, doi: 10.1057/S41307-016-0034-4/METRICS.[12] D. Larsen–Freeman, “On Language Learner Agency: A Complex Dynamic Systems Theory Perspective,” Mod. Lang. J., vol. 103, pp. 61–79, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1111/MODL.12536.[13] S. Mercer, “Understanding learner agency as a complex dynamic system,” System, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 427–436, Dec. 2011, doi: 10.1016/J.SYSTEM.2011.08.001.[14] E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan, “The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior,” Psychol. Inq., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 227–268, 2000, doi: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.[15] J. R. Savery and T. M. Duffy, “Problem Based Learning: An Instructional Model and Its Constructivist Framework,” Technology, vol. 35, no
Underrepresented Youth Increase STEM Degrees. (EdWorkingPaper: 22-607). 2022, Retrieved from Annenberg Institute at Brown University: https://doi.org/10.26300/wc1x-8k13. 8. Baran E, Canbazoglu Bilici S, Mesutoglu C, Ocak C., The impact of an out‐of-school STEM education program on students’ attitudes toward STEM and STEM careers. School Science and Mathematics. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12330.9. Todd, C., Collaborations Between Under-Resourced High School Students and STEM Professionals to Increase Participation in Science and Engineering Fairs, European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, www.ej-edu.org, ISSN: 2736-4534, Vol. 3, Issue 1, 6 pages, January 1, 2022 (online).10. Salvad´o, Z., Garcia-Yeste, C., Gairal-Casado, R
thechallenges they face and offering better quality of support. We hope to share the personas withinstitutional stakeholders to build empathy and perspective for nontraditional students inengineering.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grantnumber 2044347 within the IUSE program. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation. References[1] National Center for Education Statistics, “Demographic and Enrollment Characteristics of Nontraditional Undergraduates: 2011-12.” [Online]. Available: https
´ di, Z. Kocsis, K. E. Kov´ cs, K. Kov´ cs, A. M¨ ller, K. Pallay, B. Eva Szab´ , F. Szigeti, and D. A. e o T´ th. The discovery of the possible reasons for delayed graduation and dropout in the light of a qualitative research o study. Journal of Adult Learning, Knowledge and Innovation, 3(1):27 – 38, 2019. 2 E. Grieco and S. Deitz. Special report NSF 23-315: Diversity and STEM: Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities 2023. Technical report, National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES), Alexandria, VA, 2023. 3 G. L. Heileman, C. T. Abdallah, A. Slim, and M
Students3.1 (CIS-S) developed by The PEAR Institute: Partnerships in Education and Resilience [12].This survey, totaling 44 questions, captured STEM interest, enjoyment, career interest, careerknowledge, and identity. However, this study focuses on the first ten questions based on thesurvey developed by Noam et al. measuring interest in science across various informal settings[13]. Researchers undertook three testing phases, including stability over time, internal structure,and construct validity. For this study, Space Club students were involved in a more generalSTEM program that included technology, engineering, and mathematics in addition to science.Therefore, any mention of “science” in the 10-item survey was replaced with “STEM.” Forexample, “I
condensed project is critical for providing student with a wholistic view of what must beconsidered when developing engineering solutions, in accordance with ABET student outcomes2 and 4. Exposure to human subject research such as the project described here, is critical forfuture engineers and scientists, as it provides a framework for considering human factors in theirfuture engineering and scientific work.References [1] K. L. Hansen, P. Nguyen, G. Micic, B. Lechat, P. Catcheside, & B. Zajamšek (2021). Amplitude modulated wind farm noise relationship with annoyance: A year-long field study. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 150(2), 1198–1208. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0005849 [2] C. Ioannidou, S
-arvoon – analyyseja tasa-arvobarometrista 2017 [Perspectives on gender equality – analysesof the Gender Equality Barometer 2017], M. Teräsaho and J. Närvi, Eds., Helsinki: NationalInstitute for Health and Welfare (THL), 2019, pp. 80–100.[8] M. Teigen and L. Wängnerud, "Tracing Gender Equality Cultures: Elite Perceptions ofGender Equality in Norway and Sweden," Politics & Gender, vol. 5, no.1, pp. 21–44, 2009,doi:10.1017/S1743923X09000026.[9] S. Aapola-Kari, "Nuorten näkemyksiä sukupuolten tasa-arvosta oppilaitoksissa jayhteiskunnassa [Young people's views on gender equality in educational institutions andsociety]," in Näkökulmia sukupuolten tasa-arvoon – analyyseja tasa-arvobarometrista 2017[Perspectives on gender equality – analyses of the
in the next section.Table 2: This table shows the activities throughout the module and the week they occur within a15 week semester. Lectures show the week they occur and assignments include the week they areassigned and due. It also describes the learning outcomes for each activity. Activities are listed inchronological order. Learning Outcome(s) (in parentheses are the associated Activity Week Occurred ABET Student Outcomes) Personal and - Describe and reflect on current state and desired future Professional Assign: Week 1 states as a person, student, and professional. (SO7) Interests & Due: Week 2
, exploring the world of craft cocktails, and making a fuss over her Boston Terrier, Gatsby. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Understanding Gen Z’s Declining Engagement with WE@RIT, a Woman in Engineering ProgramIntroductionAround 2016-2017 we began noticing sharp declines in current student engagement with ourwomen in engineering program, WE@RIT, within Rochester Institute of Technology’s KateGleason College of Engineering. The program itself was launched in the early 2000’s during theMillennial era, and the programming playbook was one of large, one-off events spearheaded byone full-time Director, and a handful of student employees. That
competition either as part of student teams or asfaculty advisor. The competition website includes competition guidelines, evaluation rubric,submission files to be part of the design proposal, winning packages, resources to help studentteams, and deadlines [1].Airport Cooperative Research Program (ACRP) conducts an annual airport design competitionfor university-level students in which U.S. student teams propose innovative designs to solvechallenges facing U.S. airports [1]. Undergraduate and/or graduate students are eligible toparticipate in the competition either as part of a course or as an independent project with facultysponsor(s). The students, either individually or in a team, prepare a 40-page design packageproposal addressing innovative
, “Experiences and Perceptions ofSTEM Subjects, Careers, and Engagement in STEM Activities Among Middle School Studentsin the Maritime Provinces,” Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and TechnologyEducation, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 153–168, Feb. 2016.[12] P. R. Aschbacher, M. Ing, and S. M. Tsai, “Is Science Me? Exploring Middle SchoolStudents’ STE-M Career Aspirations,” Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 23,no. 6, pp. 735–743, Jun. 2014.[13] A. J. Hayter, Probability & Statistics for Engineers and Scientists, 4th Edition. CengageLearning, 2005.[14] J. Saldana, The Coding Manual for
allies programs to support and promote gender equity in Academia,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 122nd ASEE, no. 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society, 2015, doi: 10.18260/p.24242.[7] L. Abrams, S. G. Shoger, L. Corrigan, S. Y. Nozaki, M. Narui, and A. Jayakumar, “Empowering male students as allies for gender equity within an engineering college,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, Jun. 2016, vol. 2016- June, doi: 10.18260/p.26945.[8] E. E. Liptow, M. H. Bardini, N. R. Krigel, M. L. Singer, and C. Carrigan, “Engaging engineers in inclusive cultural change through a new method, articulating a succinct description
Number of Target Time period Event Event description participant Participants s Training of in-service teachers from Lauderdale Lakes Middle Teachers’ August, 2019 STEM Teachers and Lake Worth Community 12 training High school for NASA-STEM content
National Center for Women in Information Technology (NCWIT) and, in that role, advises computer science and engineering departments on diversifying their undergraduate student population. She remains an active researcher, including studying academic policies, gender and ethnicity issues, transfers, and matriculation models with MIDFIELD as well as student veterans in engi- neering. Her evaluation work includes evaluating teamwork models, broadening participation initiatives, and S-STEM and LSAMP programs.Dr. Susan M Lord, University of San Diego Susan M. Lord received a B.S. from Cornell University in Materials Science and Electrical Engineering (EE) and the M.S. and Ph.D. in EE from Stanford University. She is
technical, professional, and personallearning outcomes can result, regardless of whether the activity is embedded within courses asservice-learning or conducted by students for pay or as volunteer activities.AcknowledgementsThis material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant#1158863. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References[1] Jeffers, A.T., A.G. Safferman, S.I. Safferman. 2004. Understanding K-12 Engineering Outreach Programs. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 130 (2), 95-108.[2] Yowell, J.L., M.S. Zarske, D. Knight
Department of States. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2015. 4. J. S. Nye, Bound to lead: The changing nature of American power. New York, NY: Basic Books, 1990. 5. N. J. Cull, Public diplomacy before Gullion: The evolution of a phrase. Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy. London, England: Routledge, 2008. 6. V. C. Turekian, P. D. Gluckman, T. Kishi, and R. W. Grimes, “Science diplomacy: A pragmatic perspective from the inside,” Science & Diplomacy, vol. 6, no. 5., 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencediplomacy.org/article/2018/pragmatic-perspective. [Accessed April 12, 2021].7. D. B. Oerther, “The Fulbright program at 70 years old,” Environmental Engineer and Scientist, vol. 52, no
).Iversen, E. (2016). "Arab women make a charge into engineering." Start Engineering. 10 06. Accessed 01 19, 2017. http://start-engineering.com/start-engineering- now/2016/10/6/arab-women-make-a-charge-into-engineering.Kantor, J. (2016). "To grow their participation In STEM, women need to come together ." Entrepreneur Middle East. 08 30. Accessed 01 20, 2017. https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/281567.Karlin, S. (2008). "Qatar University opens EE doors to women." IEEE Spectrum.Koushki, P. A., Al-Sanad, H. A. and Larkin A. M.. (1999). "Women engineers in Kuwait: Perception of gender bias." Journal of Engineering Education, 88 (1).Mannan, M. (2016). "Middle East female STEM graduates turning their backs on the
theirorganizations, Ibarra 12 used the term “provisional selves” to talk about the experimental phasesof identity formation as one adjusts to new expectations and sometimes even new organizationalcultures. He witnessed several forms of experimentation that advancing professionals use,including imitation, efforts to remain true to one’s self and ideals, and use of internal andexternal feedback mechanisms to evaluate their developing “provisional selves.” Ibarra definedthese strategies as “the degree of congruence between what one feels and what onecommunicate[s] in public behavior about one’s character or competence”12 (p.778). With itsfocus on personal-professional identity alignment, this autoethnography employs the secondform of experimentation, “true-to
what type of intervention(s) you would recommend.Our preliminary findings indicate a strong grounding in collaboration for all teams andindividuals; strong evidence of empathy among some (but not all) teams and individuals; andvarying degrees of learning that integrates the humanities and engineering. We summarize ourfindings below.Collaboration: All teams and individuals appeared to be engaged. Individuals seemed to haveroughly equal contributions in terms of time on task and specific contributions. All teamsdemonstrated appropriate teamwork. People listened to each other, responded to each otherappropriately, and seemed to value others’ contributions. There was little or no domination byany single person or pair of persons, no
transition to academic writing moreeasily so that the costs of the transition do not undermine them.References1. D. L. Peters and S.R. Daly, “The challenge of returning: Transitioning from an engineering career to graduate school,” in 2011 Proc. ASEE.2. W. Schilling, “Issues affecting doctoral students returning to engineering education following extensive industrial experience,” in 2008 Proc. ASEE.3. D.L. Peters and S.R. Daly, S. R., “Why do professionals return to school for graduate degrees?” in 2012 Proc. ASEE.4. D.L. Peters and S.R. Daly, “Returning to graduate school: Expectations of success, values of the degree, and managing the costs,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 244-268, 2013.5. J.S. Eccles, “Subjective task