will be further advanced by obtaining the InstitutionalReview Board approval to carry out the research with human subjects. The researchers hope toquantify the value generated for the students by participating in the EIRC to further bolster thesupport for this program. The dissemination of the results may encourage participants to continuein their value creation after they leave the EIRC.Once the results from this study are obtained and analyzed, the future work of the researchersinvolves answering another research question: How do we translate the value proposition tostudents who are not part of a community of practice? Translating some of the best practices inthe EIRC to students who are not part of it will surely impact the recruitment and
progress paper discusses the Academy of Engineering Success (AcES), an NSF S-STEMsupported program, which employs known best practices to support and retain underrepresentedstudents in engineering through graduation. The goal is to graduate more students fromunderrepresented populations in an effort to ultimately diversify the engineering workforce.This paper describes this program’s unique implementation of a specific subset of retention bestpractices, such as facilitating (1) the development of both a feeling of institutional inclusion andengineering identity by providing opportunities for faculty-student and student-student interaction aswell as major and career exploration, (2) academic support, including support for the development ofbroader
Topic 3 4 Evidence of ImpactIn today's presentation, we will share the details of a longitudinal study on a middle schooloutreach program for girls. We will begin by sharing some background on Camp Reach and theoriginal elements of its design which have remained relatively constant over the last 20+years. In addition, we will share some brief information on other outreach programs at WPI,since participation in these outreach programs is one of the main sources of the touchpoints wediscuss in our research.Next, we will discuss the study design of this particular research. Camp Reach was originallydeveloped with the intent of conducting longitudinal research. Therefore, the program
Investigator, working to improve practices to recruit and retain women of color in STEM and enhance institutional climate at USD. Other current research grants support pathways for veterans in higher edu- cation, and the NSF program called, ”Revolutionizing Engineering & Computer Science Departments.” Her co-authored books include The Borderlands of Education (with Susan Lord), Mentoring Faculty of Color, and Beginning a Career in Academia: A Guide for Graduate Students of Color. She is past-Vice President (2017) of the Pacific Sociological Association, and an appointed consultant to the American Sociological Association’s Departmental Resources Group. Fluent in both quantitative and qualitative research methodologies
Paper ID #27374Examining the Role of Parents in Promoting Computational Thinking in Chil-dren: A Case Study on one Homeschool Family (Fundamental)Ms. Hoda Ehsan, Purdue University, West Lafayette Hoda is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education, Purdue. She received her B.S. in me- chanical engineering in Iran, and obtained her M.S. in Childhood Education and New York teaching certification from City College of New York (CUNY-CCNY). She is now a graduate research assistant on STEM+C project. Her research interests include designing informal setting for engineering learning, and promoting engineering thinking in
funding from the National Science Foundation to examine and address inequities in higher education, specifically as they relate to Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM). She served the NSF ADVANCE grant initiatives as a co-Principal Investigator, working to improve practices to recruit and retain women of color in STEM and enhance institutional climate at USD. Other current research grants support pathways for veterans in higher edu- cation, and the NSF program called, ”Revolutionizing Engineering & Computer Science Departments.” Her co-authored books include The Borderlands of Education (with Susan Lord), Mentoring Faculty of Color, and Beginning a Career in Academia: A Guide for Graduate
impact made to the students in their assigned classwas low, attributed to having no creativity within the rigid training structure [7]. A study byShannon [11] revealed that TAs who attend departmental training were more likely to havepositive ratings in the classroom, but the best UGTA training was viewed as prior experiencewith teaching. Small amounts of training (1 day or less) that often focus on university anddepartment policies do not provide enough time for UGTAs to learn and more importantlydevelop a comprehension of pedagogical skills, limiting the professional development achieved.From a small sample size of 6 graduate TAs at Texas Tech University, survey results suggestedthat graduate teaching assistants view preparedness, fair grading
working to createopportunities to foster analytical and problem solving abilities among its upper divisionengineering students. CET seeks to provide Junior and Senior-level students with undergraduateresearch and industry workforce experiences to better prepare them for graduate programs andfor highly evolving and technology-based labor market. The literature has reported for more thanthree decades the substantial benefits for underrepresented minorities (URM) when engaging inURE. A myriad of recent publications substantiates the importance of URE including increasedconfidence in research and professional skills, enhanced preparation for graduate school, andgreater clarity on future career pathways [4], [5]. Using grant-funded equipment and
quizand a survey immediately following the assignment. Following this, after a waiting period of twoweeks, all students will be given an unannounced pop quiz about the Dayanta, with the resultsbeing compared between the groups to look at the impact of the interactive system on both short-term and longer-term memory. Given this heuristic study, the authors believe this research willcontribute to a better understanding of the use of 3D models and interactive media containingthem in undergraduate instruction.7. AcknowledgmentsThis research is supported by the Construction Laboratory for Automation and SystemSimulation (CLASS) of The Ohio State University. The authors wish to thank the ASEEreviewers, whose comments have considerably improved this
Transformation (NEET) Living Machines (LM) thread and is also the instructor for 20.051, 20.052 and 20.053 which are the three classes entitled ’Living Machines’ required by all students participating in the LM thread. Dr. Kassis’ research interests lie at the convergence of engineering, biology, and computation. He is particularly interested in creating engineering tools to answer difficult biological questions. Dr. Kassis has worked on a variety of interdisciplinary research projects from elucidating the role of lymphatics in lipid transport to designing organ-on-chip microfluidic models to developing deep convolutional networks for biomedical image processing.Mr. William Dickson, General Motors Will graduated with a
theworkforce [6]. There are many explanations of individual excellence and entrepreneurialmindset [7,8, 9] and multiple studies about engineering students [10,11,12] with an emphasison a high need for achievement and potential for break-through innovation [13]. Since the late1990’s engineers and designers have been exploring moods and feelings and their connectionto better solutions [14]. And while research links entrepreneurial status to personality theory[15] and personality to leadership [16], few studies focus on the impact of emotion oninnovative success. This paper aims to begin filling that gap with a preliminary experiment toshow how students experience a story of innovation. The experiment is inspired by Radcliffe President Mattina
the position. Unfortunately, the lack of technicalskills and overall ability to perform the required duties of the position led to the dismissal of theemployee after a mere six months. The mathematical impact was: ~$28,000 between paying theindividual’s salary for six months and the 30% of the individual’s salary it cost the company toreplace this person. Having an individual in a role they were not qualified for over the course ofsix months also adversely impacts the employer’s projected profit margins. Privateorganizations generally do not view this as an acceptable standard practice where profits are thedriving force. Figure 3 displays a chart from Boushey and Glynn that shows the cost of replacingan employee [15
individual belongs toprofessionally, and/or voluntarily. Therefore, ethical conduct and practice is a traditional cornerstone ofeducation and the professional conduct and development of workforce in all industries.Today, engineers play a crucial role in the development of the direction of technology, research, economicgrowth and thereby impact on the safety, wellbeing, and lives of people. Engineers make decisions or areinvolved in the decision-making and operational processes of business, government, and/or non-profitorganizations at various levels (strategic, tactical, and operational). Since engineers’ design and makesolutions available to use for dealing with the societies’ complex problems, the direct and ripple effects ofthese decision-making
through the use of interview data from our research studyof engineering education innovation origin stories. This paper extends the process by furtherusing stories to recognize and take advantage of opportunities for change, highlightingcommonalities based on stories using qualitative research on the origin story of an innovativeengineering program.Why StoriesStories have long held power in human society. Stories are used as a way to construct,understand and communicate meaning around events and experiences [2, 3, and others]. Theact of telling a story is an effective way to disseminate a particular construct of meaning. Theact of responding to a story, or re-telling a version with personal commentary, further developthe communal understanding of
course, tenured or tenure-leading, and/ora professor of practice), reasons for conducting the research, and the procedures involved should they meetthe requirements of the program. The 11 instructors were affiliated with six academic departments in thecollege.B. Procedures Selected observers were invited to an informational orientation session. The session covered thepurpose of the study including a discussion on SETs, number of expected observations, required COPUStraining, and post-program commitments. Following the orientation, faculty and graduate student observersattended a 1.5-hour training on using the COPUS. The training included participant introductions, exerciserationale, protocol and code introductions. Several guided
. Lorelle A. Meadows, Michigan Technological University Dr. Lorelle Meadowsjoined Michigan Technological University in 2014 where she is leading the creation of a new honors college uniquely committed to inclusion and equity, and eliminating barriers to high impact educational practices. Prior to joining Michigan Tech, Dr. Meadows was Assistant Dean of Aca- demic Programs in the College of Engineering at the University of Michigan.Her primary responsibility in that role was to assure the delivery of a curriculum that addressed college-wide educational objectives in order to prepare students for the careers of the 21st century. This engagement led to her development as an educational researcher and she now conducts
dialogues. However, instructor facilitation may result in an instructor-centered discussion whichlimit students’ participation and voice [18], and student-facilitated discussions provide analternative approach. Peer facilitation can foster a sense of student ownership and help studentsfeel more at ease in expressing their opinions [19], and allow practical hands-on experience ofbeing a discussion facilitator [18]. Compared to instructor-facilitated discussions, research onstudent-facilitated discussions is still limited focusing more on the student facilitation techniques[11], [20]. This study aims to explore how overall design and management of student-facilitateddiscussions influence peer interaction and critical thinking in engineering
creating engaging experiences for his students. His work is primarily focused on two areas: engineering education and design. Professor Hoople’s engineering education research examines the ways in which novel approaches can lead to better student outcomes. He is the principal investigator on the National Science Foundation Grant ”Reimagin- ing Energy: Exploring Inclusive Practices for Teaching Energy Concepts to Undergraduate Engineering Majors.” He has also co-developed a unique interdisciplinary course, Drones for Good, where engineer- ing students partner with peace studies students to design a quadcopter that will have a positive impact on society.Dr. Joel Alejandro Mejia, University of San Diego Dr. Joel
mechanization and post-harvest maize production in Wang’uru, Kenya and Iganga, Uganda. She also served for four years in the U.S. Navy aboard the USS Sacramento (AOE-1) as an Interior Communications Electrician.Dr. Melissa Vosen Callens, Melissa Vosen Callens is currently an assistant professor of practice in instructional design and commu- nication at North Dakota State University, Fargo. Her areas of research and teaching interest include Popular Culture and Online Education. Her writing can be found in The Ultimate Walking Dead and Phi- losophy, English Journal, Communication Teacher, Hollywood Heroines: The Most Influential Women in Film History, and A Sense of Community: Essays on the Television Series and Its Fandom
Inventory and a Chemistry Concept Inventory for assessing conceptual knowledge and change for intro- ductory materials science and chemistry classes. He is currently conducting research on NSF projects in two areas. One is studying how strategies of engagement and feedback with support from internet tools and resources affect conceptual change and associated impact on students’ attitude, achievement, and per- sistence. The other is on the factors that promote persistence and success in retention of undergraduate students in engineering. He was a coauthor for best paper award in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2013.Prof. James A. Middleton, Arizona State University James A. Middleton is Professor of Mechanical and
coordinating institution, a better understanding ofprogram logistics, and new and strengthened professional relationships. We discovered a numberof challenges associated with providing intensive professional development opportunities tograduate students, including timing of experiences relative to degree progress, loss of connectionto the home research community, and financial impact, especially as it relates to travel andhousing.While a search of existing literature in professional development in higher education hasprovided best practices for existing programs, there is little to no available research highlightingbarriers that exist to offering different types of professional development opportunities tograduate student populations. These barriers
research space. ● Networking & Pitching Workshop – The importance of networking is highlighted along with tips and guidelines for building and maintaining your professional network both online and in face-to-face settings. Students practice their skills through guided hands-on activities and a mock networking session. Students also prepare and practice delivering a 90 second elevator pitch of their project. ● Preparing for Graduate School – In this session students learn about the opportunities for graduate school funding such as the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program. The activity includes a discussion of best practices for preparing for graduate school including finding the right advisor and research
differences, it is important to have cultural training and to experience anotherculture in that particular country. One of the best ways for students to experience another cultureis to take part in a study abroad course and to immerse themselves in another country’s traditionsand customs. The Commission on the Abraham Lincoln Fellowship Study Abroad ProgramReport concluded, “What nations don’t know can hurt them. The stakes involved in study abroadare that simple, that straightforward, and that important. For their own future and that of thenation, college graduates today must be internationally competent.”5Not only should graduates be internationally competent, research indicates links betweenstudying abroad and improved graduation rates, as well as
than twice as likely to enroll in an ET program versus Engineering. Wesuspect it may be due to traditional Engineering programs’ requirement of higher levels of mathand science classes, often lacking in under-privileged or underserved urban or rural high schools.Recently published research by the New York Equity Coalition supports this supposition.Understanding the reasons for the higher representation of these students in ET can provideinsights on the background of these students for developing effective practices and programmingto improve retention of this cohort. It would also provide useful information for increasing thediversity of traditional engineering programs. This paper presents initial findings from a work inprogress that is part
Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, LA, 2016.[18] M. K. Khalil and I. A. Elkhider, “Applying learning theories and instructional design models for effective instruction,” Advances in physiology education, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 147–156, 2016.[19] J. Hattie and H. Timperley, “The Power of Feedback,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 81–112, Mar. 2007.[20] S. M. Brookhart, C. M. Moss, and B. A. Long, “Teacher inquiry into formative assessment practices in remedial reading classrooms,” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 41–58, Feb. 2010.[21] M. Burrow, H. Evdorides, B. Hallam, and R. Freer-hewish, “Developing formative assessments for postgraduate students in
thefield strives, and whose concerns are addressed and presented. Grounding in feminist theory helpsto work a basis that organizations can be and are cultural - a notion many organizational scholarsnote as an integral force for understanding change (Schein, 1990). It provides the researchers andthe research itself the ability to be reflexive while paying critical attention with regard to genderand other oppressive intersections as they arise in analysis. As organizational dynamics unfoldlayers of written and unwritten regulations eroding the engineering education profession, whichscaffold gender neutral engineering practices, power is enacted and must not only beacknowledged but addressed. These power relations within organizations influence all
specific R&D effort.The product development effort was to research and design a software-based, 3-Band audioequalizer using MATLAB and was to be delivered to a real campus customers with a realdeadline. The deliverable was to demonstrate the product by applying it to adjust the audiotonality on mp3 music files in real-time at QCC’s Annual STEM Honors Conference.Our results showed this was a transformative experience for the student who acquired an acuteawareness of meeting customer schedules, product requirements, managing schedule slack, andpursuing design alternatives to mitigate risk of failure as defined by a missed customerdeadline. The overall learning effectiveness and design, as well as lessons learned, arediscussed, including future
, and has led the development of the project ”Systemic Transformation of Education Through Evidence-based Reforms”, which he submitted to NSF; it was approved by NSF in 2015 (NSF-DUE 1525574). He now serves as PI of this 5-year, $3,000,000 IUSE project that seeks to get faculty in a research intensive university to adopt evidence-based teaching practices, and to change the system to one that values and rewards both teaching and research, with an end result of increasing graduation rates and numbers in the STEM disciplinesDr. Robert L Potter, University of South Florida c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019
considering many target groups to collect different pointsof views and is innovative in as much as results will speed up and improve the way we conceiveinternationalization of engineering education, improve student training, enhance employabilityand, ultimately, help build a better world. The impact will be considered at different levels:At the local level: ● Promotes student mobility ● Promotes active learning and practices of global competence ● Prepares students better for international experience ● Facilitates the design of embedded mobility curricula ● Facilitates and accelerate HEIs work towards comprehensive internationalization ● Assesses the quality of international experience and training
, studentsfound the intensive method more interesting, and rated this format higher overall. On the contrary,some researchers have expressed their concerns about the negative impacts of intensive courses. Theybelieve academic quality is compromised by the efficiency of time and cost. Additionally, another issuereported about intensive courses is their intrinsic requirement for a high level of self-discipline and self-regulation which impacts the success of students lacking self-management skills as compared withtraditional course formats. However, there are not ample research studies addressing the preference ofcourses with physical activities and hands-on experiences in an intensive format offered in a regularsemester. In this narrower area, two