attention cueingin animations. Computers & Education, 55(2), 681-691.[11] Dorman, J. P. (2002) Classroom environment research: Progress and possibilities.Queensland Journal of Educational Research, 18, 112-140.[12] Fraser, B. J. (1994) Research on classroom and school climate. In D. Gabel (ed) Handbook ofResearch on Science Teaching and Learning (pp. 493-541). New York: Macmillan.[13] Fraser, B. J. (1998a) Classroom environment instruments: Development, Validity, andapplications. Learning Environments Research, 1, 7-33.[14] Marquez, E., Garcia Jr., S. Creating a Learning Environment that Engages EngineeringStudents in the Classroom via Communication Strategies. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition. June 16-19, Tampa, Fl. Paper ID: 26093
ASEE National Engineering Technology Teaching Award and Fredrick J. Berger Award winner.Shawna Thomas (Instructional Assistant Professor)John Michael Moore (Instructional Assistant Professor) (Texas A&MUniversity) Dr. Michael Moore is an instructional assistant professor in the Department of Computer Science and Engineering at Texas A&M University. Michael teaches C++ programming, Human Computer Interaction, and a course he developed on Accessible Computing. Michael worked as a certified sign language interpreter while pursuing his graduate degrees. Those experiences working with the Deaf community have motivated his interest in equity for people with disabilities. He now works to be an ally, advocates that
Teaching International, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 374–385, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1080/14703297.2015.1108214.[5] A. Pagano, S. Shehab, and L. Liebenberg, “WIP: Introducing Students to Human-Centered Design in a Design for Manufacturability Course,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Conference, 2020, p. 12.[6] “EAC-Criteria-2020-2021.pdf.”[7] R. Buchanan, “Wicked Problems in Design Thinking,” Design Issues, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 5– 21, 1992.[8] M. Meinel, T. T. Eismann, C. V. Baccarella, S. K. Fixson, and K.-I. Voigt, “Does applying design thinking result in better new product concepts than a traditional innovation approach? An experimental comparison study,” European Management Journal, p. S0263237320300232, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.emj
Engineering, Industrial and Systems Engineering, and a PhD in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. She is an Associate Research Professor and the Assessment and Instructional Support Specialist in the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education at Penn State. Her primary research interest include faculty development, the peer review process, the doctoral experience, and the adoption of evidence-based teaching strategies. She is currently serving as the ASEE Educational Research and Methods division Vice Chair of Programs for ASEE 2022.Sam Spiegel Dr. Spiegel is Assistant Vice President for Online Education and was the founding Director, Trefny Innovative Instruction Center at the Colorado School of
, IPv6 Hall of Fame 2019 inductee, and a technology expert for the European Commission. His research focuses on next generation infrastructures and IOT. Dr. Popoviciu completed his Executive MBA at Kenan-Flagler Business School, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Dr. Popoviciu is currently an assistant professor at East Carolina University's College of Engineering and Technology, where he teaches and participates in cyberinfrastructure research.Colby Lee Sawyer Colby Sawyer, East Carolina University – Software Developer © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.comEnabling Generic Sensing Devices to use LoRa
infrastructure specifically focused on sustainable infrastructure and its cost. Other research interests include engineering education topics. She has been a member of ASEE since 2015 and is currently serving as Program Chair of the Architectural Engineering Division and is the Construction Division Chair.Sanjeev Adhikari Dr. Sanjeev Adhikari is faculty from Kennesaw State University. Previously he was faculty at Morehead State University from 2009 to 2016 and faculty at Purdue University – Indianapolis from 2016 to 2019. He completed a Ph.D. degree in civil engineering, focusing on construction management, from Michigan Technological University in 2008. He has an extensive teaching background with 20 years of the academic
processes, Machine Design, Renewable Energy and Additive Manufacturing. His current research interests include Robotics, CIM, Sustainable Manufacturing, Micro Machining, Additive Machining and Engineering & Technology Education. He has published several papers, in these areas, in various national & international conferences and journals. He has worked in heavy and light manufacturing industries manufacturing pumps, motors, and CNC machine tools in the areas of system design, production planning and control and manufacturing. Edinbarough also served in paramilitary forces and in the Indian Air Force. He is a Life Member of the ISTE, a senior life member of the IE (India), a member of the ASEE & SME, and a licensed
efficacy among engineering TA's," in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, 2019.[6] J. E. Stice, R. M. Felder, D. R. Woods and A. Rugarcia, "The future of engineering education IV," Chemial Engineering Education, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 118-127, 2000.[7] N. T. Buswell, Swimming upstream: Pathways of new engineering faculty at non-R1 institutions, Purdue University, 2017.[8] A. E. Austin, "Creating a bridge to the future: Preparing new faculty to face changing expectations in a shifting context," The Review of Higher Education, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 119-144, 2002.[9] A. E. Austin and M. McDaniels, "Preparing the professoriate of the future: Graduate student socialization for faculty roles," J. C. Smart, Higher
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Survey year Figure 3: Course workload over time, as perceived by students. Higher scores indicate more work. 3.0 is equivalent to an “average” course, 5.0 is a “high
for a Material and Energy Balances course," Chemical Engineering Education, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 109-118, 2017, doi: https://journals.flvc.org/cee/article/view/104416.[26] S. J. Stone and M. W. Liberatore, "Attitudes Toward and Usage of Animations in an Interactive Textbook for Material and Energy Balances," in ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--36728.[27] M. W. Liberatore and K. Chapman, "Reading anytime: Do students complete missed readings after the due date when using an interactive textbook for material and energy balances?," in ASEE Annual Conference, Tampa, FL, 2019, pp. 1-10, doi: https://peer.asee.org/33224
. 736, 2019.[17] D. Ramella, “Oral exams: A deeply neglected tool for formative assessment in chemistry,” in Active Learning in General Chemistry: Specific Interventions. ACS Publications, 2019, pp. 79–89.[18] M. Huxham, F. Campbell, and J. Westwood, “Oral versus written assessments: A test of student performance and attitudes,” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 125–136, 2012.[19] A. S. Theobold, “Oral exams: A more meaningful assessment of students’ understanding,” Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education, pp. 1–4, 2021.[20] L. K. Davids, “A study on the effectiveness of team-based oral examinations in an undergraduate engineering course,” in 2012 ASEE Annual Conference &
/word-entrepreneur-mean/ (accessed Mar. 28, 2022).[5] M. S. Kennedy, H. L. Cox, and S. K. Lanier, “Board # 71 : Tracking Research Self-Efficacy of Participants in an NSF Research Experience for Undergraduates Site,” presented at the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2017.[6] A. K. T. Howard, Undergraduate Research for Composites in Extreme Environments, Second Year Study,” Proceedings of the 2018 ASEE Southeast Section Conference, Daytona Beach, FL, March 4-6, 2018.[7] J. B. Hylton, D. Mikesell, J.-D. Yoder, and H. LeBlanc, “Working to Instill the Entrepreneurial Mindset Across the Curriculum,” Entrepreneurship Educ. and Pedagogy, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 86–106, Sep. 2019.[8] “Expanded KEEN Student Outcomes (aka e
Paper ID #37105Give me a coffee break! Pilot study on improving examperformance and reducing student stressNelson GranjaMiguel Andrés Guerra (Professor of Civil Engineering and Architecture) Miguel Andrés is an Assistant Professor in the departments of Civil Engineering and Architecture at Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, in Ecuador. Miguel Andrés is a civil engineer from USFQ (2009), was awarded a MSc in Civil Engineering – Construction Engineering and Management at Iowa State University (Fulbright scholar, 2012)and his PhD in Civil Engineering at Virginia Tech (2019), as well as two Graduate Certificate in
. Steinlicht and B.G. Garry, “Capstone project challenges: How industry sponsored projects offer new learning experiences,” in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 15-18, 2014, Indianapolis, IN.[4] B. Allison, S. Ludwick, and W. Birmingham, “A mechatronics capstone project with an interdisciplinary team and an industrial partner,” in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, San Antonio, TX, June 10-13, 2012.[5] P.K. Sheridan, G. Evans, and D. Reeve, “A proposed framework for teaching team-effectiveness in
Foundation to study increasing the fairness of engineering assessments. In total, she has been on the leadership of more than $24 million dollars in research awards. Her research on evaluation of online learning (supported by two NSF awards #1544259,1935683, ) has resulted in more than 20 peer-reviewed conference and journal publications related to engineering learners in online courses. She was a FutureLearn Research Fellow from 2017-2019; a 2018 recipient of the FIE New Faculty Fellow Award and was the 2021 Program Chair for the Educational Research Methods Division of ASEE.Tracy Anne Hammond (Professor) Dr. Tracy Hammond is the current Secretary of the Faculty Senate and passionate about Faculty governance. Hammond is
inspired by our students, who requested a greaterconnection between the technical content of classes and real world SJ issues, including the rolethat engineers play. The intent is to engage faculty in the development of new curriculum whileproviding a mechanism for direct student feedback on new ideas. Success was measured by thelevel of engagement of faculty in the challenge.A Call to ActionIn Spring 2019, a small group of diverse students requested that more social justice and appliedproblem solving be included in the curriculum. They organized and led the EngineeringMindfulness in Climate and Curriculum (EMC2), a group of faculty, administrators, and studentswith the goal of affecting change in our engineering community, classroom, and
of this pilot canadequately answer our four research questions with access to a larger sample size.Future WorkUpon amending the study based on community feedback obtained during the ASEE NSF postersession, we will expand this study during the fall 2022 semester to include fifteen engineeringstudents, tripling the sample size of this pilot. We also plan to run this same study withpractitioners (after performing a pilot) to investigate if any differences exist between these twopopulations.AcknowledgementsThis work is supported by NSF Research in the Formation of Engineers [RFE DUE# 2113844,2113845, 2113846]. This work is also supported by the USDE Graduate Assistance in Areas ofNational Need (GAANN) Fellowship [P200A180055]. We would also like
conference papers and book chapters.Mr. Ryan Hare, Rowan University Ryan Hare received his B.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Rowan University in 2019. He is currently pursuing his Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering at Rowan University. His current research focus is applying artificial intelligence methods to create enhanced educational systems and improve student learning. Further interests include serious games, intelligent tutoring systems, adaptive or intelligent educational systems, and leveraging student data to enhance learning. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Evaluation of an AI-assisted Adaptive Educational
) and desired personal characteristics for the graduatestudents (e.g., critical thinking, problem-solving approach, data preparation, analytics, andpresentation). The contributions from the advisory board were the driving force for the newdirection and strategy for the graduate program. Industry professionals suggested and inputsfrom the board were successfully incorporated.A study by Stelyn (2019) suggested the perception of students played an important role in thestructure for the new course providing a learning experience. The student feedback and studentfocus group were used in generating new course structure, operations, and the course impact fortheir career. Student evaluations of teaching and learning and student suggestions on
; Carberry, A. R. (2021, January). Practicing Engineers’ Definition of Their Expertise: Emergent Themes and Frequency by Gender Identity and Role Change into Management. In ASEE Annual Conference proceedings.[10] Miskioglu, E., Martin, K. M., Carberry, A. R., Bolton, C., & Caitlyn, A. (2021, January). Is it Rocket Science or Brain Science? Developing an Approach to Measure Engineering Intuition. In ASEE Annual Conference proceedings.[11] D. R. Laker and J. L. Powell, “The differences between hard and soft skills and their relative impact on training transfer,” Human Resource Development Quarterly, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 111–122, 2011, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.20063.[12] Cech, T. R. (1999). Science at liberal
communities.The next steps of this program will be to begin developing qualitative and quantitativeassessments of student impact and to work towards establishing metrics for the “Value to thePartners” activity. This will allow a more formal assessment of the functionality of thepartnership. These efforts will help understand and balance the trade-offs between student andcommunity outcomes while providing value to the partners.References[1] “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2019 – 2020 | ABET.” ABET, 2019.[2] E. De Graaff and W. Ravesteijn, “Training complete engineers: Global enterprise and engineeringeducation,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 419–427, Dec. 2001, doi:10.1080/03043790110068701.[3] J. Lucena, G. Downey
, and E. L. Diaz, “Education and building capacity for improving resilience of coastal infrastructure,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2019, doi: 10.18260/1-2--32686.[5] C. L. Lopez del Puerto, H. E. Cavallin, J. L. Perdomo, J. M. Barreto, O. M. Suarez, and F. Andrade, “Developing a collaborative undergraduate STEM program in resilient and sustainable infrastructure,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2019, doi: 10.18260/1- 2--32629.[6] C. López del Puerto, I. Pagán-Trinidad, L. Aponte-Bermúdez, and S. Adams, “NUEVOS CÓDIGOS DE CONSTRUCCIÓN 2018 Y EDUCACIÓN PARA MEJORAR LA RESILIENCIA DE LA INFRAESTRUCTURA COSTERA EN PUERTO RICO 1 NEW BUILDING CODES 2018 AND EDUCATION TO IMPROVE
, 2022).[20] L. B. Wheeler, S. L. Navy, J. L. Maeng, and B. A. Whitworth, “Development and validation of the Classroom Observation Protocol for Engineering Design (COPED),” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 1285–1305, 2019, doi: 10.1002/tea.21557.[21] D. L. Reinholz and N. Shah, “Equity Analytics: A Methodological Approach for Quantifying Participation Patterns in Mathematics Classroom Discourse,” J. Res. Math. Educ., vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 140–177, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.5951/jresematheduc.49.2.0140.[22] M. Sanders, S. Spiegel, and J. Zoltners, “Moving Beyond ‘Does Active Learning Work?’ with the Engineering Learning Observation Protocol,” presented at the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT. doi
science and math courses allows them toexperience real-world problems which enables them to make connections to STEM fields [2].Data show that K-12 students from rural areas are less likely to have experience with STEMfields in the classroom compared to urban areas. This is due to a multitude of factors includingbudgets and teachers not having the necessary resources [5]. Many urban schools receive morefunding, therefore drawing in more qualified teachers and more resources [4]. A difference inSTEM education between rural and urban schools seems to be due to financial reasons [4][5].Data was collected from a 2019 outreach summer camp designed to increase student interest inSTEM. The hypothesis is that summer camps affect students’ interest in
tolink these topics in the curriculum and (2) students can see the benefits of combing materialsselection and simulation in design.References[1] M. Prince, “Does active learning work? A review of the research,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 93, no. July, pp. 223–231, 2004, doi: 10.1038/nature02568.[2] “National Survey of Student Engagement.” https://nsse.indiana.edu/nsse/index.html (accessed Feb. 02, 2022).[3] S. J. Quaye, S. R. Harper, and S. L. Pendakur, Student engagement in higher education: Theoretical perspectives and practical approaches for diverse populations. Routledge, 2019.[4] K. Krause and H. Coates, “Students’ engagement in first‐year university,” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher
process.ReferencesAEP. (2021, February 20). GuaraniSat-1: Paraguayan Space Agency.https://www.aep.gov.py/index.php/proyectos/guaranisat-1Kurita, J. H., & Ortiz Coronel, D., & Moreira Bogado, L. D., & Vega, B. F. (2020, June),CanSat Pico-satellite Building Workshop as an Effective Tool for STEAM Education, A Ca-se Study Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, VirtualOn line . 10.18260/1-2--34257Coronel, C. D., & Mosqueda, M. L., & Vega, B. F., & Stalder, D. H., & Kurita, J. H. (2021,July), Building 1U CubeSat as a Tool to Promote Project-Based Learning in Paraguay, a CaseStudy Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, VirtualConference
Dale and Suzi Gallagher of Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He has degrees from Swarthmore College, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and the University of Florida. He studies the longitudinal study of engineering students and forming and managing student teams and with collaborators has been recognized for the best paper published in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2008, 2011, and 2019 and from the IEEE Transactions on Education in 2011 and 2015. Dr. Ohland is an ABET Program Evaluator for ASEE. He was the 2002–2006 President of Tau Beta Pi and is a Fellow of the ASEE, IEEE, and AAAS. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022
by the ASEE community e.g., to remix and create funshareable instructional content memes, and to create accessible audio and text descriptions for studentswho are blind or have low vision. Text extracted from each scene can also used to improve the accuracyof captions and transcripts, improving accessibility for students who are hard of hearing or deaf.1 Introduction Recent advancements in educational technologies have made available many innovative approaches toengage students with the course materials. In addition to standard-classroom teachings, efficient and reliableeducational tools have been developed to make the content more accessible to all students. ClassTranscribe isan educational web application that is designed to offer
learning and assessment tool in her introductory physics courses for non-majors. One component of her research focuses on the role that various forms of technology play in terms of student learning in physics and in engineering. She has been an active member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and the American Association of Physics Teachers (AAPT) for over 30 years. Dr. Larkin served on the Board of Directors for ASEE from 1997-1999 as Chair of Professional Interest Council (PIC) III and as Vice President of PICs. She has received numerous national and international awards including the ASEE Fellow Award in 2016 and the Distinguished Educator and Service Award from the Physics and Engineering Physics
the labs (determination of addresses and nicknames needed for a lab and sketches of HMI screens) to be submitted as pre-lab work to force students to be better prepared for lab. • Review all lab documents for clarity. • Look at improving cable length and cable management on the equipment. • Look at adding another module with solenoids and other devices.References[1] A. R. M. Khairudin, A. Abu-Samah, N. A. S. Aziz, M. A. F. M. Azlan, M. H. A. Karim andN. M. Zian, “Design of Portable Industrial Automation Education Training Kit Compatible forIR 4.0” in 2019 IEEE 7th Conference on Systems, Process and Control (ICSPC), 2019, pp. 38-42, DOI: 10.1109/ICSPC47137.2019.9068090.[2] S. Hsieh, “Design and Evaluation of Sensor