Information Systems (MIS) from the department of Business Administration at the Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences at the Hashemite University, in Zarqa, Jordan, in 2007. His research interest are focused on Engineering management and systems engineering applica- tions in healthcare, manufacturing, operations management, business, and other industries, modeling and simulation of complex systems, distributed networked operations, and Engineering Education.Dr. John C. Kilburn Jr, Texas A&M International University John C. Kilburn Jr. is Associate Vice President for Research and Sponsored Projects and Professor of Sociology at Texas A&M International University. He has been awarded grant funds from the NSF
. Since its firstconception, IoT came a long way in consumer products and industrial applications. Numerousresearch projects have been conducted; and, countless research papers have been published.IoT gained momentum in recent years and became one of the hottest topics in the IndustrialDesign (ID) discipline. IoT transformed the way once acceptable design methodologies intoobsolete. New design disciplines started to emerge to solve complex information architectureproblems. The consumer market is experiencing a growth of products that work by networking“things” with sensors. House appliances with sophisticated sensors help owners by carrying outhouse chores. Autonomous homes control indoor climate while the owners are not present.Smart devices
postsecondaryeducation choices [2, 3]. Given the unique geographic and cultural factors, it is critical to studyrural students’ college and career choice in context. Thus, this project focuses on ruralcommunities to understand how key stakeholders and organizations support engineering as amajor choice and addresses the following questions:RQ1. What do current undergraduate engineering students who graduated from rural high schools describe as influences on their choice to attend college and pursue engineering as a post-secondary major?RQ2. How does the college choice process differ for rural students who enrolled in a 4-year university immediately after graduating from high school and those who transferred from a 2-year institution?RQ3. How do
Paper ID #31442Design and Development of a Sensor/Actuator Module to EnhanceProgrammable Logic Controller (PLC) Laboratory ActivitiesMr. Brad L. Kicklighter P.E., University of Southern Indiana Brad holds a BS in Electrical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology (1989) and an MS in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Purdue University (2001). His past work experience includes eleven years at Delphi (formerly Delco Electronics) as an Advanced Project Engineer, eleven years at Whirlpool Corporation as a Lead Engineer/Solution Architect, and three years at Ivy Tech Community College as an Instructor/Program
related to culture, curriculum, and community to achieve adaptability, innovation, and shared vision. Alongside her research, Dr. Ogle has been active in the development of engaged learning and has led two interdisciplinary undergraduate translational research and education courses - Clemson Engineers for Developing Countries (CEDC) and Clemson Engage. Both courses include trips to developing countries, international internships and sig- nificant fund-raising to support projects with community partners. As a result of her efforts, the CEDC program grew from 25 students to over 100 from 30 different departments and was recognized by the Institute for International Education (IIE) with the Andrew Heiskell Award. As a
Dean’s Ambassador Program seeks to enhance leadership developmentand foster a spirit of pride among undergraduate as well as graduate students within the Batten College ofEngineering and Technology and the ODU community.● Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE): SAE provides students a hands-on opportunity to applyclassroom knowledge to real-world projects for international competitions.● Student Government Association (SGA): SGA recommends, promotes and advises the development ofrelevant programs and services; a medium between student body and university administration.● VEX U Robotics Team: Students from a variety of majors (not only engineering) who design, build andprogram robots for tournament competitions.● Engineering Makerspace and
Catherine Mobley, Ph.D., is a Professor of Sociology at Clemson University. She has over 30 years experience in project and program evaluation and has worked for a variety of consulting firms, non-profit agencies, and government organizations, including the Rand Corporation, the American Association of Retired Persons, the U.S. Department of Education, and the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. Since 2004, she been a member of the NSF-funded MIDFIELD research project on engineering education; she has served as a Co-PI on three research projects, including one on transfer students and another on student veterans in engineering.Dr. Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants Catherine E. Brawner is
class families are more accustomed tostraightforward orders from authority figures than to the indirect communication strategies(Delpit, 1995; Melnick & Meister, 2008). Whenever instructors choose to use these indirectcommunication strategies, they need to provide students with explicit lessons on how nondirective verbal interventions are actually “code” for direct commands.Instructors interviewed in this study mentioned that email communications to some middle-eastern students sometimes seemed less effective, these students preferred face to facecommunication. So, taking few minutes in the class explaining what they need to do for anassignment or project produced better result.Effective instructors of culturally diverse students
, and associate professor of electrical engineering at Kettering University. Dr. Finelli’s current research interests include student resistance to active learning, faculty adoption of evidence-based teaching practices, the use of technology and innovative pedagogies on student learning and success, and the impact of a flexible classroom space on faculty teaching and student learning. She also led a project to develop a taxonomy for the field of engineering education research, and she was part of a team that studied ethical decision-making in engineering students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Impact of Prior Experiences on Future Participation in Active Learning
creation of formal and informal entrepreneurship programs [2]. Students areexposed to business knowledge and entrepreneurial experience in project-based experiential 1formal coursework, student incubators, pitch competitions and mentorship opportunities underpracticing entrepreneurs. Shartrand, Weilerstein, Besterfield-Sacre, & Golding [3] have reportedthat, in 2010, more than half of ASEE-affiliated schools were exposing their students toentrepreneurship through formal coursework and/or extracurricular programs [3]. In the nearfuture, these numbers are likely to increase as more institutions begin focusing on developingentrepreneurially minded
=Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Sure) for participants to rate their opinion of experiences inSTEM majors at their HBCU. Survey items were developed to reflect the common reasons forstudent departure as outlined in the published text Talking About Leaving and the experiences ofsenior leaders on the project from STEM fields and at HBCUs [4]. To ensure the survey focusedon the intended areas and that the researchers engaged in a comprehensive approach, each surveyitem was aligned with a research thrust area and compared with the theoretical framework. Toaccount for differences in demographic information needed, two parallel surveys were createdfor each group (Group 1 and 2).Data Collection Data were collected from students (Group 1
been involved in collaborative research projects focused on conceptual learning in chemistry, chemical engineering, seismology, and astronomy.Dr. Margot A. Vigeant, Bucknell University Margot Vigeant is a professor of chemical engineering at Bucknell University. She earned her B.S. in chemical engineering from Cornell University, and her M.S. and Ph.D., also in chemical engineering, from the University of Virginia. Her primary research focus is on engineering pedagogy at the undergraduate level. She is particularly interested in the teaching and learning of concepts related to thermodynamics. She is also interested in active, collaborative, and problem-based learning, and in the ways hands-on activities such as
propose a Fundamental Learning Integration Platform (FLIP) which creates aphysical connection between the conceptual and practical engineering concepts throughout anentire 4-year Mechanical Engineering curriculum [10]. Students were made explicitly aware ofhow each concept from their courses fits into the bigger picture through an end of semesterproject that revolved around a specific aspect of the steam engine. This concept is difficult toapply to Electrical Engineering because of the wide variety of specializations offered within themajor. While connections between areas are plentiful, creating a singular project that faculty ofall specializations will deem sufficiently applicable would be nigh impossible.Alnajjar proposes “Integrative Learning
(2007).8 Beichner, R. J. et al. The student-centered activities for large enrollment undergraduate programs (SCALE- UP) project. Research-based reform of university physics 1, 2-39 (2007).9 McGee Banks, C. A. & Banks, J. A. Equity pedagogy: An essential component of multicultural education. Theory into practice 34, 152-158 (1995).10 Strickland, B. Kierkegaard and Counseling for Individuality. Personnel & Guidance Journal 44 (1966).11 Gneezy, U., Leonard, K. L. & List, J. A. Gender differences in competition: Evidence from a matrilineal and a patriarchal society. Econometrica 77, 1637-1664 (2009).12 Tatum, H. E., Schwartz, B. M., Schimmoeller, P. A. & Perry, N. Classroom participation and
in order to ensure a higher response rate. Our combined targetpopulation was approximately 1,609 undergraduate students with a gender breakdown of 53%women and 47% men in a broad range of undergraduate majors. 110 responses were received,including 59 STEM majors, 17 arts majors and 23 students who identified as having a major inneither of those categories. The overall response rate was 9.4%. Due to the limited scope of thisproject and the barriers to human subject access, the feasibility of our sample leaves our studysubject to sampling bias, making it difficult to generalize our results beyond the institutionsampled for this project. Variables This study included four dependent variables representing student interest in STEM
. Lacking diversity on an engineering team, welimit the set of solutions that will be considered and we may not find the best, the elegantsolution.” [6].Related worksRTTD-ID builds on Real-Time Text Display(RTTD) developed by Kushalnagar, et al [11]. forclassroom use. RTTD is a caption display methodwhich tracks a single speaker moving across aclassroom and projects captions transcribed by aC-Print captioner or Automatic SpeechRecognition, above them, allowing deaf viewers tomore closely follow what a speaker is saying. Thesystem is designed to be portable, easy to set-up,and low-cost. It uses a Microsoft Kinect 2 to track Figure 2: RTTD with multiple speakersthe position of the speaker. The
in a real negotiation process with professional and financial stakes. Undoubtedly, welearned many lessons throughout the process, including the need to construct a more concisesurvey instrument, and those lessons will inform our ongoing efforts to study this topic.Furthermore, with the complex nature of gender and negotiation, additional data collectionmethods should be explored to help us better understand what happens during negotiationprocesses and how gender factors into those processes.To that end, we have begun a second phase of the [name removed] project that entails collectionof different qualitative data. This phase began with a storytelling circle and methodologydiscussion held at a conference in January 2018 [17]. Analysis of our
, Boulder Derek Reamon is the Co-director of the Integrated Teaching and Learning Program (ITLP) and the En- gineering Plus (e+) degree program, and a Teaching Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engi- neering. As ITLP co-director, he coordinates 19-22 sections of First-year Engineering Projects, a course that has a proven benefit on retention within engineering and is also a nationally recognized model for freshman design courses. The e+ program has created a flexible engineering degree and a pathway to sec- ondary math and science teaching licensure, to increase the numbers of STEM teachers that have strong c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018
, however multiple-choice options could not be devised to retrieve the datasought [19].Collection Methods. Since this project required human subjects, the researchers sought andobtained IRB (Institutional Review Board) approval. Following this, a link to the survey wasdistributed to professional educator organizations, school districts, and personal networks tospread the survey over as wide an area as possible. Subjects were made aware of the intent of theproject. Records were kept of all contacts and an attempt to equally cover science, technology,engineering, and math educators was made.Data Analysis Methodology. Responses to 17 questions were gathered using an online Qualtricssurvey. The survey received 211 “hits” during the five weeks it was
project?" "What artifacts in theroom might also connect?" When students discuss a shared, recent experience, theirobservations were richer and more relevant. In either event, introducing the crosscutting conceptsformally made the future group and individual conversations related to the concepts moremeaningful. Allowing for wait time for students to look at the list of concepts and also betweenconversations surrounding ideas was crucial in helping students process this new academiclanguage. As students referred to the same concepts in multiple engineering challengesthroughout the day, they were doing more than solving a specific problem. They were knowinglylooking for cause and effect, asking what structure might best serve a function, even trying
integrity of the discipline itself. Of course, nearlyhalf a century of science and technology studies scholarship has demonstrated that engineeringwork is always cultural and political: humans make decisions about what projects to pursue andwhat design factors to prioritize amid a complex set of social, political, and cultural demands[e.g., 15-17].Prior research has speculated a possible connection between the prevalence of this ideology andinequality in engineering. Specifically, depoliticization justifies an unequal status quo in theprofession by prescribing broad avoidance of engagement with concerns like inequality within“real” engineering work. This scholarship argues that depoliticization functions as a mechanismsof inequality reproduction at
Student Experience Survey - HIP Course CONSIDERABLE TIME AND EFFORT 1.11 How many hours, in a typical 7-day week, do you spend preparing for this course? Less than 1 hour 1-5 hours 6-10 hours More than 10 hours To what extent do you agree with the following statements: 1.12 I had to spend a lot of time and effort in order to do well in this course. 1.13 This course challenged me to reach higher academic or personal goals than I thought I could. REFLECTIVE AND INTEGRATED LEARNING 1.14 How many times, over the entirety of the course, have you worked on an assignment or project that required integrating ideas or information from
] and some images are from [4-5].Toy Project at the University of North Florida areworking to engage students and community members by teaching toy adaptation adapting anddonating accessible toys. Toy adaptation involves modifying electronic toys to make them moreaccessible to children with diverse abilities. This includes deconstructing a toy and soldering auniversal activation port within the toy’s circuitry, such that a variety of alternative switches canbe used for toy activation (Fig. 1).Previous studies from other groups have found that toy adaptation is effective in enhancing first-year engineering students’ understanding of the field of engineering, and the connection betweenengineering and society [6-8]. Additionally, our previous work
with the hope that students would also: Develop educational materials and hands-on STEM activities as a service to the community Develop project/time management, organizational, and leadership skills. Develop effective listening/collaboration skills while working with community partners. Recognize and understand ethical responsibilities of engineers.Course History:This course was created in 2014 and was, initially, a two-unit course that served as a vehicle forthe outreach, discussions with partner liaisons, and assignments. Soon after, one to two “lunch andlearns” were included each quarter to provide a more convenient avenue for guest speakers anddiscussions. In 2015, the course took on its current three-unit format with a lecture and a
project is to identify how wemight cultivate inclusive engineering cultures in the absence of critical masses of peopletraditionally underrepresented in engineering. Stated another way, this challenges us to considerhow we might actualize more diverse and inclusive engineering environments starting with thosealready present in large numbers. This suggests as opposed to waiting until we have largenumbers of individuals from diverse groups to address the issues impacting them, we start withincreasing the awareness of those from majority groups to the marginalized experiences ofpeople from underrepresented groups as they navigate heteronormative engineering cultures.One potentially transformative way of doing this is by shifting the mindsets of
Hartman, Rowan University Professor of Sociology, Chair of Sociology and Anthropology Department and IRB Chair, Rowan Uni- versity. Co-p.i. of RED NSF RevED project at Rowan University. Editor-in-chief, Contemporary Jewry.Dr. Beena Sukumaran, Rowan University Beena Sukumaran has been on the faculty at Rowan University since 1998 and is currently Vice President for Research and Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering. She served as Department Head for 7 years. Under her leadership, the Civil and Environmental Engineering Program saw considerable growth in student and faculty numbers. Her area of expertise is in micro-geomechanics and has published over 100 peer reviewed conference and journal papers including
) and projected (2016+)female enrollment in the orthopaedic residency class. “Baseline” represents model withparameter values reflecting our current program evaluation results. “Worst-Case” reflects worst-case assumptions for parameter values in terms of recruitment and retention in the orthopaedicspipeline. Considering the duration of our programming efforts (Figure 3), if we were to cease allprogramming immediately (2015), our past programming efforts would yield a peak diversity of27% female in 10 years (2025) before declining back to the 14% baseline within 12 years (2027).Similarly, if we were to continue programming only for 5 more years (until 2020), we wouldexpect an identical peak of 27% female within 10 years. This peak would
encompasses a broad range of activities that engage thestudents in meaningful learning.2,5 While homework and laboratory sessions likely includemeaningful learning activities, advocates of active learning focus on approaches that take placein the classroom in place of traditional lectures.2 Felder and Brent use the following definitionfor active learning: “anything course-related that all students in a class session are called upon todo other than simply watching, listening and taking notes” (p. 2).6 Active learning strategiesinclude the use of clicker questions in class, peer instruction, inquiry-based learning,collaborative learning, and problem- and project-based learning.4,5,6, 7Many active learning strategies have been used successfully in
-5 take away ideas. TheMoodle gradebook provides a low maintenance method of measuring student progress throughthe program. Content and goals for the modules are briefly discussed below.Cultivating Perseverance. Based heavily of the work of Angela Duckworth’s Grit Scalestudents are asked to rate a series of statements such as “I have difficulty maintaining my focuson a project that takes more than a few months to complete” according to how similar thestatement is relative to how they see themselves [11]. The students are directed to view aTedTalk by Angela Duckworth about Grit and the importance of perseverance in achievingsuccess [12]. This module about perseverance is aimed at helping students see the relationshipbetween their daily
used K’nex to teach engineering, thereneeds to be a sharing of ideas, innovations and best practices. The ARCE program at Cal Poly isleading the effort to start a consortium of universities that would facilitate such collaboration anddialogue with the goal of incorporating the K’nex Corporation as part of the effort.Bibliography1 Ressler, S. “The Project Management K’nexercise: Using Role-Playing to Facilitate Learning About Design andConstruction.” 1998 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, ASEE, 1998.2 Estes, A., LaChance, E, and Ressler, S. “K’nexercise: Introducing Students to the Key Participants in the Design-Construction Process.” 2002 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, ASEE, 2002.3 Estes, A.C., and