regularly throughout the semester.References[1] M. K. Hartwig and E. D. Malain, “Do students space their course study? Those who do earn higher grades.,” Learn Instr, vol. 77, p. 101538, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.LEARNINSTRUC.2021.101538.[2] A. Latimier, H. Peyre, and F. Ramus, “A Meta-Analytic Review of the Benefit of Spacing out Retrieval Practice Episodes on Retention,” Educ Psychol Rev, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 959– 987, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1007/S10648-020-09572-8/FIGURES/4.[3] C. R. Bego, P. A. Ralston, K. B. Lyle, and J. Immekus, “Introducing Desirable Difficulty in Engineering Mathematics with Spaced Retrieval Practice.” Jul. 26, 2021.[4] R. F. Hopkins, K. B. Lyle, J. L. Hieb, and P. A. S. Ralston, “Spaced
. [6] D. Brabazon, L. Donovan, M. Melia, M. P. O’Mahony, A. Egan, and B. Smyth, “Supporting problem-based learning in moodle using personalised, context-specific learning episode generation,” Proceeding of 1st Moodle Research Conference, 2012. [7] D. Zapata-Rivera, “Adaptive, assessment-based educational games,” Intelligent Tutoring Systems Lecture Notes in Computer Science, p. 435–437, 2010. [8] W. Ravyse, S. Blignaut, V. Leendertz, and A. Woolner, “Success factors for serious games to enhance learning: a systematic review,” Virtual Reality, vol. 21, 03 2017. [9] Y. Tang, K. Jahan, and T. Bielefeldt, “The effectiveness of an adaptive serious game for digital logic design,” 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition
. Table 1. Systems Engineering Coding Results Michigan Montana Code Code Description Tech Tech Total Example Student Quotes “Working to improve whatever S Systems 46.6% 27.8% 39.4% systems they are working with.” “Design and prototype computing CD Modeling & Design 44.9% 19.5% 33.3% systems.” Project/operations/system “Someone who acts as an overseer M s management skills 17.3% 41.7% 25.9% to a project
development was studied using the Tuckman model, first popularized in the 1960's forworkplace teams and later updated [5], [6]. This model consists of four stages: Forming,Storming, Norming and Performing. Tuckman demonstrated that team members tend to act asindividuals during the first two stages, and then realize that, as contributors to a team, morecould be accomplished with the team than individually. This realization leads team memberperformance toward the Norming and Performing stages. A summary of each of the stagesand their key characteristics is given in Table 1 below [1], [5]–[7]. This table was adaptedfrom a prior study using similar methods with introductory engineering transfer student teams:Table 1: Team Development Stages and Key
needed to wait for students to log into the online class before starting the practice.Author 3 noted that being able to move the time of the mediation to better fit in the coursematerial for the day was advantageous. Additionally, Author 3 noticed that different classsections had different preferences. For example, Author 3’s morning class section liked havingthe practice early during class (e.g., at the beginning), while the afternoon class section liked thepractices later in the class session, especially on Friday (e.g., at the end of class). Lastly, it is ofnote that Author 2 thought a five-minute practice might be too long for an online course,especially when done daily, but the same duration worked well for the in-person course,according to
). Data Analytics in Educational Management System.International Journal of Computer Applications, 975, 8887.[2] Nghe, N. T., Janecek, P., & Haddawy, P. (2007, October). A comparative analysis oftechniques for predicting academic performance. In 2007 37th annual frontiers in educationconference-global engineering: knowledge without borders, opportunities without passports (pp.T2G-7). IEEE.[3] Hamsa, H., Indiradevi, S., & Kizhakkethottam, J. J. (2016). Student academic performanceprediction model using decision tree and fuzzy genetic algorithm. Procedia Technology, 25,326-332.[4] Lepenioti, K., Bousdekis, A., Apostolou, D., & Mentzas, G. (2020). Prescriptive analytics:Literature review and research challenges. International Journal of
Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering department as well as the Envi- ronmental Engineering and Earth Sciences department. Prior ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 WIP: Leveraging Elements of the Researcher Development Framework Embedded in Entrepreneurial Attributes to Improve Graduate Student Professional Development Jennifer S. Brown1, Emma Buell1, Karen High1, and Stephanie Cutler2 Clemson University1, The Pennsylvania State University2Introduction and Motivation Traditionally, faculty members in STEM fields encounter silo-ed approaches toprofessional development, and this trend extends to their graduate students (future
that the grants have for individual faculty rather than solelyfocusing on the value that faculty bring to the University through their funded work.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grants0811076 and 1209115.Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are thoseof the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. References[1] AdvanceRIT. "NSF AdvanceRIT Archives (2012-2018)." Rochester Institute of Technology. https://www.rit.edu/advance/our-archives (accessed January 12, 2022).[2] S. Mason et al., "Institutional transformation at a large private
transformationstopics, which are covered in the Electric Circuits II course) from the textbooks most often used inthe past five years, the one by J. W. Nilsson and S. A. Riedel [1]. Another textbook used less oftenis the one by Ulaby and Maharbiz [2]. The later book includes examples on the use of modernSPICE packages like Multisim, which is a GUI tool that makes both circuit design and analysismore intuitive for the student. In general, the topics covered by the different instructors include a)Overview of Circuit Analysis and Terminology b) Simple Resistive Circuits c) Kirchoff’s VoltageLaw (KVL) and Kirchoff’s Current Law (KCL) d) Thévenin/Norton Equivalents e) OperationalAmplifier Circuits f) Inductor and Capacitors Circuits g) Sinusoidal Analysis and
-content/uploads/2020/09/EAC-Criteria-2020-2021.pdf[7] T. J. Brumm, L. F. Hanneman, and S. K. Mickelson, “The data are in: Student workplacecompetencies in the experiential workplace,” American Society for Engineering Education AnnualConference, 2005.[8] R. F. Vaz and P. Quinn, “Benefits of a project-based curriculum: Engineering employers’perspectives,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2015. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.23617[9] B. K. Jesiek, N. T. Buswell, and S. Nittala, “Performing at the boundaries: Narratives of early careerengineering practice,” Engineering Studies, 13(2), 86–110, 2021.https://doi.org/10.1080/19378629.2021.1959596 p. 104[10] R. S. Adams, T. Forin, M. Chua, and D. Radcliffe, “Characterizing the work of coaching
to find solutions toproblems from a business perspective.Acknowledgement: This research was supported by a REU Site grant from the National ScienceFoundation (# EEC 1757882). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendationspresented are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. Lastly, the project evaluation data was provided by an independent evaluator fromThe Mark USA.References1. Aheleroff, S., Philip, R., Zhong, R. Y., & Xu, X. (2019). The degree of mass personalisation under Industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP, 81, 1394-1399.2. Warnaby, G., & Shi, C. (2019). Changing customer behaviour: Changing retailer response? The potential for pop-up retailing. Journal of Customer
deeply in their engineering education data analysis. We also hope that withthis executive summary, we can start a conversation on how best to engage undergraduateresearchers in this type of work to foster a deeper understanding and meaning in our research. Inclosing, we end with a question to consider when hiring undergraduate researchers: What ways inyour work can you help connect your undergraduate researchers to their lived experiences andto the constructs being investigated?AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1920421. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of
Chapter, a member of the National Business Aviation Association (NBAA)’s Emerging Technologies committee, and a reviewer for ERAU’s Faculty Innovative Research in Science and Technology program.Emily Faulconer Dr. Emily Faulconer is Associate Professor within the Math, Sciences, & Technology Department at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University – Worldwide Campus. She earned a Ph.D. in Environmental Engineering Sciences from the University of Florida in 2012. Her research interests are within the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, primarily in undergraduate research and online education. Safety is also an area of interest, and she serves as a founding member of the Academic Safety Committee for Embry-Riddle
E S Rural Urban Technology 2 5 1 6 0 7 Natural Sciences 2 0 0 2 0 2 Social Sciences 1 2 1 2 0 2 Math 1 2 0 3 0 3 All the areas 4 7 7 4 10 2 *E: Elementary – S: SecondaryThe participants answered items such as: I can define
Paper ID #38294Breaking Boundaries: An Organized Revolution for theProfessional Formation of Electrical EngineersChris S Ferekides (Associate Professor) Chris S. Ferekides received the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the University of South Florida. He has been a faculty member in the Electrical Engineering Department since 1992. He is currently service as the department chair, and is the principal investigator of a NSF Funded RED Project that addresses the professional formation of electrical engineering students. His research is in the areas of electronic materials with a focus on photovoltaics.Carol
interview development for the study. The authors also thank the year 1 participantsfor their repeated insight, enthusiasm, and sharing their experiences during the study’s manylongitudinal commitments.References[1] H. Perkins, J. Gesun, M. Scheidt, J. Major, J. Chen, E. Berger, & A. Godwin, “Holistic wellbeing and belonging: Attempting to untangle stress and wellness in their impact on sense of community in engineering,” International Journal of Community Well-Being, vol. 4, pp. 549-580, 2021.[2] S. K. Lipson, E. G. Lattie, and D. Eisenberg, Increased rates of mental health service utilization by US college students: 10-year population-level trends (2007–2017), Psychiatric services, vol. 70, ed. 1, pp. 60-63
courseperformance. This project considers only one course over two academic years for undergraduatestudents. Hence the outcomes cannot be generalized to all majors or students. However, theresults could provide valuable insights to improve the learning outcomes of high educationinstitutions.References[1] S. Singer and K. A. Smith, "Discipline-based education research: Understanding and improvinglearning in undergraduate science and engineering," pp. 468–471, 2013.[2] R. R. Hake, "Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A sixthousand-student surveyof mechanics test data for introductory physics courses," American journal of Physics, vol. 66, no.1, pp. 64–74, 1998.[3] C. H. Crouch and E. Mazur, "Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and
standards in the third andfourth years of study can help students align educational concepts with real-world applications.6However, this requirement is not universally applied in most colleges and universities.2 Phillips, M. and S. Huber (2017). Standards Resources for Engineering and Technology. Issues inScience and Technology Librarianship, Purdue University.3 Harding, B. and P. McPherson (2010). What do employers want in terms of employee knowledge oftechnical standards and the process of standardization? 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition.4 Solomon, D., Y.-T. T. Liao, and J. T. Chapin (2019). Maximizing the Effectiveness of One-timeStandards Instruction Sessions with Formative Assessment. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition.5 ABET
recorder role most easily,participation was either split evenly across members or left one member out, groups seemed tobond over waiting for autograder results and ended group activities with small talk, and groupsasked for help or referenced an external resource when stuck. The observation protocol isundergoing validation, and the research team hopes to further contextualize the observations byusing peer evaluations and surveys.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.#2121412 and Graduate Research Fellowship Program. Any opinions, findings, and conclusionsor recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the
the airflow around a smallwind turbine with a diameter of 1.8 meters and revealed that the maximum power coefficient andtorque coefficient are observed at a wind speed of around 10 m/s and an optimum angle of attackof 5 degrees. In addition, Wang et al. (2019) used pressure-based anemometry to measure theairflow around a small wind turbine with a diameter of 1.2 meters. The study showed that thewake's velocity deficit and turbulence intensity increase with the increase in downstream distance,and the maximum velocity deficit and turbulence intensity were observed at a distance of 3-5D(where D is the rotor diameter) downstream. Over the past year, UVU has hosted a multi-faceted research project which aims atdeveloping an autonomous
different type of institutional agents. In order to measure the latent construct of mattering, we used six items in whichrespondents were asked about the extent to which they agreed or disagreed with statements suchas: “If I don't return to this University in the next month, my classmate(s) will miss me” (seeitems here: https://bit.ly/3H5bwn6). These survey items were developed for a prior surveyinstrument that examined the relationship between student experiences, integration variables(validation, belonging, and mattering), and educational outcomes for first-year students at threeLatin American universities (Unpublished Dissertation Manuscript). The development of the six items was preceded by the revision of theoretical
/focus-group protocols. Theconsortium started the process in spring 2020 by collecting all the interview and focus-groupprotocols used by three different partner ERCs. All questions were extracted and comparedacross the protocols. Five common categories emerged after aligning the questions. These fivecommon categories are listed in table 1. In fall 2020, the consortium conducted extensive reviews and commentaries, as well asfrequent discussions, to determine a set of initial questions that would be included in theprotocol. All prior extracted questions were listed per category in a spreadsheet. All consortiummembers were asked to rate each question with “essential (E)” or “supplemental (S)” and then torank the priority of each question
statics.BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. Kolb, D., Experiential Learning, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1984). 2. Wankat, P. C. and F. S. Oreovicz, Teaching Engineering, McGraw-Hill (1993). 3. Clement, J., "Using bridging analogies and anchoring intuitions to deal with students' preconceptions in physics," Journal of research in science teaching, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 1241- 1257, 1993. 4. Cadmus Jr and Robert R., "A video technique to facilitate the visualization of physical phenomena," American Journal of Physics, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 397-399, 1990. 5. J. Lowman, Mastering the techniques of teaching, 2nd Ed, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1984. 6. D. G. Schmucker, "Models, models, models: The use of physical models to enhance the
Paper ID #36954Exploring the Influence of Students’ Perceptions of CourseAssessment on Retention and Professional Identity FormationLayla S Araiinejad I hold a Bachelor's of Industrial in Systems Engineering from Auburn University and am a future graduate student at MIT!Thomas Matthew Heaps Concurrent undergraduate senior in Mechanical Engineering and first year Master student in Engineering Education.Brooke Elizabeth CochranCassandra J McCall (Dr.) Cassandra McCall, PhD, is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department at Utah State University. Her research focuses on enhancing diversity
, Abdulkarim S. Ahmed3,5, Fatai O. Anafi1,5,Adrian O. Eberemu4,5, Ayodeji N. Oyedeji1,5,6, Kazeem A. Salami1,6, Akinlolu Akande7, David Dodoo-Arhin8 1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria 2 Department of Educational Foundations and Curriculum, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria 3 Department of Chemical Engineering, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria 4 Department of Civil Engineering, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria 5 Africa Centre of Excellence on New Pedagogies in Engineering Education, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria 6
Brimacombe Memorial Lecture Award in 2010, and She and her co-authors also received the AIST Josef S. Kapitan Award in 2005 and 2016, the AIST Computer Applications Best Paper award in 2006. She was awarded 2017 Outstanding Faculty in Engagement by Purdue University Northwest and Gerald I. Lamkin Fellow for Innovation & Service by the Society of Innovators. Dr. Zhou has been a Fellow of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers since 2003. She has been very active in profes- sional societies. She has served in various boards and committees such as the AIST Foundation Board of Trustees.Tyamo Okosun, Purdue University, NorthwestArmin Silaen ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023
ReviewA brief review of literature on the incorporation of curricula related to DEI and the assessmentmethods utilized was conducted. These treatments ranged from separate courses related to DEI[3], activities embedded into first-year courses [4,5,6], design courses and design experiences[3,6,7], and embedded activities across multiple courses within the curricula [6,7]. The methodsutilized to assess the impact of DEI curricula were survey instruments using a Likert scale. Theseinstruments varied in breadth and degree of validation. The short form of the Miville-GuzmanUniversality Diversity Scale (M-GUDS-S) [8] was considered to be too general and not directlyapplicable to the engineering profession. Even the short form has 42 items in the survey
- ciation for Uncrewed Vehicle Systems International (AUVSI) Florida Peninsula Chapter, a member of the National Business Aviation Association (NBAA)’s Emerging Technologies committee, and a reviewer for ERAU’s Faculty Innovative Research in Science and Technology program.Emily Faulconer, University of FloridaDr. Kelly A George, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Worldwide Kelly Whealan George is an Associate Professor with the College of Aviation at Embry-Riddle Aeronauti- cal University – Worldwide. She is the Graduate Curricular Chair for the Department of Graduate Studies. Her research interests include online education, aviation economics, economic impact studies and under- graduate research. Dr. Whealan George
Support Students’ Diverse Pathways. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/21739., 2016.[6] S.-A. A. Allen-Ramdial and A. G. Campbell, “Reimagining the pipeline: Advancing STEM diversity, persistence, and success,” BioScience, vol. 64, no. 7, pp. 612–618, 2014.[7] G. N. Arellano, O. Jaime-Acuña, O. A. Graeve, and L. D. Madsen, “Latino engineering faculty in the United States,” MRS Bulletin, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 131–147, 2018, doi: 10.1557/mrs.2018.23.[8] National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, “National Survey of College Graduates: 2019,” Alexandria, VA: National Science Foundation., 2021.[9] University of New Mexico School of Engineering, “Enrollment and Graduation Data,” Sep. 2022
purpose.Acknowledgment: “This material is based upon work supported by the National ScienceFoundation under Grant EEC-BPE 2135080” Disclaimer: Any opinions, findings, andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.”References[1] National Science Board, Science and Engineering Indicators 2020. Arlington: National SciBoard. Available: https://www.nsf.gov/nsb/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=299268&org=NSB.[2] E.L Kryst, S Kotok and A. Hagedorn, Pursuing higher education in rural Pennsylvaniaschools: Shaping the college path. The Rural Educator, pp. 1 – 11, Winter 2018.[3] G. Saw, C. N. Chang, and H. Y. Chan, Cross-sectional and longitudinal