completedprojects alone. Both courses are part of the core computer science curriculum for all computerscience majors and minors, and are considered gateway courses to specialized upper levelcourses.In our results, we observed an association between student partnerships and increased projectperformance during the same semester, confirming the observations of prior work. Whenexamining student performance in the following course (CS3), our largest statistically significantresult was for students in the lowest GPA quartile: those who had partnered in CS2 wereassociated with improved project scores in CS3, where they all worked alone.1 Introduction and Related WorkPair programming is a software development technique where two programmers work together atone
section. Using the submitted reports and surveys, the researchersassessed performance ratings from students to attempt to answer the research questions outlinedabove.Conduct of the Laboratory SectionsThe 19-student class was broken into three sections. The two students involved in developing themodule participated in different sections, but did not take the assessment survey and are notincluded in the results.For the two in-lab sections, the laboratory period began with an orientation to the topic andreview of the laboratory handout (see Appendix) and procedure. The following learningobjectives were used to structure the delivery and evaluate learning:1. Identify the natural frequency and period of a freely vibrating single degree-of-freedom
Seminar Seriesb c d Figure 1. Flyer and brochures from the first four years of the Seminar Series. (a) 2012- 2013 was a simple word document flyer, (b) 2013-2014 had an image of DNA generated by a faculty member and student, (c) 2014-2015 was a purchased image, (d) 2015-2016 was illustrated by an art professor at the University who will oversee future covers created by students and faculty.supportive climate, enhancing promotion and leadership, and increasing retention of womenfaculty in STEM. Support for a seminar series that would increase faculties’ networkingopportunities and allow a young female to take on a leadership role in the organization of theseries was in
success course focus on MATLAB programming. The transfer successcourse has been taught for the last four years by the same faculty member who teaches the materialand energy balance course. This paper will describe the success course structure, content andassessment. In addition, the graduation and retention rates will be presented for transfer studentswho have and have not taken the success course.Introduction Engineering and computing professionals are an essential ingredient for securing ournation’s future economic success (1-4). The availability of a diverse, highly skilled, and well-educated technology workforce is a must for meeting workforce demands and for solving thecomplex social, environmental, health, and security challenges of
engineering as a major for women. They werenot a significant influence for male students. The result did not depend on the profession orqualification of the parents. We argue that these findings demonstrates that women still needmore support and acceptance than men to choose engineering as a career and they need this inaddition to their own intrinsic interest in the field. Implications of these findings for practice willbe discussed.IntroductionDespite the preponderance of women in bioscience, chemistry and medicine, engineering isstagnant or losing ground in the proportion of women majors.1 According to the NSF, Bachelor’sdegrees awarded by sex and field were flat at approximately 50% women for all of science &engineering from 2002-2012 but
predictor of retention in STEM.1, 2 Analysis of ourtransfer students in fall 2011 showed that approximately 60% of transfer students in engineering,computer science or mathematics entered at the Calculus level or lower. Based on this data andprior work, the programming for this grant was designed to include an initial focus on mathreview and support.To facilitate individual, independent review of mathematics at pre-calculus levels and below, wepromoted the ALEKS online mathematics review program during transfer orientation. Theprogram was made available to students at no charge through the Idaho NSF STEP program(2010-2015).3,4 During this same time, significant pedagogical improvements were underway inCalculus I funded through two other grants (NSF
done biomedical research during post doctorate research positions at the Uni- versity of Michigan (Ann Arbor, MI), Tohoku University (Sendai, Japan), and Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN). He has taught classes for and been an advisor on capstone senior design projects for Wentworth students in the programs of electrical engineering, computer engineering, electromechanical engineering, and biomedical engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Project-based Learning for Electrical Engineering Lower Level CoursesAbstract:Project-based learning (PBL) is applied as an attempt to increase both understanding and senseof inspiration for a field. PBL works to integrate and apply 1
within a team16. Guest members to thegroup are viewed as less similar to the rest of the core team and this affects the receptivity theyreceive when inputting ideas from the core members12 21. This level of ostracism to non-prototypical members, or guest members, can severely inhibit future contributions by decreasingmember’s sense of belongingness and motivation22. If no superordinate identity can be foundbetween guest members and core members then evidence shows core members are unlikely toaccept the guest members contributions23 thus limiting successful behavioural integration. Hypothesis 1: Over time, a strong social identity will have a negative effect on individual’s perceptions of behavioural integration.Perceptions of
summarized in Figure 1.Week 1The semester begins with a teamwork icebreaker activity on Day 1; students reflect on the bestteam they’ve ever been a part of and share with the class why it was such a good team. Duringthe discussion good teamwork characteristics are added to the white board. This activity sets thetone for the teamwork expectations for the coming term. After the icebreaker activity theinstructor introduces students to new topics through the National Academy of Engineering GrandChallenges. It is then revealed to the students that they will be tasked with working in teams to Page 26.915.3research one of the challenges and prepare a 10
classrooms and labs of dozens of New York City public schools. He received NYU- SoE’s 2002, 2008, 2011, and 2014 Jacobs Excellence in Education Award, 2002 Jacobs Innovation Grant, 2003 Distinguished Teacher Award, and 2012 Inaugural Distinguished Award for Excellence in the cate- gory Inspiration through Leadership. Moreover, he is a recipient of 2014-2015 University Distinguished Teaching Award at NYU. In 2004, he was selected for a three-year term as a Senior Faculty Fellow of NYU-SoE’s Othmer Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies. His scholarly activities have included 3 edited books, 7 chapters in edited books, 1 book review, 55 journal articles, and 109 conference papers. He has mentored 1 B.S., 16 M.S., and 4
construction education to take ondifferent roles, experience a project from different perspectives, and share their expertise withtheir peers.The teams in the C4P laboratory currently design, coordinate and construct an 8 foot by 8 footmockup of a commercial building that includes concrete foundations, formwork, light gaugemetal framing, waterproofing and flashing systems, masonry, acoustical ceilings and drywall.Additionally, each mockup includes basic electrical, lighting, plumbing, and ventilation systems(see Figure 1). Page 26.982.3Figure 1: Revit rendering of integrated lab moduleSix independent groups act as design/build ‘companies’ each semester
Science at Wright State University. He is the lead PI for Wright State’s National Model for Engineering Mathematics Education, which has been supported by both NSF STEP Type 1 and CCLI Phase 3 awards. He has received numerous awards for his work in engineering education, and was named the 2005 Ohio Professor of the Year by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching and Council for Advancement and Support of Education (CASE).Dr. Frank W. Ciarallo, Wright State University Page 26.1142.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Measuring the impact of a mathematics
of $600,000 each, were Page 26.1543.2received in succession. The first one, DUE-0728485, covered the period 2007-2013 (including ano-cost extension); we will refer to this as Grant #1. The second one, DUE-0965783, coveredthe period 2010-2013; we will refer to this as Grant #2. The vast majority of funds in both grantswere allocated to student scholarships, with roughly 10% allocated to administrative and studentsupport services, as required by NSF guidelines. These administrative and support funds wereused to fund many of the program activities described below.Populations. The program participants, referred to as S-STEM Scholars, were
-weekassignment included a preliminary assessment, a group research project, an evaluation of teammembers, and a follow-up assessment to determine whether the project had changed any studentattitudes. The paper discusses specifics of the reasons for the PBL approach, a brief descriptionof the characteristics of Problem Based Learning, details of the multi-part assignment, resultsfrom the Spring 2014 class, and proposed refinements for future iterations.The Problem of Under-RepresentationMany studies have been performed by a variety of researchers trying to understand the factorsthat affect the lack of representation of women in science, technology, engineering, andmathematics (STEM) fields. The complex and somewhat convoluted diagram in Figure 1, from
students do not need to study the underlying theory before class to understandthe algorithms. This methodology is aimed to explode the abilities of those with kinestheticlearning (others with a preference for other style of learning can make use of the videos,textbook, or the instructor’s lecture notes).3 It has the beneficial side effect of lettingstudents to socialize with their fellows by requiring them to get in touch and talk to eachother, and giving them the opportunity to learn their fellow’s names. It also avoids studentsto fall asleep in class, since they have to stand up and move to specific positions during thesimulations. Even though similar proposals exist in the literature,5, 6, 1, 4 some of them are nottailored to courses in data
directly from high school to mature, part-time commuterlearners with careers. This paper presents the approaches taken to develop this course fromexisting learning objectives for delivery in two very different settings, to diverse learners inmechanical engineering technology. Learning outcomes resulting from lecture and laboratoryinnovations are considered.IntroductionFrom the inception of baccalaureate engineering technology programs, faculty have struggled tofind the right balance between technical, professional, and general education in their four-yearcurricula.1 Implementation of legislated limits on credit hour requirements beginning in the1990s adds a further curricular constraint.2,3. Effective in 2013 in Indiana, baccalaureate degreecredit
been applied to less structuredenvironments due to advances in technology [1].To introduce industrial robotics we decided to use the Open Source Robotics Operating System (ROS)and Moveit software [2]. In previous work we developed labs using ROS and Moveit to teach basicKinematic concepts in robotics [3]. The previous work only used simulated robot arms to teachconcepts in robotics. The obvious next step for us was to add a real robot arm to the lab configuration.We have worked with well over a hundred students at the high school level and a small number at thecollege level successfully building robot arms similar to the one shown in this paper. The robot armused RC servo motors to drive the robot arm joints. The robot arm was controlled in
autogenerates successively harder problems for a student to solve. Scores per student are reported to the instructor. Figure 1: Boolean algebra tool. (a) User prompted to select a property. Goal and initial equation shown. (b) User selects terms. (c) Continue applying properties to reach goal. Combinational circuits A student next learns how logic gates that implement Boolean algebra's operations of AND, OR, and NOT can be connected as combinational circuits to implement
knowledge about how the prototypes worked. His reflections onteaching emphasized classroom management and how to model design process steps.Our findings have implications for incorporating engineering experiences into work with noviceteachers. Teacher educators should consider supporting the framing of design as a knowledgebuilding enterprise through explicit conversations about epistemology, apprenticeship in sense-making strategies, and tasks intentionally designed to encourage “figuring things out.”IntroductionThe inclusion of engineering design at all grade levels in the Next Generation Science Standardsnecessitates efforts to create learning opportunities for teachers to learn to teach engineering 1.The NGSS call for the “integration of
are madeusing Adobe Flash animations, videos, text, and audio. The software consists of five majormodules, the modules in turn contain sub-modules comprising of ‘slides’ which could beanimations, videos or text with/without audio. Each slide was made with a simplistic and creativeapproach making it easy for the student to understand the concepts, while ensuring scientificaccuracy at the same time.The five major modules are: (i) Introduction, (ii) Applications, (iii) Fuel cell systems, (iv) Celllevel, and (v) Fuel cell science. The design concerning the development of the modules wasdiscussed in depth in the 2015 ASEE paper15. Figure 1 captures the main interface of thesoftware and also stills from some of the animations. The user interface is
most important professional development course for anengineering student which combines project-based learning and the real-world practice of a formalengineering design process. Early efforts in the past as well as currently ongoing have emphasizedon improving the overall capstone experience for students as well as the enhanced engagement bydesign instructors. Banios [1] outlines a capstone design course following closely real-worldengineering practices. The paper summarizes a two semester capstone design curriculum makingstudents work as part of teams to design projects first at a proposals stage and then follow it in thesecond semester with a pilot model realization. An important mention in this work is that the teamstructure applied to
investigations will include parent-boy dyads forcomparison, but was not collected at this time.Dyads consisting of a parent with their daughter (aged 3-5 years) were video-recordedwhile engaged in two different engineering tasks: building a tower out of familiarmaterials and constructing a second tower out of unfamiliar materials (Figure 1). In thepreliminary phase, participants (n = 25) were asked to build a tower with a specified goal(i.e. to a specific height), whereas participants in the follow-up phase (n = 25) were giventhe same directions though infused with a social context (i.e. building for someone, for aspecified purpose) (Table 1). Within the preliminary phase there was a limited contextbelayed to the participants, allowing the problem to be
ofretention in the major by 2.3 times compared to first-year students from prior years, while non-participation lowered the odds of retention by 1.35 times.IntroductionIn 2011, President Obama called for U.S. engineering schools to graduate an additional 10,000engineering students every year.1 One impetus for making this appeal, as explained by the JobsCouncil, was that engineers drive innovation, creating jobs for skilled and unskilled workersalike.2 In short: more engineers can drive economic recovery, and by extension, stability. Inresponse to the appeal, many engineering school deans recognized that one solution was toimprove the retention rate of engineering students,3 specifically first-year retention, which at thetime was reported to be around
with a reason to be searching the city for a key, and it is essential to creating a successfulKey Clue. Alongside the theme is a storyline that guides the teams through the week. Pastthemes / storylines have included a pirate seeking a lost treasure, a murder investigation thatinvolved a missing key and a film noir-style private-eye searching for a lost object. Studentteams must not only solve the difficult ciphers, but also understand their meaning within thecontext of the story.Final Solve. Every clue and activity throughout the six day event culminates in leading the teamsto a very specific location within the Calgary city limits. Ultimately, the final solve must include: 1. Deliberate culmination of all the week’s clues: Organizing all
University. Dr. von der Embse utilizes a social justice framework to examine the intersection of education policy and school mental health. His research is focused in three primary areas including: (1) an examination of teacher stress and student test anxiety surrounding high-stakes exams, (2) the creation and validation of internalizing behavior and socio-emotional wellness screening assessments, and (3) the training of teachers and schools in population-based assessment methods (e.g., universal mental health screening, Mental Health First Aid) to inform tiered and targeted intervention.Dr. Zachary J Domire, East Carolina University Zachary Domire completed his B.S. (Honors), M.S., and Ph.D. in Kinesiology at The
main activities: (1) hands-on, museum-style exhibits anddemonstrations in the engineering building, (2) small group sessions facilitated byundergraduates with discussion and hands-on activities, (3) a concert where all 350 fifthgraders accompanied the artists-in-residence on custom instruments designed and built byundergraduates for the performance of a classical music work composed by the artistsspecifically for this educational event.IntroductionFifth grade academic standards for music in Indiana call for an understanding of the“relationships between music, the other arts, and disciplines outside the arts,” specificallyciting examples in mathematics. Neither the standards for mathematics nor science (thestate does not have fifth grade
is much easier toimplement, manage and assess programs at the collegiate level. Several research studies however havealso suggested that the best predictor of academic success at the college level is the rigor of academicinstruction at the K-12 level [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. Unfortunately, under-represented minorities in STEM,particularly those from low income households, are more likely to be in programs with insufficientacademic rigor [2, 5, 6, 7].Universities and colleges, partially in response to these studies, have also introduced programs at the pre-college level, designed to enhance STEM success among under-represented minorities and low incomestudents. Hill [8] described a program applied to Detroit area schools in 1976 which included
University of Pittsburgh at JohnstownAbstractThe goal of this paper is to discuss efforts to engage and inspire engineering students by addingentrepreneurial course content and creating relevant extra-programmatic opportunities. Threeprimary mechanisms discussed in this paper include 1) entrepreneurship-specific coursemodifications to both a first-year engineering course and to a second-year engineering designcourse (including collaboration with business faculty and students), 2) creation ofentrepreneurially-relevant extracurricular clubs, activities, and events for students on campus and3) introduction to extra-university interaction opportunities for engineering students interested inentrepreneurship with both the private sector and with students
influence from European organizations. Anumber of countries within the ASEAN now have institutions with academic programsaccredited by AUN-QA.1, 2This paper provides a partial review of the similarities and differences of accreditation asimplemented by ASEAN University Network (AUN-QA) and ABET Inc. The philosophicaldifferences of ABET and AUN-QA accreditation, including constituency involvement, will beidentified as well as the similarities and differences between ABET's assessment and evaluationrequirements and the AUN-QA model for program accreditation. The authors have not seen asimilar analysis published in the engineering education literature.Discussion of some similarities and differences of AUN-QA and ABET accreditation ispresented from
focusedon supporting specific transition and action processes. Transition processes relate to preparationfor work accomplishment whereas action processes involve the actual execution of the task. Theintervention was designed to provide support for key transition and action processes that areknown to drive team effectiveness. Definitions of the types of action and transition processesfrom the team literature and the associated scaffolds used as part of the intervention evaluated inthis study are presented in Table 1. The last column in the table indicates the specific element ofthe intervention that was designed and utilized to support each team process. The scaffoldsincluded cognitive tasks such as an activity focused on the development of shared