include experimental geotechnics, numerical modeling, liquefaction assessments, and dam safety. She is also interested in issues related to women in engineering and has published numerous articles in ASEE conferences.Maribel Viveros, University of California MercedBianca Estella Salazar, University of California, MercedChangho Kim, University of California, Merced Changho Kim is Assistant Professor of Applied Mathematics at the University of California, Merced. He is participating in the ”Why, What and How” Calculus project as co-PI. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Interest & Engagement Tactics for Success 1
engineering course. We characterized ChatGPT usage as either productive or unproductivefor learning and defined four general reasons why students engaged with AI in this course:ChatGPT as 1) A learning aid 2) A coding resource specifically 3) An inevitability 4) A personal perspectiveWe discuss some of the ways that students can use AI responsibly as an asset to their learning.Their responses also show student awareness and current understanding of the positives andnegatives of AI use for acquiring and applying foundational programming skills. The results alsoshow that the majority of students who chose to use AI did so to enhance their learning ratherthan replacing their original work.Introduction and
Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT; Lent et al.,1994) and Critical Race Theory (CRT; Crenshaw et al., 1995), our study explores career pathwaysacross ME, EE, and CE, extending the inquiry to discern differences in career interests, mental andphysical health, and the experiences of minority stress and a commitment to racial justice—twopivotal aspects crucial among underrepresented racialized minority (URM) doctoral students inshaping their career interests (Monroe-White & McGee, 2023; McGee et al., in press).Statistics from the ASEE reveal that mechanical, computer and electrical engineering were amongthe top disciplines in 2020 in terms of the number of doctoral degrees awarded. Table 1 belowsummarizes these numbers. While the table below
“Research guided only by the controlling yardstick of profit undermines the role of the universityas a public sphere dedicated to addressing the most serious social problems a society faces.Moreover, the corporate model of research instrumentalizes knowledge and undermines forms oftheorizing, pedagogy, and meaning that define higher education as a public good rather than as aprivate good” [1]. -Henry GirouxIntroductionWhat has been coined as a crisis in graduate education, is evidenced primarily by 1) highattrition rates and 2) a mental health crisis among graduate students [2], [3]. The issue of attritionis of interest to various stakeholders including faculty
STEMpedagogy. Such initiatives aim to elevate interdisciplinary teaching standards, tacklethe unique challenges faced by rural regions, and promote the all-encompassingadvancement of students in these areas, thereby propelling the progression of STEMeducation at large.Keywords: STEM education; Rural teachers; Teaching beliefs; Classroom evaluationpractice; STEM literacy; Course subject1. Introduction The development of modern society is closely tied to the progress and innovationin science and technology [1]. Rural STEM education becomes instrumental in drivinghigh-quality educational development in rural areas. It’s imperative to concentrate oncultivating high-level innovative professionals and improving educational quality, aprocess that hinges
consequently be less interested in pursuing a career where these are the only perceivable fieldsthat they can work in. These findings are reflected in waning undergraduate and graduate enrollment in chemical,petroleum, and chemical-related engineering. Year-to-year medium percent change in freshmanenrollment in this major had been steadily declining since 2018 in 96 institutions, with a markable10.4% decrease in 20203. In their 2021 Graduate Enrollment Census, The National ScienceFoundation found that chemical engineering had the smallest 1-year growth of 1.4% in 2020-21,and the large 5-year decline of 29.1% in 2017-21 among other engineering disciplines4. Thesestatistics demonstrate a national declining trend in pursuing chemical engineering, and
(DGMs): Regenwetter et al. [1] conducted a study focusing on thepotential of Deep Generative Models (DGMs). These models aim to replicate datasets. However,the authors highlighted the limitations of DGMs in addressing engineering design challenges.Through a case study on bicycle frame design, they demonstrated that while DGMs can generatenew frames resembling past designs, they often fall short of meeting engineering performancestandards and requirements. The findings underscored the importance of engineering-centricconsiderations in AI modeling, suggesting that purely similarity-focused approaches may noteffectively translate to engineering tasks [2]. The researchers emphasized the potential of AImodels as design "co-pilots" with appropriate
. Microelectronics arepervasive in everyday life, from smartphones to life-saving medical devices and GPS navigationto home thermostats. Vulnerabilities in U.S. microelectronics workforce capabilities have been aknown factor within the industry since the early 2000s [1]. While the demand formicroelectronics has surged, the U.S. industrial base has consolidated mainly into a few suppliers[1], [2] with limited technical capabilities in the workforce to scale up. The U.S. is encounteringa growing gap between its need for microelectronics design and manufacturing capabilities andits ability to meet these needs domestically, resulting in an undesirable dependence on foreignsuppliers. Although several U.S. universities, in partnership with U.S. Defense
alsoreinforces the importance of using multiple strategies to support students in believing that theycan (self-efficacy) do engineering and should continue to pursue it as a valuable career choice.IntroductionEngagement plays a significant role in determining the level of success that engineers canachieve, both during school and at work. In the workplace, employee engagement has beenshown to increase productivity [1], retention rate [1], job satisfaction [2], and customer loyalty[3]. On a similar note, academic student engagement has been shown to be positively associatedwith critical thinking [4], academic achievement [5], retention in engineering degree programs[6], and persistence [7]. Retention in engineering is especially important as the demand
visualization for roboticsand automation. The students were given weekly robotics laboratory experiments in the course onrobotics and mechatronics. VR robotics integrated with Internet-of-Things based mechatronicsenables students to explore innovative approaches to integrate theoretical knowledge with practicalapplications, enhancing information retention, and promoting critical thinking.1. IntroductionThis paper presents the student learning result of a laboratory course on advanced robotics andmechatronics integrated with virtual reality (VR) and Internet-of-Things (IoT). Virtual realityindustry is getting more recognition due to its application in various fields other than gaming suchas education, medical, entertainment, military, fashion
entertainment applications like video games or 3Dmovies, it also finds use in psychology, medicine, and as a workspace for testing and developingnew technologies [1-4].Incorporating wind energy technology learning into the education system can benefit from VR asa practical tool for understanding the design and development of wind energy technology. Thepaper presents the project's framework, reports, and student survey findings, along withconclusions and expectations for future success. The project report delves into the team structure,component selection, system design, and simulation results. The student survey indicates that theproject enhances students' understanding of renewable energy prospects, providing them with theopportunity to play a
andreflect on their community’s strengths and concerns through imagery, fostering critical dialogueand knowledge-sharing [1]. While popularly utilized in medicine, social sciences, and education,its application in engineering education [2–5] and computer science education [6–8] is relativelynew and underexplored. This position paper aims to bridge this gap by presenting acomprehensive account of a pilot study that introduces photovoice to computer science students,showcasing the method’s merits and contributions. It will outline implementation and adaptationof the method’s steps, obstacles faced during its duration, the value derived from the emergentthemes from visual artifacts developed from participants, and the holistic value derived fromactive
. Increasing happiness at work, and measuring its impact, has been the subject of numerousstudies across different cultures and industries. Research shows that it correlates with positiveoccupational outcomes. Specifically, happier employees exhibit higher levels of engagement,improved productivity, greater levels of career satisfaction, and a greater sense of well-being intheir lives [1] – [4]. Singh, Saxenda, and Mahendru find that there is no widely-agreed upon definition ofhappiness in the literature, but they describe it as “a harmonious state where the individual’sphysiological and psychological needs are satisfied in the past, present, and future, leading themto live a meaningful and contented life” [5]. To experience happiness at work
reconsider the role that spatial skills actuallyplay in training engineers. This paper argues that spatial skills testing and training interventionsare a misuse of the time and energy of people who want to help women and other historicallyexcluded students succeed in engineering. We must reframe our interventions withoutperpetuating deficit models about cognitive abilities like “spatial skills,” a construct which, inspite of its wide popularity in the STEM education community, has been very poorly formulated.References[1] S. G. Vandenberg and A. R. Kuse, “Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensionalspatial visualization,” Percept Mot Skills, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 599–604, Dec. 1978, doi:10.2466/pms.1978.47.2.599.[2] M. Peters, B. Laeng
response bias.1-4 When we minimize the ambiguity of survey prompts, we adopt a standard set by thewhite, male majority, leaving dominant ideology intact. In contrast, when we integrate social science conceptsinto our survey, we provide an opening for the “subaltern” to speak.5Introduction: Disrupting ideological hegemony in engineering by naming cultureTextbooks on survey design emphasize the importance of generating clearly worded, accessible promptsas a means of decreasing response bias,1-4 but the concept of accessibility presumes a referent. Forwhom must our questions be clear? For whom may this demand for baseline clarity limit expression?Our primary argument in this paper is that the demand for accessible survey prompts may suppress whatis
Society for Engineering Education, 2024DISABILITY STATUS AND BELONGINGNESS 1 Unseen: Examining the Link between Disability Status and Students’ Sense of Belonging in Undergraduate Engineering ProgramsDISABILITY STATUS AND BELONGINGNESS 2 AbstractOver the past few decades there has been a growing interest in understanding theindividual and systemic factors that positively and/or negatively impact theeducational experiences and outcomes of underrepresented students in engineering.Students of color, women, and students with disabilities (SwD) often face barriersand
project. We also note that language is an important concern among Indigenousand Native communities. Although we use the terms Indigenous and Native interchangeably, we willhonor the language choices of the communities and individuals involved in this work. This practice ofintroducing ourselves first also mirrors calls for researchers and educators to be transparent in ourpositionalities and perspectives, especially when working with Indigenous communities [1]. It is in thatspirit and tradition that before we discuss our proposed work, we begin with our own stories andpositionalities as a team.Qualla Ketchum ᏏᏲ, ᏆᎳᏓᏩᏙᎥ. ᏥᏣᎳᎩ ᎾᏍᎩᎠᎨᏴ. I am Qualla ᏆᎳ (qua-la) Ketchum, and I am a citizenof the Cherokee Nation. I grew up within the Nation’s boundaries
our first semester at ournew university, we, the authors, discovered common experiences and interests, especially aroundnavigating our new role as professors of clinical practice.We chose to develop this work in the style of an autoethnography where our driving goal was toreflect on (1) how the expectations we had starting a new role at research-intensive universityaligned with our lived experience, and (2) in what ways our expectations were being informed byprior experiences at teaching intensive universities. We agreed to meet bi-weekly to discuss ourexperiences and to document them we developed an informal, qualitative process that wefollowed throughout the semester. This process included three main elements: (1) individualreflections and
, and work-life balance challenges hinderwomen's participation and advancement in engineering. The paper discusses research-informedrecommendations to promote greater gender diversity and gender equity among engineeringfaculty and university faculty, hence contributing to the broadening of the participation ofwomen faculty in engineering and Ethiopian higher education.Keywords: engineering education, faculty, diversity, mixed methods, gender bias, culturalbeliefs, Ethiopia 1Introduction & BackgroundGender diversity in academic institutions, particularly in engineering, is increasingly concerningworldwide [1], [2], [3]. Achieving gender equality
likely to receive positive rankings, enhancing their national standingand competitiveness [1]. Similarly, institutions with high retention rates are often perceived asproviding a supportive and effective learning environment. These successful student outcomeslead to higher levels of student satisfaction, and satisfied students are more likely to contributepositively to an institution's community and serve as advocates for the institution [2].Additionally, alumni who complete their programs in a timely manner are more likely tomaintain connections with their alma mater, contribute to fundraising efforts and providevaluable support to current students [3].Timely graduation and other academic successes are not universal for all demographics
sociotechnical thinking into afirst-year engineering computing course. Redesigned components support students in identifyingand critiquing the social, political, and economic decisions in engineering from a social justicelens. In the course, students work on five major socio-technical coding projects. They are alsoprovided with readings and frameworks to question narratives of technological neutrality andcenter the differential impacts of technology. In this study, we consider classroom data from asingle small-group discussion held during the Water-Energy-Land modeling and optimizationproject. As part of this project, in one class students were asked to discuss and determine (1)positive and negative impacts from decisions about the use of water from
student assessment. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Work In Progress: Factors Influencing Career Choice and Success in Undergraduate Biomedical Engineering StudentsIntroductionThe field of biomedical engineering (BME) has witnessed significant growth in recent years,driven by advances in technology and a growing emphasis on healthcare innovation. This growthhas led to a large range of post-graduation career paths for BME undergraduates includingmedical and professional school, graduate school, and direct employment as engineers in themedtech, biotech, and healthcare industries [1]. Much of the literature on career choice andmotivations of these students focuses on their plans at
facilitate formal education on the premise that they would improvestudent learning outcomes. Dawson, et al. [1] indicate that adopting technological innovationsin higher education significantly impacts the quality of learning delivery, studentengagement, and academic accomplishments. To meet the complex and dynamic demands ofthe 21st century, stakeholders of engineering education have also been exploring and adoptinginstructional technologies to improve the teaching and learning experience in engineeringeducation. To develop technical competencies in engineering students, integrating diverseeducational technologies such as educational games, mobile learning tools, and virtual realitytechnology is important [2], evidenced by the extensive breadth of
engineering and computing education and backend development.Jacob Underwood, Arizona State University Jacob is a sustainable civil engineering undergraduate student at Arizona State University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Work In Progress: Development of Customized Application for Neurodiverse Engineering StudentsAbstractEngineering college students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) face unique challengesbeyond the rigor of the curriculum. Students with ASD may have sensory issues, communicationdeficits, and executive functioning challenges such as assignment organization and timemanagement [1]. At Arizona State University we have developed a program for
of race, sexual orientation, and gender amongparticipants. Our results highlight the pervasive influence of detrimental engineering ideologies[1], [2] within the everyday symbols, rituals, and curricula and other built infrastructure withinan engineering school. Students from diverse social identities reported that these physicalmanifestations invoke tensions between their sense of belonging and the perception ofdepoliticization within the field of engineering [3], the centrality of military and corporateinterests [4], [5], detachment from societal issues [3], and a glaring dearth of diverserepresentations within labs, classrooms, hallways, statues, public gathering areas, and studylounges.These findings underscore the significance of
’ belongingnessand their behavioral response. In addition, we found that, despite mean differences inbelongingness, affective response, and behavioral response, there were few gender differences inthe pattern of relations. For both female- and male-identifying students, belongingness predictedboth students’ affective and behavioral responses. These findings suggest that course-levelbelongingness plays an essential role in how students respond to active learning and that fosteringan atmosphere that supports belongingness may benefit all students.1. Introduction Engineering education has long understood the importance and value of instructional practicesthat invite students to construct rather than passively receive knowledge – broadly referred to as
is to continue to establish abenchmark for comparing the ESC experiences of project-based student engineers to those intraditionally operated programs.The three programs studied in this paper are in the same college of the same institution. Further,the cultures of engineering and computer science are similar [1][2][3]. Thus, we consider thecultures of the two engineering programs and the computer science program to belong to a sharedcontext.Previous studies demonstrate the stressful nature of engineering and engineering educationculture. Heavy workloads, high expectations, rigorous assignments, smart students, and fiercecompetition for grades are typical descriptors of engineering programs [4] [5] [6]. Studentsuffering and a bootcamp-like
, equity, inclusion, and belonging at NC State College ofEngineering takes many forms. As stated before, the programmatic efforts are the most visible,but they are not the bulk of the work. The model described in this paper take the form of a three-dimensional coordinate system. This approach was selected to illustrate three sliding scales withopposing aspects. The axes are shown orthogonal to one another, but that is not actually intendedto be a part of the model. The angle between axes is not intended to imply any relationship.There are three axes of activity associated with the work:1-Strategic versus tactical2-Relational versus performative3-Systemic versus individual Relational
of engineering and design education, the development of spatialvisualization skills is viewed by many as a key to ensuring student success and competency. Spatialskills are crucial for grasping, manipulating, and projecting spatial relationships between objects,and are pivotal in understanding [1] and solving complex problems that involve spatial orientationand design [2, 3]. Such skills are indispensable in various fields, particularly in engineering,architecture, and various other STEM disciplines [4] [5] [6].The engineering design process is profoundly visual in nature, involving the rendition of abstractconcepts into tangible representations. Sketching plays a central role in this translation, which isan important skill for engineers
Ph.D. in Educational Policy and Planning from UT Austin. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 The Role of STEM Society Scholarships in Supporting the Retention and Persistence of Women in Engineering and Computer ScienceIntroductionProgress and innovation in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) fieldsrely heavily on their ability to promote gender equality in all aspects of society [1]. Althoughstrides have been made toward achieving gender equality, there remains a noticeable gap when itcomes to the representation of genders in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, andMathematics) fields – women constitute less than 30% of the graduates in these fields [2