AC 2011-1334: DEVELOPMENT AND ASSESSMENT OF AN ENGINEER-ING COURSE FOR IN-SERVICE AND PRE-SERVICE K-12 TEACHERSAnnMarie Thomas, University of Saint Thomas AnnMarie Thomas is an assistant professor of Engineering at the University of St. Thomas, and co- director of the UST Center for Pre-Collegiate Engineering Education. Her teaching and research focus on Engineering Design and K-12 Engineering Education. Prior to her appointment at UST, she was a faculty member at Art Center College of Design.Jan B. Hansen, Ph.D., University of Saint Thomas Jan B. Hansen is co-director of the Center for Pre-Collegiate Engineering Education at the University of St. Thomas. Her current interests as an educational psychologist focus on
other western countries. Curriculum reformis recommended to improve recruitment and retention of students from all of these groups too.What is an inclusive curriculum?Early approaches to teaching diverse students aimed to ensure that ‘different’ students wereincluded, as opposed to excluded, in lectures and laboratories, giving rise to the term ‘inclusive’teaching. Faculty were urged to examine their teaching practices and to ensure that in theassumptions they made about students’ backgrounds, in the examples and metaphors they used,and in the attention they gave to individual students, they were not excluding those students whocame from cultures which differed from the dominant culture represented in the class (usuallyyoung, white and male
the Director of Accreditation and Assessment Services for the College of Technology at the University of Houston. His primary focus has been the practical application of assessment and evaluation strategies to enhance educational quality in the college and university. Prior to joining the University of Houston, Dr. Ramos worked as a researcher for the Southwest Educational Development Laboratory, evaluating a systemic reform model designed to improve student academic performance in low-income, high-minority districts. He also worked as Evaluator for Boston Connects, a program designed to address non-academic barriers to success in urban elementary schools via a web of coordinated health and
-management Certificate, Pan American University at Edinburg, TX 1975 Teaching Certification, Pan American University at Edinburg, TX Appointments 09/2018-present RET Master Teacher Coordinator; Special Projects, The University of Texas at Austin; Cockrell School of Engineering, NASCENT Education Research Center 11/1/12-2018 Evaluator, Chemical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin Cockrell School of Engineering, NASCENT Education Research Center 09/1/11-present External evaluator, Chemical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin Sustainable Grid Integration of Distributed and Renewable Resources (IGERT) 09/2003-08/2005 Principal Investigator, College of Natural Sciences, The University of Texas at
, and has led an NSF supported effort to integrate Mathematica laboratory sessions intothe freshman calculus sequence at Wright State University.KULDIP S. RATTAN is a Professor in the Department of Electrical Engineering at Wright State University. Hereceived his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Kentucky in 1975. Professor Rattan conductsresearch in the area of electrical control systems, and is active in engineering education reform. He has been therecipient of the CECS Excellence in Teaching Award at Wright State University in both 1985 and 1992, and of theCECS Excellence in Service Award in 1991, 1996 and 2003.MICHAEL L. RAYMER is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Computer Science & Engineering at
Session 2793 Using Rubrics to Facilitate Students’ Development of Problem Solving Skills Kevin P. Saunders1, Charles E. Glatz2, Mary E. Huba1, Maureen H. Griffin 3, Surya K. Mallapragada2, and Jacqueline V. Shanks2 1 Iowa State University Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies/ 2Iowa State University Department of Chemical Engineering/ 3 Des Moines East High SchoolAbstract We developed a series of problem-based laboratories in chemical engineering
Paper ID #9644Use of a CPLD in an Introductory Logic Circuits Course with Software andHardware UpgradeDr. Ying Yu, University of Hartford Dr. Ying Yu received her B.Eng. from Fudan University, Shanghai, China, in 2000. She received her M.Eng. and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from Brown University, R.I., USA, in 2003 and 2007, re- spectively. Since 2008, she has been teaching as an assistant professor of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at University of Hartford. Her current research interests are audio and speech signal processing, acoustic scene classification, speaker identification and
process, butoftentimes engineering technology students have few opportunities to develop their skills in thisarea as they matriculate through their chosen degree program. Many programs require only oneor two writing courses outside of the major. In addition, courses that require communication inthe form of laboratory reports often provide minimal feedback regarding appropriate writingstyle, the effective support of results with analysis, and maintaining efficiency in writing.In this paper, a new approach is presented that unburdens some of the responsibility from theinstructor to peer tutors outside of the engineering technology major who are skilled writers.Although this effort has been ongoing, with engineering technology students required to
surveying students requires an extensive number oflaboratories (indoor and outdoor). Outdoor laboratories are used to develop skills with surveyinginstruments, teach field techniques, and reinforce concepts taught in lectures. Instructors use aconsiderable portion of the allotted time to provide an overview of the lab, which reduces thetime students can spend in the field conducting the lab. Due to the spatial nature of the tasks, it isoften difficult for students to visualize the steps to complete the labs. As a result, students areoften underprepared for the activities. In outdoor labs students move from one location toanother to collect data related to each task. During the lab students frequently have questions, butit is difficult for the
. She has extensive experience researching biofilm bacteria in industrial systems. Currently, Dr. Goeres leads the Standardized Biofilm Methods Laboratory at the Center for Biofilm Engineering. The mission of this laboratory is the development and validation of quantitative standard methods for growing, treating, sampling and analyzing biofilm bacteria. Her goal is to promote collaboration among the various entities interested in biofilm methods.Diane Walker, Montana State University Diane Walker is a Research Engineer with the Center for Biofilm Engineering (CBE) at Montana State University. One of her responsibilities is to mentor student interns within the Standardized Biofilm Methods
2004-05 academic year.Overview of Scientific Work Experience Programs for Teachers There are two common terms, SWEPT and RET, that describe professional developmentopportunities for teachers that place them in 4 – 8 week summer internships or fellowships inresearch laboratories and/or in corporate settings. According to the Triangle Coalition forScience and Technology Education, Scientific Work Experience Programs for Teachers(SWEPTs) are summer programs in which elementary and secondary science and math teacherswork with scientists or engineers to do supervised, paid work in areas that are relevant tosubjects that they teach. The Triangle Coalition asserts that “SWEPTs provide industry, labor,government, higher education, alliances
Christine E. Hailey is a Professor and Senior Associate Dean in the College of Engineering at Utah State University. She is Director of the National Center for Engineering and Technology Education, an NSF-funded Center for Learning and Teaching. She is a member of the ADVANCE-US team, an NSF-funded program to address issues that impact female faculty's effectiveness and satisfaction in the four engineering and science colleges at Utah State.Daniel Householder, Utah State University Daniel L. Householder is Co-Principal Investigator of the National Center for Engineering and Technology Education and holds visiting professorships in the College of Engineering at Utah State University and the
Paper ID #19389Assessment of physics course outcomes, general education outcomes, andABET course outcomes of engineering majors, technology majors, and healthsciences majors at a community collegeDr. Raul Armendariz, Queensborough Community College Assistant professor of physics at the Queensborough Community CollegeProf. Tak Cheung Tak Cheung, Ph.D., professor of physics, teaches in CUNY Queensborough Community College. He also conducts research and mentors student research projects.Dr. Charles Neuman, Queensborough Community College, CUNY c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Assessment of
andmathematical concepts of modeling physical systems, it is much more difficult to give students anunderstanding of the artful aspects of the modeling process outlined above. In this paper wedescribe a series of laboratory and homework exercises designed to help students hone these skills,discuss how to assess their performance on the exercises and share the results of student opinionsurveys.1 IntroductionIn the Systems Engineering Department at the United States Naval Academy all students arerequired to take a junior level course on mathematical modeling. During their senior year allstudents in the department form teams of two or three to design and build a device. Many of theseprojects contain some type of basic automatic control system. Most
from highschool to community college to university. Participating companies play an important rolein defining competency gaps, developing case studies, placing students in internships, anddeveloping state of the art laboratories. Competency gaps serve as a driver to curriculumdevelopment. One objective of the program has been to enhance diversity and encourageunderrepresented minorities to pursue careers in engineering by presenting them with aseamless pathway early on in their education process. The paper will also provide answersto such questions as: How to develop a stable pipeline of students? What is the role ofindustry in program development? What are the significant achievements of the 2+2+2program after three years of implementation
curriculum, using • Preplanned field exercises in laboratory components of select courses and modules in Freshman and Sophomore Engineering Clinics, and • Open-ended field exercises as part of Junior and Senior Engineering Clinics.Faculty from Civil, Chemical, and Electrical Engineering are involved in this project. Fieldequipment purchased for the project is used to obtain water, air, and soil/sediment samples,measure fundamental soil/sediment, water and atmospheric parameters in the field, and survey /map field sites. Activities supported by the requested equipment are both preplanned and open-ended. In preplanned activities, students complete specific tasks similar to traditional laboratoryexercises, except the activities are
students under the remote leaning environment as aresponse to the COVID-19 pandemic. The MMTK has also shown its potential to be ameaningful teaching and learning tool more broadly in undergraduate engineering education.With some future development work, the MMTK can be implemented in other courses includingintroduction to materials science and hands-on mechatronics courses.References [1] L. Feisel and A. Rosa, "The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education", Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 121-130, 2005. [2] J. Ma and J. Nickerson, "Hands-On, Simulated, and Remote Laboratories: A Comparative Literature Review", ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 38, no. 3, 2006. [3] C. A. Jara, F. A. Candelas
(teaching on the web). Theremaining 35% should be F2F, including laboratories, seminars, and exams.5.3 Topic 3One important consideration for designing a course for a BL offering is the collaboration ofstudents. Various benefits can be ascribed to group collaboration. The students working as agroup usually achieve better results than those working individually, because groupdiscussion helps reinforce concepts qualitatively and/or quantitatively. In addition, sincegroup members coordinate their activities, they achieve better results and acquire a widerknowledge than those working individually. Multiple perspectives allow: ≠ Less knowledgeable group members to learn from more knowledgeable ones. ≠ More emphasis on the individual member
thatcomplement traditional teaching methods. Course and laboratory development are discussed,and project selection and management is emphasized. This analysis was done to predict theeffectiveness of project-based instruction for programs related to power generation, ingeneral, and to renewable energy, in particular.Two different courses were examined and their course learning outcomes compared to theexpected, statistically predicted outcome. Both courses were structured as lecture-lab-project,where the laboratory experiments were sufficient in number and complexity to consolidatethe topics addressed during lectures, while the projects selected were intended to coversufficient number of topics addressed through the first half of the course, as the
Paper ID #25316Using More Frequent and Formative Assessment When Replicating the WrightState Model for Engineering Mathematics EducationDr. Leroy L. Long III, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Dr. Leroy L. Long III is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Fundamentals at Embry-Riddle Aeronau- tical University in Daytona Beach, FL. He earned his PhD in STEM Education with a focus on Engineer- ing Education within the Department of Teaching and Learning at The Ohio State University (OSU). He earned his Master’s in Mechanical Engineering at OSU and his Bachelors in Mechanical Engineering at Wright State University. Dr
Paper ID #18454Development of the Engineering Learning Classroom Observation Tool (EL-COT)Ms. Timeri K. Tolnay, Colorado School of Mines Timeri joined Mines in November of 2015 to support the growth and Development of the Trefny Innova- tive Instruction (I) Center, and to bring her extensive background in instructional coaching to the college level. Prior to joining Mines, Timeri worked for a nationally recognized online Learning and Assessment System called ShowEvidence where she supported educational institutions in transferring their teaching, learning, and assessment practices online to create greater coherence
Session 2475 Outreach Scholarship: A Valuable Key to Promotion and Tenure David S. Cottrell Pennsylvania State University at Harrisburg1. Introduction Teaching, research, and service – these three words traditionally encompass thefunctional mission of the college professor. But as the 21 st Century dawned, manyuniversities have awakened to a call to reconnect to those who benefit substantially fromour scholastic activities – our constituents. The Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology (ABET) echoes this realization with newly revised accreditation criteriarequiring program goals to
widely-adopted technology trend, there is a significant need to address thetechnical skills of the emerging workforce and improve their quality of training especially in thefield of additive manufacturing. As 21st century industries transition to globally interconnectedconglomerates (Industry 4.0), the training programs also need to evolve to provide the high-techskills required3. This portrays a need for innovative focused advanced engineering trainingtechniques that can increase the pool of highly skilled American workers with requiredproficiency. However, the main implication of teaching emerging technologies in academiapertains to not many institutions (both schools and colleges) continually being able to afford andprocure the required
deliver sufficient performance due to network delays.The study by our colleagues1 is closely related to the teaching style presented in thispaper. They offered two parallel sessions, one using traditional lectures and the otherusing streaming video and “direct problem solving” in laboratory. The comparison wasconducted on a sophomore-level course on digital systems and a junior-level course onmicrocontroller. They discovered no significant difference in students’ performance butstudents strongly preferred the new teaching style.Our work differs from previous studies in the following ways. First, all students are oncampus and this course is not distance learning2. In fact, students are encouraged to usecampus computers to watch the videos with a
AC 2012-5153: MEASURING THE DIFFERENCES IN SPATIAL ABILITYBETWEEN A FACE-TO-FACE AND A SYNCHRONOUS DISTANCE ED-UCATION UNDERGRADUATE ENGINEERING GRAPHICS COURSEDr. Wade H. Goodridge, Utah State University Wade Goodridge, Principal Lecturer in the Department of Engineering and Technology Education at Utah State University, instructs Solid Modeling, CAD, Introductory Electronics, Surveying, and Introductory Engineering courses at the Brigham City Regional campus. Goodridge has has been teaching for the Utah State College of Engineering for more than eight years. He holds dual B.S degrees in industrial technology education and civil engineering from Utah State University, as well as an M.S. and Ph.D. in civil
communications circuits and virtual environments is difficultbecause of the rapidly changing underlying technologies and the breadth of necessary multi-disciplinary understanding. Researchers tend to become ‘delta functions of excellence’ withoutsignificant collaboration with others, especially in different fields. This cultural divide isinvariably carried into the classroom, where courses and laboratories are only rarely coordinatedin a way that will maximize their impact on student understanding and ultimately careeropportunities. By providing a framework for both faculty and students to expand theireducational and research horizons in an area of critical national need it is hoped that everyone,students and faculty alike, will significantly benefit
Ohio State University in 1994 and 1997, respectively. He teaches both undergraduate and graduate courses related to mechanisms and machine dynamics, integrated product development, solid mechanics and plasticity theory, structural design and analysis, engineering analysis and finite element methods and has interests in remote laboratories, project-based learning and student learning assessment. His research is in the areas of remote sensing and control with applications to remote experimentation as well as modeling of microstructure changes in metal forming processes. He publishes regularly in peer-reviewed conference proceedings and scientific journals. At the 2006 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition in Chicago
Technologies Office, where he managed multiple interna- tional research programs and provided strategic analysis to guide R&D strategy. He also has an ongoing collaborative appointment with the Strategic Energy Analysis Center at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Using campus energy system data to save energy and provide students with real-world learning experiencesAbstractA variety of engineering classes teach students how to analyze thermodynamic systems or evenprovide students with training on simplified lab models of real systems. However, relatively fewcourses provide students with exposure to actual thermodynamic
interest and letters of support from their college’s dean anddepartment chair to the Assistant Director of Residential Education. Candidates are interviewedto determine optimal fit with their intended community’s curricular component and within aresidence hall system where relationship building is a critical element of the position. Serving asFiR is considered part of the faculty’s teaching workload and faculty receive course release forone semester during each year of service in this capacity.Membership in a RC community incurs no additional cost to the students beyond that of theirUniversity Housing contract. The University, as a whole, has made a commitment to the successof our living-learning communities by pledging financial and in-kind
laboratory explorations and adesign project that were designed to expose students to different disciplines and teach technicalcommunication skills. These one-day laboratory experiences and multi-day design project werenot designed with EML in mind, however, as the university incorporates EML into itscurriculum, how well these labs already incorporate these principles is of interest. Therefore, thispaper will investigate: How much EML is already incorporated into the laboratory and designproject curriculum and which areas of EML do each exploration lack? To investigate this task,each lab was coded against an EML curriculum objective matrix that was developed to designand evaluate EML curriculum. This facilitated quantification as to how well each