change atscale. With this in mind, then, the creation of lesson modules, thinking together about shifts inpedagogical practices, and social media campaigns –all happen against a backdrop of root causeanalysis that frames issues of inequity in engineering education and practice as connected withracism, classism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, and other wider forms of oppression in society.Our work is inextricably, connected with organizing movements and strategies outside the realmof engineering.More specifically, this project and week of action builds on efforts outside of engineeringeducation including work by Myles Horton [13] and the Highlander Center for Research andEducation [14], rooted in Horton's principles of popular education. One of the
Pramod Khargonekar Assistant Director for Engineering National Science FoundationPresentation at the EDC PPC Colloquium February 11, 2014 NSF ENG: Investing in transformative research and education to foster innovations for benefits to society Research Innovation Education Societal Benefits2 November 20, 2015 NSF Directorate for Engineering (ENG) • Engineering Centers Engineering Education and • Engineering Education Centers (EEC
in the paper Mind the Gaps:Engineering Education and Practice, [12]. Speaking to the “misalignment between engineeringeducation and practice” the author makes clear that a “Technical problem-solving model cannotexplain practice” and that engineers can only change the world “. . . if they also deliver theartefacts represented by their problem solutions and designs.”Engineering education urgently needs to revisit how Science, Engineering and Technology areordered and especially how practicing engineers are essential to R&D programs. Practitionersare empowered with an acute awareness of what is commercially practical as to materials,manufacturing processes, and how to employ what is available to be able to create what wasunavailable
Page 9.988.8the child’s mind develops and forever impacted the way we teach children. Edison inventedProceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition CopyrightÆÉ 2004, American Society for Engineering Educationthings that made our lives a bit easier and changed the way we live. Edison was, indeed, a modelof Piaget’s constructivist model of learning.Today Piaget’s theory can still be seen in the modern engineer. Whether one is looking in theworkforce or the college setting where engineers are being trained, Piaget’s model ofdevelopment and learning is prevalent. It is the structure around which many courses, ToyingWith TechnologySM being one of many examples, are successfully developed
Session 3225 Engineering Design – On-Line Rebecca Sidler Kellogg, Jerald Vogel, Vinay Dayal Iowa State UniversityIntroductionTransforming engineering curriculum to an on-line asynchronous format presents manychallenges and opportunities. Engineering design has typically been taught as a collaborativeinteractive course at Iowa State University where student involvement and engagement waspromoted in face-to-face synchronous learning environments. With the dawn of e-learning, anew opportunity to reach students on-line, faculty at Iowa State University re-examined
differentiates engineering from science (which desires completeness ofexplanation regardless of utility).73.2 Can engineering design be deconstructed?Jacques Derrida deconstructed literary texts, showing how the seemingly coherent text with asingle meaning was really a contingent interpretation, with multiple meanings. Can engineeringdesign be similarly deconstructed? Perhaps. While the designer may have in mind a singlepurpose, that purpose is communicated only obliquely to the user through the design itself. Anadmirable design fits form to function so that the design itself implies the use. But thiscommunication is never perfect. The user interprets the design, sometimes using it in ways thedesigner intended, sometimes in ways the designer never
post 60’s educational world, it is in vogue to pass over the fundamentals andlaunch students at a very early age into the holistic writing process. The idea is the fundamentalsof how to write a sentence will be absorbed by little insights and little on-demand discussionswith teachers about nouns and verbs and at some point in time the light will go on and everythingwill come together,” Henderson explains. “Well, sadly that rarely happens. It is particularlybothersome to the engineering mind, because the engineering mind knows that process just isn’tgoing to work. At the very get go. So the engineering mind is desperately wanting somebody tosit down and share the fundamentals first. The other thing the engineering mind craves iswhenever
allow for effective learning, suchas the measurement of very small voltages/currents, or observations of high frequency signalsusing a high-speed scope, and so forth. With this in mind, the mobile studio approach is truly seenas an additional tool to be utilized where possible, but is not a complete replacement fortraditional laboratory equipment for all courses. We envision that aside from these very fewexceptions, nearly all courses can be designed to utilize the mobile studio lab instrumentationeffectively.IV Mobile Studio LogisticsThis section discusses the key considerations that informed the hardware selection process andguided the decision process for the practical logistics of implementing a mobile studio basedelectrical engineering
Paper ID #40224Origami in Materials EngineeringDr. Anuja Kamat, Wentworth Institute of Technology Anuja Kamat is an Associate Professor in the Civil Engineering Department at Wentworth Institute of Technology, Boston. Prof. Kamat received her Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from the University of Arizona, Tucson, and MS in Civil Engineering from the University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Origami in Materials Engineering In the author’s university, Wentworth Institute of Technology, Boston, a newer electiveand a lab-based
, E. (1995). “Practitioner and Student Recommendations for an Engineering Curriculum.” Journal of Engineering Education, ASEE, 84(3), 241-248.9. Lienhard, J. H. (1996). “The Eye of the Mind in 21st Century Engineering.” Presented at the ASEE Gulf- Southwest Section Conference, The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX.10. Rasmussin, E. (1995). “New ASCE Report Urges Changing Education by a Matter of Degrees.” ASCE News, 20(11), 1 & 6.Biographical DataDr. Enno “Ed” Koehn is Professor and Chair of the Department of Civil Engineering at Lamar University,Beaumont, TX. Professor Koehn has served as the principal investigator for several construction research anddevelopment projects and has
Session 3520 Engineering Programming Language Concepts Holly Patterson-McNeill, Carl Steidley Texas A&M University-Corpus ChristiAbstractThe study of programming languages is beneficial to all levels of programmers. The first part ofthis paper reviews some of the reasons for studying programming languages. To isolate some ofthe issues of language design, definition, and implementation, mini-languages have been used inProgramming Languages courses. Mini-languages are small and complete, yet restrictedlanguages. They have a small syntax and simple semantics. Mini-languages and their
Session 3353 MATLAB & Freshman Engineering Patrick E. Devens Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State UniversityAbstractVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State University’s (VPI&SU) College of Engineering hasmade the switch. MATLAB1 is now the problem-solving software used by the freshmanengineering program. The reasons for switching to MATLAB, how MATLAB was integratedinto the existing introductory course, and some lessons learned after implementing MATLAB aredescribed below. The purpose is to show both positive and negative aspects of switching toMATLAB in
. Page 11.570.3 Proceedings of the 2006 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ø 2006, American Society for Engineering Education Session 1823On the other hand, higher knowledge requires the use of innovative mind processes and is oftenreferred to as the creative use of insight. Some refer to this as using innovation to solve prob-lems that previously were unknown. In engineering, higher knowledge has traditionally beeninvolved in graduate programs. However, in the knowledge age this will change. Knowledgeage engineers (students & faculty) must master the ability to routinely
faster way and in a larger community. For engineers, the decisionprocess is even more complex once the implications have serious impact not only to the targetcustomers but also to the society as a whole and to the environment. This is an aspect that showsthe necessity for engineers to search for the acquisition of an ability to respond to socialnecessities having in mind the cultural aspects when developing a project.The effects of this aspect in engineering formation implies a different approach providing thefuture engineers a notion about policy, ethics and social sciences, which are so important toprepare them to the future work market that will require the respect and promotion of society andenvironment as assets1.Most of social groups have
SESSION 3454 UTILIZING ENGINEERING ENTREPRENEURS TO INSTILL AND ENHANCE ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN TODAY’S STUDENT POPULATION Vincent Gallogly, Adjunct Professor The Cooper Union, Albert Nerkin School of Engineering, New York City.ABSTRACTMeeting the dual challenges presented in today’s engineering schools by the bright,energetic student with the dream of turning her ideas to riches, and awakening the interestof the research, detail oriented, single solution student to the vagaries of the market placeand the entrepreneurism; harnessing energy and enthusiasm, without stifling it, teachingthe basics of
Introduction to Engineering courses are in close alignment withthe standard’s based kits developed by the National Science Resource Center (Science andTechnology for Children – STC) and those developed by Lawrence Hall of Science at theUniversity of California, Berkeley (Full Option Science System – FOSS). The methodologyused in the teaching of science focuses on a hands-on/minds-on approach. Teachers must havethe content background to help their students develop meaning from their experiences. In orderto do this at the elementary level teachers must get past their own fears about their lack of abilityand/or knowledge in the areas of math and science. Through the Engineering for Educators classit was expected that the preservice teachers in elementary
observation to the next in the hope that something will turn up. Too often the hypotheses with which we work are at home in the twilight regions of the mind, where their wavering outlines blend into a shadowy background. There they are Page 9.1102.8 safe from sudden exposure, and are free to swoop down for sustenance on whatever datum comes their way. Models are at any rate conscious, explicit, and Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education definite; there is nothing ghostly in their
prepare technical graduates with a proper moraland analytical foundation to perform their duties. By introducing ethics into the curriculum, we help students to stimulate their moralimagination, sharpen their critical thinking skills, and sensitize them to their professionalresponsibilities to the public. Proceedings of the 2006 ASEE Mid-Atlantic Conference With this in mind, a one-semester course in engineering ethics should include casestudies (actual or hypothetical) covering the following topics. • Need for engineering ethics • Codes of ethics • Ethical behavior in academia • Moral thinking and moral problem solving • Risk, safety, and liability in engineering • Employer/employee
Paper ID #30123Experiencing Ethical Engineering PracticeMs. Dayoung Kim, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dayoung Kim is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her current research interest centers on engineering ethics and social responsibility, and she is specifically interested in cultural influences on engineers’ moral formation. She earned her B.S. degree in Chemical Engineering at Yonsei University, South Korea in 2017.Dr. Justin L Hess, Purdue University at West Lafayette Dr. Justin L Hess is an assistant professor in the School of
studentinterest and excitement about STEM and improving their technological literacy.Bibliography:1. Technically speaking : why all Americans need to know more about technology / Committee on Technological Literacy ed. National Academy of Engineering Greg Pearson and A. Thomas Young, National Research Council. 2002, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.2. Taking Science to School:Learning and Teaching Science in Grades K-8, Richard A. Duschl, Heidi A. Schweingruber, and Andrew W. Shouse, Editors. 2007, National Research Council: Washington, DC.3. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School, Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning, J.D. Bransford, A.L. Brown, and R.R. Cocking, Editors. 2000, National
have two project engineers in mind. One is based in the Middle East and is verystrong in theory. The second is based in the United States and is very strong inapplication. The Middle Eastern engineer may be able to derive a solution more quicklythan his/her US counterpart due to a strong theoretical understanding. The US engineermay be able to derive a less expensive alternative due to a strong applicationsunderstanding. Corporate pressure is on… What do you do?Case 4: A Computer Glitch One Would Not ExpectAs the Computer Programming Technology expert at your firm, many people seek youradvice. At times it is to rid them of spyware or viruses. Sometimes it is a systems issueand you refer them on to your technical staff. Today was a surprise. A
it be? 7. What do you wish those who influenced you had done differently to prepare for higher education leadership, knowing what you know now? 8. Please review the proposed Model of Faculty Leadership Relationships and provide any feedback that comes to mind (can be on content or layout or if there is something that causes you to recall a situation in your development). 6 Appendix B ENGINEERING MODEL OF FACULTY LEADERSHIP RELATIONSHIPSFUNCTION DEFINITION BEHAVIORS (HOW TO BEHAVIORS (HOW TO RECEIVE
robot and competed in head-to-headcompetitions to achieve a given goal. Figure 1: Teachers building bridges using Jenga™ Blocks Figure 2: Teachers building Lego™ RobotsThe “Hands on the Human Body” clinic module focused on comparison of the human body withengineered systems. When most people think of engineering, the human body usually is not thefirst thing that comes to mind, but the systems of the body can be used to demonstrateengineering principles from all of the major disciplines. Simple experiments using the humanmuscles were used to demonstrate the concepts of levers and force balances which are verycommon in Physics. Blood pressure monitors and the human heart were used to demonstrateconcepts of
ISEK: Iowa State Engineering Kids Enticing Future Generations of Engineers Camille Sloan-Schroeder, Jacob Ingman Iowa State University College of EngineeringIntroductionIowa State University College of Engineering is working to provide engineering opportunitiesfor students in kindergarten through eighth grade that are fun, hands-on, and educational. Theseactivities make up a program called Iowa State Engineering Kids, simply referred to as ISEK.ISEK is a program designed to address the ever-increasing demand for engineering andtechnologically literate students to enter the pipeline of higher education and ultimately, theworkforce. Based on
reporting the assessment.SummaryElectrical Engineering Freshmen Practicum provides hands-on experience and introduces thestudents to computer-aided-design (CAD) tools, fabrication technologies, programming methods,and electrical engineering laboratory practice that will serve them throughout their academic andprofessional careers. More importantly the hands-on exercises serve to stimulate the curiosity ofthe developing mind, bring relevance to the theoretical training in the classroom, provide apractical foundation for significant senior capstone projects, and fire the passion for thisprofession.References[1] US News & World Report, America’s Best Colleges, 2003. Best Undergraduate Engineering Programshttp://www.usnews.com/usnews/edu/college
planning must be used to find the best places for these types of opportunities to beintroduced into the curriculum to enhance the educational experience of the student withoutjeopardizing any of the existing university constraints.Efforts are being made to find commonalities in certain courses across all 3 programs to expandopportunities for cross disciplinary activities. For example, all 3 programs have a 2 credit hourcourse titled Freshman Experience. In this course, they are introduced to the engineeringprofession, taught study skills, computer skills, and engage in various project based activities tospark their creative engineering minds. Up until the Fall 2010 semester, each of the 3 programshad their own Freshman Experience course so all of
thevarious meanings of this phrase with the goal of helping academic departments inindustrial engineering (whatever they are called) decide (1) how to use or not use theword “systems” in describing industrial engineering and (2) what to teach students aboutsystems engineering. What can we learn from the other fields that use the phrase“systems engineering”?Meanings of “systems engineering”When people use the phrase “systems engineering,” they have in mind one of thefollowing meanings: 1. The INCOSE definition, 2. A sub-field of electrical engineering, 3. A sub-field of industrial and systems engineering, 4. A sub-field of engineering management or technology management, 5. The information technology definition, or 6. Systems
) “A Model for Freshman Engineering Retention”,Advances in Engineering Education, ASEE, Volume 01, Winter 2009Seymour, E. and Hewitt, N. (1997) “Talking About Leaving: Why the undergraduates leave thesciences”. Published by Westview Press, Boulder ColoradoShepard, S.D., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., Sullivan, W. M. (2008) “Educating engineers, designing forthe future of the field” Book Highlights of research published by Carnegie Foundation forAdvancement of Teaching, 2008 (http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/elibrary/book-highlights-educating-engineers-designing-future-field accessed March 14, 2010)National Research Council (NRC) Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning (1999)“How People Learn; Brain, Mind, Experience and School
and stationaryelectroconductivity measuring sensors. This topic is therefore something that I am familiar withoutside of the class.”Though this feedback is limited in volume, it provides outsized value when developing coursesand material for students. Observation of responses showed an overarching trend that studentsrelated to material as it fit into the aspects of their daily lives whether the students came from anagriculture or engineering background. This in turn allowed students to connect the two fieldsand grasp complex theories or tasks given. Keeping this in mind, faculty considered developmentof future courses and the structure of the ET-AG curriculum in a way that straddles bothagriculture and engineering realms in a relatable
engineering; for example, some aspects of education have been studied in domainsoutside academic instruction – e.g. computer-based instruction – and lessons learned from thosedomains can be shown here. Throughout this paper, fundamental references to the field arenoted.Summary of Cognitive Science Insights Into LearningCognitive science provides insights relevant to education into individual learning. The mainfocus of cognitive science is to understand the human mind, building on several diversedisciplines including psychology, neuroscience, linguistics, philosophy, anthropology, andartificial intelligence. Often going beyond purely psychological explanations of how the mindfunctions, cognitive science also centers on understanding cognition in real