/resources/SP13_3268_West_Report_2015.pdf.[29] H. Najafi, L. Harrison, C. Geraghty, G. Evans, Q. Liu, and G. antz., "Learning analytics in Ontario post-secondary institutions: An environmental scan," Toronto, ON: eCampusOntario, 2020, Available: https://www.ecampusontario.ca/wp- content/uploads/2020/03/2019-03-27-learning-analytics-scan-en.pdf.[30] J. S. Gagliardi, A. Parnell, and J. Carpenter-Hubin, "The analytics revolution in higher education: Big data, organizational learning, and student success." Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, 2018.[31] AIR, EDUCAUSE, and NACUBO, "A joint statement on analytics from AIR, EDUCAUSE and NACUBO." 2019, Available: https://changewithanalytics.com/statement/[32] J
and beyond COVID-19," Education Sciences, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 236-257, 2020.[20] T. De Jong, M. Linn and Z. Zacharia, "Physical and Virtual Laboratories in Science and Engineering Education," Science, vol. 340, no. 6130, pp. 305-308, 2013.[21] L. Fleming, "Perfecting Cross-Pollination," Harvard Business Review, pp. 22-24, September 2004.[22] E. G. Derrick, H. J. Falk-Krzesinski, M. R. Roberts and S. Olson, "Facilitating interdisciplinary research and education: A practical guide," Science on FIRE: Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research and Education” workshop of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, 2011. Proceedings of the 2021 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference
time (s) time (s) time (s) 300 300 320 295 295 p init = 307 kPa 2.71 mm d t = 1 mm 290 290
answer key isQuestion 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Answer c a B a c c d b c aEven though many questions had 4 multiple choice answers some students chose the 5th answerto indicate the did not know the answer. They were asked to chose (e.) if they did not understandto discourage guessing.Problem 2 Laplace Transform (50 pts.)Find the Laplace Transform, G(s) of the following signal, g(t).g(t) = e-2t sin (3wt)3 out of 10 gave correct responses, 3 gave incorrect responses, 5 had no clue.SOLUTIONLet f(t) = sin (wt), then F(s) = w/(s2 + w2)Apply scaling propertyIf f(t) ú F(s), then f(at) ú 1/a F(s/a)Therefore,Let p(t) = sin
Engineering Education Annual Meeting, Salt Lake City, UT.4 IEAust, (1996) “Changing the culture: Engineering education into the future,” Institution of Engineers Australia, ACT 1996.5 Tonso, K., (2007) On the Outskirts of Engineering: Learning Identity, Gender, and Power via Engineering Practice, Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.6 Romney, A. K., S. C. Weller, and W. H. Batchelder, (1986) "Culture as Consensus: A Theory of Culture and Informant Accuracy," American Anthropologist, 88: 313-38.7 Fox, R.G. (ed) (1991) Recapturing Anthropology: Working in the Present, Sante Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.8 Marcus, G. E. and M. J. Fischer, (1985) Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human
population groups are expected to be more than half (52percent) of the resident college-age (18–24 years old) population of the United States by 2050.Additionally, just about a quarter century ago, the National Science Board’s Commission onPrecollege Education in the Mathematics, Science, and Technology (MST) assessed the state ofUS precollege education in the subject fields and found it seriously lacking to meet the projecteddemand.[1]In the late 1980’s the Task Force of Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Scienceand Technology called for cooperation among schools, colleges, industry and federal and stategovernments to increase the pool of science and engineering talent, particularly forunderrepresented minority groups, through
tomention a few.3.3 The Lookup Table and Intensity TransformationAll the above intensity transformation (point-processing) operations can be viewed as directly orindirectly performing a lookup table (LUT) based mapping on the input pixel intensities of animage to produce a new set of output pixel intensities for the corresponding pixels, and therebyproducing a modified image. It should be noted that as the name implies, a lookup table is atable that contains a set of all possible (full range) input intensity values arranged in increasingorder R = { r0=0, r1=1 r2=2 …, rk=k …, rL-1=L-1}, and a corresponding set of output (mapped,reassigned) intensity values S = {s0, s1, s2, …, sk, …, sL-1} into which the input intensity valuesare correspondingly
research assistant for the Women in Information Technology Project and a doctoral candidate in Human Development at Virginia Tech.Peggy S. Meszaros, Virginia Tech Dr. Peggy S. Meszaros is the William E. Lavery Professor of Human Development and Director of the Center for Information Technology Impacts on Children, Youth, and Families. She is the former Senior Vice President and Provost at Virginia Tech and has been a faculty member and administrator for 28 years at private and public research universities. She has published over 80 scholarly articles and book chapters on research topics such as academic benchmarking, mother and daughter communication, adolescent decision-making, and the
concept has grown since the late 1950’s. Krupczak andBlake (Blake & Krupczak Jr., 2014) have charted development of the concept, lookingparticularly at the intersection of technological literacy with engineering literacy. It shouldbe noted that the term “technological literacy” is more commonly used in the United Statesthan other nations. A sense of how technological literacy has become more prevalent inconversations on education can be seen by looking at the word frequency of the term usingthe Ngram viewing tool (Google, 2010). While this tool has significant biases and limitations(Pechenick, Danforth, & Dodds, 2015) the relatively high representation of scientific andtechnical literature in the corpus and the fact that “technological
-world issues,and consistent iteration helps both “mitigate design fixation” and “reinforce[s]...adaptive andcreative thinking” (p. 2). University makerspaces serve as a central location for students topractice knowledge learned in the classroom, and hone their design skills.Antonucci-Durgan, et. al (2014), Dukart (2016), and Whitmer (2014) acknowledge academicmakerspaces as spaces where experiential education occurs. Two examples of experientiallearning opportunities are internships and cooperative learning (co-op) programs. Whileinternships and co-op programs are encouraged in engineering education settings, there are fewestablished opportunities of such opportunities at university makerspaces. There is evidence ofseveral university makerspace
verbal (V) ability, in the middle is spatial (S) and math (M) is on the right. STEMstudents, to the right of Figure 1, have an ‘I’ shaped ability profile (i.e. M > S > V), incontrast to the ‘V’ shaped profile (i.e. M ≥ V > S) of the HSS students. Clearly, the ‘I’shaped profile, developed by high school, was a predictor of a STEM education path anddistance travelled on this path. Given that this predictor contains not just math ability butspatial ability also, STEM educators have reason to treat spatial ability in the same way asmath ability: assess incoming students for the ability and provide resources to address anyshortcomings in it. While it is now common to find math learning support centers co-existingbeside engineering schools
representational competence in the context of vectoranalysis. This approach is similar to that taken by Klein et al in developing an RC assessmentfor kinematics [15].Table 1. Summary of vector concepts and representations for each item on the TRCV (v2.0).The representations listed in the two right columns include Pictorial, Symbolic, narrativeLanguage, Numeric, and Diagram. Item Relevant Vector Concepts Representations Question Answers 1 2D, position vectors, vector addition PL S 2 2D, cross product PLS L 3 2D, Cartesian
. 17 References[1] S. J. Poole , and J. F. Sullivan. "Assessing K-12 pre-engineering outreachprograms," Frontiers in Education Conference, vol. 1, pp. 11B5-15, 1999.[2] J. J. Kuenzi, "Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education:Background, federal policy, and legislative action." 2008.[3] S.Y .Yoon, M. Dyehouse, A. M. Lucietto, H. A.. Diefes‐Dux, and B. M. Capobianco, "Theeffects of integrated science, technology, and engineering education on elementary students'knowledge and identity development," School Science and Mathematics, 114, no. 8, pp.380-391,2014.[4] T. J. Moore, and K. M. Tank,"Nature-‐Inspired Design: A PictureSTEM Curriculum forElementary STEM Learning," 2014.[5] T
regulatory move,asking the group “how to work best together?” M2 responds in a joking manner with, “I thinksharing ideas is a good idea,” his gaze moving over the other group members while smiling. M1echoes M2’s response, evoking laughter from all group members. Following this interaction, theGTA addresses a separate, nearby group and offers several suggestions as to how to think aboutthis first bullet point. The group members in the study all look over and listen to the GTA’ssuggestions. After listening to the GTA’s advice, M1 laughs to his group and states, “Well thatdidn't really help.” The group laughs, then goes back to writing independently before F1 asks,“Are you guys writing actual stuff or just generic teamwork things?” M2 responds with a
representations listed in the two right columns include Pictorial, Symbolic, narrativeLanguage, Numeric, and Diagram. Item Relevant Vector Concepts Representations Question Answers 1 2D, position vectors, vector addition PL S 2 2D, cross product PLS L 3 2D, Cartesian components N D 4 2D, Cartesian components, vector addition DNS LN 5 3D, Cartesian components N D 6 3D
, textbooks, letters and diaries in the cause of providing somehistorical context for two centuries of physics education. Table 1. Special Collections Resources. Special Collections Resources Letters of CDT George Cullum USMA 1833, 9 Sept 1831 and 16 June 1832 [31] Letter of CDT John Pope USMA 1842, 24 Nov 1839 [32] Letter of CDT Ulysses S. Grant USMA 1843, 18 July 1840 [33] Letters of CDT William Dutton USMA 1846, 19 Oct 1842 and 3 Sept. 1844 [34] Natural & Experimental Philosophy Notebook of CDT James Runcie USMA 1879 [35] Diary of CDT Charles H. Barth USMA 1879 [36] Letters of CDT George S. Patton USMA 1909 [37] Letters & Diary of CDT Richard Von Schriltz USMA 1941 [38,39] Letters of
programs best provide students from diverse backgrounds with a variety ofinternational experiences to maximize their global preparedness? These are questions we haveset about to answer as part of a large, multi-university study5.Specifically, in this NSF funded study of the effectiveness of various forms of internationalexperiences, we have used a nationally recognized and normed instrument to survey both firstyear and senior engineering students initially at four partner institutions, and more recently at anadditional dozen engineering programs throughout the U. S. In doing this, questions arose thatwe needed to address if we were going to better understand the impact of the various forms ofinternational educational experiences available to
Paper ID #9827Utilizing Think-Aloud Protocols to Assess the Usability of a Test for EthicalSensitivity in ConstructionMr. Kenneth Stafford Sands II, Virginia Tech Kenneth S. Sands II is a doctoral candidate and graduate assistant in Environmental Design and Planning at Virginia Tech. His research focus is on professional ethics and its pedagogy.Dr. Denise Rutledge Simmons, Virginia Tech Denise R. Simmons, Ph.D., is an assistant professor in the Myers-Lawson School of Construction & Civil and Environmental Engineering at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. She holds a B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in civil
26.470.5rate of rotation. Figure 3 depicts this situation.21 X G S 𝜔𝑡 r θ O
Paper ID #13634ENCOURAGING STUDENTS TO SEE THE ROLE OF SERVICE COURSESIN THEIR MAJORDr. Kenneth W. Van Treuren, Baylor University Ken Van Treuren is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering at Baylor University. He received his B. S. in Aeronautical Engineering from the USAF Academy in Colorado Springs, Colorado and his M. S. in Engineering from Princeton University in Princeton, New Jersey. After serving as USAF pilot in KC-135 and KC-10 aircraft, he completed his DPhil in Engineering Sciences at the University of Oxford, United Kingdom and returned to the USAF Academy to teach heat transfer and propulsion
assignment was utilized to allow students an opportunity to creatively expresstheir understanding of a particular topic(s) that had been discussed in class. This activity wasgiven near the end of the semester and in some ways served as a “capstone” project for thestudents. Students were allowed to select a topic(s) based on the course readings, class lecturesand discussions, any of the video segments, or topics brought up through the guest lectures. Inaddition, students were encouraged to consider the topic of their short paper as a springboard fortheir creative projects.Students were required to submit a proposal, in 250 words or less, that included an overview oftheir proposed project. Abstracts were submitted electronically through Blackboard. In
hybrid water supply systems in the context of urban water management: challenges and opportunities. Water, 7: 153‐174. 5 Gran, S. B., Saphores, J., Feldman, Hamilton, A. j., Fletcher, T. D., Cook, P. L. M., Stewardson, M., Sanders, B. F., Levin, L. A., Ambrose, R. F., Deletic, A., Brown, R., Jiang, S. C., Rosso, D., Cooper, W. J., and Marusic, I. (2012) Taking the “Waste” out of “Wastewater” for human water security and ecosystem sustainability. Science, 337(6095): 681‐686. 6 Rahman, S., Khan, M.T.R., Akib, S., Din, N. B. C., Biswas, S. K., and Shirazi, S. M. (2014) Sustainability of rainwater harvesting system in terms of water quality. The Scientific World Journal, 2014. 7 Jhansi, S. C. and
graded homeworks are returned to thestudents. The class discussion helps some students, but others remain unclear about the distinctionsbetween the notions of domain, problem in the domain context, and solution. The key questionthat motivated our work was, how do we help students overcome such misconceptions and developdeep understanding?In the CONSIDER approach, following the lecture(s) on the topic, the instructor would post thehomework on the CONSIDER system. The instructor will also specify a deadline by which eachstudent will be required to submit her answer. The homework may be similar to the one abovebut, for this discussion, we assume there is only one question, item (3) from the example. Oncethe instructor has posted the homework, each
addition of engineeringcontent and practices to NGSS does not add additional requirements to the science standardsalready being taught. Although NGSS is not adopted in Oklahoma, the new OklahomaAcademic Science Standards, OAS-S, mirror NGSS. Further, many participants stated that eventhough they did not receive any resources for teaching engineering, they were satisfied with thisbecause they did not teach engineering anyway. This reveals that teachers do not understand thescience standards they are required to teach as part of OAS-S, which require them to beengineering teachers. Some participants’ responses indicated that teachers held misconceptions about thedifficulty or nature of engineering. For example, a few participants mentioned
teachers. These teachers will expand ontheir previous research and assist other teachers with their own curricular development to preparefor final publication to www.teachengineering.org. We will document at least twenty curricularpieces.AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1609089. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.This work has also been supported by the Institute for Critical Technology andApplied Science (ICTAS) at Virginia Tech.References [1] V. Lohani and T. Younos, “Implementation and assessment of an interdisciplinary
resulting in a call to view the concept of belonging as complex,multi-faceted, and impacted by extra-institutional factors [6]. Recent research on sense of belonging among graduate students has begun to consider demographicattributes and characteristics of the academic environment [7-10]. Gardner et al.’s [8] exploration ofdoctoral students’ sense of belonging across different disciplines indicates that engineering doctoralstudents reported a relatively lower sense of belonging within their academic department compared tostudents in other disciplines. Recent work by O’Meara et al. [11] echo this claim, reporting that fewerfacilitators of sense of belonging exist within STEM doctoral program environments than in non-STEMprograms. These
, and A. S. Malik, “The influences of emotion on learning and memory,” Front. Psychol., vol. 8, no. 1454, 2017.[3] M. J. Riemer, “Integrating emotional intelligence into engineering education,” World Trans. Eng. Technol. Educ., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 189–194, 2003.[4] D. Kim and B. K. Jesiek, “Work-in-Progress: Emotion and intuition in engineering students’ ethical decision-making and implications for engineering ethics education,” 2019.[5] A. Bandura, Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York, NY: Freeman, 1997.[6] F. Pajares, “Self-efficacy in academic settings,” in American Educational Research Association, 1995.[7] D. W. McMillan and D. M. Chavis, “Sense of community: A definition and theory,” J
., & Leifer, L. J. A1 (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and 1613 learning. Journal of engineering education, 94(1), 103-120. Atman, C. J., Adams, R. S., Cardella, M. E., Turns, J., Mosborg, S., & Saleem, J. (2007). Engineering design processes: A comparison A2 433 of students and expert practitioners. Journal of engineering education, 96(4), 359-379. Carberry, A. R., Lee, H. S., & Ohland, M. W. (2010). Measuring A3 engineering design self‐efficacy. Journal of Engineering 192 Education, 99(1), 71-79
and active exercise would be to calculate the longitudinal speed ofsound in aluminum, point out the E/ is also the specific stiffness of a material, and thendemonstrate how easy it is to initiate both the longitudinal and transverse waves in a rodby hitting them with a hammer (a rubber mallet) parallel and perpendicular to the end ofthe aluminum rod14. The typical speed of sound in aluminum is 5150 m/s while in steel itis about 5100 m/s. 2.84 x10 9 N / m 2v? = 1551.4 m/s (Average Values, Extruded Acrylic11) 1.18 x10 3 kg / m 3 12.0 x10 9 N / m 2v? = 5855 m/s (measured values, soundboard Engelmann Spruce) 0.35 x10 3 kg / m 3The calculated speed of a longitudinal wave in a