outcomes for theirstudents, and build a curriculum to meet these expectations. This series of courses addresses atleast three of these outcomes directly: • An understanding for professional and ethical responsibility • The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global societal context. • Knowledge of contemporary issues.An understanding for professional and ethical responsibility: This curriculum is designed toprovide engineering and technology students with a broad understanding of ways to apply theirdegrees. Not only will they set the application of their degree on a global scale, but they willalso be introduced to ways their degree
engineering projects.Ethics in project To introduce students to ethical standards in global project engineering. MSc Engineering Projectmanagement On completion of this module students should know how to act when Management/MSc faced with an ethical dilemma. Engineering ManagementResearch This module should provide students with the experience of the process MSc Engineering ProjectDissertation: and methodology of research by defining and studying a complex global Management/MScEngineering
socalled “Project FEUP” was approved by FEUP pedagogical board, conceived by Prof.Carlos Costa, the FEUP’s Dean between 2001 and 2010. The main goal has been toguide carefully the first steps of every new student arriving at FEUP each year since this Page 21.51.4could be decisive for his/her future along the graduation process and to help students tounderstand the impact of engineers in the society, the engineers task in solvingproblems, and the need for professional ethics and social competences, in line withmany others initiatives in the world 11, 12, 13, 14.The “Project FEUP” was conceived with the help of a couple of other teachers to be theopening
, digital signal processing, andengineering ethics. Email: paulleiffer@letu.eduR.WILLIAM GRAFF, PhD, PER. William Graff is a professor of Electrical Engineering at LeTourneau University.where he has taught since 1975. He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees from Purdue University in electricalengineering. Prior to joining the faculty at LeTourneau, he was assistant professor of electrical engineering atDrexel University for six years, and at Wilkes College for two years. His professional interests include antennas,microwaves, plasmas, and ethics. Email: BillGraff@letu.eduROGER V. GONZALEZ, PhD, PERoger V. Gonzalez, is a professor of Biomedical & Mechanical Engineering at LeTourneau University withspecialties in Musculoskeletal
educationalobjectives.Relationship between program outcomes and program educational objectivesTo better illustrate the POA process used at Gannon, Table 1 defines the correlation that existsbetween the program objectives and the program outcomes. To provide a useful background forthe examples presented (Table 1 and following), the program education objectives are givenhere. However, any program objective statements could be used in the POA process described.Hence, the specific program objective statements are not critical to the discussion of the process. Program Objectives: Pgm Obj 1. Sound preparation for adaptation in exciting, rapidly-changing areas of technology and the passion for lifelong learning Pgm Obj 2. Ability to respond to ethical
of educational psychology and research that different instruments may be used withfrequency following the debut of the instrument only to result in re-analysis of the data withdifferent metrics if an issue of validity or reliability is raised in conjunction with the increase inapplications. Perry’s model relating to ethical and intellectual development of college studentsserved as a seminal model for developmental theorists for many years, yet recently, the modelhas been criticized and the validity has been questioned due in part to the limited number ofsubjects and the gender of the subjects11,12.A brief description of the 1985 version of the Kolb LSI instrument follows: • The 1985 version of the Kolb LSI contains 48 short sentences
relationship between each design element as itintersects with each customer requirement. The prioritization of the design elements can beseen from their absolute and relative value shown in the QFD matrix. The design element absolute value is calculated by summing the products of theimportance value of each requirement and the correlation value at the intersection betweenthat requirement and that design element. For example, in the first QFD matrix, for thedesign element of “Institution-industry and institution-community relationships”, the absolutevalue was found by multiplying the importance value for the requirement of “Understandingof professional and ethical responsibility” (3) by the strong correlation value (5) to get 15.This value was
, a and engineering an ability to design a system, component, or process to c meet desired needs d an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams an ability to identify, formulate and solve engineering e problems an understanding of professional and ethical f responsibility g an ability to communicate effectively a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in, h life-long learningCriterion 3 (c & f) can be grouped
. J.McKeachie (Ed.), Learning, Cognition and College Teaching. New Directions forTeaching and Learning, No. 2. San Francisco : Jossey - BassNovak, J. D. and Gowin, D. B.(1984). Learning How to Learn. New York :Cambridge University Press.Perry, W. G., Jr. (1984). Examsmanship and the liberal arts: A study in educationalepistemology. In A. M. Eastman et al. (Eds.), The Norton reader (6th ed.) (pp. 282 -292). New York: Norton. (Reprinted from L. Bramson [Ed.], Examining in HarvardCollege: A collection of essays by members of the Harvard faculty, 1963, 125-135,Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press)Perry, W. G., Jr. (1970). Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the CollegeYears : A scheme. New York : Holt, Rinehart, and
area interest are lean six-sigma, scheduling, engineering education, andprofessional ethics. He has published papers in peer-reviewed journals and conferenceproceedings and provides consulting service in these areas. His two novels, The Internship: AnEngineering Ethics Novel and The Internship Edge: A Lean Six-Sigma Novel were written ascompanion book for engineering courses and available in Amazon. Moras is a ProfessionalEngineer in Texas. Proceedings of the 2024 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference West Texas A&M University, Canyon, TX Copyright © 2024, American Society for Engineering Education
) through (7), plus anyadditional outcomes that may be articulated by the program. 1. an ability to identify, formulate, and solve complex engineering problems by applying principles of engineering, science, and mathematics. 2. an ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors. 3. an ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences. 4. an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic
credit hoursbased on their desired workload. Many students enroll in the course for multiple semesters tocontinue their project work, and in doing so, can fulfill a general education “global challenges4”requirement and/or a major-specific technical elective. The learning outcomes for the coursesequence include, but are not limited to: project planning, application of knowledge frommultiple disciplines, problem recognition and design processes, sustainability, leadership,teamwork, communication, application of humanitarian ethics, cultural awareness, and globalperspectives. The learning outcomes are intentionally inclusive of the seven ABET CriterionThree standard student outcomes5. As part of the program, students are regularly presenting
article “This is Not Farming” written by Katie Dobie (2011). Thisarticle discussed the issues surrounding Confined Animal Feeding Operations and environmental Page 24.940.5contamination. Students were asked to research the topic discussed and identify fact versusbiases in the article. Lab Skills: Environmental Justice and Ethics, Identifying fact from biases,Contamination of soil and water, EPA regulations for fecal coliform contamination in drinkingwater and recreational water, Quantitative measurement of bacteria.Case 4: Tours Students toured a local LEED Platinum hotel where they learn about green buildings,water conservation, and
pill dispenser for the elderly; new breakfast cereal and packaging. Semester 4 Product Manufacturing Manufacturing of a coil winding machine.For example, the first project (Global Perspectives) is designed to introduce students toengineering in a global context. Specific emphasis is on: Understanding and applying the basic design process Awareness of cultural, ethical, economic and social needs Personal and professional characteristics – critical and creative thinking Project planning Written communication Page 24.1016.5The knowledge gained in the other first
research questions themselves (e.g., What is the underlyingassumptions beneath the questions that are being asked? Who defines the system of study?)Objective research is best utilized in the study of inanimate objects which can be manipulatedwith fewer ethical concerns; However, it is less applicable to human systems where manipulationand control of human subjects raises ethical questions. In action research, the aim is to serve thecreation of the desired outcome. In our case, our research was initiated with the intent of creatingsocial value toward thriving communities. The result of action research is “meaning,” derivedthrough reflexive contemplation of the patterns, to include the thought patterns of theresearchers, who are themselves subjects
. Familiarity with four source databases. Finds information in a handbook.Standard 3. The information literate student Evaluates information using ABCDcritically evaluates the procured information mnemonic.and its sources, and as a result, decideswhether or not to modify the initial queryand/or seek additional sources and whether todevelop a new research process.Standard 4. The information literate student Knows four types of intellectual property.understands the economic, ethical, legal, and Understands the difference between commonsocial issues surrounding the use of knowledge and not so common knowledge.information and its technologies and either as Understands plagiarism and
State University. His research interests are in the areas of Nanotechnology, Fiber Optic Communications, Faculty Development, Application of Telecom- munications Technologies in Distance Education, and Social and Ethical Implications of Technology. He is the author of many educational papers and presentations. He has authored/coauthored the following books: • Nanotechnology: Ethical and Social Implications (2012) • Technology and Society: Issues for the 21st Century and Beyond 3E, (2008) • The Telecommunications Fact Book and Illustrated Dictionary 2E (2006) • Fiber Optic Communication: An Applied Approach, Prentice Hall, N.J.(2002) • Technology and Society: A Bridge to the 21st Century (2002) • Technology and
dualism” has also been used by Faulkner and others todescribe how the technical aspects of engineering are often viewed as both superior to andseparable from social dimensions.3 Further worth noting is Cech and Sherick’s discussion of howengineering education perpetuates such schisms by reinforcing historically dominant – yetincreasingly antiquated – images of the profession’s epistemological, ethical, and ontologicalfoundations. This hegemonic reproduction impedes efforts to transform engineering faculty, Page 24.1265.2courses, curricula, and culture in ways that might breach the boundaries between the field’stechnical core and the actual
skills, the objectives of a capstonecourse, project, or experience should typically include the following [4]: • Provide students an opportunity to synthesize knowledge from formal and informal learning and apply such knowledge to contemporary issues in the field • Help prepare students for a successful career by providing experiences that enhance their labor market advantage • Increase students’ understanding of the “big picture” including ethical and social issues related to the field • Help students understand the relevance of theory and research to practice • Provide opportunities for teamwork and leadershipBecause of the importance of capstone programs, ABET has delineated key components thatthese
. Ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs. 2 (design an activity or demonstration to teach a concept using creativity and innovative ideas) 3 ABET f. Understanding of professional and ethical responsibility. (need for outreach and science education to the public, professionalism) 4 ABET g. Ability to communicate effectively. (to a non-technical audience, with multimedia presentation and in written report) 5 ABET i. Recognition of the need for and an ability to engage in life-long learning. (reflect on experience and continuing outreach after graduation) The groups chose an engineering concept from their coursework
thereview process. Applicants must also 1) demonstrate a work ethic, time management skills,communication skills and professionalism; and 2) agree to participate in all parts of the program.To better understand the number of students that can be affected by SIIRE, we analyzed Page 23.942.7engineering enrollments and financial aide eligibility. Table 1 reports first-time freshmenenrollment figures for 2006-2011 and retention figures (after freshmen year) for all but 2011.The data from Table 1 indicates significant enrollment growth since 2006. Table 1 - Undergraduate Engineering Students
excitinghands-on design challenges to analyze artificial organs. In more advanced core engineering courses andlaboratories, students will explore the function of artificial organs in the laboratory and investigate thevariables affecting their performance. The engineering goals of this project are: (1) to explore the function of human and artificial organs; (2)to apply current research methodology state-of-the-art medical devices for a hands-on investigation ofartificial organs; and (3) to introduce fundamental engineering principles through experiments with artifi-cial organs; (4) to investigate the factors affecting artificial organ performance and design criteria; and (5)to explore the complicated ethical issues regarding the technological
discuss artificial intelligence through computer science usingheuristics. Additionally, the students debate the ethics associated with artificial intelligence andwhen legal rights should apply to artificial beings.Teachers attend a week-long, immersive professional development workshop for Cyber Sciencethe summer prior to teaching the course6. Following the professional development workshopteachers gain access to all curriculum materials including lesson plans, master notes, andsupplemental documents which are found on NICERC’s website. Communication is maintainedthroughout the school year via the website allowing for any questions, concerns, or issues ateacher may experience when teaching the material.Narrative #1 – High School Teachers
Paper ID #6392Problem-Solving Learning Environments for an Introduction to Food Engi-neering CourseProf. Tammara Ram´ırez , Universidad de las Americas Puebla Tammara Ramrez is a Science, Engineering, and Technology Education Ph.D. student at Universidad de las Americas Puebla in Mexico. She teaches ethics and development complex thinking skills related courses. Her research interests include faculty development, outcomes assessment, and creating effective learning environments.Prof. Aurelio Lopez-Malo, Universidad de las Americas PueblaDr. Enrique Palou, Universidad de las Americas Puebla Professor Palou is director of
as Ethics, GRE preparation, Getting into Graduate School, and Abstract Writing. Additionally, tours of campus research facilities (e.g. cyclotron, immersive visualization center) were offered. Finally, students were required to participate in the campus-wide REU poster session held during the first week in August. Students kept their posters for presentation at national or regional conferences and to display in their home departments to facilitate recruiting. Social activities REU students were integrated into the larger Texas A&M research community—over 200 undergraduates were involved in a dozen REU and other formal summer research programs in 2011. Students were housed with students from these other summer research programs in a
Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), particularly the Body of Knowledge report15, andarticles from the Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice. Fromthis literature I identified three central themes of uncertainty in measurement, economicalimpact, and ethical decision-making as critical issues that are underrepresented in CivilEngineering, and particularly in Geotechnical Engineering curricula. In summary, I used theevidence shown in Figure 2 to select and justify the content for the new FSFME course. Figure 2. Evidence used to select and justify content for FSMFE courseOverall, I organized the enduring understanding into four primary learning objectives; studentswere expected to: describe how issues
districts have stringent regulations and need several layers of approval beforesanctioning a tele-mentoring program. For example, mentors will probably need to undergo abackground check and district school boards may need to be consulted before participatingstudents are surveyed. Because the assessment involves human subjects, an Institutional ReviewBoard (IRB) protocol must be followed and agreements signed. Some districts may requirementors to report “alerts,” or situations indicating at-home abuse or other improper situations.Thus, the professional supervisor will need to discuss these ethical / legal guidelines with thementors. Additionally, the professional-level supervisor will need to set up a training and areporting regiment for the college
the assessments was analyzed withappropriate statistical techniques for small sample sizes to examine improvements in students' © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Midwest Section Conferenceconceptual understanding of Statics. The qualitative data from the informal discussions helpedidentify common themes with respect to the experiences of the students with PBL in theIntegrated Project team’s environment.2.7 IRB - Ethical Considerations Throughout this research study, Ethics were considered.2.7.1 Respect for Human Subjects Student confidentiality and anonymity were maintained throughout this research study.Since the Statics course previously
room.The theme of the CE483 escape room aimed to introduce the students to forensic engineeringand engineering ethics in addition to reviewing course concepts. The escape room was themed asa case study of the Harbour Cay Condominium collapse [25]. The students were given 90minutes to determine who was at fault for the collapse. The results of the investigation conductedby the National Bureau of Standards were used to create puzzles to assess the students’ ability toachieve the course objectives [25]. However, the numbers were changed to facilitate appropriatecodes for the combination locks, but the puzzles followed the storyline. The six course conceptscovered were moment envelopes, detailing reinforcement, punching shear, nominal momentcapacity
potential solutions to current best practices to satisfy defined objectives within complex, open-ended identified requirements, criteria and constraints. Constraints to Des.b design problems, be considered may include (but are not limited to): health and considering safety, ethics, safety, sustainability, environmental, ethical, security, economic, and applicable standards aesthetics and human factors, feasibility and compliance with and regulations. regulatory aspects, along with universal design issues such as Critically evaluate and societal, cultural and diversification facets. [13] Des.c