterion forautoethnography. These criteria and applications to our study are summarized in Table 1.Table 1. Research quality Quality Criterion Consideration/application in our study We included first-person positionality to explicate our current positions in the EER community and foreground the power Reflexivity differentials in our mentoring relationships. Our statements of goals provide additional perspective on the mentoring relationships. We grounded the study in relevant frameworks and demonstrate alignment
engineers interested inECD (extension). Traditional graduate engineering training often lacks education aboutunderstanding engineering as a socio-technical endeavor while graduate engineering research isoften for graduate advisors to be presented in professional conferences, published in academicjournals, and eventually contributing to the output of a research lab. Even when graduateengineering education is complemented with ancillary “social” topics like research ethics orprofessional communication, it often lacks a concerted effort to view engineering as a socio-technical endeavor, which, as we propose, is a necessary precondition for effective communityengagement. Even when the research topic could be relevant to communities or
engineeringstudents and physics major students. Our community college requires Calculus One as a co-requisite in Calculus Physics One. The use of the spatial-numeric tool facilitated by Excel wouldbe acceptable as a helping tool to the use of analytical geometry, especially when MicrosoftOffice 365 is already included in the student fee in our CUNY system The pedagogy of using thevan Hiele learning model in physics with quantitative questioning had not been popular as far aswe know. The use of the placebo comparison method to validate a new pedagogy wouldgenerate ethical issues in education. Therefore the deployment of the van Hiele learning modelin calculus physics with spatial-numeric tool would need justifications which include brain scandata. Among the
education to university life and provide support to students - Equip students with important professional skills Assessment Report on Engineering Overview Mini Project, Ethic case study, Quiz (1,2), CPBL Report (Stages 1,2,3), Presentation (Stages 1,2,3), Video, e-learning, PR & PI (problem restatement & problem identification), Peer teaching notes (Stage 1,2,3), Test, Reflection, Peer Rating T&L approach Cooperative learning Cooperative Problem-based learning Methods Conducted through in-class activities where students in a group of 4 are given 3
innovative, and rapidly evolving professional ecosystem. Principal among these skillsare critical thinking, analytic reasoning, creativity, self-reflection, teamwork, cultural awareness,technical communication, and ethical literacy [37]. The demand for such skills in the modernworkplace has been heeded as a calling for the rehabilitation of oral assessments in STEM. Thisis because such a form of assessment has been argued, above all else, to encourage deeplearning—a requisite for the development of the 21st century skillset [38-40]. Of distinct value inthe digital era too are other benefits of oral assessment, such as its capacity to promote thedevelopment of communication and interpersonal skills in students [10, 32, 41], crucial forsuccess in the
processes of design, help students use science,mathematics, and computation, and encourage engineering ways of thinking and collaboration aswell as teamwork and ethics (American Society for Engineering Education, 2020; Moore et al.,2014). Engineering curricula that involve these indicators may then benefit learners more thantraditional teacher-centered approaches (Cunningham et al., 2020).Such engineering curricular materials are being implemented in a growing number of inclusiveclassrooms that involve students with IEPs together with students without IEPs. Yet, despite theimportance of engaging all students in high-quality engineering curricula, relatively littleresearch explores engineering projects in inclusive settings. Research that has
and Course OutcomesABET Outcomes addressed in this course:• Outcome 1 – Ability to analyze complex computing problems and apply principles of computing and other relevant disciplines to identify solutions.• Outcome 2 – Ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specific needs with respect to public health, safety, and welfare keeping into consideration, global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors.• Outcome 3 – Ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences.• Outcome 4 – Ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, with consideration for the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic
(4 credits) • Differential Equations with Linear Algebra (4 credits) • Applied Probability and Statistics (B2) (3 credits) • General Physics I (3 credits) • General Physics Laboratory I (1 credit) • General Physics II (3 credits) • General Physics Laboratory II (1 credit) • General Chemistry I (C1) (3 credits) • Chemistry Laboratory I (1 credit) • Engineering Ethics (F1, IT6) (2 credits) • Basic Engineering Graphics and Design (1 credit) • Engineering Computing and Problem Solving (1 credit) • Fundamentals of Engineering Design (2 credits) • Statics (3 credits) • Dynamics (3 credits) • Mechanics of
2022)50. How to make images accessible for people. Available at: https://help.twitter.com/en/using-twitter/picture-descriptions. (Accessed: 17th February 2022)51. Alternative Text | Accessible U. Available at: https://accessibility.umn.edu/what-you-can- do/start-7-core-skills/alternative-text. (Accessed: 17th February 2022)52. Palmer, Z. B. & Palmer, R. H. Legal and Ethical Implications of Website Accessibility: https://doi.org/10.1177/2329490618802418 81, 399–420 (2018).53. Mifsud, J. 8 Free Web-Based Website Accessibility Evaluation Tools - Usability Geek. Available at: https://usabilitygeek.com/10-free-web-based-web-site-accessibility- evaluation-tools/. (Accessed: 11th May 2022)54. Gernsbacher, M
CollectionData collection for the study was conducted in the fall semester of 2019. A total of 132 studentsparticipated in the study. 25 (18.9%) were female students. 36 students were first-year students,74 were second-year students, 15 were third year students, and 7 were fourth-year students.Participants were registered in first- and second-year introductory engineering design coursesthat aimed at offering students an authentic learning environment. Before collecting any data,ethical approval for the research was obtained from the University of Ottawa’s office of researchethics and integrity review board. The principal author shared the questionnaire links with thestudents at the beginning of the semester. Participation was voluntary. Students were
data for this paper is from four focusgroups conducted each with two to four students in the same year for a total of 12 students acrossall four years. Students were asked about their general experience in the program and specificteaching practices used, to further support an understanding of teaching from first principles andrelated practices. The names used throughout the paper are pseudonyms.Data collection and analysisThe study protocol was approved by the appropriate university research ethics board. Theinterviews and focus groups were conducted on Zoom, due in part to the Covid-19 Pandemic,and were subsequently transcribed by the research team. The interviews and focus groups wereanalyzed using an open coding process; codes were
former threads on Advanced Materials Machines, Renewable EnergyMachines, and Digital Cities, respectively.IV.B.i. An Overview of Each Track in the new Thread Materials Machines. NEET students will learn design methods and machine controls,and the application of advanced materials machines, technologies, and processes to meetsustainability and climate goals. Energy Transition. Students will be trained on energy production, conversion, storage,and transmission technologies that produce little to no greenhouse emissions. Digital Cities. This track emphasizes the development of fundamental skills in urbanplanning and policy including ethics, justice, and engagement; statistics, data science, andgeospatial analysis and visualization
and then buildFoK findings into school curricula. [42] Vygotskian framing of “use-value” knowledge ensures that “bothlife-based and discipline-based knowledge are valued for curriculum” and supports an “inclusive, fair-world justice” ethic. [74] Strengths and gaps associated with use of FoK to research with militaryundergraduates in engineering are discussed in the following sections.Strengths of FoK for Research with Military Undergraduates in EngineeringFoK is an assets-based approach to educational praxis. Using the FoK approach, research and teacherscollaboratively reveal and define diverse assets of oppressed groups and transform deficit assumptionsinto use -value categories of knowledge. [42]Gaps within FoK for Research with Military
, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 208-224. Apr. 2009. [Online]. Available doi:10.1177/000312240907400203[4] J. C. Lucena, Defending the Nation: U.S. Policymaking to Create Scientists and Engineers from Sputnik to the ‘War Against Terrorism.’ Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 2005.[5] S. Secules, “Making the familiar strange: An ethnographic scholarship of integration contextualizing engineering educational culture as masculine and competitive,” Engineering Studies, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 196-216. Sep. 2019. [Online]. Available doi:10.1080/19378629.2019.1663200[6] E. O. McGee and L. Bentley, “The equity ethic: Black and Latinx college students reengineering their stem careers toward justice,” American Journal of Education
knowledgeably select a major. Recognize and assess contemporary, global, Situating this project in a specific and local and ethical issues and societal impacts of context will increase students’ understanding solutions/designs. of engineering issues and the byproducts of engineering solutions.7.2 Usability and adaptability.The target audience for the project-based learning assignment is second-year undergraduate ECEstudents in an integrated design course. A pilot study was conducted to discuss the project andperform lab usability testing with graduate students and upper-level undergraduates. Studentparticipants were offered gift cards as an incentive. All
college. Generally,this group of military students has served or are serving as enlisted servicemembers and arelikely to be first-generation or from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups that have beenhistorically underrepresented in engineering education [1] and the engineering workforce. Inaddition, both prior and current enlisted military students are widely considered to be those whohave developed/will develop key attributes, such as a strong work ethic, maturity, and leadershipskills, during their time in service that prepare them for academic success in engineeringeducation and for impact in engineering careers [2].BackgroundThe U.S. military has been a driving force in the evolution of engineering education in theUnited States since
correlation with more traditional engineeringproblems versus the more challenging open-ended coursework. Student 3 portrays a markedlydifferent type with week 3 (site visit) closely aligning with Stolk’s type 1, week 5 (site visit)correlates to high internal motivation and high external regulation, week 7 (Zoom problemsession) is a classic style 1, week 9 (FE engineering economics problems) is type 4, week 11(ethics) is type 2 and week 13 (sensitivity project) is type 4. Unlike other students, this studentdid not complete the learning reflection.Freshman Level Introduction to Engineering Design SIMS and BNS ResponsesAs previously noted in the course comparison of SDI across the semester, Graph 1, the Freshmanlevel Introduction to Engineering Design
students defined UD beforeand after our intervention. To analyze the responses, we coded the open-ended definitions intobroad themes using an emergent coding strategy modeling after Wildman et al. [21].Ethics approval. The University of Washington Human Subjects Division determined that theactivity of human subjects research described in this manuscript qualified for exempt status (IRBID STUDY00001906).Descriptions of ActivitiesHere we present a summary and brief descriptions of example activities that include specificprompts, so instructors can try these activities in their own courses.Bioengineering Capstone Design. 1. Introduction to Accessibility, Disability, and UD Topics via Guest Lecture: A local expert in accessibility was invited
institution. Each implementation, taking theform of a variable length PD or camp, often but not necessarily occurring during the summer,may present content to teachers exclusively, students exclusively, or some combination ofteachers and students. In addition to the flexibility provided in the form and participants invited to the PDor camp, the program allows for wide ranges in offered curriculum. Some camps preparestudents for industry grade examinations, such as the Certified Ethical Hacker examinationfrom the EC-Council[25] while other camps choose to present more foundational cyberse-curity concepts [26]. This highlights the potential for vastly different content within thebroader grouping of GenCyber, ensuring that the needs of K-12 teachers
networked- model, the traditional analysis, laboratory, and design components would be deeply interrelated: engineering knowledge remains central but is configured to include both technical and contextual knowledge; competencies of practice, laboratory, and design experiences are integrated into the whole, as are professionalism and ethics.”With a continued focus on expanded access and curricular innovation, this decade of innovationlead to increased recognition of the program's successful curricular elements, yet for the facultyit served to only increase the recognition of the need for expanded innovation in both thedirection of upper division curriculum and the direction for expanding the active and application-based
of the Workplace Environments Network, and is currently Co-Chair of the Communication Network. She is a member of the National Communication Association and the American Society for Engineering Education.Kingsley A. Reeves (Associate Professor) Kingsley Reeves is an Associate Professor at the University of South Florida in the Industrial and Management Systems Engineering Department. His current research interests focus on the lean six sigma philosophy and applications of traditional industrial engineering methods to solve problems in the education service sector. He is also active in engineering education research with a focus on the formation of ethical engineers. Kingsley is also a current RIEF mentee.Elizabeth
they gave 100% - and sometimes 110% - to everyproject that they work on. While these statements reflect positively on students’ work ethics, theydo little to clarify whether there was any meaningful connection between student work and theproject topic. Perhaps the most salient takeaway with regards to behavioral engagement issummarized by Melanie: “I might be more motivated if a project idea is cool, but that depends alot on how the project is presented.” In other words, the theming of the project may matter lessthan the project being presented in an interesting way.Affective EngagementThe matter of affective engagement is difficult to address based on the data presented. While itwas clear that some students felt passionate about the content