, S.Sheppard, and K. Jackson, An engineering major does not (necessarily) an engineer make: career decision-making among undergraduate engineers, Journal of Engineering Education, 2009. 12. Agresti and B. Finlay, Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences, 3rd edn, Prentice Hall. Upper Saddle River, NJ(1977). 13. Meyers, K., Pieronek, C., and McWilliams, L. “Engineering Student Involvement,” 2012 ASEE National Conference, San Antonio, TX. 14. W. Smith, Does gender influence online survey participation? A record-linkage analysis of university faculty online survey response behavior, Research report, San Jose State University, San Jose, CA (2008). Page 23.519.14
invites faculty members on a regular basis toprovide descriptions of available research projects that undergraduate students can take. Grovestudents are informed on a regular basis when opportunities become available through e-mail andthe school’s web site. The selected “Bridges” students received a stipend and were required towrite a report or paper about their work and present it with a poster at an undergraduate researchsymposium. Special efforts were made to recruit women and minority students. Appendix 1provides a typical example of an undergraduate research project.2b. The summer research course for potential transfersSince 2007 the Grove School of Engineering offers a four-week summer research course forcommunity college students
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 FACTORS INFLUENCING STUDENTS’ CHOICE OF ENGINEERING MAJOR, CASE STUDY AT THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAVENAbstractThis research focuses upon evaluating decisions made by engineering students to choose orchange their field of engineering study in order to determine influences and mechanisms thatdrive their choice of engineering major at the University of New Haven (UNH). Socializers(parents, peers, and faculty), self-identified competence, and media sources were studied for theirlevel of influence and effect upon the selection of an engineering field. This research alsoinvestigates students’ perceptions of different engineering majors at the
project targetsrecruitment and retention of engineering ethnic minorities, women, and economicallydisadvantaged and/or First Generation college-bound students. The strategies include: cohortbuilding, networking, and pathway to graduate school. Cohort building includes buildingproductive academic relationships among students, between students and faculty, and betweenstudents and the university administration. The networking strategies include building andupholding a professional network with all people the students meet within their education andfuture career field, such as advisors, faculty members from whom they take classes, professors intheir major, internship supervisors, employers or administrators, and throughvolunteer/community activities
Paper ID #8004Development of an Open-Source Concurrent Enrollment Course that Intro-duces Students to the Engineering Design and Documentation ProcessProf. Richard Cozzens, Utah Educational Network This paper will be presented by four of the TICE Grant Curriculum Development Team members: Richard Cozzens Professor at Southern Utah University Jeremy Farner Professor at Weber State University Thomas Paskett PhD Isabella Borisova Professor at Southern Utah UniversityMr. Jeremy Ray Farner, Weber State University Assistant Professor Design Engineering Technology Weber State University, Ogden Utah Bachelors in Design
students9) How important is it to you to fit in with other students in your engineering-related courses? Possible probes: male students, female students, other students in your engineering program, other engineering studentsChoice of Major and Career Goals10) Do you have any plans to change your major? If so, please describe them for me.11) At this point, what kind of work do you see yourself doing after you graduate?12) At this point, how important is it to you to have a career as an engineer after you graduate?Gender-Related Issues13) Please describe for me what it has been like for you, being a woman in your engineering program.14) How much does being a woman contribute to how you see yourself as a person?15) How important is
undergraduate assimilated knowledge throughsuccessfully greater career opportunities, recommendations from supervisors and third partiesand the potential students statement of purpose. In the final analysis, it is a judgment decision onmaturity, based on a collection of factors that support an informed decision on the potentialsuccess of an applicant. These many career oriented factors are typically not available whenassessing the Master’s applicant who has just completed their undergraduate degree.This paper shares the quantitative results of a longitudinal study of nearly 400 workingprofessional adult learners, from business and industry, who graduated from Purdue University’sCenter for Professional Studies in Technology and Applied Research (ProSTAR
by industry, students, alarge number of faculty members and the Dr. Mohamed Noori, Dean of Engineering,. Thisis an organization that has become embraced by all. The real surprise was watching andlistening as the student leaders explained their rise from a novel idea to the most reveredstudent group on the Cal Poly campus; not for their ability to sell widgets, but for theirdevelopment of leadership within their organization and others.The founders of the club had created a leadership structure that documented anddelivered: succession planning, mentoring, tutoring and a Long Range Strategic Plan forthe future of the organization. Each retiring member of the board (students graduating)introduced their replacement for the next year and
- I am more comfortable in figuring out problems on my own, without the guidance of a higher authority figure.” (A1)[1]Realizing this sense of self-confidence is paramount in becoming an effective leader. In order to be aneffective leader one must be confident enough in one’s abilities to make decisions for the group. A leaderoften arises as a person who can make decisions in difficult situations where information may be limited.Francisco Dao is the founder of 50 Kings, an exclusive annual retreat aimed at fostering meaningfulrelationships among members of the technology and media community. [2] Dao states, “While the fearful will agonize over decisions and always make the safe choice, the confident will take the
Paper ID #7975Designing an Introductory Entrepreneurial Thinking CourseMr. Daniel Michael Ferguson, Purdue University, West Lafayette Daniel M. Ferguson is a graduate student in the Engineering Education Program at Purdue University and the recipient of NSF awards for research in engineering education. Prior to coming to Purdue he was Assistant Professor of Entrepreneurship at Ohio Northern University. Before assuming that position he was Associate Director of the Inter-professional Studies Program and Senior Lecturer at Illinois Institute of Technology and involved in research in service learning, assessment processes
program staff to include this in future activities with the suggestion of schedulingit in fall when more students would take advantage.STEM female faculty role models shared life stories (personal and professional) and experienceson the path to success at the mentoring Networking events. In 2010-2011, three Networkingevents were held in both the Fall and Spring semesters. The purpose of these events was to givementors and mentees an opportunity to talk with professors outside the classroom atmosphere oncareer and major related topics and seek professional advice. Professors from chemistry,mathematics, biomedical sciences, and environmental engineering presented. One event eachterm was focused on advising or shared experiences by EXCEL graduate
. Teaching interests relate to the professional development of graduate engineering students and to leadership, policy, and change in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Primary research projects explore the preparation of engineering doctoral students for careers in academia and industry and the development of Page 23.557.1 engineering education assessment tools. She is a National Science Foundation Faculty Early Career (CA- REER) award winner and is a recipient of a Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE). c American Society
contacted the identified expertsand interacted with them in person or over the Internet. They also explored media coverage of their topics. Theywere not mandated but expected to meet their mentors on regular basis. Some of them carried out surveys to getinsight into their topics.Synthesize: Students were expected to put together all the things that they had learnt and understood to create acoherent whole. Such a synthesis was required to be done at information, knowledge, or wisdom levels, butstudents mostly ended up doing it at information or knowledge level. As an example, gathering informationabout a particular regime and just organizing it in a particular way is called ―information synthesis‖. Analyzingthe reasons for the fall of a regime and
one technique necessary to capture attention of Freshmen students. • Technical education should begin in high school with hands on training in all aspects of machining, welding, electronics, controllers, etc. The focus should be hands on. After high school those with engineering aspirations can take their education to the next level while others are well prepared to move into higher paying skilled labor employment. • Students need to have the ability to communicate effectively on a professional level, and be able to act/react ethically when they begin their career. A basic understanding of business fundamentals could greatly improve their contribution to an employer as well. • In order
Paper ID #7915Motivation of Latina Students Leading to Retention in EngineeringDr. Carrie Robinson, Arizona State University Page 23.915.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Motivation of Latina Students Leading to Retention in EngineeringAbstractFemales and underrepresented ethnic minorities earn a small percentage of the engineering andcomputer science bachelor’s degrees awarded in the United States, receive an even smallerproportion of graduate degrees, and are
pedagogy. In practice, there is a dearth in theliterature, but the few papers focusing on design in K-12 engineering seem to show itseffectiveness. Cunningham and Lachapelle20 summarize the results from six years ofEngineering is Elementary, an engineering design curriculum for elementary schools, and findthat it has improved interest, engagement, and performance in both students and teachers. Sadleret al.21 show that after engaging in design challenges, middle school students’ science skillsincreased, though they evaluated solely the ability to design science experiments. Kolodner22finds that students participating in Learning By Design engaged in collaboration,communication, decision-making, and design of investigations much more like experts
occupations.24SCCT theory has also made an impact on models attempting to explain the withdrawal of studentsfrom undergraduate education. Compared to the models cited earlier that stressed the importance ofacademic performance and other institutional factors, such as student-institution match, SCCTfocused more on cognitive-person variables, such as self-efficacy, to reveal the potential for studentsto exert personal agency in their career endeavors.25 26 What is especially important about thesevariables is that they can be assessed and their conditions altered during the freshman year andbeyond in order to enhance students’ perceived consequences of succeeding in college and staying inschool.27 28While this study’s pathways model (Figure 1) bears
Paper ID #6270Examining the Experiences and Perceptions of First-Year Engineering Stu-dentsIrene B Mena, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Irene B. Mena has a B.S. and M.S. in industrial engineering, and a Ph.D. in engineering education. Her research interests include first-year engineering and graduate student professional development.Dr. Sarah E Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Sarah E. Zappe is Director of Assessment and Instructional Support in the Leonhard Center for the En- hancement of Engineering Education at Penn State University. In her current position, Dr. Zappe is re
readings from a variety of sources. These materials provided a foundation to buildadditional understanding of ethical reasoning using a variety of both inductive and traditionalteaching methods including small and large group discussions (both face-to-face and online),classroom debates, formal written papers and examination questions requiring students to buildan argument based on a prescribed ethical framework.Three separate traditional teaching techniques were utilized to promote students’ ability to applyethical frameworks and considerations to the decision making process. The first was assignmentof a substantial paper examining an ethical dilemma regarding a post-graduation employmentopportunity.27 The dilemma involved a soon to graduate
been assigned specific roles or functions to perform and who have a limited life span of membership [1]. Over the past few years, at the University of Oklahoma, a graduate course titled AME5740 Designing for Open Innovation has been designed, course content and assignments developed and a learner centric paradigm instantiated. Different facets of this course have been described in several publications – most recently in [2], [3]. In these papers, the authors explore the key question: How can we foster learning how to learn and develop competencies? In this paper we document our initial findings as to how far we have succeeded in facilitating students learning how to learn and develop competencies within this course
, and are all tenured.Hence, many of the demographic and attribute elements of the survey are irrelevant.What is relevant are the elements questioning work effort relative to personal values. TheSEECS Faculty Satisfaction Assessment (see Appendix B) uses a subset of questions from theHERI survey. To emphasize the association between the personal statement and the facultymember‟s perspective on the value of the SEECS work to realize the personal value, an emphasisaspect is included in the assessment. Hence, a faculty member is not only asked whether thepersonal statement is important, but also whether the SEECS program is viewed as beingimportant relative to the statement. Essentially, if faculty members highly rate a value statementand if the
teachers: The event provides an opportunity for faculty Faculty Sponsor sponsor to interact with high school teachers. Such interaction leads to exploration of possible collaborations. In the past the faculty sponsor has submitted a proposal to the National Science Foundation with participating high schools as implementation partners. Personal gratification: Meeting students who may consider the computing field as their career choice and discussing software engineering practices with them and their teachers provides a personal gratification. Host Institution Publicity
interviewed.Obtaining Knowledge about the Transfer Process through OrientationMost students recognized that the transfer process involved several discrete decisions andrequired access to information often not readily accessible through their own personal efforts. Inparticular, orientation programs and academic advising were an important source of informationabout the transfer process and about succeeding at the receiving institution. Students describedparticipating in several types of orientation: at the university level, college level and departmental Page 23.524.5level. Others participated in orientation activities both at the sending institution and the
adjustment and their success in college.4 In fact, the academicachievement of Latino students in particular tends to be enhanced by professors perceived to besupportive and accessible.4Students’ level of comfort approaching faculty for academic and social support can contribute totheir sense of belonging.3 Students who cultivate relationships with faculty members outside theclassroom tend to both report higher levels of satisfaction with their college and graduate.4 Infact, minority students who complete science and engineering degrees often highlight the role ofa faculty member as being instrumental to their success.4 Positive experiences with supportivefaculty can increase students’ sense of belonging and contribute to a climate that
Society for Engineering Education, 2013 A Descriptive Study of Engineering Transfer Students at Four Institutions: Comparing Lateral and Vertical Transfer PathwaysStudents who attend two or more institutions during their post-secondary educational careers, ortransfer students, make up just over one-third of all American students.1 Additionally, 25% ofstudents who transfer will do so more than once.1 Reasons for transfer vary widely, but usuallyinclude academic, financial, or institutional factors.2 Moreover, reasons for transferring may bedifferent from reasons for discontinuing coursework until a later date (stopping-out), as thosewho stop-out normally identify more personal reasons for leaving an institution compared to theacademic
software engineering faculty.During the first two weeks, students are directed to seek and research a suitable project topic byquerying faculty members, employers, or any other source available to them. The caliber of theproject and its suitability as a capstone experience are subject to faculty approval. In the currentcase, the three students made two important decisions: they decided to work as a team and,among the few topic choices that were offered to them, they selected a project in robotics.The ECE department owns two Cyton V2 7-dof robotic arms29 in need of a simple intuitive userinterface that allows easy programming of manipulation tasks. Figure 5 shows a picture of onerobotic arm.Multidisciplinary project experience in SEIn regards to
find that their performance is poor may be less likely to participatein a study on thermodynamics because these students are averse to the thermodynamics context.We plan to engage partner sites directly in an effort to recruit more students in the future. Onemethod that Dillman suggests for improving response rates in through the use of rewards44. Wehave developed an incentive plan for faculty members that will help pass on information aboutthe study in an effort to reach more students.Acknowledgements We would like to thank the faculty members that helped distribute the survey and thestudents who took the survey. This paper is based on research supported by the National Science Foundation underGrant No. EEC-1150384. Any opinions
manufacturing career. By assessing the manufacturing processes course content in directcomparison to manufacturing curriculum standards, along with making sure the program as awhole teaches basic professional skills (that are not manufacturing-specific), Calvin’s programcan become an example that is successfully “incorporating manufacturing content required oftheir graduates and demanded by their constituencies into existing programs” 11 as recommendedin the four pillars document.Curriculum and Manufacturing Processes Course BackgroundThe mechanical engineering concentration curriculum at Calvin includes a number of requiredengineering courses as listed in Table 2. Currently there is only a single course required (andoffered) for engineering students
. Traveling abroad required the projectteams to work together to accomplish their goals even as they changed throughout the trip. Theunpredictability of working in a new, foreign environment meant they had to be flexible andaccommodating to unforeseen circumstances. This required each member to contribute, worktogether, and take on responsibilities that often involved doing new things and being in situationsthey were uncomfortable.Being abroad presented personal challenges and often the more experienced project membershelped others work through these challenges. Seeing cultures with living conditions so differentfrom their own can be startling but ultimately students responded with an increased sense ofresponsibility to put their engineering
their challenges and contexts. The exemplar faculty advisor mustalso reflect on their practice, and deeply understand all aspects of the baccalaureate curriculum.Advising must help the student look beyond a semester-to-semester roadmap of isolatedcoursework and should help the student plan his or her trajectory through the program in terms ofacademic work, career planning, workplace engagement, and community involvement, all ofwhich are critical steps on the way to becoming an engineer. In this paper, the theoreticalframeworks for academic advising are presented; the concept of an advising syllabus isdescribed, and results from our own professional development program for engineering facultyadvisors are discussed.The Need for Improved