administrative pathways 2.50 2.00 3.33Note: The results are reported as an average on a scale of 1 to 4 (1 = strongly disagree; 2 = disagree; 3 =agree; 4 = strongly agree).ReferencesBerk, R. A., Berg, J., Mortimer, R., Walton-Moss, B., & Yeo, T. P. (2005). Measuring the effectiveness of faculty mentoring relationships. Academic Medicine, 80(1), 66-71.Blackwell, J. E. (1989). Mentoring: An action strategy for increasing minority faculty. Academe, 75, 8-14.Cawyer, C. S., Simonds, C., & Davis, S. (2002). Mentoring to facilitate socialization: The case of the new faculty member. Qualitative Studies in Education, 15(2), 225-242.Fowler, E. J. (2009). Survey research methods
template will beavailable in the summer of 2017. At that time, all existing problems will be updated to this templateversion.Example 1 – filling a weigh tankWe outline the variable parameter problem creation process with an example from an introductory coursein Chemical Engineering. The original example problem, with highlighted regions of the values that willbecome variable parameters, is shown in Figure 2. A mass of 1500 pounds of liquid having a specific gravity of 1.2 and molecular weight of 150 is pumped into an empty weigh tank over the course of 25 seconds. The tank is cylindrical with a diameter of 3 ft. Determine the: a) average mass flow rate (lb/s) b) average volumetric flow rate (gal/min) c) average molar flow rate (lbmole/s) d
versus attentively viewing the videos and taking notes likein a regular classroom setting. Several traditional students mentioned that after the midtermexamination, they had to modify their approach due to the online nature of the course. Spring2017 is providing the first opportunity to compare online and on-campus student performance inEEE 460 for identical term lengths, specifically, a full 15-week semester.References1. Online Programs Accredited by ABET, Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET), http://www.abet.org/accreditation/new-to-accreditation/online-programs/, accessed January 13, 2017.2. S. M. Phillips, M. Saraniti, “A fully online accredited undergraduate electrical engineering program,” ASEE
completeunderstanding.The author hopes to institute a hybrid format between traditional lectures and the flipped format.For less difficult concepts, the author may use the flipped format directly. However, for manysubjects, the traditional lecture format is required to maintain satisfactory progress throughcourse topics. The lecture videos can be used by students after in-class lectures to reviewdifficult ideas and also to review and prepare for exams. Hence, the author believes that videoproduction is a worthwhile endeavor.References 1. M. Stickel, “Teaching Electromagnetism with the Inverted Classroom Approach: Student Perceptions and Lessons Learned,” 121st ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, June 15-18, 2014 2. S. Freeman, S
At the outset of the test, the participants listed three areas of interest in aerospace. They weregiven a few minutes to look around the webpage and share initial impressions. Afterfamiliarizing themselves with the site, they were presented with three compulsory tasks related totheir area(s)8 of interest: ● Find a research database ● Find an article ● Find a bookAfter the three above tasks were completed, optional tasks followed: ● Find information about senior projects guidelines ● Find industry-based standards that might be of use for a project or paper ● Find formatting guidelines for an American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) report ● Find where to get help if struggling to find information ● Make an
tools. Spring 2017 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, April 7-8, 2017 MSUReferences1. Gaudin, S. (2007). Security Breaches Cost $90 To $305 Per Lost Record. InformationWeek. April 2007.2. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2017). Information Security Analysts. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/ooh/computer-and-information-technology/information-security-analysts.htm.3. Richards, R., Konak, A., Bartolacci, M. R. and Nasereddin, M. (2015). Collaborative Learning in Virtual Computer Laboratory Exercises. Spring 2015 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, 2015 Villanova University,1-13.4. Konak, A. and Bartolacci, M. R. (2016). Using a Virtual Computing Laboratory to Foster Collaborative Learning for Information Security and
right of center) directed at optical detectors with audio amplifier andspeakers located to the left and right outside of the image. Spring 2017 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, April 7-8, 2017 MSUReferences. 1. James L.Huff, Carla B. Zoltowski, and William C.Oakes, “Preparing Engineers for the Workplace through Service Learning: Perceptions of EPICS Alumni,” Journal of Engineering Education (January 2016): 43 – 69. 2. John S. Lamancusa, Jose L, Zayas, Allen L. Soyster, Lueny Morell, and Jens Jorgensen , “The Learning Factory: Industry-Partnered Active Learning,” Journal of Engineering Education (January 2008): 5 - 11. 3. Alan J. Dutson, Robert H. Todd, Spencer P. Magleby, Carl D. Sorensen, “A Review of
to the S language and environment which was industrializedat Bell Laboratories. It was developed by John Chambers and his colleagues. R is considered tobe enhanced and has an upgraded implementation of the S language. Most of the code written forS runs unaltered on the R platform. R provides a wide variety of statistical and graphical techniques, mainly linear andnonlinear modelling, classical statistical tests, time-series analysis, classification and clustering.R is also used as the vehicle of choice for research in statistical methodology and this platformprovides an open source route to participation in this activity. One of R’s key advantages is thatit is easy to work with and it is well-designed for publication of quality plots
proposal Program Scientific Grants See also the IC’s programmatic descriptions Director Review Specialist (http://www.nih.gov/icd/index.html). OfficerNIH Program Officials: your primary contactPre-Application During the Award Assess the “fit” to the IC, Program(s) Discuss problems in execution Start the conversation early: develop (rebudgeting, re-scoping, your ideas together extensions…) Choose the right activity/mechanism Find an administrator to
either a student or team to participate in a discussion with the instructor.These generally followed an ACL activity where the individual team outcomes were presented forthe benefit of the entire class. Figure 1: Image of audience taken by video recording system during traditional lecture potion of control lecture. Seats A1-F13 were evaluated as part of the study. The [#]s are the ordinal values assigned to each studentIn total, 59 video clips 20-30 seconds in length were analyzed from the five lecture recordings.Data points were selected such that they were spaced throughout the lecture and contained a singleactivity (e.g. the lecturer talking, a random-calling activity, or an active-collaborative learningactivity). Each clip was played on
. References[1] Cazden, C. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.[2] Kutz, E. (1997). Language and literacy: Studying discourse in communities and classrooms. Portsmouth, NH:Boynton Cook.[3] van de Weghe, R. (2003). Classroom discussions of literature. English Journal, 93(1), 87-91.[4] Langer, J.A. (2001). Beating the odds: Teaching middle and high school students to read and write well.American Educational Research Journal, 38, 837-880.[5] Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (1991). Instructional discourse, student engagement, and literature achievement.Research in the Teaching of English, 25(3), 261-290.[6] McNeill, K. L, & Pimentel, D. S. (2009). Scientific discourse in three urban classrooms
their own work experience, if they have any, that is related to acourse topic.Architecture and engineering professors who have worked as architects/engineers prior to orwhile teaching have an advantage. They bring a wealth of real-world knowledge to theclassroom that they share through relating personal experiences related to each course topic andconcept. This is the same for other licensed professionals who become professors, such asdoctors, dentists and lawyers. They share their professional experience with their students as apedagogical tool. Students enter these professional programs expecting to learn from professorswho have real world experience in their area(s) of expertise. However, many engineering facultyhave not worked outside of
persist in engineering are not creative, it is by our instructionthat creativity is neglected and then phased out. Enhancing the creative skills of engineeringstudents can begin by incorporating the practices of art education, not necessarily to reconstructengineering courses, but to pepper our existing courses with material borrowed from the morecolorful side of campus.References1 Bairaktarova, D. (2016). Syllabus - Introduction to Spatial Visualization.2 O’Connor, A. J., Nemeth, C. J., & Akutsu, S. (2013). Consequences of Beliefs about theMalleability of Creativity. Creative Research Journal, 25(2), 155–162.https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2013.7837393 Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.4 Matusovich
earned his B.S. in Product Devel- opment Engineering Technology at ETSU in 2013. Mr. Craig also has held a Master Plumber License as well as a natural gas license since the early 1980’s. He owned and operated Lenny’s Plumbing and Water Treatment in the 1980’s and 1990’s. He currently works in the Educational Leadership and Policy Analysis department at ETSU as a doctoral fellow while pursuing his Ed.D. in Private Sector Educational Leadership. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 The Development of Engineering Management Education in K-12 Schools: A Longitudinal Case StudyAbstractIn partnership with Bristol Tennessee Essential Services (BTES) whose
. comparison” Change Changing the original claim “Yeah, this has a greatest change, of Claim sorry” “Oh no, metal A was the greatest and for the melting point, it should be metal C” Question Asking for explanation, “That is the one, right?” clarification or approval. “Does this make it more elastic?” “Which one?” Response Providing any type of “No, relation is between bond response(s) to peer’s yes/no strength and elastic
. in ASEE annual conference proceedings (2012).2. US Congress Joint Economic Committee. STEM Education: Preparing for the jobs of the future. (2012).3. Carreno, S., Palou, E. & Lopez-Malo, A. Eliciting P-12 mexican teachers’ images of engineering: What do engineers do? in ASEE annual conference proceedings (2010).4. Tsui, L. Effective strategies to increase diversity in STEM fields: A review of the research literature. Journal of Negro Education 555–581 (2007).5. Demetry, C. et al. Supporting young women to enter engineering: Long-term effects of a middle school engineering outreach program for girls. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 15, (2009).6. Leggon, C. B. &
–154 (2012).4. Besterfield-Sacre, M. E. et al. Essential factors related to entrepreneurial knowledge in the engineering curriculum. In 2012 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition (2012).5. Purzer, Ş., Fila, N. D., & Nataraja, K. M. Evaluation of current assessment methods in engineering entrepreneurship education. Advances in Engineering Education, 5, 1-27 (2016).6. Charyton, C., Jagacinski, R. J., Merrill, J. A., Clifton, W. & DeDios, S. Assessing creativity specific to engineering with the revised creative engineering design assessment. J. Eng. Educ. 100, 778–799 (2011).7. Genco, N., Hölttä-Otto, K. & Seepersad, C. C. An experimental investigation
identity does slightly change over time for students- unfortunately, engineeringidentity decreased.ReferencesBlackwell, L.S. & Trzesniewski, K.H., 2007. Implicit Theories of Intelligence PredictAchievement across an Adolescent Transition : A Longitudinal Study and an Intervention Author( s ): Lisa S . Blackwell , Kali H . Trzesniewski and Carol Sorich Dweck Published by : Wiley onbehalf of the Society. , 78(1), pp.246–263.Burns, K.C. & Isbell, L.M., 2007. Promoting malleability is not one size fits all: Priming implicittheories of intelligence as a function of self-theories. Self and Identity, 6(1), pp.51–63.Available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15298860600823864.Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social
the US. IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 19, 38–39 (1999).4. Bernstein, D. S. Enhancing undergraduate control education. IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 19, 40– 43 (1999).5. Antsaklis, P. et al. Report on the NSF/CSS Workshop on New Directions in Control Engineering Education. IEEE Control Syst. 19, 53–58 (1999).6. Albanese, M. A. & Mitchell, S. Problem based Learning: A review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Acad. Med. 68, 52–81 (1993).7. Menekse, M., Stump, G. S., Krause, S. & Chi, M. T. H. Differentiated Overt Learning Activities for Effective Instruction in Engineering Classrooms. J. Eng. Educ. 102, 346–374 (2013).8. Roberts, D. & Borowski, A. A revised undergraduate controls lab featuring exposure-based
; Lauenroth, W. K. (eds) (2003). Models in ecosystem science. Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford, 476pp.Clark, S. K., Sibley, D. F., Libarkin, J. C., & Heidemann, M. (2009). A novel approach to teaching and understanding transformations of matter in dynamic earth systems. Journal of Geoscience Education, 57(4), 233-241.Croneis, C., and Krumbein, W.C. (1936). Down to Earth: An Introduction to Geology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 501 p.Haas, C. N., Rose, J. B., & Gerba, C. P. (1999). Quantitative microbial risk assessment. John Wiley & Sons.McNeal, K. S., Libarkin, J. C., Ledley, T. S., Bardar, E., Haddad, N., Ellins, K., & Dutta, S. (2014). The role of research in
the previous quizlet but using cold-air-standard analysis.8With the new structure, the problems start out simple and repetitive but then build up to thelarger problems. This learning process was efficient enough that the instructor was able to coverextra material in that week, thus the introduction of the Otto cycle (Day 3, Quizlets 2 and 3).4. Assessment In 2015 and 2016, surveys were distributed approximately one month into the semester. These surveys included the free-response question: “What aspect(s) of the class help you the most and why?” Results from that question are summarized in Figure 3.Figure 3: Summarized results of the survey question “What aspect(s) of the class help youthe most and why?” given approximately one
). After school student club practices in U.S. kindergarten thru 12th grade educational institutions. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in the World, 2(3), 235-244.4. S. Crowe, Robotics playing a bigger role in STEM education”, May 27, 2015,5. A. Welch and D. Huffman, "The Effect of Robotics Competitions on High School Students' Attitudes Toward Science”, School Science and mathematics, Vol. 111, No. 6, 12/2011.6. F.B.V. Benitti," Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review", Computers & Education, 2012.7. G Nugent, B Bruker, N Grandgenett, "The impact of educational robotics on student STEM learning, attitudes, and workplace skills", Robots in K-12 education: A
., Merle, D., Jackson, C., Lannin, J., & Nair, S. S. (2010). Professional skills in the engineering curriculum. IEEE Transactions on Education, 53(4), 562-571. 9. O’Leary, S. (2014). Incorporating employability into degree programmes by using consultancy projects as a form of international internship. In Proceedings of the Global Internship Conference 8th Annual Conference (pp. 173-176). 10. Rajala, S. A. (2012). Beyond 2020: Preparing engineers for the future. Proceedings of the IEEE, 100(Special Centennial Issue), 1376-1383. 11. Sargent Jr, J. F. (2013). The US science and engineering workforce: Recent, current, and projected employment, wages, and unemployment. 12. Stiwne, E. E., & Jungert, T. (2010
itproduced a “wrong” answer because it failed to account for the most significant factor in ethicaldecision-making: a decision that has the potential to harm the environment, people or morespecifically children, will have a more greater impact on the decision than the current modelallows [4].A traditional cost-benefit analysis (CBA) consists of listing alternative projects and programs,listing stakeholders, and selecting measurements. In the triple bottom line approach, quantifyingsuch attributes becomes increasingly difficult as has been discussed since the introduction of thesocial and environmental components in the 1970’s. The difficulty in creating a commonmeasurement of quantity for comparing and creating a single CBA rests in the question of
, and value and enable students and instructors to moreclearly identify gaps and misalignments that may lead to unsuccessful designs.ReferencesABET Engineering Accreditation Commission, Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs,Effective for Reviews During the 2016-17 Cycle, Baltimore, MD, October 16, 2015.Castellion, G. and Markham, S. K. (2013), “Perspective: New Product Failure Rates: Influenceof Argumentum ad Populum and Self-Interest”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30:976–979. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.01009.xCrismond, David P. and Robin S. Adams, “The Informed Design Teaching and LearningMatrix”, Journal of Engineering Education, October 2012, Vol. 101, No. 4, pp. 738–797.Dym, Clive L., Agogino, Alice M., Eris, Ozgur
universal assessment tool, becausethese engineering skills are essential for any engineering career, whether it was inentrepreneurship, intrapreneurship or in engineering firms and factories.ReferencesBjorklund, S. A., & Colbeck, C. L. (2001). The View from the Top: Leaders’ Perspectives on a Decade of Change in Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education, 90(1), 13– 19.Blais, R. A. (Ed.). (1997). Technological entrepreneurship and engineering in Canada. Chicago: Canadian Academy of Engineering.Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board. (2017). Retrieved from https://engineerscanada.ca/accreditation/accredited-programs-by-institutionClair, S., & Baker, N. (2003). Faculty Use and Impressions of Courseware
: http://dschool.stanford.edu/our-point-of-view/#design-thinking. (Accessed: 30th December 2016)7. Altman, A. & Krauss, G. G. The key ideas of MDW IX: A summary. International Journal of Engineering Education 32, 1331–1335 (2016).8. Siniawski, M. T., Luca, S. G., Saez, J. A. & Pal, J. S. Design Thinking and Service-Learning for First-Year Engineering Students *. 32, 1508–1513 (2016).9. Rossmann, J. S. Engineering design as a liberal art: A first-semester introduction to design thinking. International Journal of Engineering Education 32, 1502–1507 (2016).10. Strobel, J., Hess, J., Pan, R. & Morris, C. A. W. Empathy and care within engineering: qualitative perspectives from engineering faculty
Justifywhytheirdesignsolutionisappropriatebasedonapplicationofcore communicatetheir science/mathematicsconcepts. designsolutionthrough B Justifywhytheirdesignsolutionisappropriatebasedoninformationobtainedin useofevidence-based problemscoping. reasoning. En grTEAMS Projec t i s fu nded by t h e N a t i o n a l Sci e n ce F o u n da t i o n un d er gra nt NSF DUE- 1238140Notebooks in the CurriculaThroughout the design project, each student maintains an engineering notebook in order to take notes, develop ideas,record testing and observations, document decisions, and plan next steps. Each of the 13 units has both commonelements of the notebook and elements that are specific to that unit. The common elements of the notebooks
student preparation, although it does not account forpreparation in math or specific pre-requisite courses.Every effort was made to make the online instruction mimic in-class delivery. The sameinstructor taught both cohorts from the same set of lecture notes, and students were required touse the same textbook [38]. Homework assignments were similar, simulation-based learningassignments were identical, and midterm exams were of approximately equivalent difficulty.The project assignment was intended to replace Cohort #1’s third midterm, and the content ofthese assessments is not expected to influence preparedness for the final exam. Importantly, bothcohorts completed identical final exams in equivalent testing conditions.Final Exam PerformanceThe
• Friends 4 for Often 5 for Yes, Very Much Do the following see you as an engineer? 1 for No, Not at All • Yourself 2 for Seldom Recognition by Self • Engineering instructor(s) 3 for Sometimes 4 for Often 5 for Yes, Very Much In your opinion, to what extent are the following associated with the field of