anticipated, but all of the results should be interpreted with the size as a majorconsideration. The other limitation is generalizability. This study was only conducted at one(R1) university with only three fields studied, so the results cannot be generalized beyond thepopulation.Future WorkWe plan to evaluate and analyze the lifelong learner results carefully so that reliable lifelonglearner items can be created, either as new questions or as questions that relate orthogonally tolifelong learning in teacher and researcher roles. We also plan to revise and distribute the surveynationally to all graduate fields of study to see how the additional fields view these roles. Also,we plan to follow up with the same population to discern any changes that may
(53%) ● Team design exercises (52%)Need improvement: ● Lecture format (69% of responses) ● Homework assignments (49%) ● Projects (33%)II. AdvisingThe College of Engineering employs professional academic advisors, with several of themfocused specifically on first-year advising. The advisors both assist students with the planning oftheir class schedules and provide guidance regarding academic and non-academic resources thatare available to students. The first-year advisors are located in the residence hall with ouracademic and co-curricular programs. Our students used academic advising services with 43%attending two to three times per semester. Residents used advising services more (65% attendingtwo to three times per semester) than
limited research that has been conducted on engineering learning in informal environmentsprovides evidence that participation in engineering programs in secondary school can lead toenrollment or interest in studying engineering in college. In a recent review of the 18 STEMprograms targeting girls, the Harvard Family Research Project’s Out-of-School Time Database10found that most of the programs increased participant’s confidence in their math skills, improvedattitudes toward and engagement in math, and increased plans to attend or enroll in college. Intheir evaluation of FIRST (a robotics club), Melchior and colleagues 11 reported that the Page
this means is that one ormore robust international partnerships are absolutely necessary to support any internationalexperience that goes beyond a superficial tour of a foreign country; yet, even such tours requireat least basic partnerships if any sort of academic element (e.g., campus tours, studentconferences) is to be included. More generally, the range of “services” that an internationalpartner might offer include: • Basic logistics. Anyone who has ever planned a foreign trip to a little-known locale knows how difficult and error-prone such planning can be. A local partner will have extensive knowledge of local infrastructure, including academic spaces, lodging, and travel within the region. For short, faculty-led
, most were in their final semester and had taken a Waste Management course that focused on composting. The mentor was aware of the challenge and had incorporated it into his course plan that semester. In order to provide an integrated classroom experience for the biosystems students a two week case study was structured to incorporate team work, geospatial techniques with use of ESRI ArcGIS software and some cultural and social studies of Belize. Table 2: Sustainability challenge, proposed solution, and partner information for composting
solution to a project. PERT separates tasks into nodes andactivity along arcs or arrows. These charts can have many, many tasks or only a few. UsuallyPERT diagrams have numbers associated with each node that are higher than the nodes they leadto21. NetMBA21 gives the following steps to planning with a PERT system: 1. “Identify the specific activities and milestones.” 2. “Determine the proper sequence of the activities.” 3. “Construct a network diagram.” 4. “Estimate the time required for each activity.” 5. “Determine the critical path.” 6. “Update the PERT chart as the project progresses.This form of diagramming allows designers to see what resources are needed to complete whattasks along with a generalized order and
this category. Recognizing thatthere are difficulties in proper delivery of systems analysis and systems dynamics to engineeringstudents; the fact remains that these tools are extremely useful for someone who plans to becomea designer. Therefore, ways have to be found to enhance the understanding of systems’ thinking,and at the same time, to develop educational experiences that could efficiently improve learningoutcomes.2) Looking at risk management and uncertainty: Engineering design is carried out relying onincomplete data, imperfect models, often with unclear objectives, and other potential problemsand constraints. The effects of such uncertainties on the design of a project may have seriousconsequences unless proper safeguards have been
example topics weresenior or capstone design, competition (e.g., steel bridge, concrete canoe, Formula SAE, solarcar, and robotics), outreach (such as Engineers without Borders), and student research projects.The poster sessions were organized as part of the regular conference planning. Page 24.964.3B. Poster Session ChallengesThe authors have seen prior attempts at encouraging student involvement in conferences. Often,these attempts had poor participation and were not sustaining. Key issues were identified duringthe organization of the student poster component. These issues and how they were addressed arelisted below.How can the content of posters
Spring 2011 no book Connecticut Engineering University of TTE 4004 x Transportation (Mannering, Florida Engineering Kilareski, and Washburn 2009) University of ENCE 370 x Introduction to Spring 2009 (Papacostas and Maryland Transportation Prevedouros 2001) Engineering and Planning University of CE 3100 x Transportation Spring 2009 (Mannering and Missouri
students to share their experiences. Other optionsmight include presenting a poster or giving a talk at a campus or regional symposium, or evengiving a formal presentation to the research group or department. Distilling their experiencesinto a poster or oral presentation gives students valuable experience in communicating technicalcontent, and encourages students to reflect on the their contributions to the larger researchproject.Example ProjectsThis three-step method for mentoring undergraduate researchers is easy for faculty to implementand scaffolds students’ introduction to the research domain. Highly motivated students have theopportunity to gain skills and responsibility as they move through the three stages of thismentoring plan. For
so interested in the class material he decided to pursue an M.S. in Construction. John also interned this past summer at SUNDT Construction as a project engineer assistant. He was in charge of the RFIs, supervised the painting and mill work, pedestrian safety, and the close out of the projects. John’s future plans are to pursue a doctoral degree in construction management, increase his work experience in the construction field, and then teach someday.Prof. Dean Takeo Kashiwagi, Arizona State University A renowned expert, educator, and researcher in best value procurement and risk/project management for more than two decades; he’s a respected adviser and mentor within the association, the public sector, and
planning guide, and an assessment tool30-32. Hierarchy A Hierarchy B (Level 1) (Level 1) Cross-Link between Hierarchy C Hierarchies B and C (Level 2) Figure 1. Cmap hierarchies and cross-links31.2. Theoretical Basis for CmapsUse of cmaps is supported by cognitive psychological research in the area of semantic memorytheory. Semantic memory refers to an organized database of concept-based knowledge, such asmeanings, understandings, and images. Unlike episodic memories, semantic memories containfactual
Engineers (SAE) Ralph R. Teetor Educational Award recipient.Mr. Michael DeLorme, Stevens Institute of Technology Mr. Michael DeLorme is an Adjunct Professor and Senior Research Associate at the Davidson Laboratory at the Stevens Institute of Technology. He has conducted over 50 significant marine hydrodynamic exper- iments on both surface and subsurface vehicles. Other areas of recent research include; the application of hydro-acoustic techniques for the detection, classification and tracking of non-emitting small vessels, the implementation of UUVs for port/maritime security and environmental assessment, and path planning of a UUV through a complex estuary.Eirik Hole, Stevens Institute of Technology (SSE) Eirik Hole has
(ITEEA, 2000). We believe thatby tying the curriculum to the STL that the activity shows promised in promoting STEM because thesestandards encourage the application of each of the STEM disciplines. The table is has three columns. Thefirst column lists the topic being taught, the second column has a brief on the lesson being taught, and thethird column lists the STL connection. Although we recognize there are many other STEM topics that canbe taught while engaging students in an ROV type activity, these lessons highlight our first iteration. Weplan on further developing and testing additional curriculum resources in subsequent years. We also havenoticed that SeaPerch has started development of ROV focused lesson plans that also teach
. Problem-Based Learning is not limited to engineering education; it hasbeen long used in other areas such as medicine education, nursing education and law education.There have been many efforts to improve the quality of teaching of soil mechanics andfoundation design courses, for example, using audio response systems to develop active learningenvironment within the classroom has been investigated3. In another attempt to incorporatelearning outcomes into an introductory geotechnical engineering course9, a listing of outcomesarticulated for several foundation design course topics has been developed which demonstrateshow the outcomes were linked to lesson plans and assignments. In this regard, exampleassessment methods and results are presented with
Trustworthy Cyberspace (SaTC) Securing our Nation’s cyberspace• Aligns with the national Trustworthy Cyberspace: Strategic Plan for the Federal Cybersecurity Research and Development Program (released December 2011).• SaTC cross-directorate program (NSF 13-578): Aims to support fundamental scientific advances and technologies to protect cyberspace.• Scholarship for Service: Aims to increase the number of cybersecurity professionals in the U.S.• Focus on Privacy: Dear Colleague Letter for new collaborations between Computer and Social Scientists, including a focus on privacy. CISE, EHR, ENG, MPS, and SBE Secure and Trustworthy Cyberspace (SaTC) Solicitation NSF 13-578
research questions presented at the end of the “Introduction” section.3 Transcriptionexcerpts were first grouped into six categories: “choice of major,” “choice of college,”“evaluation of college experience,” “career plan,” “imagination of the profession,” and “notionof engineering learning.” Within each category, inductive coding was conducted to discoverrecurring themes from student reflections.4 Where appropriate, field notes from participantobservation were used to supplement students’ narratives (e.g., sometimes students in theinterviews referred to their projects, the content of which was documented in my field notes).Data from archival research was used to compose a brief introduction of the historical andcontemporary background of the
reduces the cost perplatform. Being a member of a team with common educational goals and using available tools toachieve these goals creates a significant leverage for instruction and makes the task easier foreveryAssessing the Effectiveness of the Collaborative Efforts This collaborative effort between 2- and 4-year institutions and local high schools is inthe early stages of development. The implementation of the common platform has just startedwith one high school teacher. Assessment data have not been collected to date. Plans are forcomparisons to be made between class grades from the year prior to implementation of theautonomous vehicle into the curriculum and this year’s student grades. Students are also requiredto complete
) and the cognitive element(s) theyaddress (level, style, or affect). We close our review with recommendations for the developmentof new assessments for innovativeness, comments on the limitations of our study, and plans forfuture work in this domain. Page 24.41.3 12.0 Framework for Critical ReviewEach innovation measure or model in our review was evaluated through two lenses: (1) internalvs. external point of reference (i.e., do the constructs/factors attempt to assess a human attributeor a human action); and (2) key elements of cognitive
Paper ID #8866Access to Cooperative Education Programs and the Academic and Employ-ment Returns by Race, Gender, and DisciplineDr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette Joyce B. Main is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a Ph.D. in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University, and an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education.Dr. Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University and Central Queensland University Matthew W. Ohland is Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University and a
class also appreciates the pop culture I am planning to reference. Onereason the Avengers worked so well in this class was that it was a shared universe. Not everyonein the class has to be a diehard fan of the universe, but most need to feel positive about it and atleast be familiar with it. I’ve found the best way to discover what fandoms are represented in theclass is to ask. It’s a great icebreaker discussion as students are coming into the class, and alsohelps demonstrate that I’m interested in them.Third, I always make sure to provide an introduction to the specific feature I am discussing tomake sure no one feels left out. For example, when discussing whether Iron Man’s suit violatesthe laws of thermodynamics, first we reviewed what his
content but have the potential to allow students todive much deeper into content should faculty members provide those opportunities. We provideillustration of these gateway concepts, and demonstrate the overall framework’s use for guidingfaculty members’ curriculum development.Pre-Workshop activities and ideasSelecting workshop participantsThe planning and implementation of the Assessing Sustainability Knowledge workshop was amulti-dimensional component of the overall project. The workshop’s goal was to synthesize keysustainability concepts and relationships into a framework that can be used to guide assessmentsof sustainability knowledge.In the fall of 2010, we put together a list of potential candidates that we wanted to invite, basedon their
project aims to characterize how engineering students view and approach innovation. Aspects of the research that are accomplished so far include: 1) a multi-phase protocol that includes interviews, process mapping tasks, and think-aloud protocols, 2) a content analysis to determine typical innovation and discovery behaviors used in innovation in technical areas, and 3) a meta-synthesis of assessment methods used in engineering entrepreneurship. Based on the findings from these studies, we made recommendations that inform activities associated with the educational plan including classroom activities and assessment tools. Introduction While innovativeness is a
the financing design duringthe planning stage by manipulating the parameters; and ultimately the most profitable solutioncan be implemented 18. This paper presents a case study depicting the cost of construction, implementation andoperation of a commercial wind farm with the application of life cycle costing using ATA. Thistechnique defines the life cycle cost for the entire operation: from financing the project, topurchasing the equipment, and the project revenue. While this approach requires extensiveresearch to determine the parallel costs and revenue rates, the results from conducting an ATAwith life cycle costs allows for a solid final decision based on actual figures and predefinedeconomic criteria. The results from this
/are used in Asian and European countries by both governmental and non-governmental organizations. Acharya has a M.Eng. in Computer Technology and a D.Eng. in Computer Science and Information Management with a concentration in knowledge discovery, both from the Asian Institute of Technology in Thailand. His teaching involvement and research interest are in the area of Software Engineering education, Software Verification & Validation, Data Mining, Neural Networks, and Enterprise Resource Planning. He also has interest in Learning Objectives based Education Material Design and Development. Acharya is a co- author of ”Discrete Mathematics Applications for Information Systems Professionals- 2nd Ed., Prentice
mobile hands-on learning into their courses.Deborah Walter (RHIT) and Kathleen Meehan (VT) have initiated the development of a conceptinventory for non-ECE majors who are enrolled in circuits classes with either hands-on activities inthe classroom or laboratory exercises conducted outside of the classroom, both facilitated byportable electronic instruments. Co-PI Ella Ingram (RHIT) has studied the existing literature obteaching circuits, examined circuits concept inventories developed by others in the field, andparticipated in the learning of basic concepts in circuits and use of lab equipment along withstudents enrolled in circuits classes for non-majors. The plan is to present a draft of the conceptinventory at the 2014 workshop to obtain
Core Chemical Engineering Curriculum – Year 3Overview and ObjectivesWe report on the progress of the third year of a CCLI Type 3 project. The goal of this project isto create a community of learning within the discipline of chemical engineering (ChE) focusedon concept-based instruction. The project plan is to develop and promote the use of a cyber-enabled infrastructure for conceptual questions, the AIChE Concept Warehouse, whichultimately could be used throughout the core ChE curriculum (Material and Energy Balances,Thermodynamics, Transport Phenomena, Kinetics and Reactor Design, and Materials Science).Conceptual questions, both as Concept Inventories and ConcepTests, will be available throughan interactive website maintained through the
their curricula in the last five years. Both universities have developed,piloted, and institutionalized two new infrastructure-themed courses. As a result of ourindependent (to date) efforts, we have generated a wide variety of teaching materials for the fourcourses. Importantly, the transformation of our curricula has involved more than adding newcourses; as a result of having all department faculty involved in the planning andimplementation, our institutions have experienced a “trickle down” effect, in which newinfrastructure-themed material has been added to nearly every course and entire coursesequences have been modified. As a result, important topics such as resilience, infrastructureprotection, environmental impacts, and sustainability
Engineering Technology Department with a major inmechanical or electrical engineering technology.The objectives of the Engineering Technology Project class are: i. To introduce the students to CNC programming including programing G-code for milling and turning operations; ii. To introduce the students to industrial robotics and robot programming; iii. To understand the fundamentals of fuel cells, fuel cell components, materials and manufacturing processes used in the fuel cell industry; iv. To be knowledgeable with the computer aided design and computer aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) process; v. To acquire experience in project planning, team work, design and creative thinking; vi. To learn how
focuses on: Fairness Equity Functioning to incentivize maximum participation from the most applicable talent Considering the compromising realities of normalizing a model Improvement #7 – in response to reducing the ProSTAR overhead through ProSTAR personnel teaching, ProSTAR agreed to negotiate with participating departments to transfer teaching incentive to off-set overhead expenses within an academic year.On submission of the above seven improvement initiatives, ProSTAR was asked to respond tothree additional questions below, which was submitted in a 13 page response. Create a plan which maps current and future overhead (personnel) growth to a rational model