byJenson and Raisor did investigate the effectiveness of a course teaching Pro/Engineer, a high-endconstraint and parametric-based 3D solid modeling package.6 The distance-based course wasderived from an existing face-to-face course that contained both theory and a hands-onlaboratory component; similar to the present study. Jenson and Raisor linked their classroom onthe main campus of the university to a classroom at a remote location. A 50 minute connectionwas made three times a week for 15 weeks, resulting in interactive web-based lectures for theremote location. Students from both locations were required to complete 19 laboratory exercisesusing Pro/Engineer, however, the software was only resident at the main campus. Students at theremote
Engineers hostsCareer Day for Girls, a one-day event for girls in grades 7-12 to get girls excited about science,engineering, and technology. Through laboratory demonstrations, interactive multimedialectures, and hands-on activities, girls meet positive role models (both female and male) and getto think about the possibilities they have for careers in the technical fields.Many Career Day participants and their parents expressed a need for a multiple-day programheld over the summer--a kind of engineering day camp for girls to get more information andexperience with engineering, and to form relationships with female engineer role models.Undergraduate members of the Society of Women Engineers at Northwestern Universitytherefore went about designing
teaching tools.2.4 Three Forms of Assessment – One Underlying Conclusion: While PRISM has achievedsuccess on several major metrics, all of our assessment results – empirical and experiential –indicate that neither availability nor ad hoc use of digital learning resources is sufficient to drivesystemic STEM reform. To the contrary, we content that a combination of abundance and easyaccess does not automatically improve teaching or enhance learning. The almost hypnoticappeal that digital resources have for students and the availability of computer laboratories inmost schools may make for a situation in which new media can be used for surface engagementor as quickly-implemented filler on days when the lesson plan has run dry.PRISM was designed to
design process at least 1.2 times per week throughout the term of the project.IntroductionFreshman engineering design coursework, now widely termed “Cornerstone” experiences, beganwide adoption in the 1990’s and into the new millennium through the National ScienceFoundation’s eight Engineering Education Coalitions, among other efforts. These first-year Page 25.1141.2engineering design laboratories serve to complement the already established seniorundergraduate level, or “Capstone” design experiences widely adopted in the 1980’s atengineering colleges across the United States. The combination of the Cornerstone and Capstonecoursework for beginning
) Figure 5: Computer designThe fabrication process is conducted in the laboratory using knives and saws. The students areassisted by a class teaching assistant and by the faculty. Construction can be a thoughtprovoking and enjoyable experience for the students (Figure 6). The final project is judged on acombination of presentation (Figure 7a), construction aesthetics (Figure 7b), and measured loadcarrying performance (Figure 7c). Figure 6: Construction Design Project DiscussionAs a whole the student projects were well constructed and designed. In most cases, however thestudents over estimated the capacities of their bridges. This was attributed to the variability inthe balsa
inthe Grading section.Changes from previous teaching methodologyBefore the introduction of SBG, the course was taught using a traditional “chalk-and-talk”lecture style. The course was traditionally graded based on a weighted average of homeworkscores, laboratory scores, midterm exam scores, and the final exam score. Students would haveonly been aware of their performance on a course concept by identifying the concept(s) involvedwith a homework or exam problem and comparing their score to the standard institutionalgrading scale.After the introduction of SBG in Spring 2020, the lecture style was intentionally not changed,except for adaptations due to the COVID pandemic. The course grading was changed to aweighted combination of objective
Paper ID #18989Dancing Humanoid Robots Lab Demonstration for the First Year Engineer-ing StudentsDr. Nebojsa I Jaksic P.E., Colorado State University, Pueblo NEBOJSA I. JAKSIC earned the Dipl. Ing. degree in electrical engineering from Belgrade University (1984), the M.S. in electrical engineering (1988), the M.S. in industrial engineering (1992), and the Ph.D. in industrial engineering from the Ohio State University (2000). He is currently a Professor at Colorado State University-Pueblo teaching robotics and automation courses. Dr. Jaksic has about 70 publications and holds two patents. Dr. Jaksic’s interests include
Paper ID #27859Observing Motor Learning and Control through Juggling and Motion Anal-ysis: A Collaboration Between Dynamics and Kinesiology StudentsMr. Jay Tyler Davis II, California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo Undergraduate Mechanical Engineering student at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo.Sonya Dick Sonya Dick is a Senior Mechanical Engineering Student at California Polytechnic State University - SLO. This is her second year working at the Human Motion Biomechanics Lab. As a research assistant, she helps create and teach interdisciplinary laboratories for undergraduate kinesiology and engineering students. Her
the National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI). A variety of nanotechnology relatedcourses or programs have been developed at the undergraduate and graduate levels. The NationalNanotechnology Infrastructure Network (NNIN), an integrated networking partnership ofthirteen universities supported by the NSF, provides user facilities serving the resource needs ofnanoscale science, engineering and technology, and supports a wide range of educationalprograms6. The National Nanofabrication User Network (NNUN), with Cornell University as thelead institution, offers undergraduate and graduate courses and laboratory services fornanotechnology community. The National Center for Learning and Teaching in NanoscaleScience and Engineering (NCLT) was
, mechanical,bio-medical, materials joining and computer engineering, as well as electrical engineering.Based on the experience gleaned throughout one instructor’s teaching experience, the format forthe circuits class has been slowly modified. A two-hour per week laboratory has been added, inwhich students are given their own breadboard, DMM, and electrical components. Note: thismay be a first: Students actually being allowed to keep something for which they paid lab fees!In each of these lab sessions the students are given a simple circuit to wire up and build, and alsoa problem to work. Student workers, who have previously taken the course, are hired to help thecircuit students along. When each student finishes demonstrating his circuit, and then
their models for an annual model making/breakingcompetition offered to freshman Engineering students from across Australia. In 2001 and2002, Victoria University students as taught by the author won this competition.1. IntroductionThe author’s underlying philosophy of Engineering education has been formed over manyyears and is “experience and practice” (wherever possible) within the teaching program afterall the key distinguishing characteristic of professional Engineers is the successful design ofpractical solutions to real problems. In 2001 the author replaced all laboratory experimentswithin the two semester freshman Statics course “Solid Mechanics A”, with a program ofcompetitive model making and breaking. The course applies to students from
increased emphasis on developing the professional skills of ourgraduates.Curriculum modifications include a greater focus on microprocessor based systems, interfacing,signal processing, and material science. Core electrical engineering topics are introduced duringthe freshman year and include both lecture and laboratory experiences. The curriculum hasretained its broad range of content topics and its traditional strong design and laboratory focus.The curriculum changes are intended to provide the breadth and depth of technical knowledgeand the professional skills that will enable our graduates to: enter industry with immediateproductivity, pursue changing career opportunities, adjust to life-long technological changes, andpursue graduate school
teams arerequired to prepare a written contract detailing the members’ responsibilities (rotation of respon-sibilities is required), weekly meeting arrangements, and how disputes will be resolved. The teammaintains a lab notebook throughout the course, and meets weekly with the course instructorand/or teaching assistant.The course is structured to contain both a lecture component ( three 50 minute periods per week)and an intense laboratory/project component (one 3 hour period per week). The lecture compo-nent initially focuses on giving the students the required background to successfully implementa design using the course’s hardware and software platforms. The focus then shifts to a sam-pling of more pragmatic design issues that most students
MIT’s CAD, CAM, and CNC courses. One of the primary instrumentations to support thispurpose is adapting and implementing the RP used by the nation’s technological schools intoMIT curriculum5-7.In July 1999, TTU’s Technology Access Fund provided a computer laboratory to support manyof the software needs for CAD, CAM and CNC practices. Fifteen DELL OptiPlex GX1, PentiumIII computers currently run programs such as: AutoCAD, Mechanical Desktop, Pro/E Wildfire,MasterCAM, and CNCez. In December 2002, this computer lab was upgraded to include 22Pentium IV computers and multimedia teaching capabilities. Although students gain excellentexperience with industrial – level CAD/CAM/CNC software tools, compatible advancedmanufacturing hardware is limited for
and laboratory experiments widely used in the pharmaceutical sciences,to teach engineering principles. Material from the seven modules is being integrated verticallyinto the curriculum beginning with the Freshman Clinic, then fundamental Engineering courses,followed by Junior-Senior Clinic research projects, and finally advanced level electives onpharmaceutical topics. At the freshman level, students are engaged in the scientific discoveryprocess with exciting hands-on analysis of commercial drug delivery systems. In more advancedcourses, students design and formulate drug delivery systems and investigate the variablesaffecting their behavior. The Junior/Senior Clinic provides an opportunity for students toperform research projects related to
generated. At the top of the reality chart would becourses which address the myriad of stakeholders one finds in industry, such as the FDA, U/L,end-users, manufacturing, service, financial, legal, etc.Real-world experience and exposure can be achieved through a number of mechanisms includingdesign courses, computer simulation, laboratory experiments, guest speakers, industrialsponsorship of design projects, field trips to hospitals and medical industry, internships andcooperative education. In this paper, we describe the mechanisms currently being used inbiomedical engineering curricula to create real-world experience and suggest future directionsfor incorporating the real-world into undergraduate curricula.II. Real World SkillsWhen incorporating
Puerto Rico atMayaguez with Sandia National Laboratories. The first year of operation of the University ofWashington’s ILF is described including the successes and problems.1) Manufacturing Engineering Education Partnership (MEEP) The Manufacturing Engineering Education Partnership (MEEP), which consists of PennState University, University of Washington, University of Puerto Rico Mayaguez, and SandiaNational Laboratories, was formed in order to provide a new, practice-based, manufacturing-oriented engineering curriculum. MEEP provides a new paradigm for the undergraduateengineering experience by providing a proper balance between engineering science andengineering practice. The partnership, with essential input from industry leaders
pre-Islamic culture and customs; where some cases can be found to be contradictoryto the Quran teachings. As example, revenge and blood vengeance, even on fellow Muslims isagainst the basic teachings of Quran. The root of most conflicts can be found in traditions andbeliefs that have nothing to do with Islam but tied to some tribal practices and beliefs4.Islamic education began with the arrival of Islam. Those with religious knowledge, usually men,have been teaching in the mosques throughout Afghanistan for many centuries. Their level ofknowledge depends on the location and the size of the city or town. A man with a very low levelof traditional and Islamic knowledge can be considered a Mullah in a small village while istreated as an
Paper ID #37746From In-Person to Remote to Hybrid: Transitioning of anUndergraduate Design Event Due to COVID-19Reza Abolhelm Reza Abolhelm is a Graduate Student in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada. His research encompasses reinforced concrete structures, nonlinear finite element analysis, shell structures, and high-performance materials. He has been teaching and supervising undergraduate students as a Teaching Assistant since 2020 and has been involved in several courses and Design Days projects at the University of Waterloo.Trevor Hrynyk
mechanics, and served as the Chair for the Women in Science and Engineering Committee. Meera joined the University of Calgary in 2015.Prof. Qiao Sun, University of Calgary Qiao Sun is a professor in the Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering at the University of Calgary. She is also the Associate Dean (Diversity and Equity, Teaching and Learning) at the Schulich School of Engineering. She obtained her BSc in Power Machinery Engineering and MSc in Mechanical Engineering from Shanghai Jiao Tong University in 1982 and 1986 respectively, and PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Victoria in 1996. She has taught engineering courses such as engineer- ing mechanics, numerical analysis, control
2006-2119: INTEGRATION OF INTERACTIVE SIMULATIONS AND VIRTUALEXPERIMENTS IN TELECOMMUNICATIONS COURSES FOR ONSITE, ONLINEAND HYBRID DELIVERYYakov Cherner, ATeL, LLC Dr. Yakov E. Cherner, a Founder and President of ATEL, LLC, combines 20+ years of research and teaching practice with extensive experience in writing curricula and developing educational software. He is the author of an innovative concept of multi-layered simulation-based conceptual teaching of science and technology. This instructional approach uses real-world objects, processes and learning situations that are familiar to students as the context for virtual science and technology investigations. To facilitate this methodology for
Paper ID #14494Enhanced Radio Lab Experience Using ePortfoliosMr. Craig Prather, Auburn University Craig Prather is a graduate student in the Auburn University department of Electrical and Computer En- gineering. He graduated with his undergraduate degree in summer of 2015 in electrical engineering. He is pursuing a doctorate in electrical engineering with a research focus in electromagnetics and microelec- tronics. Craig is currently a teaching assistant for a junior level lab where the students build and test an AM radio.Ms. Haley Kay Harrell, Auburn University Haley Harrell is a graduate teaching and research
design and manufacturing for students in Mechanical Engineering, ManufacturingTechnology, and Industrial Design. The prototype work for this project was funded by a San JoseState University (SJSU) curriculum grant, a seed grant of $20,000 from Hewlett Packard forcomputer equipment, and Unigraphics software donated by UGS. The project team developed athree-course sequence using solid modeling as a medium to teach design, materials andmanufacturing technology constraints through innovative design case studies. Students learn byfacing design challenges while being instructed about the constraints of manufacturabilityincluding properties of materials and modern manufacturing methods. In each course, studentsdevelop three to four products. All
Session 1368 Design, Fabrication and Testing of Wooden Trusses for Undergraduate Mechanics David Hall, Kelly Crittenden College of Engineering and Science, Louisiana Tech UniversityAbstractThe sophomore engineering curriculum at Louisiana Tech University includes a mechanicscourse that integrates topics from statics and mechanics of materials. This three semesterhour course, which is officially listed as 2/3 lecture and 1/3 laboratory, attempts toseamlessly integrate lecture, laboratory, and group problem solving. The laboratorycomponent of the course focuses on the design
effective teamsand establishing performance goals, and 5) Applying systems thinking to solve complexproblems. The first two modules were integrated into freshman classes, the third into asophomore class, the fourth into third year laboratory courses, and the fifth into senior designcourses. This paper describes the learning outcomes and the reinforcement activities conductedin the courses into which they were integrated for two of these modules. The findings of themodule specific surveys and the assessment results are also presented.IntroductionHaving good technical skills is necessary but insufficient by itself for an engineering graduate todevelop as a leader and innovator.1 In today’s environment, engineering graduates must alsopossess an
createmore integrated and impactful laboratory experiences in undergraduate physics [42], [43], weintegrated CT and ED into a traditional introductory undergraduate physics lab for engineeringand science majors. The goal of this multidisciplinary approach to teaching physics was topromote students’ conceptual understanding of physics while fostering scientific inquiry,mathematical modeling, ED skills, and CT. In this context, we proposed the following researchquestion to better understand the undergraduate students’ learning of CT in a multidisciplinarySTEM environment:To what extent does engaging students in integrated engineering design and physics labs impacttheir development of computational thinking
currently teaching the undergraduate classes of Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering and Computer Methods in Civil Engineering as well as a newly developed graduate course on Numerical Modeling in Geotechnical Engineering.Dr. S. Immanuel Selvaraj P.E., University of Evansville Dr. Immanuel Selvaraj is an associate professor of civil engineering at the University of Evansville, IN. He holds a PhD degree from Auburn University and a licensed professional engineer.Dr. Dennis J. Fallon, The Citadel Dennis John Fallon is presently Distinguished Professor of Engineering Education at The Citadel in Charleston, South Carolina. He received his BSEE from Old Dominion University (ODU) with honors in 1970, and his MSCE and PhD
, requiring no more thanwhat is already available to us in our current teaching. This mode of integration of designrequires the largest institutional investment - in faculty able to plan, manage and evaluate adesign task. Despite their diversity, all of these efforts have a common characteristic that make themsignificantly different from traditional teaching modes and offer the potential for leveraging achanging of our culture. They are all open-ended. Page 3.391.2How is this significant? The argument here is that the reform of engineering undergraduateeducation is not primarily a matter of new laboratory equipment and space, instrumentation
AC 2010-2378: ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATIONMysore Narayanan, Miami University DR. MYSORE NARAYANAN obtained his Ph.D. from the University of Liverpool, England in the area of Electrical and Electronic Engineering. He joined Miami University in 1980 and teaches a wide variety of electrical, electronic and mechanical engineering courses. He has been invited to contribute articles to several encyclopedias and has published and presented dozens of papers at local, regional, national and international conferences. He has also designed, developed, organized and chaired several conferences for Miami University and conference sessions for a variety of organizations. He is a senior member of
World War II. The need for militarydevelopment and space exploration during the Cold War era fueled a marked shift in the natureof engineering degrees with a heavy engineering science component [1], [2]. As the engineeringprograms became more science-heavy, ET programs started being established to prepareprofessionals who were trained in specific domains of technology and could fill the need for“skilled crafts and the highly scientific professions” (Smith and Lipsett, 1956, as cited in [1]).As a result, one significant aspect of the ET degree is its emphasis on practical and laboratory-based instruction and relatively less focus on advanced mathematics. As a report by the NationalAcademy of Engineering notes, “the pedigree of ET is rooted in