, Charlottesville, VA 2 Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 3 University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 4 University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 5 University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HIABSTRACT – In Fall 2007, a coalition of four universities was awarded an NSF CCLI grant tosupport the development of a curriculum with the goal of cultivating systems thinking in students.Systems thinking, as defined in this project, is the ability to envision architectures of complex-engineered systems and the principles that underlie them. The
Human MotionAbstractAssessing abnormal movement resulting from poor health is essential for monitoring patients’health status and quality of life. In this paper, we describe a capstone senior design project thatuses wearable wireless sensors to measure and collect signals with information about the motionof a person in need of medical care. A triaxial body-fixed accelerometer is used to record humanmotion. Sampled data are transmitted using an IEEE 802.15.4 wireless transceiver to a datalogger and passed to a PC. The analysis of the recorded data facilitates possible characterizationof human motion. The implemented system allows for inexpensive and unobtrusive monitoringduring normal daily activities at home or in a nursing home environment.1
. Page 14.1145.5The students performed a sequence of assignments to learn about different features of themicrocontroller and the instruction set. These assignments are listed in Table 2 below. Table 2. Microcontroller Applications Student Exercises Assignment Description Topics PICKit1 only Switch controlled LED Familiarity with development tools Yes PLD Simulator Use of logical instructions Yes Strobed LED Flasher Decisions, looping, instruction timing Yes LED Flasher Timer, polling Yes Electronic Dice Project Timer, polling, instruction set Yes
ExperiencesCompetence: Knowledge - Cultivation of technical - Learning about new and/orabout the technical expertise emerging technologies whiledomain - Logical thinking managing routine job requirements - Critical thinking - Understanding the business - Analytical capability implications of technical decisions - Problem solving - Learning new processes, tools, and - Project management methodologies to support the organization’s goals
project trackedthe movement of the dancers on the stage for a performance entitled Frequency that representedthe finale of the Repertory Dance Theatre’s spring recital. “This is probably the most innovativeconcert we have ever done” was the quote of the director of our dance program. The basic themeof “aliens among us” was realized when alien dancers distorted the signals on radios andtelevisions as they came in close contact with them. “We created a workshop this semester sostudents can experiment using technology and engineering in dance performances. The studentshave displayed incredible knowledge, creativity and professionalism in their approach to usingtechnology” according to the computer science faculty member involved in the
AC 2009-1848: BLENDING ONLINE LEARNING WITH A TRADITIONALCOURSEChristi Patton Luks, University of Tulsa Dr. Patton earned a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from Texas A&M University, a M.S. in Applied Mathematics from The University of Tulsa and a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from The University of Tulsa. Currently she is Applied Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at the University of Tulsa. She directs many interdisciplinary design projects through the Chemical Engineering department and Engineers Without Borders. Page 14.285.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009
effort to drive the point home.While on the one hand, there has been a hue and cry over conservation of resources andcleansing the environment, practically no attention has been paid to the ‘how to’ approach thatseeks to accomplish this noble objective. If it can be unequivocally proved that environmentalconsciousness actually does make business sense and in the long run could be cost effective, thatwould help in widening the umbrella of the conservationists. Additionally, it would also impartthe idea of sustainability more universal appeal.This paper presents just such an effort. The project that has been described in the followingpages was undertaken at a university in the Southeast United States. The university has beenundergoing a
the choice ofmanufacturing processes, and finally to the insight as to why these materials are able todo the job that is required of them – this enquiry being the essential building block ofmaterials science knowledge. The remainder of the term was the supplementary bottom-up approach that followed the conventional body of knowledge sequence such as crystalstructures, phase diagrams, heat treatment principles and so on. The top-down approachincluded among other things two main teaching tools. The first tool consisted ofliterature research projects conducted by each student on a contemporary topic inmaterials engineering. The students were given research papers from current materialsscience journals as their primary resource. The students were
Page 14.43.1Mary Darrow, Iowa State University Mary Darrow is a doctoral student in Educational Leadership and Policy Studies (ELPS) at ISU. She has extensive community college experience, and came to ISU from DMACC. She is currently the project coordinator for the SEEC project, and is also involved in many STEM intiatives at ISU.© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 intiatives at ISU. Page 14.43.2© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 A Learning Village: Utilizing a Holistic Approach to Create Connections between Community College Pre-Engineering Students and Iowa State’s College of
materials onto asubstrate. Laboratory exercises range from low-cost transmission lineexperiments to capstone laboratory activities using a table-top sputtering system.Faculty-enhancement workshops include both basic and advanced workshopsrelated to RF plasma processing and measurement.The project, funded through a grant from the Advanced Technological Educationprogram at the National Science Foundation (NSF # 0603175), is an extension ofwork performed at Portland Community College (NSF # 0101533). This projectincreases the robustness of the instructional modules, expands the number andscope of the laboratory exercises, and provides basic and advanced faculty-enhancement workshops for college and university faculty.This paper provides an overview of
control plan morerealistic. FMEA seems to work best when a team documents its knowledge on cause- andeffect-relationships. In this analysis mode, the timely sequence of failure events should beworked out first, before entering results into a FMEA sheet. The students will learn howto apply this technology to improve the company’s competition in today’s market.Class projectsAll class formal projects, which are referenced from some U.S. famous and successfulcompanies, are introduced and assigned to students to help them in learning and planningthe manufacturing strategy in today’s industry. The instructor has brought his extensiveindustrial experiences in the class to help students in their project preparation andlearning process.The sampled class
Science Foundation funded project: Enhancing Visualization Skills—Improving Options aNd Success (EnViSIONS). The purpose of the Envisions project is todisseminate and compare results for a course of remedial spatial visualization modules at sevenmajor universities. The data will be collected and the impact of the modules or courses will bemeasured independently at all universities.Four spatial ability modules were incorporated into one course at Purdue University: CGT 116,Geometric Modeling for Visualization & Communication, which is a core introductory computergraphics course that provides entry-level experiences in geometric modeling. As part of thiscourse, students develop geometric analysis and modeling construction techniques and
Japan.However, although knowledge of standards should be integral to engineering and technologyeducation, standards education is still generally acquired after students graduate from college –in their professional lives and as needed. Private corporations, government agencies and otherprofessional organizations have provided this training for the last century, because mostengineering and technology programs in the United States do not have standards education intheir curriculums. In the college curriculums, consideration of standards has been generallylimited to applications in the design of senior projects. Page 14.1070.2The Engineering Accreditation
AC 2009-1764: INTEGRATING LABVIEW AND REAL-TIME MONITORINGINTO ENGINEERING INSTRUCTIONVinod Lohani, Virginia Tech Vinod K Lohani is an associate professor in the Engineering Education Department and an adjunct faculty in the Civil and Environmental Engineering at Virginia Tech. He received a PhD in civil engineering from Virginia Tech in 1995. His research interests are in the areas of knowledge modeling, water and energy sustainability, engineering learning modules for freshmen, and international collaboration. He leads a major curriculum reform project (2004-09), funded under the department-level reform program of the NSF, at Virginia Tech. A spiral curriculum approach is adopted to
AC 2009-2054: A COURSE ON SUSTAINABLE MATERIALS USE IN CIVILENGINEERING: SYLLABUS, DELIVERY, AND STUDENT FEEDBACKSanjaya Senadheera, Texas Tech Page 14.21.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 A Course on Sustainable Materials Use in Civil Engineering: Syllabus, Delivery and Student FeedbackAbstractCivil engineering construction projects use by far the largest quantity of natural resources, bothrenewable and non-renewable, consumed in the world. Civil engineers wield enormous influenceover the utilization and conservation of these valuable resources. Therefore, civil engineeringeducators have a responsibility to prepare tomorrow’s
. Shuman is Associate Dean for Academic Affairs, School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh and Professor of Industrial Engineering. His areas of interest are improving the engineering education and the study of ethical behavior of engineers. As Associate Dean, he has introduced a many curricula innovations. He has been principle or co-principle investigator on over 20 sponsored projects funded by the NSF, HHS and DoT, the RW Johnson Foundation, and EiF. He is Editor of the new Advances in Engineering Education.Chris Yoder, University of Pittsburgh Chris Yoder is a senior industrial engineering student at the Swanson School of Engineering University of Pittsburgh.Phil Weilerstein, National
. program at IPFW, the students are from diverse educational and professional backgroundswith wide research interests. They are interested in courses that are related to their backgroundthat could help them towards the Directed Project research. While on one hand, due to resourcesconstraint, it is not practical to offer several courses that cover all of student interest areas. Onthe other hand, because of the newly launched programs, often times the enrollment number isnot enough to run a full course. The proposed special topic courses aim to narrow this gap byallowing students to work on a semester long course which will help them to understand thestate-of the-art in their fields of technology. These courses are designed to prepare students
describes the motivation for the Spirit Global Design Challenge, itslinkage to ABET outcomes, defines global learning and how it integrates into the Engineer of2020 program, and provides pilot implementation lessons learned and the initial assessment ofstudents’ global perceptions (pre and post global design experience). The paper then concludeswith plans for the next implementation. I. Introduction and MotivationIndustry has made clear the need to graduate engineers with more than just technical skills. Akey component for today’s graduate is the ability to thrive in a globally collaborative workplace.Engineers must work with global colleagues in both face-to-face and computer mediatedenvironments. Efforts to assess virtual team projects have
interested in energy issues has increased significantly. In the first assignmentin fall 2006, 2007, and 2008 the percentage of students stating a primary interest in energy was0%, 26%, and 35%, respectively. The first year course includes assignments and lectures to helpstudents understand the role of energy in EVEN. In 2007 and 2008 there was a guest lecture onsustainable energy. In 2006 to 2008 the students completed a team project on solid wastemanagement where they evaluated the methane generation potential from a landfill using the USEPA LandGEM software. In 2008 the students compared the energy yield from solid wasteincineration to the energy that could be captured from the landfill methane. In 2008 the studentsindividually considered the
developing such programs.Keywords: New Product Development, MS-MBA, multidisciplinary, entrepreneurship.Introduction The main aim of this dual-degree MS/MBA project was to further the economicdevelopment of the area by encouraging cooperation and coordination between academiaand industry. As a part of this endeavor, the following main tasks were envisaged: Page 14.1234.2o Graduate Program Developmento Interface with College of Lawo Development of "Idea Bank"o Product Development and Commercialization Forumo Entrepreneurial Board.Graduate Program Development The focus of this innovative dual-degree program was to integrate the skills andknowledge
atimestamp and sends it to a defined Webserver.Definition of the educational objectiveAmong the development of the content structure the didactical design of the project as well asthe performance of the educational scenario is relevant. Therefore the educational objectiveshave to be defined and designed. Page 14.1387.7The major educational objective is the improvement of cognizance in the subjects of ESOT andTOS as well as the comprehension of coherence between both subjects. Therefore thehierarchical order is strictly defined. The improvement of cognizance in each single subject is thefoundation to build upon the superior cognitive comprehension of
at Purdue University.Leah Jamieson, Purdue University Dean Leah Jamieson is the John A. Edwardson Dean of Engineering/Ransburg Distinguished Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Dr. Jamieson earned a BS degree from MIT and MA, MSE and PhD degrees from Princeton. She is co-founder and past director of Purdue's Engineering Projects in Community Service (EPICS) program. Dr. Jamieson is the 2007 President and CEO of the Institute for Electrical and Electronics Engineering and she is a member of the National Academy of Engineering. Her research interests ;include engineering education,computer engineering and signal processing
constraints. During the early accreditation visits under EC2000, programswere expected to consider most if not all of the engineering constraints. Studentswrestling with the constraints for the first time barely scratch the surface ofunderstanding these constraints within their designs. Recently ABET1 changed thewording of the outcome to “engineering constraints such as regulatory, economic,environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, constructability, andsustainability.” Either it was recognized that not every design project would considermost of the engineering constraints or it might be impossible to get students to fullyconsider most of the engineering constraints. The new wording does require programs toconsider more than one
understanding and integrating complex problem solving in undergraduate engineering education. This latter project is funded through her recent NSF CAREER award. Her other research interests lie in cardiovascular fluid mechanics and K-12 engineering education.Julie Trenor, Clemson University JULIE MARTIN TRENOR is an assistant professor of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University. Dr. Trenor holds a Ph.D. in Materials Science and Engineering from Virginia Tech and a bachelor's degree in the same field from North Carolina State University. Her research interests focus on factors affecting the recruitment, retention, and career development of under-represented students in
AC 2009-83: PARTNERSHIPS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ANDINTERNATIONAL EDUCATIONBradley Striebig, James Madison University Dr. Bradley A. Striebig is an associate professor of Engineering at James Madison University. He has a Ph.D. in Environmental Engineering from Penn State University, where he was the head of the Environmental Technology Group at the Applied research Laboratory. Prior to accepting a position to develop the engineering program at James Madison University, Brad was a faculty member in the Civil Engineering department at Gonzaga University. He has worked on various water projects throughout the US and in Benin and Rwanda.Susan Norwood, Gonzaga University Susan Norwood
, computer-integrated testing devices such as table-top windtunnels and materials testing devices, animation, electronic publishing, digital audio/videoproduction, etc. 2 Concurrently, high school Technology Education programs turned to digitaldesign and prototyping tools, such as CAD, 3D modeling, rapid prototyping technologies (CNCrouters, mills, lathes), robotics and programmable controllers, and the like).In the mid-1980s, Technology Education pedagogy began to shift from the “project method” to aproblem-based learning pedagogy the field referred to as “the technological method,”3 now morecommonly called “technological design” or “engineering design.” It is now fairly routine to seeTechnology Education students using tools of all kinds—both
. Richard Millman is the Director of the Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics and Computing (CEISMC) and Professor of Mathematics at the Georgia Institute of Technology. He received a B.S. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a Ph.D. from Cornell University in Mathematics. He was the President of Knox College (Galesburg, IL), Provost of Whittier College (Whittier, CA) and the founding Provost for California State University, San Marcos. He has twice served 2-year terms as a Program Officer at NSF, was interim chair of the Department of Curriculum and Instruction at the University of Kentucky, and is the Principal Investigator and Project Director of ALGEBRA CUBED
identifyadvantages and disadvantages of various instructional and assessment methods as they relate toteaching within the engineering domain. Specifically, by the end of the course, students shouldbe able to: Practice strategic course planning by aligning various components (i.e. objectives, instruction, and assessment) for a specific course, Write clear and concise objectives for a course they are teaching, Identify advantages and disadvantages of various instructional methods (i.e. active learning, problem-based learning, discussion, collaborative learning), List methods of classroom assessment including the advantages and disadvantages of each (multiple-choice tests, constructed-response tests, and projects
and the logistics complex. To ease the development ofthis type of experiential learning, a process for such collaborations is needed. In thispaper, a template for a team taught course where university faculty partner withpracticing engineers is provided. Using this template, a methodology that includes bestpractices, guidelines, and activities is developed which can be used by faculty to moreeasily integrate practice into their classroom. A checklist for selecting appropriateindustrial projects with the collaborating partners is also included. To illustrate the usageof this methodology, a case study of a course partnership between industrial experts andKettering University Mechanical Engineering faculty is provided.IntroductionTeam teaching
sequence in curriculum do not suit the needs of all thestudents of different programs and the employers. The present sequence of in-class semesters andmandatory co-op semesters is such that students have solid mechanics competency after the firstco-op experience while machine design course which is last in the sequence is taughtconcurrently with the first part of senior design projects. The present sequence is therefore lessbeneficial to the students in terms of co-op experience and the senior project.This paper presents initiatives taken to address these issues and discusses the details of theproposed scheme. Initially, the issues were identified from all the stakeholders’ inputs. And thenour approach has been evolved with three main components