, that is, theidealized vision of the curriculum design put forth by designers in the printed materials used forthe course. Yet, it must be noted, curricula are generally not implemented as planned, and maynot even unfold the same ways under the guidance of the same teacher in different class sections.Consequently, analyses of the intended curriculum paint a foundational but incomplete picture ofa course that gives so much attention to in-class group project work. To address thisshortcoming, Porter and colleagues22 distinguish the intended from the enacted curriculum. Theenacted curriculum refers to the specific content as it is actually taught by teachers and studiedby students during the course of learning and instruction.Analysis of the
lecturedominant pattern, when cooperative learning protocols are deployed. The paper shows howcooperative learning can advance academic success, quality of relationships, psychologicaladjustments, and attitudes toward the college experience. A number of relevant questions docome to mind, including: What needs to be done to move the process forward? What are the keycomponents of successful deployment of active learning in general and cooperative learning inparticular? How to foster and expand the community of engineering faculty who decide to usecooperative learning? What plans and resources need to be mobilized to institutionalizepedagogies of engagement including cooperative learning, at the department or college level?Achieving the change needed in
participants expressed a limited availability of childcare facilities on-campus.A female assistant professor, case A9, used the metaphor of ―unicorns and rainbows‖ to describehow childcare facilities appear to exist, but in reality either they are rare to find or cannot befound at all. She also noted that there are staff members who help parents locate childcare intown, but without way to assess the quality of those facilities. She suggested that the universityshould have a system to help the childcare facilities plan for additional resources in order to meetthe high demand of these services on campus. Lastly, she felt that twelve weeks of parental leavewas not enough to find suitable child care for her. In the box below, a dashed line was
missions to the outer planets.Dan Ingold, University of Southern California Mr. Ingold is a Senior Research Analyst and PhD student with the Center for Systems and Software Engineering at the University of Southern California (USC). Mr. Ingold has over 30 years of experience in the development of software-intensive systems, and prior to joining USC was CEO of a firm that developed specialized systems for defense C4ISR and industrial applications. His research interests are in the application of hybrid agile/plan-driven techniques to the development of large-scale, software- intensive systems. Mr. Ingold received his BS in Computer Science from Purdue University, and MS in Computer Science from USC
the analysis of this project’s data, to be described below, we have drawnheavily on the “epistemic frame elements” introduced by the Epistemic Games research group(epistemicgames.org). This group develops then researches games designed to help school-agedchildren learn to “think like a professional,” developing games for engineering, urban planning,and journalism. The epistemic frame helps researchers think through what “thinking like aprofessional” actually means in the context of people’s speech and actions. Shaffer andcolleagues19 argue (p. 4): The epistemic frame hypothesis suggests that any community of practice has a culture [...] and that culture has a grammar, a structure composed of: • Skills: the things that people within the
AC 2011-1627: MYSTERIES AND HEROES: USING IMAGINATIVE ED-UCATION TO ENGAGE MIDDLE SCHOOL LEARNERS IN ENGINEER-INGLucy McAuliffe, Smith College Lucy McAuliffe is the senior editor and an instructional designer for the Talk to Me Project. Lucy is currently a student at Smith College, majoring in American Studies and Environmental Science & Policy. She is a First Group Scholar, and recipient of awards including the Newton Arvin Prize in American Studies and a grant from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. She plans to enter the publishing industry upon her graduation in 2012.Glenn W Ellis, Smith College Glenn Ellis is an Associate Professor of Engineering at Smith College where he teaches courses in engi- neering
eliminating all methods except QFD, Brainstorming and FMEA. • A lack of requirements for the application of engineering analysis in design. The use of engineering analysis being what distinguishes engineering design from craftsman or artistic design.6 This was exemplified by a number of projects, which failed to meet the customer requirements, often due to a lack of design analysis on the part of the project team. • A number of design projects that did not contain appropriate material for a capstone design experience and/or emphasized non-engineering aspects such as the development of marketing materials and business plans
neering and technology education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011Thomas F. Wolff, Michigan State University Dr. Thomas F. Wolff is Associate Dean of Engineering for Undergraduate Studies at Michigan State University. In this capacity, he is responsible for all activities related to student services (academic ad- ministration, advising, career planning, women and diversity programs, etc.) and curricular issues. He is principal investigator on several NSF grants related to retention of engineering students. As a faculty member in civil engineering, he co-teaches a large introductory course in civil engineering. His research and consulting activities have focused on the safety
women? 6) How successful are existingstructures at addressing these barriers? Climate survey results, in conjunction with objectivehuman resource data review and benchmarking of policies and benefits against peer schools witha focus on elements that have been tied to potential barriers are used to address each question.This paper explores answers to each research question and summarizes accomplishments madeover the grant period and plans for institutionalizing various initiatives.BackgroundRIT currently employs 95 women tenured and tenure-track (T TT) faculty in the science,technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines, or 22.8% of the total STEM TTT faculty (Table 1); this is significantly below the 30.10% represented by the 2006
attention is frequently focusedon individual creativity and other personality traits, organizational cultures, and other non-technical capabilities. We argue here that the typical descriptions of innovation competencies arecorrect but incomplete, lacking critical dimensions that are essential for planning an educationalcurriculum and assessing progress within it.The foundation of our model of innovation competencies rests on our definition of innovation:The ability to develop novel solutions to problems that result in significantly enhancedstakeholder satisfaction. As engineering educators, we believe that innovation is only effectivewhen it includes the full cycle leading to delivery of improved stakeholder outcomes, and thisintroduces challenges
self-managing and reliable smart grid isseen as the future of protection and control systems [3]. This philosophy requires finding a wayto implement in the laboratory.The Smart Grid design aims are to provide overall power system monitoring, create controlstrategies to maintain system performance and security and to reduce cost of operation,maintenance, and system availability planning. The Smart Grid Control gives us capabilities suchas: predicting system behavior, anticipatory operation and adaptation to new environment, Page 22.813.2handling distributed resource, stochastic demand and optimal response to the smart appliances.The smart grid
appreciated the opportunity to work ontheir technical writing, although some felt that the peer review feedback was not helpful and thatthe writing process distracted from their work on the projects. In the future, we plan tostreamline the peer review process and to refine the evaluation rubric so that students providemore effective feedback to their peers. Our goal is to further improve the quality of writing,without compromising the students’ focus on the design and development of their projects.IntroductionIt is essential for engineering students to develop a solid foundation in technical skills as well as Page 22.843.2“soft skills”, such as
assigned decimals such as 9.6 togrades. The professors put course materials and grades on course websites for some classes. Testgrades were posted on bulletin boards.Social and Cultural Interactions: Outside of school, it was easy to spend time with Brazilianstudents since they spoke English and the foreign students knew conversational Portuguese. A Page 22.949.9group of Brazilian students was dedicated to orienting exchange students, and several Brazilianstudents planned social events throughout the semester such as a BBQ and a hike. Since therewas very little on-campus housing and most of the students‟ families lived in Rio de Janeiro,student
are the new faces of academic computing. Bonnie A. Nardi University of California, IrvineIt’s seems clear that at least since the dot-com bust, Computer Science has had difficultyattracting new students. The percentage of college freshmen planning to major in computerscience dropped from 3.4% in 1998 to 1.4% in 2004. Further, data from the National Center forEducation Statistics shows that computer and information sciences conferred fewer degrees thaneither the visual and performing arts or the social sciences and history. Downward trends forwomen entering the field date back to the 90s. After a brief
suggestions for improvement.A summary of responses to the open ended question is provided in Table 1, while the Likertresults are given in Table 2. From Table 1, it is evident students felt the experience enhancedtheir mastery of the subject matter (see summary of answers to questions 1, 2a, and 3). Theyalso indicated a significant level of preparation and planning (question 5). As predicted byAristotle and proponents of active learning, students easily made the connection between anincrease in ownership of the process (or more doing) and an increase in understanding. Inaddition, students appeared to have made the connections between concepts required for transferand practical application. For example, responses to question 4 (regarding
translates her work in these areasas well as that of other Pitt sustainable engineersinto student projects as the assistant director of education outreach in the Mascaro Center for Sustainable Innovation, Pitt’s center for green design.Leidy Klotz, Clemson UniversityAnnie R Pearce, Virginia Tech Dr. Annie Pearce is an Assistant Professor in the Myers-Lawson School of Construction at Virginia Tech specializing in sustainable facilities and infrastructure systems. Throughout her career, Annie has worked with practitioners in both public and private sectors to implement sustainability as part of building plan- ning, design, construction, and operations. As a LEED Accredited Professional, Annie brings the latest in green
narrative analysis[22, 23] of student reflections written by eachstudent after participating in multiple reflective activities over the course of one semester. In theinitial research design we planned to conduct an interpretive, phenomenological study in whichwe planned to code the students’ process reflections as emotions and triggers. However, after thefirst iteration of coding the data as emotions and triggers in NVivo (a qualitative researchsoftware that allows for highlighting and coding text electronically) the researchers noticedsomething unexpected. In the students’ process reflections the students described their emotionsthrough telling a story. Their emotions were often described as changing through the course of aproject or a specific
cooperative-collaborative teaching strategies to enhance thelearning environment.Evaluation and AssessmentThe first year of the project focused on the development of the modules and pilot implemented insome cases. A formal evaluation on full implementation has been planned. The details of theassessment plan through internal and external evaluations are discussed next.INSTRUCT project will involve both a formative and summative evaluation to be conducted aspart of the overall evaluation of the project activities and their impact. These evaluations will beconducted by an independent evaluation agency. The purpose of the formative evaluation is toensure that the goals of the project are being achieved and to identify any areas whereimprovements are
forwriting a final report that summarizes the current state in the area, describes the experimentaltechniques utilized, discusses the expected outcomes, provides data of the actual outcomes, andexplains the reasons for the departures between the expected and the actual results. The teamwill analyze the data, draw conclusions and suggest possible ways for improving the accuracy oftheir experiments. The team will also suggest ways in which the medical technology thusinvestigated could be improved for more effective use and maintenance. Afterwards, the teampresents their findings to the class as a whole.The BET 301 course will be offered to undergraduate students of SoTAPS, SoBESHS, andCoNHP in alternate academic quarters with planned course review in
into the IPT program. That semester, 27 students from Austin and Decaturhigh schools in Decatur, Alabama were tasked to designing science payloads to be integratedinto the spacecraft being developed by the IPT students that semester. The pilot program wasvery successful – the students, teachers, and administrators who participated were very excited.Anecdotally, the program impacted the future studies of several of the participants. In one Page 22.1474.5instance prior to initiation of the pilot program several of the students were not planning to takeAP science or math courses in their senior year. As a result of their involvement with
the mostaccurate form of assessment to determine if team-building had occurred.Current trends in curriculum theory employed at the elementary and secondary school levels can Page 22.1492.3inform the efforts of engineering educators. One of the most widespread models for curriculumplanning in K-12 schools is the “Understanding by Design” or “backwards design” approachdeveloped by Wiggins and McTighe (2005).7 Figure 1 illustrates the three stages of this model. 2. Determine 3. Plan learning 1. Identify acceptable experiences
Statistical Sciences (NISS) and Professor of Statistics at North Carolina State University. She is an Elected Fellow of the International Statistical Institute, also Elected Fellow of the American Statistical Association. She has served as Asso- ciate Editor for the Journal of the American Statistical Association, the Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, and has been Vice-Chair of the Publication Board of the American Statistical Association. The areas of her technical expertise and current research include design of complex experiments, Bayesian inference, spatial statistics and topological foundations for statistical theory. She received her Ph.D. in Statistics in 1969 from Iowa State University. She can
influence of all thesevariables is random and insignificant as proved by the level of significance of 5%. Since 5%significant level is an acceptable industry standard, the same was adopted in this study. Theauthors plan to extend the strategy of this study to two other courses over the next three years.Performance of the control group was compared with that of the experimental (ethics) group.The average course grades for the control group and the experimental groups were 63 and 74respectively. The experimental group showed a 17.5% improvement over the control group.With a calculated t value of 2.8, the groups are significantly different at an alpha value of 0.05.At the end of semester a survey was conducted to determine how well prepared the
appropriate spline. The students then used these computed differencesto create plots. The error analysis and plots were created using the MATLAB software severaldays after the launch. These error plots are shown in Figure 3 in the Appendix.Test Cases Page 22.1355.7Toward the end of the Spring term 2010, the team was able to test their system on threeoccasions: May 15, May 23 and June 5. The system worked as planned on the first and thirdlaunches but a radio malfunction rendered the system inoperable on the second launch.Although the system performed well, post-flight analysis suggested that there was room for someimprovements.The test cases
project: Learn that engineering is not a “Junkyard Wars” endeavor. Engineering involves a design and planning stage which many first year students want to skip. Learn teamwork. Learn that design specifications can change at any time, and engineers need to be able to deal with those changes. Learn about cost trade-offs that engineers have to deal with. Page 22.1066.4The students are given a functional specification. They must design and build an arm that iscapable of picking up and setting down an empty Styrofoam cup that could be placed either rightside up or upside down. They may manually manipulate the arm
health, international project-based service learning, and engineering education reform. Prof. Paterson teaches courses on cre- ativity, engineering with developing communities, and community-inspired innovation. He has served the American Society for Engineering Education in numerous capacities, as a member of the Interna- tional Strategic Planning Task Force, the International Advisory Committee, and Global Task Force, and as Chair of the International Division. He actively serves Engineers Without Borders-USA, as a chapter co-advisor, education committee chair, and lead on EWB’s efforts to examine its educational impacts. He is currently leading several NSF-funded projects involving the design and assessment of
to student academic success and adjustment during the 1st year of college12. Engineering Development – Students complete three engineering/design projects in their Introduction to Engineering and then one semester-long project in each of the following EPD courses. These projects increase in complexity and significance each semester as students learn the project management and teamwork skills needed to successfully Page 22.1475.6 integrate their engineering knowledge with practical application. Example projects include city bicycle path planning, carbon footprint studies for city traffic routes, energy
International Mon- itoring Committee in IGIP, Council Member of ”International Council for Engineering and Technology Education” (INTERTECH), Member of Administrative Committee of Education Society of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc (IEEE-EdSoc) in (2001-2004) and (2008-2011), Member of Strategic Planning Committee of Education Society of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics En- gineers, Inc (IEEE-EdSoc), Board Member of ”Global Council on Manufacturing and Management” (GCMM) and Director of Brazilian Network of Engineering (RBE/SP). He was President of Brazilian Chapter of Education Society of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc (IEEE-EdSoc), Secretary of Santos
engineering professionalism by Mohawk Valley Engineering Executive Committee, and forging closer relations with the IEEE Mohawk Valley section. Dr. Qazi is a senior member of IEEE and a member of American Society of Engineering Education. M. Yasin Akhtar Raja is a Professor of Physics & Optical Science and ECE at the University of North Carolina (UNC) at Charlotte. He joined UNC Charlotte in 1990 and has served in various faculty po- sitions and on several planning and program committees for establishing new Ph.D. programs, centers, and units. His research expertise spans from Nanophotonics and Optoelectronic devices and components for Optical Communication Networks. His Labs are currently is engaged in Nanophotonics