graduates, co-op activities, and potential development ofcollaborative research programs. Unfortunately, adjuncts are marginalized by the academicsystems in place today; and their contributions to the academic process are undervalued. Next,the paper reports on the success story of an adjunct, a practitioner with good credentials, who“teamed-up” with a “full-time” faculty, in an attempt to bring the practice to 4 thyear students in ageotechnical/ foundation engineering class. The success achieved in meeting course objectives,as a result of practitioner’s role, was attributed, in large measure, to proper planning andcoordination that preceded course delivery. Plus, the willingness, experience and abilities of theadjunct in addressing the practice in
is not yet complete.Research on propagation and institutionalization of educational innovations has suggested that aninstitutionalization plan should be constructed in three phases: (i) describe the gap between thecurrent situation and the desired future situation, (ii) prepare a plan for bridging the gap, and (iii)prepare a plan for monitoring progress toward bridging the gap. This paper describes howVentureWell is integrating this three-phase approach to institutionalization, Designing forInstitutionalization (DI), into its Faculty Grants program. The DI approach is an adaptation of thethree-phase Designing for Sustained Adoption Framework, which supports educationaldevelopers to increase the percentage of educational innovations that are
Training curriculum teaches STEM educators to work in high-functioning teams to focuson specific audiences of prospective female students for targeted recruitment instead of relyingon the traditional broad brush approach of generic STEM career awareness. The team-based, 12-week WTE Online Training combines asynchronous video modules and assignments with liveinteraction and feedback from the trainer in Team Coaching and Live Question & Answer Calls(see Figure 1). The WTE Online Training System also includes nine months of team-basedFollow-Up Support for plan development and implementation that culminates in a GroupPresentation Call where teams present their outcomes.Participants in this NSF Project’s Online Training are now able to see
, +humanities) educationMove toward more and earlier experiential learning in UG engineeringAdoption/adaption of NGSS by ~2/3 of statesPossible AP Engineering course NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERINGEducator Capacity Building in PreK-12 Engineering EducationProject Goal: Understand current and anticipated future needs for engineering-literate PreK-12 educators in the United States and how these needs might be addressed.Work Plan: Literature review, landscape scan, workshops, consensus reportCurrent Status: Committee met late November; next meeting in mid-April. NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING LinkEngineering.orgFunded by ChevronThree primary audiences: PreK-12 educators PD providers
FTE) Teams● Preparing a data management plan● Archiving and publishing datasets in VTechData● Developing data infrastructure● Offering data education opportunities● Supporting discipline-focused data and informatics projects ○ Sustainable software development ○ Data modeling, manipulation, visualization, and analytics ○ Preparing data for repository deposit ○ Transforming data for reusePreparing a Data Management Plan https://dmptool.orgArchiving, Sharing, and Citing Data● Practicing data sharing ○ re3data.org ○ VTechData ○ Publishing data papers● Understanding the benefits of sharing● Guidance on data citation https
follow FAIR •Public-private principles •Shift to Discovery •Catalogs solutions •Source on the fly Computation• Analytics – Biostatistics – Statistics – Distributed analytics – Machine learning – Optimization• Visualization – Visual Analytics – Depicting results• Management – Business process – Preserving provenance of analytical strategies – Maintaining version control Infrastructure• Commons• Identity management and authentication• Planning and forecasting tools• Business analytics Courtesy Warren Kibbe National Library of Medicine (NLM)• Mission: To
, extreme events, and planning. These concepts are delivered in interactive lecture and flipped classroom modes. Data‐driven examples, case studies, and an integrative planning and design exercise provide guided and independent learning opportunities. The module includes explicit formative and summative assessment elements, culminating in the team project. After the materials were created, the module was reviewed for quality by independent experts, revised by the instructor team, pilot tested, assessed, revised again, and made available online. The pilot testing was conducted in four different courses, at a variety of undergraduate student levels (freshman to senior), and at different institutions. The pilot
. • Sponsor 70%; State 15%; OR/college/dept 5%/5%/5%• Other Cost Share: • Most c/s is in-kind e.g. % time of faculty and key staff • Up to 10% cash matched 1:1 College/Dept• We require 2-4 weeks to develop cost share plans • It is rarely formulaic, and often requires 1-1 negotiation. Some offices require 2 weeks lead time
Sustainability. For six weeks in the summer, accompanied by severalprofessional learning workshops throughout the school year, rural middle and high schoolmathematics and science teachers engage in a research program within the College ofEngineering. The main goal of the program is for teachers to develop an in-depth understandingof how research principles, engineering applications, and the engineering design process (EDP)can enhance the delivery of instruction in their content area through standards-based instruction.The intent is to create a pedagogical shift in how the teacher approaches lesson plan designcreating more meaningful, engaging, and authentic learning experiences for their students. Aunique aspect of this program is the focus on rural
key elements from the program thatalumni found impactful, such as a group design project, field trips, and seminars. Smith andBailey3 discuss their “high touch, high value,” accelerated, systems engineering Master’s degreeprogram. They also reported the results from an alumni survey that highlighted students’ generalsatisfaction with the program. Wuyts et al.4 developed a one-year, multi-campus biochemicalengineering program in Belgium. This program was modular and they focused on the innovativeimplementation of the modules at multiple campuses and their future assessment plans. Each ofthese studies highlighted the new curriculum for a one-year Master’s program. The studentevaluation that was reported was in the form of alumni surveys from
Engineering at The University of Alabama in 1999. He has enjoyed 15 years of a dynamic profession of teaching, research, and service. he now serves as the Director of Undergraduate Programs for his Department.Dr. Steven Jones, University of Alabama Steven Jones earned a B.S. degree in civil engineering from Auburn University in 1992. In 1994, he earned an M.S. degree in civil engineering with concentrations in transportation engineering and economics. He holds a Ph.D. in civil engineering from the University of Virginia where he concentrated his education and research on the interaction of transportation and air pollution. His 20 plus years of transportation engi- neering and planning experience spans both academic and
2016, Zaida became an ELATE@ Drexel (Executive Leadership in Academic Technology and Engineering) alumnus presenting an insti- tutional action project titled ”Raiders Abroad: A sustainable model for globally competent engineering students” that was adopted by the WCOE. The project, based on the work of cross functional teams estab- lished a strategic plan for 2016-2020 focusing on student participation and assessment on programs abroad and the development of a travel scholarship fund for students under financial hardship in the college. Mrs. Gracia brings twenty five years of experience as a mathematics’ professor at the Sacred Heart University in Puerto Rico. She led successful initiatives to increase minorities
tofurther develop these courses so that non-technical topics such as developing a business plan andconducting a market study can be incorporated. As a first approach, course materials introducingstudents to the fundamentals of running a business has been developed and incorporated into theinstruction of these courses. Initial results observed shows that the ET students are greatlyinterested in non-technical side of developing a product. The ultimate goal is to have studentsfrom other disciplines such as business, finance, and marketing to work with ET students so thatthey can experience the complete product development process.As a case study, this paper discuss a senior design project carried out by a mechanicalengineering technology student. The
school girls.The primary goal of the camp was to introduce more female students into STEM, especially, thefield of engineering through robotic projects and competitions, simple programming, guestspeakers, and STEM based field trips. There were 26 camp participants representing variousschool districts of San Antonio with a special emphasis of recruiting from underrepresentedcommunities. The camp was planned, coordinated, and directed by the authors who were also theprincipal investigators of the miniGEMS program. Additionally, five undergraduate researchassistants from the AVS Lab and three middle school teachers from the local school districtshelped with the prior planning and the entire management of the daily camp activities. The campwas
metacognitive reflections about their participation in these informal learningenvironments.Background and MotivationThe conceptualization of “thinking about thinking” has evolved since Flavell [8] first discussedmetacognition. Researchers have agreed that metacognition consists of knowledge of cognitionand regulation of cognition [8, 19, 20, 25]. Knowledge about cognition describes individuals’self-knowledge, knowledge about strategies, as well as appropriate application of differentstrategies in practice. Knowledge about cognition consists of three types of knowledge includingdeclarative knowledge, procedural knowledge and conditional knowledge [10]. Regulation ofcognition indicates that individuals are capable of planning, managing information
institutions like IUPUI meet certain accreditation requirements and requires thateach program develops a continuous improvement plan. The improvement plan typically consistsof a compilation of student materials, employer surveys, and course evaluations used to ensurecontinuous improvement within a program. In 2004 IUPUI, MET program faculty decided that astandardized senior examination would be part of the program process improvement process, [1].IntroductionThe Department of Mechanical Engineering Technology (MET) at IUPUI, has applied a seniorassessment examination as part of the senior capstone course for the past 12 years. It is designedto test the knowledge of MET seniors on core-MET subject areas. The Senior Assessment Examcontains questions and
to Engineering and low graduation rates. This lead to a decision by the Deancourse to provide a greater focus on critical thinking, of the SoECS to appoint a first-year programs coordinatormetacognition, and acquisition of effective student (JLL) and challenged him with improving freshman tolearning skills. Additionally, a number of student success sophomore persistence rates. The first order of business wasinitiatives have been instituted and additional initiatives to get ‘plugged in’ to the First Year Engineering Experienceare planned for the future. The results, while not yet up (FYEE) movement, starting with attendance at the 6th Annualto the levels typically cited at the First Year
standardsand applications relevant to students. Each teacher developed a plan for her/his own school andcurriculum during this part of the RET. Formative feedback on these plans included weeklyfeedback from graduate student, research mentors, resource specialists from Engineering Projectsin Community Service (EPICS) at PU, and the other teachers in the RET program. Teachers were also embedded into the research groups of their mentors: they attendedgoup meetings, discussed research results, and conducted laboratory work, modeling exercises,or other utilized other methodologies to answer their research questions. Teachers also workedwith their research group to develop implemenation plans, and in particular, what type ofsupplies and equipment
learning30 and co-generation.31 The students receive researcher’s expert opinion,which provides the benefits of cognitive apprenticeship.21In each iteration, two separate groups of students work toward building two identical robots. Forone group, the teacher and researcher use traditional qualitative observation, brainstorming,discussion, questionnaire, and feedback methods to analyze the outcomes of the iteration.7,8 Forthe second group, in addition to the traditional methods, the teacher and researcher follow someadvanced systems engineering approaches under the cognitive apprenticeship of the expertresearcher. The DBR is treated as a continuous improvement (CI) method,32 and resembles as theDeming or Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle.33 The teacher
permissions. Just as with thetraditional log books, students were told that their Basecamp sights would be checkedperiodically and that their updating and content on the site represented 5% of their grade in eachof the courses. Basecamp allows for postings to be viewed by each individual associated with theproject.As part of the overall redesign of the capstone experience, a project sponsor survey wasimplemented beginning with those projects that ended in the spring of 2015 (those beginning infall 2014). The project sponsor survey was distributed at the end of the project. Sponsors weretold that their feedback would not have bearing on the students’ grades, but that it was part of theprogram’s assessment and continuous improvement plan (which it is
his professional tenure he has received awards for construction innovation, superior project performances and one of the projects received indus- try recognition a project of the year. Dr. Austin recently earned his Doctorate in Construction Management from the Georgia Institute of Technology where his research focus was on accelerated project deliveries (i.e., faster, more predictable fast-track construction). His teaching and research interests cross the spectrum of the construction man- agement subjects, with a current focus on project management, construction equipment, planning and scheduling and research and teaching methodologies. c American Society for Engineering Education
published about this important area of engineering ethics either. As well,professional ethical codes in engineering typically ignore student engineering design projects(Foot 2006) and likewise engineering design projects planning rarely address Human SubjectsResearch (Healey et al., 2013; Diaz & Nathans-Kelly, 2016).This lack of clarity and lack of education for undergraduate engineers about testing humansubjects in their design projects has multiple negative consequences. The first is that theengineering students and faculty members lack understanding as to when to involve appropriateoversight by regulatory entities such as the Institutional Review Board (IRB). Lack of clarity hasconsequences of putting the subjects of the testing at potential
. Kenneth A. Bright, University of Delaware, College of EngineeringDr. Rachel Davidson, University of Delaware Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering Associate Dean for Diversity, College of Engi- neering Core Faculty Member, Disaster Research Center University of Delaware Newark, DE c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Engineering (verb) Diversity: Using the Engineering Design Process to Develop and Implement a Strategic Plan of Action for Undergraduate Diversity at the Institution LevelJenni M. Buckley, PhD1; Amy Trauth-Nare, PhD2; Kenneth Bright, BA1; Michael Vaughan, PhD1; Rachel Davidson, PhD1 1
of BIM. This paperpresents a newly-developed BIM course which aims to help CM students better understand theBIM workflow and focuses on advanced uses of BIM in construction projects. The course isdivided into three modules: BIM workflow, basic BIM applications, and advanced BIMapplications. The BIM workflow module discusses how BIM is addressed in project deliverymethod, contract, the execution plan, and team building. The basic BIM applications moduleexplains the typical BIM applications in 3D coordination, 4D scheduling, 5D estimating,logistics, visualization, etc. The advanced BIM applications module demonstrates the latesttechnology advances in the AEC industry that utilize BIM applications, including laser scanning,virtual reality, and
students develop the interdisciplinaryskills required to address critical and rapidly evolving societal challenges. We designed a casestudy on the Historic Fourth Ward Park in Atlanta, a project recently certified Gold by the ISI(Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure) Envision rating system. The Envision rating system is aholistic planning tool that can help mitigate barriers in decision making to facilitate moresustainable outcomes across its categories of quality of life, leadership, resource use, the naturalenvironment, and climate and risk. The Envision case study was used as the basis for a teachingmodule bridging engineering and cognitive psychology by highlighting the interconnectednessbetween these fields. Too frequently, engineering
sustainability programs in eachcountry and by comparing sustainability efforts in developed countries with those in adeveloping country. Of primary importance throughout each program was providing the studentsone-on-one interactions with researchers in each country and allowing them to continue thoserelationships as they completed research projects back in the U.S.This paper reviews the process of establishing and developing an international research programand the key elements needed to make it successful. It then discusses the actual researchexperiences in our program, the work products developed, and the benefits realized by thestudents. The key topics discussed include program planning, logistics, program execution,assessment, and lessons
activity, and replaced the other reflections with short assignments inspired by examples from Studying Engineering by Raymond Landis,4 focusing on topics including goal-setting and reflecting on different engineering job functions. Career preparation exercises. In Fall 2015 and Fall 2016, weekly student assignments included preparing a résumé, attending and reporting on a university-hosted career exploration event, and reflecting on their visit to the engineering career services center. In Fall 2015, students also took an online assessment (Indigo) designed to measure workplace competencies (similar to a personality test and DISC assessment combined). Academic success planning. In Fall 2015 and 2016, students were asked to make a
practice and Baxter Magolda’s Learning PartnershipsModel, which is based on self-authorship, was developed for ethnographic classroomobservation. The collected data will help us better understand the educational environment andeducational processes3, as well as the actors situated within them. In this paper, we offer ananalysis of pilot data to better understand how the classes might align with desired outcomes -such as student development of self-authorship, reflective practice, and capacity for innovation.Using this analysis, we identify possible implications for (a) adjustment of academic plans, and(b) evaluating and adjusting the educational environment, both described by Lattuca & Stark’smodel.Introduction / Purpose Statement
State University. QMRA III is a one-and-a-half-week training program designed for advanced graduate students, post-doctoral fellows and earlycareer professionals to assimilate scientific data and implement computer programs towardsbuilding a risk assessment for assuring safety and health goals. Each cohort of QMRA IIIconsists of engineering, biological and social scientists with the goal of cross training. As part ofthe evaluation plan of the program, students were asked to construct a box-and-arrow diagramconveying a risk management plan involving the full range of biologic, economic, social,political, and cultural factors that impact risk during a pathogen exposure. Additionally, experts,professors and career professionals who were also the
reasoning tosupport the claim is considered an act of EBR, even if the evidence is incorrect or the reasoningis specious. In EBR, a design decision is also considered a claim, where the underlying claim isthat the design decision meets the client’s criteria and constraints.MethodsThis study uses thematic analysis of video data as the primary source of data. The publishedlesson plans are a secondary source of data used to understand where EBR practices should beexpected throughout the lessons. The two sources are combined for a greater understanding ofhow EBR practices are seen throughout an integrated STEM unit in Kindergarten classrooms.ParticipantsThree Kindergarten classrooms teaching the same integrated STEM unit, Designing PaperBaskets, were