Sciencedegree. Also, there are many online teaching platforms dedicated to this subject. However, there is noclear consensus on what knowledge students need in order to be able to accomplish the tasks thatemployers are expecting. We are in the process of developing a comprehensive curriculum tailored toteaching students the necessary Data Mining theory and skills in our institution.Our proposed curriculum is influenced by data gathered from syllabi of courses taught in the area of DataMining at different institutions of higher education across the United States. Each syllabus was used togather information for the topics taught in the class, the textbook and reading materials, the primarylanguage used to teach students the concepts, and the frequency of
StudentsFigures 8 and 9 demonstrate the assignment grades for graduate and undergraduate students,respectively. Histograms and the adjusted normal probability plots demonstrate that both cohortswere very successful in securing high grades. One student from each group did not turn in theassignment and therefore received zero.Table 5 summarizes evaluation results both the course and instructor received at the end of the Fall2017 and Fall 2016. In total, 23 students responded to the questions and filled out the online surveyout of 25 registered students in Fall 2017. On the other hand, 20 out of 27 students responded tothe questions at the end of Fall 2016 in which the IMSG was not offered as an activity to thestudents. The results indicate that the overall
discussions. The course redesign process is further informed by the inclusion of studentstakeholders in the project, namely, undergraduate and graduate students who self-identify asneurodivergent. Student contributors share individual experiences and perspectives to identifybeneficial instructional practices and foster a personal connection with the faculty.Introduction of the I-StandardsThe I-Course Standards document resulted from the first stage of the I-Team process, emergingas a framework to guide the course redesign process throughout the life of the project. The I-Course Standards were inspired by the approach and format of Quality Matters, the certificationsystem for online courses, which is adopted at the university for all online classes
integrated in this regard and the STEM acronym was elevated to STEAM [14]. However,STEAM did not gain as much steam as STEM yet, and it is not as popular either.Qualifications Required for the Position of Instructor for Engineering Courses:A scan of more than one hundred online announcements for engineering faculty positions atvarious institutes of higher education in the US and a few parts of the world was executed. Itrevealed expected similarities as well as differences in listing the qualifications needed tobecome an instructor for engineering courses. Showing full details on this scan here is ratherlong and tedious, and therefore it is not necessary especially many of the details are repetitive.In lieu of that, a relatively shorter tabulated
certain assignments weren't always specified” Category of Investigation: Team Teaching Increase coordination between instructors and among modules; share content; Construct consider one overarching syllabus “Sharing materials and assignment information between modules” Example Excerpts “Having the previous module instructor provide a brief outline of assignments and major takeaways from the course to the upcoming instructor” Category of Investigation: Thematic Approach Construct Increase clarity in connection between modules “Some modules were in continuity others weren't” Example Excerpts
emphasized engineering education to promote persistence and success in engineering.Dr. Mehdi Khazaeli, University of the Pacific Mehdi Khazaeli is an Associate Professor in School of Engineering and Computer Science at University of the Pacific. He also serves as Director of Pacific’s Technological Innovation and Entrepreneurship (TIE) Program. He teaches courses in Design and Innovation, Decision Making, Building Information Modeling and Data Analytics. He has consulted with and/or taught seminars to a variety of clients in R&D-based industries, research organizations and educational institutions.Mr. Jeremy S. Hanlon, University of the Pacific American c
can identify latent skills from existing instructional text on existing onlinecourseware [24]. Text mining techniques have been used to connect job descriptions and coursedescriptions and curricula descriptions [25]. In another application, course descriptions arecompared against the resume of a faculty in order to assign adjuncts to courses [26]. Gomez et al.analyzed the text of learners’ reviews of courses in Massive Open Online Course (MOOC)platforms to better support course selection in MOOCs [27].Gender Differences in writing (text data)Numerous empirical studies have been conducted examining text-level linguistic features relatedspecifically to men and women and the effects of gender on linguistic behavior [28] - [32]. Theseworks
Instead of relying on coordinators contracts started a threeday bootcamp. It provided to do all training, departmental week prior to the an overview of policies, the course experts led some sessions. This start of classes, thus project, the learning management reduced monotony for attendees limiting training system, and university online and leveraged expertise of options. recordkeeping systems, as well as colleagues. We found that if prepared instructors to teach the bootcamp is optional, those first two weeks of course content. missing training are behind. Instructors had a Deliberate decisions
summer 2020, the firstsyllabus was drafted with learning outcome and topics. The syllabus was sent to our ExternalAdvisory Committee (EAC) for their comments on whether or not any topic needed to bestrengthened/omitted. One challenge was to arrange so many topics for a 3-credit hour class in a15-weeks semester. The schedule assigned for each topic was included. With the EAC’s comments,the course topics were finally decided as indicated below.1. Introduction to NASA and the global aerospace industry (1 week) NASA history and mission Aerospace manufacturers and their major products (Airbus, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, GE Aviation, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon (including Pratt & Whitney), Safran, Rolls-Royce.)2. Overview of
general scheme for thinking about each of the 0 – 4values was adapted from the work by Crosswait [2]. This chart (see Table 1) is provided tostudents in the syllabus for the course and discussed during class time. Evaluation Meaning Score EXCEEDED THE STANDARD You have demonstrated complete mastery of this element by completing 4 assessments with no errors. Your work is exemplary and complete. Translates to a grade of A MET THE STANDARD You have demonstrated proficiency in this element. Your work indicates an
information and training is available online. • Take advantage of special [and free] opportunities created for University Seminar to both illustrate the many aspects of engineering careers and to introduce the students to campus resources. For instance the pilot section was able to take a glass bottom boat tour of a spring-fed lake, schedule a stress management presentation from student health services, and even a tour of the football stadium through the athletics department. • A serious challenge for expanding this model will be in identifying enough engineering faculty to volunteer to teach a special section. The course sections in the described study were limited to 20 students in order
in engineeringthrough the inclusion of UD and disability topics in the curriculum. A long-term goal is todetermine whether incorporating UD into engineering curriculum attracts and retains studentswith more diverse characteristics into the engineering field. These potential students includethose with disabilities, women, and other underrepresented groups that have demonstrated aninterest in and preference for improving the world around them.In this paper, we present findings from a preliminary online discussion and site visits toengineering labs with students with disabilities. Based on these findings, we identifyopportunities for including disability and UD topics in engineering curricula as well as ways inwhich engineering courses can be
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Providing Deep, Foundational Learning in an Introductory Energy Systems & Sustainability Course Paul J. Weber and Joseph P. Moening School of Engineering & Technology Lake Superior State University Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan, 49783, USA Email: pweber@lssu.edu, jmoening@lssu.eduAbstractAn understanding of current energy issues is becoming increasingly important, given that energyinfluences many aspects of modern life. It was with this in mind that a new course entitledEnergy Systems & Sustainability was developed. This
receivedinclude: • “The course was really easy with easily understood concepts, but the test had a lot of true false that were difficult. It seemed like the tests were designed to trick not test.” • “The course seems to be more of a survey of many concepts and ideas as opposed to a set of connected concepts that build on one another. This is okay, but I feel like some of the lectures could be reorganized for more flow.” • “I liked that Learning Suite (the online schedule and grading system) was very organized, and the course structure was the same all semester, but I didn’t learn much…It would be more appropriate as a 400 level course to be less broad and delve more deeply into
, promoting legitimacy andintellectual authority, and centering critical reflection.Creating a community of learningOne of the main ideas that hooks puts forward in Teaching to Transgress is the importance ofcreating a community of learning in the classroom. A community of learning for transformativepedagogy involves “making the classroom a democratic setting where everyone feels aresponsibility to contribute” [1, p. 39]. My efforts to build a community of learning in ENG 3020began on the first day of class. After going through the course syllabus, I devoted time toclassroom conduct and norms. First, I highlighted main ideas from Arao and Clemens’s chapter“From Safe Spaces to Brave Spaces” [5], as they have noted that “safe spaces” may hinderstudent
threeunexcused absences. While these policies are not unreasonable, they tend to motivate students toparticipate in these activities. We recommend similar policies adapted to your courses toincentivize students (e.g., those who benefit from more guiding structure or who are tempted toprocrastinate) to stay engaged and not fall behind.Observations and Tips: This is a very different grading structure that many students are notfamiliar with, so it is helpful to review the grading structure and the retesting process more thanonce (e.g., after the first testing session when they may have more motivation to understand thestructure than on the first day of class when the syllabus was presented). In the end, we didn’timpose grade deductions if a student gave a
Policy and Sexual Misconduct Policy were found themost interesting topics from students’ responses. The Mission and Vision of the institution andthe selection of the institution were found least interesting. Figure 1 summarizes the responses tothe use of various tools used in teaching. The students have overwhelmingly found thesupplemental classroom powerpoint presentations helped them in learning. This was followed bylearning from the articles on various topics and audio/video clips. The students alsooverwhelmingly found the online course management tool, Schoology helpful as the referencesource for the class notes, external links to related news media and articles, and assignments.Figure 1. Student responses to the use of educational resources
Paper ID #33642Development and Use of Open Educational Resources in an UndergraduateHeat and Mass Transfer CourseDr. Julie Mendez, Indiana University-Purdue University Columbus Julie Mendez is a Clinical Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Indiana University-Purdue University Columbus. Her interests include active learning strategies, online course development, alter- native grading practices, and Universal Design for Learning. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Development and Use of Open Educational Resources in an
satisfy seven principles as summarized (see Table 1).The first principle, equitable use, is applied to make the design useful and marketable to peoplewith diverse abilities [14]. This was implemented through the course website, textbook, syllabus,and captions. The course website was pre-designed and developed to be accessible to everyoneincluding neurodiverse students. A digital textbook was adopted for text-to-speech functionalityand automated pre-lecture quiz options. Pre-recorded videos were captioned. Syllabus and othercourse files were in accessible file forms and uploaded to the course website in advance. Thispackage is designed as a stand-alone package of online course an instructor can keep usingsemester by semester, once it is
Materials114 In recognition of inequity among the student population, this course requires no textbook.115 All assigned materials are digitally available through UVA’s online learning management116 system. This course design choice enhances accessibility, supporting the course goal of117 inclusion. Foundational texts that have informed the course include Technology Matters: © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 3 2023 ASEE Southeastern Section Conference118 Questions to Live With by David Nye; Engineering Ethics: Contemporary and Enduring Debates119 by Deborah G. Johnson; and Race After Technology by Ruha Benjamin. Based on the
concepts.This online assignments have video based coaching problems, tutorials with hints to guidestudents to learn the electrical circuit concepts and regular text book end of chapter homeworkproblems. As part of the course requirement, students are assigned to do the conceptual problemsto self-learn and to do more advanced problems to master the concepts. This mandatory requisitemakes them learn the chapter-materials in more in-depth. The aim of this study was to determinewhether this tool will indeed help students to learn the course materials to their own as well as totheir instructors’ satisfaction.This report will present information about the Mastering Engineering approach used in oursections and the weekly workload assigned to students. The
081 was that the instructor, who read and replied to the extra credit journal entries, addedtokens to the students stash (a column in the online grade center) whenever they earned a newtoken. The teaching assistant removed tokens whenever the students requested to use them, as wellas took care of all report grading. Without a trusted, well-organized and consistent teachingassistant who understands the educational value of this grading system with whom communicationis open and honest, this system will become difficult.IV. Implementation Changes in Future Course OfferingsEven though specs grading was positively received and succeeded in achieving the hoped outcome,some students (three) raised the issue of perceived performance pressure and
thefollowing sections, we will first briefly introduce these two classes and then discuss recentcoordination efforts to further improve the curriculum integration.II.A. Engineering Design Methods (EDM)As mentioned earlier, EDM is the theoretical portion of the design curriculum taught over onesemester. Due to the high enrollment, the class is offered in both the fall and spring semesters.Typically, advanced sophomores and juniors form the majority of the students, however some out-of-sequence seniors also take this course in the fall semester. A comprehensive syllabus comprisedof mechanical engineering design case studies, research work and application forms an integralpart of EDM.Throughout EDM, industry-relevant tools are introduced to students at
out how to operationalize them in theirclassrooms. Research has shown that faculty interested in pedagogical transformation areoften overwhelmed by the many tools, frameworks, and theories available [13]. One of theobjectives of this paper is to remove this burden on faculty and instructors by providing themwith an organized checklist of inclusive teaching practices stemming from variedframeworks, along with some easy-to-use resources, strategies, and examples, all in a singleresource. Further, our inclusive course design checklist is organized around the variouscomponents of teaching (e.g., writing the syllabus, selecting/training TAs, etc.) so it is (wehope) more pragmatic, accessible, and implementation-ready to educators, all the
would be responsible forinsights into communication with professors, email attending each class, interacting with the students in and outetiquette, organization through time management, of class, and aid with course presentations and gradingunderstanding the syllabus, exposure to study according to the discretion of the faculty member. Theenvironments, and personal management skills. Campus student mentors are chosen by the faculty member and areengagement activities are also encouraged including typically engineering students but can also be chosen from aattendance at college seminars and university programs poll of interested students in the University. Mentors areand participation in relevant engineering professional
instructorsoften lower the rigor of teaching a course in an abbreviated semester that results in increasedstudent performance. But this was not the case for the present study; the syllabus, teaching method,and evaluation methods adopted by the instructor were exactly the same for both Spring andminimester sessions.A shortcoming of this study could be that it was not controlled for student demographics. However,the author did not observe any significant difference either in age or ethnic difference between thetwo groups of students, except for gender. The percentage of female students in the compressedsemesters was about 16 and that in the regular semesters was 10. But it is doubtful whether thisfactor would be responsible for enhanced student performance
material and that the pace of the course was too fast. Half ofthe syllabus was eliminated. Only the content listed previously was covered. Concepts likegames, social network integration, online storage and maps were eliminated. Additionally, thestructure of the course was changed. Instead of two or three days of lecture where severalconcepts were introduced followed by a homework assignment, students were introduced to oneor two concepts before being tasked with implementing the concept themselves. On the first dayof lecture, students were given a demonstration and code walk through. As the instructorexplained the concept and typed each line of code, students took notes and copied code andcomments. On the second day of lecture, students and
for meeting many of the country development objectives. There have been numerous approaches to improve the abilities of professors to prepare and deliver courses. Structured independent learning using published resources (e.g., books, online), workshops, seminars, and mentoring are among the most common. This paper describes a peer mentoring program to build the capacity of water resources and environmental engineering professors in Pakistan. The program is delivered using an online learning management system, Canvas. The peer mentoring is conducted through weekly interactions via video conferencing with additional learning facilitated through Canvas. Structured instruments guide mentor review and feedback on the creation of syllabi, lesson
-Depth/Synthesis). We provided more Synthesis lessons than would be needed in a single course because multiple synthesis lessons allow flexibility for instructors based one which In-Depth topics they cover. Findings/Results – 17 participants submitted spreadsheet responses and 12 participants participated in the summary webinar. A model course outline was created from the list of 78 topics, retaining the modules and three levels of content within each module. An attempt was made to balance between the three discipline-specific modules (One Water, Transportation, and Energy). Furthermore, the model syllabus utilized several of the most useful sets of materials from University X and University Y and four “showcase lessons
their senior projects as the culminating effort towardsgraduation. This course includes lectures in technical writing and technical reporting techniquesas highlighted in Table 5. Table 5 Senior Project Class (EGT417) syllabus activitiesCombined with the EGT291W class, vertical integration offers additional opportunities for thestudents to improve their writing and communication skills. Attention was also given in theattainment of the students’ outcome “g” (SO7) which is mapped according to the ABETaccreditation criteria [22] as depicted in Table 6, below: Table 6 Table of Course EGT417 Competencies to Students Learning OutcomesConclusionDespite the inconclusive results of the survey, a wealth of evidence can be found in