://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114- fqs0503440Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M. & Saldaña, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE.Montfort, D., Brown, S., & Shinew, D. (2014). The personal epistemologies of civil engineering faculty. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(3), 388–416. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20050Offorma, G. C. (2016). Integrating components of culture in curriculum planning. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 8(1), 1–8. http://ijci.wcci- international.org/index.php/IJCI/issue/view/3Patton, M. Q. (1990). Quality evaluation and research methods. SAGE.Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2005). Designing main questions and probes. In
twice. He has published one book and more than 165 book chapters, scholarly journal papers, and refereed conference proceedings. He has supervised more than 20 Ph.D. and MS students to completion during his tenure, and taught more than thirty (30) different courses related to computer and engineering technology. He is active in several professional societies and editorial boards and is a senior member of IEEE and ASME and ASEE and AHSIENancy Romance FAU STEM Collaborative 916 SW 35 Ct. College of Engineering and Computer Science Boynton Beach, FL 33435 Florida Atlantic University Home 561-752-0990 Boca Raton, Florida 33431 Cell 561-716-4000 (561)-297-3577 EDUCATION Ed.D. 1982 Educational Leadership – Curriculum
Paper ID #37831Research on the Construction of Artificial Intelligence andHuman Language Lab in China’s Universities: Progress,Challenges and ProspectsXi Xi LU Xixi LU is a graduate student at the Graduate School of Education, Beijing Foreign Studies University, Beijing, China. Now, she is mainly engaged in research on curriculum and instruction as well as higher education. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.comTHE CONSTRUCTION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND HUMAN LANGUAGE LAB 1 Research on the
thequality-control review process again and can pass the decision gate when it meets the SPCcriteria - within control limits including any six-sigma SPC. Each phase is a touch-point forquality assurance and control. The control limits for each phase may be tailored for a phasebased on historical records of the phase and hence each phase is treated independently. Figure 2also shows the connections between the different decomposition phases. Each decompositionsubphase is directly related to an integration sub-phase. These relationships are important since apoor performance in an integration phase may be strongly related to poor execution in itscorresponding decomposition phase.Once the system validation is done (the last development phase in the
college to start several successful programs: an undergraduate major in Robotics and Mechatronic Systems Engineering, a graduate certificate in Advanced Electric Vehicles, and a thriving partnership for student recruitment with several universities in China. He has also been the dissertation advisor for and graduated many Ph.D. students. Dr. Das’s areas of research interests are modeling and simulation of multi-disciplinary engineering problems, modeling multi- physics problems in manufacturing, engineering education, and curriculum reform. He has worked in areas ranging from mechatronics system simulation to multi-physics process simulation using CAE tools such as Finite Elements and Boundary Elements. He has authored or
allows us to observe students’ behavior in online courses and can beconsidered as another indicator of their success [19].This study examines students’ behavior online, especially video lecture viewing, and its effect ontheir performance. It utilizes learning analytics available from the video-hosting platform ofPanopto. Since instructor-created videos are an integral component of a blended course, ageneralized deduction is that the greater the engagement of a student in the online component,the better the performance of the student in the course. Previous studies have mostly focused oncumulative data analysis with regards to video views, video watch times, or course grades. Whilecumulative data provide good insights, examining each student’s
) Nathan Delson is a Teaching Professor at the University of California at San Diego. His research interests include robotics, biomedical devices, and engineering education. He teaches introductory design, mechanics, mechatronics, capstone design, medical devices, and product design & entrepreneurship. His interests in design education includes increasing student motivation, teamwork, hands-on projects, and integration of theory into design projects. In 1999 he co- founded Coactive Drive Corporation (currently General Vibration), a company that provides haptic solutions. In 2016 Nate co-founded eGrove Education, Inc. an educational software company focused on teaching sketching and spatial visualization skills
year Ph.D. student studying in Science Education at COE and working in Engineering Education at Purdue University. Interested in researching engineering design thinking, curriculum development, and educational psychologyMuhsin Menekse (Associate Professor) Muhsin Menekse is an Associate Professor at Purdue University with a joint appointment in the School of Engineering Education and the Department of Curriculum & Instruction. Dr. Menekse's primary research focuses on exploring K-16 students' engagement and learning of engineering and science concepts by creating innovative instructional resources and conducting interdisciplinary quasi-experimental research studies in and out of classroom environments. Dr. Menekse is
Learning ——A case of a certain Engineering College in ChinaAbstract:University innovation is a crucial component of building an “innovative country.” Theinnovation of university students constructed the university innovation system. Therefore,cultivating undergraduate students’ ability towards scientific literacy and creating aninnovative environment is especially crucial. To address the problem of undergraduates' lackof self-innovation consciousness and scientific research ability in the conventional talenttraining process that focuses on intensive lectures and is evaluated by the paper test. In thisarticle, through literature research and case studies, taking a certain engineering collegelocated in Beijing, China as an
related to engineering design thinking and engineering education professional development.Brian Douglas CowburnTheresa Green Dr. Theresa Green is a postdoctoral researcher at Utah State University with a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Utah State University. She holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Valparaiso University and an M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Utah State University. Her research interests include K-12 STEM integration, curriculum development, and improving diversity and inclusion in engineering.Wade H Goodridge (Associate Professor)Kurt Henry Becker (Engineering Education Professor) Kurt Becker, Ph.D., Professor, Department of Engineering Education, College of Engineering, Utah State
development described in the previous paper demonstrated the importanceof understanding the culture in which educational decisions are made, for those decisions area reflection of the society in which they are made. Opportunities taken, and opportunities lostare a function of those mores; for some a decision will be an opportunity to be taken, and forothers it will be an opportunity lost.This study confirms the importance of “culture” in educational decision making, be it interms of career choice, institutional status, or curriculum and teaching.Following a brief introduction, essentially a short precis of paper 1, answers to fourteenquestions derived from the philosophy of the Percy Report, and other elements of itsdiscussion are given in the light
studentinteraction and team building through the development of critical thinking skills. These keystrategies will enhance student 4th -year graduate rate to our expected goal of 20%. Therefore,there is a need for systematic training in the current curriculum to equip students withcomprehensive knowledge in cutting-edge topics such as 3D printing. The impact of 3D printingis steadily increasing in the world including the chemical engineering profession. 3D printing, or 2additive manufacturing, has become an enabling technology in traditional chemical engineeringprocesses (developing internals for process plant equipment) and emerging areas such
making that respects both micro and macro ethicalobligations. Professional associations have an essential role in upholding ethics and shapingpractice as they “are often responsible for maintaining professionalism and integrity among theirmembers” [22]. As stated by Marchant [39], “professional societies use a variety of soft lawinstruments to try to regulate and influence the conduct of their members, including guidelines,ethical codes of conduct, best practices, and model rules”(p. 183). Engineering ethics educatorsoften discuss their field’s professional codes in classrooms making engineering students aware ofthe existence and the content of the codes. As stated by Nair and Bulleit [40], “When we think ofteaching engineering ethics, good
as mechanical engineering. Through two rounds of searching relevant journalsand article databases, we identified four sources of barriers to CAD software: gender bias in CAD andmechanical engineering; lack of current representation and community for women; gender disparities inspatial reasoning skills; and self-efficacy of individuals. We also found three areas where differentframings and techniques can position CAD to be leveraged to be an enabler to improve genderrepresentation: course design, outreach activities, and general considerations in engineering.The literature findings were synthesized and brought into two strategic approaches that describe how theresults can be integrated into the current state of CAD learning and engineering
1979. He worked in the aerospace and computer industries in California and Oregon from 1979 to 2002. He was an instructor at the OGI School of Engineering at Oregon Health and Science University, where he received a Ph.D. in 2009. Since 2009 he has been a professor of electrical engineering and Washington State University Vancouver.Pavel Pisarchuk I’m a junior electrical engineering student at WSUV who hopes to use his skills in the industry to help make the world a better place!Allegra A BryantDanielle GedlickTerry Sjolander © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.comThe Status of Laboratory Education Focusing on
Paper ID #36963“At the Bottom of the Food Chain”: Constructing AcademicIdentity in Engineering Education as International GraduateStudentsCristian Eduardo Vargas Ordonez Cristián (Cris) Vargas-Ordóñez (he/his/él) is a Colombian third-year PhD student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. Raised around the life of photography and as an amateur contact improv dancer and yoga teacher, he is interested in integrating the arts and engineering in educational settings to promote and protect universally recognized human rights and fundamental freedoms. His research with his advisor, Dr. Morgan Hynes, includes
exceeding 30%Dalhberg et Mixed Method Integrative Approach for Majority male Veteransal. (2020) Curriculum Development Not stated and non-[29] Framework Able-bodied veterans Constructivist Learning TheoryMobley et al. Qualitative No specific theory stated or Majority male Serving in(2020) [30] discussed Majority White the Able-bodied Reserves or
Paper ID #38322The concerns and perceived challenges that students facedwhen traditional in-person engineering courses suddenlytransitioned to remote learningSarah Lynn Orton (Dr.) Dr. Orton is an associate professor in Civil Engineering and is an active member of the American Concrete Institute and the American Society of Civil Engineers. Dr. Orton also serves as the Director of Undergraduate Studies for the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at the University of Missouri. She has participated in several programs aimed at improving undergraduate education. Her research projects have involved the use of
. reflection practice integration 5. affective awareness and professional integrity development [1]We created Fig. 1 (below) to illustrate our understanding of the potential dynamic between theseinfluencers within an engineering program, but we also arrived at the conclusion that ourunderstanding of their significance and their relationship to each other (and to applying them tocreate transformative programs in engineering education) was still in need of furtherinvestigation and articulation [1]. What we do believe this figure conveys in a useful way is thesituational, relational nature of the transformative learning process for our students. As thestudent on the left and the student on right interact with each other, they build a shared
instrumental in the provision of accessible curriculum andacademic accommodations [63]. Under the current model, faculty are often asked to retrofit theircourse for a particular student after the course has already been developed, which can be a verydifficult undertaking [43]. While some faculty members desire education on how their teachingstyle affects learners, such educational resources are often difficult to access [63]. Withoutresources on how to provide an inclusive education, faculty are often unsure what access needsstudents may have (especially those with disabilities and even more so with invisible disabilities)and how those needs could be met [63].PurposeResponding to this paucity in the current body of knowledge, this paper seeks to
. Table 3 presents the percentage of responses for each item as well as the results ofthe t-test. Participants reported statistically significant increases in the following: Plans to addadditional CS courses, Strategies to make CS curriculum more equitable, Strategies to improve CScurriculum, Strategies to recruit more diverse students into CS, and Strategies to add CS A or CSPrinciples courses.Next, to determine whether significant differences on any of the items existed between schoolsserving majority BIPOC and those serving majority non-BIPOC students, we conducted a KruskalWallis test on CS graduation requirements and an ANOVA on all other items. There were nostatistically significant differences for any items based on school racial/ethnic
Paper ID #37584The Effects of Assessment Method for Regular, Out-of-Class,Learning on Student Performance and Content Retention ina System Dynamics CourseLouis A Diberardino (Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering) Dr. DiBerardino is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Ohio Northern University. His teaching and research interests are in dynamic systems, musculoskeletal biomechanics, and integrating curriculum with the entrepreneurial mindset.Lawrence Funke (Assistant Professor) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022
Paper ID #37595Work-In-Progress: Liberian Undergraduate EngineeringStudents' Perceptions of the Impact of COVID-19 on theirLearning ExperienceCollins N. Vaye Collins N. Vaye is a first-generation college student and a native of Liberia, West Africa. Currently, he is a 3rd year Engineering and Computing Education Ph.D. student at Florida International University. His research interests revolve around: –Effective Technology Integration in Engineering Education. –Faculty Development, Professional Development, and Technology Supported Learning. –Broadening Participation in Engineering and Engineering Technology within and
specialaccommodations for an instructor. Prior to pandemic protocols, engineering faculty on occasionrecorded voice-over-Powerpoint lectures and some labs as supplemental content for otherwiseface-to-face courses. Engineering faculty at The Citadel are well-trained in in-personpedagogical best practices thanks in part to mini-ExCEEd workshops [2], as well as onlineinstruction, which is offered as professional development through The Citadel’s Center forExcellence in Instruction, Teaching, Learning, and Distance Education (CEITL&DE). Similarcenters operate within higher education Institutions across America, and even with regularfaculty trainings, it is well known and acknowledged that an instructor faces a daunting timemanagement task when planning for
Paper ID #37304Student performance impacted from modifying a first-year/semester engineering core course during a globalpandemicJacques C. Richard (Instructional Associate Professor/Aerospace Engineer) Dr. Jacques C. Richard is an instructional associate professor and REU Principal Investigator at Texas A&M University. He got his Ph.D. at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. He studies plasmas using particle and spectral methods, as well as engineering education factors that build critical algorithmic thinking skills in diverse engineering students. Research includes plasma turbulence and plasma jets, and jet engine
onrace and gender. We have been using ethical models to explore decision making ofhypothetical and real products/systems. Our curriculum is a work in progress; hence weare assessing the course on an on-going basis.IntroductionEngineers and computing professionals make products and processes that shape oursociety. Because of this large societal impact, engineering and computing professionalorganizations such as ABET and ACM recommend or require ethics to be integratedinto undergraduate educational programs. While integration of ethics is essential, giventhe recent and ongoing societal reckoning with racial justice and (in)equity issues, weargue that more of a specific focus on JEDI (Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion) isneeded. In this
students enrolled in the program.Digital Logic Spring 2020 (EE 3770)Logic and Digital Design is the first digital electronics course in the curriculum. It coversBoolean algebra, logic gate, some MSI components, and a brief introduction to VHDL. Inaddition to the theoretical coverage, there are five individual design projects resulting inbreadboarded logic circuits and a group final design project implemented using an AlteraCyclone board. At the beginning of the semester, students acquire a parts kit containing all thecomponents necessary for the five design projects.Usually, toward the last three weeks of the course, each final project group will check out anAltera Cyclone board to implement and demonstrate their final project to the class.Logic
Paper ID #37512Features of Identity-based Engineering LeadershipInstructionBrett Tallman (Instructor) (Montana State University - Bozeman) Brett Tallman is a Postdoctoral Research Associate at University of Texas, El Paso studying faculty agency development at HSIs. He received his doctorate in Engineering from Montana State University (MSU), with focus on engineering leader identity development. His previous degrees include a Masters degree in Education from MSU (active learning in an advanced quantum mechanics environment) and a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Cornell. In addition to his academic career, he
issues in the construction industry, asshown in the research overview framework in Figure 1. The verbal and non-verbalcommunication training focused on helping students identify their unconscious biases,microaggression, stereotype, prejudice, and cultural humility. An in class-expert training onunconscious biases and the role of culture in communication offered students an opportunity tolearn about social sustainability in terms of effective interpersonal and group communication,emphasizing how systemic racism makes its way into the construction industry. The researchteam integrated this activity as part of the coursework, and an Associate Professor from theDepartment of Communication provided professional training. The training was repeated
; Oregon Mesa, 2018;AUTHOR, 2020). Couch et al. (2019) conducted an extensive review of K-12 IvE programs andnoted that they often represent partnerships between schools and higher education institutions.However, IvE has meaningful potential for integration into community spaces, such ascommunity centers, libraries and maker-spaces, as well as other professional and industrysettings investing in today’s workforce development and education. It is with attention to thispromise, that the [PROGRAM, UNIVERSITY] has designed, implemented, and continues toshape the [PROGRAM], which has grown to a framework that builds from our K-12 school andeducator connections, afterschool opportunities, and community engaged invention, offering anIvE pathway for