two and how that impacts how they think ofthemselves and their learning. The narratives presented in this paper were collected as part of a weeklyone-hour reflection seminar that all students in the program are required to enroll in each semester. One ofthe goals of the course is to give students the opportunity to think about the connections between theirliberal arts courses and the general liberal arts university experiences, with what they are learning in theirengineering specific courses and experiences. In an attempt to create a student-centered body ofknowledge that initiates the dissolution of the techno-social dualism prevalent in engineering education,we present here student narratives and a discussion based on these narratives to
) communicating effectively, (4) recognizing ethical andprofessional responsibilities and considering the impact of engineering solutions, (5) functioningon a team in an inclusive environment, (6) analyzing and interpreting data, and (7) acquiring andapplying new knowledge [10].This paper describes the course module activities that help students succeed in completing theresearch report, the components of the research report, and grading checklists used by studentsfor creating successful deliverables and by instructors for grading guidance. This paper alsodescribes the assessment of students’ reports and student feedback in a reflection assignment.The paper ends with a discussion and conclusions.The Cross-Cultural Design Module and Cross-Cultural UI
Based Learning andProject Organized Learning and it has proven to be a successful education strategy in several highereducations also when the pedagogical models differ from each other. In the various definitions of PBLthe following three levels can be distinguished: Central theoretical learning principles; specificeducational models based on PBL principles; and different practices within the guidelines of traditionaleducational models [2]. In Denmark where Aalborg University was founded in 1976 the university wasbased on the PBL approach and it is a problem and project based model. The Aalborg PBL tradition Proceedings of the 2011 North Midwest Section Conferencebuilds on the experiential and reflective learning
-related skills,and enables them to become more self-aware/mature independent thinkers. While many studentsengage in experiential learning activities voluntarily, some schools have formalized a creditedversion as an elective to ensure the learning includes the reflective and conceptual components,as verified by a deliverable outcome. A few schools such as Messiah College have also gone astep further to require an approved experiential learning activity of all students, includingengineering majors, to enhance their career preparation and community engagement beforegraduation. Students matriculating to Messiah College as of 2015 may now opt to fulfill theExperiential Learning Initiative (ELI) by either credited internship, practicum, service
to make adjustments as needed. Specifically, students who effectively employ metacognitivestrategies, such as reflection and self-assessment, are more likely to master the problem solvingskills that are essential to programming success [3].Writing to learn (WTL) activities promote metacognition in any discipline. Based on the ideathat writing is a visual representation of thinking [4], WTL activities are usually short, low-stakes writing assignments that are designed to promote reflection, analysis, synthesis, anddeeper understanding of course material. When integrated into a problem-solving assignment,such as a programming lab, WTL prompts allow students to think about the choices they aremaking and the reasons for those choices. When
teachingnetwork will make initial small changes in their teaching, which will lead to increasingly largerchanges over time. For the second method, the principal investigators (PIs) applied self-study,2 aqualitative research method, to examine and reflect on their design-based decisions,implementation, and outcomes. Results indicated that the structures and practices supportedmediating processes. Mediating processes became proximal outcomes. Medial and distaloutcomes for faculty change may likely be a multi-year trajectory. Conjecture mapping and self-study proved to be useful methods in evaluating a process grant focusing on faculty change.KeywordsFaculty Development, Design-based Research, Conjecture Mapping, Self-Study Methods,Engineering
approach that integrates project management methods andtools with Lean-Six Sigma methods. An additional objective of this research is to develop abetter understanding of the unique aspects of the engineering problem solving process. Weassessed the student’s problem solving strategies, products, and design process reflections usingWolcott’s “Steps for Better Thinking” rubric 1.IntroductionCapstone courses give students the opportunity to solve large, unstructured problems in aclassroom setting. These team-based projects mimic the industrial setting that most students willenter upon graduation. Throughout the capstone experience students find themselves faced withcomplexities not found in a traditional course, especially when the projects are
interests include interdisciplinary collaboration, design education, communication studies, identity theory and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include exploring disciplines as cultures, interdisciplinary pedagogy for pervasive computing design; writing across the curriculum in Statics courses; as well as a CAREER award to explore the use of e-portfolios to promote professional identity and reflective practice. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Student Persistence Through Uncertainty Toward Successful Creative PracticeAbstract: To increase creative practice among students in engineering and other
itself, the assessment strategyshould promote these attributes. Where possible, assessments are imbedded into the work of theproject and the team.Assessments of students in EPICS consider an individual’s holistic body of work in the contextof a larger team environment. The assessment process is designed to accommodate students fromdifferent majors working in different phases of the design process and in different roles. Theassessment practices are also intended to follow the form of personnel performance reviews inindustry, to help equip students to thrive in their careers after graduation. Each student isevaluated on five outcome criteria: 1. Accomplishments, 2. Design Process, 3. Reflective and Critical Thinking, 4. Teamwork or
the same numbers have entered theprogram simultaneously from other engineering majors. Similar departure rates are seen inprograms across the country. Reversing attrition from civil and environmental engineering is acritical need for addressing society’s grand challenges effectively. This attrition is due in part tolimited discipline-focused engagement until students’ junior year. To address this, the School ofCEE is providing early engagement in authentic engineering experiences and giving students theopportunity to reflect on these experiences to solidify their CEE identity. We are creatingopportunities early and across the curriculum for our students to engage in interactive problem-based learning centered on the global grand challenges
Service-Learning Design CourseAbstractThe development and skill of empathizing with others has become a necessity for successfuldesign engineers. To develop this skill, learning experiences are needed that encourageengineering students’ understanding of their users and stakeholders. Studies have shown an“authentic” experience involving real-world contexts reflecting the work of professionals helpsto develop and foster empathy. At Purdue University, a service-learning design program partnersmulti-disciplinary teams of students with community organizations to address needs and solvereal-world problems. In previous research on the program’s design process, findings showed howstudents perceive the human aspect of engineering design and how they
abruptly transitioned from face-to-face instruction to completely remote in Spring2020 (S20), and as it reappeared as a hybrid course in Fall 2020 (F20) and Spring 2021 (S21).The focus of this present paper is not on the instructional changes required by COVID (anddiscussed in our companion paper), but rather on how those in turn changed the approach to thehandling of ethical questions and to the assessments of students’ responses to those scenarios.One hypothesis is whether the content or style of the pre-post scenario answers and of thereflections changed between an answer handwritten under time-pressure and one electronicallycaptured with little time constraint. Did the answers or reflections measurably change if moretime were to be allowed for
of enhancing learningthrough service learning activities. The initial motivation for increasing student engagement inthe industrial engineering program was to satisfy the criteria for accrediting engineeringprograms by the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. The more recentdevelopment is the establishment of PACCE at UW-Platteville. The paper presents a summary ofPACCE service learning projects and student reflections. INTRODUCTION TO IE PROGRAM AT UW-PLATTEVILLE The College of Engineering, Mathematics, and Science consists of seven departments:Chemistry and Engineering Physics, Mathematics, Civil and Environmental Engineering,Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and Software Engineering, General
one’s skills and experiences beyond the classroom. Astudy was conducted at NYU Tandon School of Engineering and found students lack support inidentifying and developing their career pathways. This study indicates that a combinede-portfolio and micro-credentialing platform could benefit students by a) providing students witha tool to reflect on and showcase their experiences, b) matching students with upper-class andalumni mentors in career pathways they are interested in, and c) providing them with curatedlists of on-campus and experiential opportunities and micro-credentials that would support theircareer pathways.IntroductionEvery student’s experience through engineering school culminates in different results -- students’future pathways range
pathways to developing those skills within anengineer’s educational experience [5]. This study seeks to explore the learner’s (highereducation students) perspective on utilizing emotional intelligence assessments, reflection andcoaching as a path to crossing the boundary between the need to develop both the technical andtransversal skills for achieving success in their professional career.Background With a call for engineering education to meet the evolving global and industry-focuseddemands of engineers, more research is needed to bridge the gap between what does industrydemand of its employees and leaders and what are the pedagogical approaches that supportbuilding that bridge within higher engineering education. Beder [6] states that
throughout theyear is critically reflective dialogue [9–10] within a safe and supportive environment thatsupports the whole community, including fellows and facilitators, to learn and grow. In additionto the nine CoP sessions, fellows are invited to participate during the fall in an InclusiveTeaching Program (CETL ITC) offered through our Center for Effective Teaching and Learning[11] and during the spring in the Howard Hughes Medical Institutes Inclusive Excellence &Equity Fellows Program (HHMI), which is based on the Center for Urban Education’s RacialEquity-Minded Series [12–13]. Figure 2: Eco-STEM Faculty Fellows Community of Practice StructureDuring the fall semester, the Eco-STEM Faculty Fellows CoP sessions include readings
identity development through engaging in reflective qualitativeresearch practices. While the student researchers were not the participants who provided the data,their engagement with the research team helped us incorporate a student view directly into ourwork as we made sense of our data, which we believe was beneficial and necessary.In this executive summary and poster, we report on the summer undergraduate researchexperience by detailing the undergraduate research associates (URAs) engagement with the data.We also provide a summary of our key takeaways highlighting the benefits to both the URAsthemselves and to the added quality of the data analysis because of the insight from the URAs.We end with a series of suggestions for researchers working
inclusion and diversity initiatives as well as employing innovative, ethical and inclusive mixed-methods research approaches to uncovering insights about the 21st century workforce. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Opportunities from Disruption -how lifelong learning can help create more connected classroomsAbstractThe coronavirus pandemic has led to instructors worldwide seeking ways to engage studentsbetter through virtual platforms. As the world interacts online, more than ever before, thispaper reflects on an educator’s experience with the virtual teaching and learning spaces pre andduring the ongoing
through meaningful reflection. The result is thatstudents gain more than just the experience of completing a design, but an enrichment andrealization of the methods and skills developed.I. IntroductionMany engineers contend that design is the heart of engineering. Traditional engineeringcurricula were based on the concept that a strong foundation in engineering sciences wouldnaturally lead to better designers. The curriculum would often contain some form of a capstonedesign experience where students would be given a design problem to resolve. The students mayor may not have been taught how to best approach the solution to the design problem. At the endof the allotted time period (a semester or some other number of weeks), the design project
through meaningful reflection. The result is thatstudents gain more than just the experience of completing a design, but an enrichment andrealization of the methods and skills developed.I. IntroductionMany engineers contend that design is the heart of engineering. Traditional engineeringcurricula were based on the concept that a strong foundation in engineering sciences wouldnaturally lead to better designers. The curriculum would often contain some form of a capstonedesign experience where students would be given a design problem to resolve. The students mayor may not have been taught how to best approach the solution to the design problem. At the endof the allotted time period (a semester or some other number of weeks), the design project
challenge is to find meaningful ways to engage freshman in analyzing ethicalchallenges.This presentation explains a collaborative approach to integrating an ethics module intoUniversity 101-Engineering (UNIV 101-E), a freshman course for engineering students at theUniversity of South Carolina patterned after USC’s nationally recognized Freshman YearExperience course, University 101. Sections of the engineering course described here include aclassroom instruction and discussion on the NSPE Code of Ethics and case studies whichstudents gather from specified websites. To support the classroom instruction, the courseinstructor and the director of the College of Engineering’s Professional Communications Centercollaborated in developing a reflective
ofengineering technology can be evaluated for technical merit, practical applicability, or any othercriterion of interest to the instructor or college.Along with achieving program goals for assessment of student learning, portfolios supportstudents in developing awareness of their strengths and weaknesses. In a good portfolioprogram, students collect their work, choose representative pieces, and reflect on this work in thefinal presentation of the portfolio. In this process they can address questions such as: Why was Isuccessful with this project? What makes a good design? How did I perform in group tasks?What else am I learning that builds on this information or skill? How can I change myperformance to better enable me to succeed?In 6 semesters of
learning objectives and compile evidence supporting assessment programming to maintain accreditation. Project Objective: Improve collection of data and evaluation of courses for program enrichment and accreditation assessment. Project Scope: The process being evaluated initiates with course offerings beginning in the fall semester and ends with a semester reflection and program review in the spring. Goal Statement: Develop methodology within the 12-16 weeks allotted that provides consistent data collection and evaluation of courses for program enrichment and accreditation assessment to reduce reactive measures taken to provide assessment documentation. Deliverables: Reflection Packet Template, Data Collection
cognitively but also in the affectivedomain, fostering students’ identity as engineers who have an entrepreneurial mindset. We presenttwo accounts of how story-driven learning and focused team development were integrated intodifferent courses and highlight how they can amplify the impacts of activities fostering curiosity,connections, and value creation (the 3Cs), which nurture entrepreneurial mindset. In one, thisresults in students who have more clarity regarding their own engineering identity and the uniqueperspectives their peers can contribute. In the other, students learned and applied principles ofeffective teaming and used stories to reflect on their experiences. Student reflections, individuallyand in teams, show augmented self-awareness
for making a difference in their community and world or personalagency. Personal agency is a capability that every individual holds; it is described by Bandura asan individual’s beliefs about their capabilities to exercise control over events that affect their livesthrough purposeful and reflective actions. Agentic actions allow students to explore, maneuverand impact their environment for the achievement of a goal or set of goals. This study identifieshow cognitive processes of forethought, intention, reactivity, and reflection shape a students’agentic behavior and together influence first-generation college students’ goal of making adifference in their community through their engineering degree.Data for this study came from a large-scale
cultural upbringing. The reaction to this realization can be emotionallydistressing, as noted, but it can also provide the opportunity for transformative learning, as it hasbeen described in the literature on adult education.Transformative learning occurs when students are able to reflect critically on the culturalassumptions, values, beliefs, and behaviors that guide their everyday activities. As Mezirow putit, it is: a rational process of learning within awareness as a metacognitive application of critical thinking that transforms an acquired frame of reference - a mind-set or worldview of orienting assumptions and expectations involving values, beliefs, and concepts - by assessing its epistemic
activities that can be used throughout various engineering andcomputer science courses from first year to upper division [5].As part of this project, the University of Denver (DU) has developed and implemented severalactivities, including a group-based hairdryer design task for second year thermodynamicsstudents. The pilot of the activity took place in spring of 2019 and this initial experience waspresented at ASEE in 2020 [6]. Since then, the activity has been run four times and iterated tohelp strengthen the goals of the activity and assess its effectiveness. Changes since the initialpilot have included options for remote courses, added reflection time, and a focus on overalldesign process instead of detailed mathematical questions. The current
undergraduate students over the years. Next, we will introduce and discuss the twoclasses (Freshman Engineering and Electromagnetism) where we deployed the method. We willalso highlight the students’ work and introduce their journeys by sharing their reflections andsome examples of their activities and challenges. The main question that we are trying to ask andfind evidence for is, "Can we re-engineer mistakes and use them as an important part of thelearning, changing, and adapting to the process, examinations, and growth of the students?” Wefound that providing low-stakes learning opportunities is impactful in encouraging collaborationsamong the students and allowing them to openly engage in their own identity, discuss, examinetheir knowledge and not
and its placement within the course structure.The 2019 reinforcement lesson provided a mid-semester opportunity for teams to revisit thescholarly and authoritative sources module from early in the semester. A short group writingassignment asked students to reflect on sources they had found and used thus far. It also providedan opportunity for faculty to remind students about related help materials in the course’s libraryresearch guide. The new mid-semester lesson was piloted in 6 course sections; deployed andgraded via Canvas, the university’s learning management system (LMS).A sampling of course faculty, both those who piloted the lesson and those who did not, wereinterviewed about their perceptions of the success of the pilot and the role
, affordances within a learning managementsystem (LMS) were used to highlight student learning outcomes, require foundational coursecontent to be completed before attempting more complex topics, provide mastery-orientedfeedback, allow students to track their progress, and promote metacognitive reflection. Thispaper describes the use of these options within the Canvas LMS. Additionally, this studyinvestigated whether student self-regulatory behaviors changed during the course. Students wereasked to complete a survey about their metacognitive self-regulatory activities related to studyingfor this course. The first survey was completed during the fifth week of the course, after moststudents had completed two reflection assignments. The same survey