Cell/Diesel Generator Energy System for Dubai Ferry," 2019 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET), 2019, pp. 1-5, doi: 10.1109/ICASET.2019.8714292.[10] A. Dicks, "Hydrogen generation from natural gas for the fuel cell systems of tomorrow," Journal of Power Sciences, vol. 61, no. 1-2, pp. 113-124, Apr. 1996, doi: 10.1016/S0378- 7753(96)02347-6.[11] A. Salazar Llinas, E. Ortiz-Rivera, and J. Gonzalez-Llorente, "Dynamic Power Control of a PV-Fuel Cell Hybrid Energy System Used in DC Motors Applications," 2014 IEEE Green Technologies Conference. 49-53. 10.1109/GREENTECH.2014.19.[12] M. Perez, Ph. Rogers, J. Buchert, D. Sullivan, and T. Emami, "Design and Efficiency Analysis of a
," 2010 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2010, pp. S3G-1-S3G-6, doi: 10.1109/FIE.2010.5673256. 2. Rahman, F., & Andrews, C., & Wendell, K. B., & Batrouny, N. A., & Dalvi, T. S. (2019, June), Elementary Students Navigating the Demands of Giving Engineering Design Peer Feedback (Fundamental) Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2--32699 3. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33 4. Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R., & Boyle, R. (1993). Beyond
Covid-19 on Applied MathematicsCourses for Engineering Students. In 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.[2] Besser, A. et al. (2020) ‘Adaptability to a sudden transition to online learning during the COVID-19pandemic: Understanding the challenges for students.’, Scholarship of Teaching and Learning inPsychology. doi:10.1037/stl0000198.[3] Faulkner, B., Earl, K. and Herman, G. (2019) ‘Mathematical Maturity for Engineering Students’,International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 5(1), pp. 97–128.doi:10.1007/s40753-019-00083-8.[4] Jamalpur, B. et al. (2021) ‘A comprehensive overview of online education – Impact on engineeringstudents during COVID-19’, Materials Today: Proceedings. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.749
, “Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Undergraduate Engineering Students: Perspectives, Resiliency, and Suggestions for Improving Engineering Education.” Ph.D. thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 2021.[3] S. James, J. Herman, S. Rankin, M. Keisling, L. Mottet, and M. Anafi, “The Report of the 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey,” National Center for Transgender Equality, 2016.[4] G. Beemyn, “Campus Pride Trans Policy,” Clearinghouse, 2021, Available: www.campuspride.org/tpc[5] R. Figard, M. Dalal, J. Roarty, S. Nieto, and A. Carberry, “Understanding High School Student Experiences in an Engineering Course Designed For All (Fundamental, Diversity),” In Proc. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022
faculty mentors, and develop more effective techniques for faculty mentoring.References1. M. Klawe, “Why We Need More STEM Students to Study Abroad,” Forbes, Mar 6, 2019. [Online]. https://www.forbes.com. [Accessed February 21, 2023].2. R. Jones and B. Oberst, International Experience for Engineering Students through Distance Learning Techniques. ASEE 2000 Annual Conference Session 2360. 2000.3. ABET Criterion. https://www.abet.org/accrediation. [Accessed February 15, 2023].4. S. Gerras et al. Strategic Leadership Primer. Army War College, Carlisle Barracks PA, 2010.5. J. Schreiner and G. Dixon. The Engineering Management Handbook 3rd Edition, Chapter 1 The Engineering Management Profession. The American Society for Engineering Management
and co-Director of the Youth Engineering Solutions (YES) Middle School project focusing on engineering and computational thinking. Dr. Klein-Gardner is a Fellow of ASEE. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 High School Administrator’s Perspectives on an Engineering Program Aimed at Broadening Participation (Fundamental)AbstractThis work explores the experiences of administrators supporting teachers in the e4usa programwhich emphasizes broadening participation in engineering at the high school level to exploreefforts to broaden participation that leverage multiple levels of the school system. Two rounds ofconvenience samples of administrators in public and independent schools
Classroom in the Online Environment of Covid? Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 2022. 30(2): p. 517-531.5. Morgan, J., E. Lindsay, C. Howlin, and M. Bogaard, Pathways of Students' Progress through an on-Demand Online Curriculum, in ASEE Conference and Exposition. 2019: Tampa, FL.6. Tsai, Y.-S., D. Rates, P.M. Moreno-Marcos, P.J. Muñoz-Merino, I. Jivet, M. Scheffel, H. Drachsler, C.D. Kloos, and D. Gašević, Learning Analytics in European Higher Education—Trends and Barriers. Computers & Education, 2020. 155: p. 103933.7. Mavroudi, A., M. Giannakos, and J. Krogstie, Supporting Adaptive Learning Pathways through the Use of Learning Analytics: Developments, Challenges and Future
.1742-1241.2011.02659.x.[8] S. M. Van Anders, “Why the academic pipeline leaks: Fewer men than women perceive barriers to becoming professors,” Sex Roles, vol. 51, no. 9–10, pp. 511–521, Nov. 2004, doi: 10.1007/S11199-004-5461-9/METRICS.[9] R. Ysseldyk et al., “A leak in the academic pipeline: Identity and health among postdoctoral women,” Front. Psychol., vol. 10, no. JUN, p. 1297, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.3389/FPSYG.2019.01297/BIBTEX.[10] N. D. Jackson, K. I. Tyler, Y. Li, W. T. Chen, C. Liu, and R. Bhargava, “Keeping current: An update on the structure and evaluation of a program for graduate women interested in engineering Academia,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings
technique that is not often applied in a person-centered manner (Godwin et al.,2021). PCA is one of the most frequently used dimension reduction methods, which aims toidentify a subset of variables to represent a dataset in a lower dimension without losingsignificant information (Kherif & Latypova, 2020). In this example, Martin & Sorhaindo (2019)compared intrinsic and extrinsic motivational factors as predictors of academic achievement forcivil engineering students. They employed PCA to consolidate motivational factors into intrinsicand extrinsic groups. The original twenty-two motivation variables were ultimately grouped intofive principal components, which accounted for 66% percent of the variance. Thisimplementation of PCA to aggregate
-doctoral fellowship at Lawrence National Laboratory focusing on com- putational analysis for nonlinear seismic analysis of Department of Energy nuclear facilities and systems. After joining SFSU in 2016, she established an active research lab at SFSU with a diverse group of under- graduate and Master’s level students. For her engineering education research, she is interested in exploring how to use technology such as virtual reality and 3D printing to enhance student engagement. She is an active member of ASCE, ASEE, and SEAONC.Shah Rukh Humayoun, San Francisco State UniversityKhanh NguyenYongjian Pan ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Reinforcing Human-Technology Interaction Theory
to use the notebook combined with Python, while the second class will be applying the traditional approach. This stage is not yet done as this is still a work in progress. Nevertheless, the plan is to introduce this new approach next year when the kinetics and reactor design course is offered.Presenting this research at the 2023 ASEE annual conference, while it is still at the progressstage, enables us to interact with other instructors who have done something similar to shareexperiences and to develop our structured assessment for next year’s intervention. In principle,the proposed intervention can be implemented in other engineering courses that have a similarteaching challenge and require a computational approach. Following the
review of empirical studies,” Computers & Education, vol. 148, Apr., 2020.[9] Computer Science Teachers Association, “Code.org Advocacy Coalition & Expanding Computing Education Pathways Alliance,” 2019 State of Computer Science Education. Available: https://advocacy.code.org/. [Accessed Dec. 14, 2020][10] J. Margolis, R. Estrella, J. Goode, J. Holme, and K. Nao, Stuck in the Shallow End: Education, Race, and Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2017.[11] J. Margolis, J. and A. Fisher, A. Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women in Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002.[12] V. Barr and C. Stephenson, “Bringing computational thinking to K-12: What is involved and what is the role of the computer
to 27high-enrolment courses. In a previous work-in-progress ASEE paper we described the PAC andan evaluation of the WTA carried out for a single course (Piña et al. 2021). In this paper, we givean overview of the TW, the PAC, and the PM; furthermore we provide statistics and a generaldescription of the interactions between WTAs and students.We identify three advantages of our approach. First, the proactiveness of the WTAs is veryappreciated by students even in cases where no actions are triggered as a result ofcommunication. Second, WTAs document cases, which helps professors of the same course tomake consistent flexibilizations through time. Third, since WTAs are coordinated at a schoollevel, lessons learned in specific courses are shared
the platform, such as compression, shear, bending, and column buckling.c) Conduct pedagogical research on sending the physical test kit to remote sites such as community colleges. The students will conduct the physical hands-on test with the online instruction of instructor.AcknowledgmentThe authors would like to thank the Armin Fleck Scholarship for supporting the project.References[1] Bishop, Jacob. "BYOE: A low-cost material testing machine to increase engagement in a materials science labcourse." 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 2017.[2] Lim, Woong, and Ho-Kyung Kim. "Design and development of a miniaturised tensile testing machine." Globaljournal of engineering education 15.1 (2013): 48-53.[3] Kiraz, Alper, et al. "A
-2-- 30982.[7] J. Wierer, “Standards-based grading for signals and systems,” in Proc. ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., Tampa, FL, June 2019, pp. 1-12, doi: 10.18260/1-2--33282.[8] S. A. Atwood, M. T. Siniawski, and A. R. Carberry, “Using standards-based grading to effectively assess project-based design courses,” in Proc. ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., Indianapolis, IN, June 15-18, 2014, pp. 1-10, doi: 10.18260/1-2--23278[9] M. Price, K. Handley, J. Millar, and B. O’Donovan, “Feedback: all that effort, but what is the effect?,” Assess. Eval. High. Educ., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 277–289, May 2010, doi: 10.1080/02602930903541007.[10] H. A. Diefes-Dux and H. Ebrahiminejad, “Standards-based grading derived data to
for the Ford Foundation Fellowship Program. Her research interest focuses on changing the deficit base perspective of first-generation college students by providing asset-based approaches to understanding this population. Dina is interested in understanding how first-generation college students author their identities as engineers and negotiate their multiple identities in the current culture of engineering. Dina has won several awards including the 2022-2023 Outstanding Research Pub- lication Award by the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Division I, 2018 ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference Best Diversity Paper Award, 2019 College of Engineering Outstanding Graduate Student Research Award
Home-based, Hands-on Lab Activities to Effectively Engage STEM Students During a Pandemic,” in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings, Virtual Conference: ASEE Conferences, Jul. 2021, p. 36744. doi: 10.18260/1-2--36744.[4] J. “Kemi” Ladeji-Osias et al., “Initial Impact of an Experiment-centric Teaching Approach in Several STEM Disciplines,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings, Virtual On line: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2020, p. 34829. doi: 10.18260/1-2-- 34829.[5] S. Ikiriko, A. Wemida, S. Efe, M. Shokouhian, O. Owolabi, and J. K. Ladeji-Osias, “Home- based Cantilever Beam Experiment for Civil Engineering Undergraduate Students,” ASEE Virtual Annual Conference
assistant for the Virginia Tech Disaster Resilience and Risk Management interdisciplinary graduate program, as well as for the VT Center for Refugee, Migrant, and Displacement Studies.Hannah Wilkinson, Utah State University Hannah Wilkinson is a graduate student in Engineering Education at Utah State University. She received a B.S. in Chemical Engineering in from the University of Utah. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 A Panel Envisioning Gender Equity in Engineering for the Next 130 Years:Perspectives from Graduate Students and Postdoctoral Researchers in WIEDAbstractIn celebration of 130 years of the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE), the Womenin Engineering Division
been recognized as a Diggs Teaching Scholar, a Graduate Academy for Teaching Excellence Fellow, a Global Perspectives Fellow, a Diversity Scholar, a Fulbright Scholar, a recipient of the NSF CAREER award, and was inducted into the Bouchet Honor Society. Homero serves as the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Chair for the Commission on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (CDEI), the Program Chair for the ASEE Faculty Development Division, and the Vice Chair for the Research in Engineering Education Network (REEN). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Comparison of student global perspectives pre and post-COVID for a study abroad
program,” in Proceedings of the 9th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, 2004, pp. 171–175.[16] G. Kanaparan, R. Cullen, D. Mason et al., “Effect of self-efficacy and emotional engage- ment on introductory programming students,” Australasian Journal of Information Systems, vol. 23, 2019.[17] M. Guzdial, “Generation cs’ drives growth in enrollments,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 60, no. 7, pp. 10–11, 2017.[18] C. L. D. R. E. Ellen L Usher, Natasha Aniceto Mamaril and M. S. Kennedy, “Sources of self-efficacy in undergraduate engineering,” in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Ex- position, no. 10.18260/p.24723. Seattle, Washington: ASEE Conferences, June 2015, https
Omodia, Charles Raleigh, and Kenny Fotouhi, “Integration of Active Learning Framework in an Instrumentation Course to involve Junior Level Engineering Students in Multidisciplinary Research Projects,” 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN, August 2022.[5] Yanjun Yan, Robert Adams, Paul Yanik, Hugh Jack, Andrew Ritenour, and H Bora Karayaka. “BYOE: Individual Lab Kit Options for Analog and Digital Circuits Suitable for In-Class or At-home Experiments,” The 128th ASEE (American Society of Engineering Education) Annual Conference and Exposition (ASEE2021), virtual, July, 2021.[6] Yanjun Yan, Ivo Rumenov Dragnov, Hugh Jack, Tasho Tashev, Mary Anna LaFratta, “A Project-Based Learning (PBL
technical innovation. Worcester, Mass.: Technical Innovation Center, Inc., 1997.[20] C. Nicometo, T. Nathans-Kelly, and B. Skarzynski, “Mind the gap: Using lessons learned from practicing engineers to teach engineering ethics to undergraduates,” in IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Science, Technology, and Engineering, 2014, pp. 1– 7. doi: 10.1109/ETHICS.2014.6893430.[21] J. W. Blake, “Using stories of technology to teach technological and engineering literacy in courses for majors,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, 2019. doi: 10.18260/1-2--33518.[22] G. U. Davis, “The role of case studies for the integration of sustianable development into the education of engineers,” World Transactions on
participation as an Assistant Mentor in the ASCE ExCEEd Teaching Workshop as well as making classrooms more equitable through his participation as a Facilitator for the ESCALA Certificate in College Teaching and Learning in HSIs and the ESCALA Culturally Responsive Teaching in STEM Mini-Course for HSIs. To get more ideas for demonstrations and how to introduce themes to your classes, Batts encourages you to check out his YouTube Channel (search Dr. Anthony Battistini) and his other ASEE conference papers. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Identifying the Strengths and the Cracks of Mastery Based Assessment in Reinforced Concrete Design (Case Study)AbstractThere is
, "Informing Replication of the Bowman Creek Educational Ecosystem Pilot," in American Society for Engineering Education proceedings, A. Genau Ed.: ASEE, 2019.[6] D. Wood, A. Gura, J. Brockman, and S. Alptekin, "Student Outcomes in Academic Community Engaged STEM projects with Multi-Dimensional Diversity.," in American Society for Engineering Education proceedings: ASEE, 2018.[7] G. Arastoopour, N. C. Chesler, and D. W. Shaffer, "Epistemic persistence: A simulation- based approach to increasing participation of women in engineering," Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, vol. 20, no. 3, 2014.[8] J. Cullinane and L. Leegwater, "Diversifying the STEM Pipeline: The Model Replication
are identified. As we preach to the students to be lifelong learners, somust our model keep evolving to better cater to the next generation of students who give us thehonor of being their learning facilitators.VII. Acknowledgements This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grantnumber EEC-1623125. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions, or recommendations expressedin this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. References [1] R. A. Shannon, S. K. Jones, and M. Mina, “Designing a Multi-Cycle Approach to Empathetic Electrical Engineering Courses,” in 2019 ASEE Annual
lego robot project using concept maps and peer led teams for a freshman course in engineering and engineering technology. In 2009 Annual Conference & Exposition, number 10.18260/1-2–4657, Austin, Texas, June 2009. ASEE Conferences.[6] Djedjiga Belfadel, Marcia Arambulo Rodriguez, Michael Zabinski, and Ryan Munden. Use of the Arduino platform in fundamentals of engineering. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference Exposition, pages 1 – 15, 2019. ISSN 21535868.[7] Nebojsa Jaksic, Boyan Li, Benjamin Maestas, and Katheryn Rothermal. Dancing humanoid robots lab demonstration for the first year engineering students. 06 2017. doi: 10.18260/1-2– 28099.[8] Eric Wang, Jeffrey LaCombe, and Ann-Marie
department.AcknowledgmentThis work was made possible by a grant from the National Science Foundation (NSF 2027471and 2105156). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] M. Borrego, J. E. Froyd, and T. S. Hall, “Diffusion of engineering education innovations: A survey of awareness and adoption rates in U.S. engineering departments,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 185–207, 2010, doi:10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2010.tb01056.x.[2] (ASEE) American Society for Engineering Education, “Creating a culture for scholarly and systematic innovation in engineering education: Ensuring U.S
projects.Education for information, 22(2), 63-75.Turns, J., Han, Y. L., Cook, K., Mason, G., & Shuman, T. (2022). Work in progress: Designing asustainable mechanism for discursively navigating change. In 2022 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition.Wuerz, E., Fitzgerald, R., Grenier, M., & Lezzi, O. (2019). Sustained Dialogue CampusNetwork. Creating space for democracy: A primer on dialogue and deliberation in highereducation.
Entrepreneurial Mindset Acquired through Curricular and Extra-curricular Components,” in Proceedings of 126th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, lorida, June 2019. Available: https://peer.asee.org/319056. S. Purzer, N. Fila, and L. Nataraja, “Evaluation of Current Assessment Methods in Engineering Entrepreneurship Education,” Adv. Eng. Educ. vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1-27, 2016. Available: http://advances.asee.org/wp-content/uploads/vol05/issue01/Papers/AEE-17-E- ship-Purzer.pdf7. J.B. Du Prel, B. Röhrig and M. Blettner, “Choosing Statistical Tests: Part 12 of a Series on Evaluation of Scientific Publications,” Dtsch Arztebl Int. vol. 107(19), pp. 343-348, May 2010, ePub. May 2014, doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0343.8. G.M
Obama administration, which held its own nationalWhite House Maker Faire in 2014. Public libraries were out front in embracing the makermovement, since their mission to serve as a hub for lifelong learning fit so well with one of themaker movement’s foundational purposes: to provide anyone, of any skill level, an opportunityfor self-directed learning. In response to the White House Maker Faire, over 100 Urban LibraryCouncil members signed a letter to President Obama in which they pledged their ongoingcommitment to being centers for creative making.Makerspaces have been called a variety of things – Fablabs, Idea Labs, Hackerspaces, InnovationLabs, to name a few – but in the ASEE PEER Document Repository, makerspace is by far themost frequently