. His work has been published through the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and the Institute for Electrical and Electronics Engineering (IEEE); he is an active member of both organizations. He holds a PhD and BS in Electrical Engineering from the University of Kentucky. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Paper ID #42797Dr. B ”Grant” Grant Crawford P.E., Quinnipiac University Grant Crawford, PhD, P.E., F.ASEE, Colonel (retired) U.S. Army, is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering for the School of Computing and Engineering at Quinnipiac University. He is a former Director of
University of Maryland, College Park. He joined the university in 2017 as an assistant clinical professor and research educator for the Designing Innovation Research Stream, where he advises first-year and sophomore students on design research methodologies. Dr. Fazelpour developed two project-based courses aimed at teaching students design and design research. In 2018, he transitioned to the Department of Mechanical Engineering to teach design-related courses, including computer-aided design and machine design. Additionally, he introduced a new course focused on design for manufacturing and assembly. Dr. Fazelpour’s active engagement in professional organizations includes membership in ASME and ASEE. He has held various
andhow the industry, the type of company, and other participants’ demographics might affect thefrequency and types of ethics and equity issues the engineers face in their practice.References 1. Chintam, K., & Prybutok, A. N., & Archuleta, C. M., & Deberghes, A., & DiBiase, B., & Li, R., & Richards, J., & Seitz, L., & Cole, J. (2023, June), Designing, codifying, and implementing social justice content in a required course on engineering and research skills for first-year graduate students. Paper presented at 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore, Maryland. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--43005 2. Shields, B. (2022). Justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion curriculum within
and R. W. Lent, Eds. John Wiley & Sons, 2005, pp. 42–69.[7] M. L. Savickas, “Career construction theory and practice,” in Career Development and Counseling: Putting Theory and Research to Work, 2nd ed., D. Brown and R. W. Lent, Eds. 2013, pp. 147–183.[8] C. A. Pantoja, “How and why women leave engineering careers: Toward an integrated framework of counseling and organizational psychology career theories,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Conference Proceedings, online, Jun. 2021[9] J. H. Kim, Understanding Narrative Inquiry: The Crafting and Analysis of Stories as Research. Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage Publications, 2016.[10] J. Cruz, and N. Kellam,” Beginning an engineer’s journey: A narrative
analysis on the value of oral exams as early diagnostic tool (Kim et al., ASEE 2022). Minju is interested in designing assessments that can capture and motivate students’ deep conceptual learning, such as oral exams and the usage of visual representations (e.g., diagrams and manual gestures).Dr. Carolyn L Sandoval, University of California, San Diego Dr. Sandoval is the Associate Director of the Teaching + Learning Commons at the University of Cali- fornia, San Diego. She earned a PhD in Adult Education-Human Resource Development. Her research interests include adult learning and development, faculty deZongnan Wang, University of California, San Diego Zongnan is currently a 2nd-year undergraduate student with a major in
how utilizing coursework during the firstyear and during the final year to introduce engineering leadership competencies supportsstudents’ understanding of the value of those competencies. Drawing on data from a survey andfocus groups, we consider the following questions: ● Upon completion of either course, are students better able to identify and communicate the value of specific leadership competencies necessary for success in an engineering career? ● Upon completion of both courses, are students able to identify and make meaning of the connection between the courses? ● What barriers do students perceive in developing professional competencies?Competency Development & Alignment with Leadership DevelopmentIn 2019, the
Paper ID #25219Beyond Likert Scales: Exploring Designers’ Perceptions through Visual Re-flection ActivitiesDr. Kathryn W. Jablokow, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Kathryn Jablokow is a Professor of Engineering Design and Mechanical Engineering at Penn State University. A graduate of Ohio State University (Ph.D., Electrical Engineering), Dr. Jablokow’s cur- rent teaching and research interests include design cognition, high performance teams, creativity in sci- ence/engineering, and mobile robotics. In addition to her membership in ASEE, she is a Senior Member of IEEE and a Fellow of ASME.Aditya Vora, Pennsylvania State
level and the literary history of science and technology. She has served twice as the chair of the Liberal Education/Engineering and Society (LEES) Division of ASEE and received that division's Olmsted Award for outstanding contributions to liberal education for engineers. Her current research projects focus on humanistic education for engineers as a system that transcends particular courses and institutions; the interdependence of ethics, communication, and STS in engineering; and establishing a collective identity for the diverse community engaged in teaching and researching engineering communication.Sofia Zajec Sofia Zajec is a rising fourth-year student at the University of Virginia majoring in systems
transformative worldviews, which "holdsthat research inquiry needs to be intertwined with politics and a political change agenda toconfront social oppression at whatever levels it occurs" [16, p. 9]. The authors acknowledge thepotential detrimental effects that oppressive forms of communication can have on the subsequentdecisions and actions of marginalized and minoritized students in disciplines like, but not limitedto, engineering.Research Question: The research question that drove this study is: What are the emotions expressed bystudents about who should and shouldn’t become and belong in engineering and how are theyconnecting these to active or passive HC experiences?Research Design and Instrument: Between 2018 and 2019, a mixed-method
on-line communications, which aredistributed to the organization’s approximately 1,800 two-year college members, have routinelyincluded NSF ATE and Mentor-Connect program information along with success stories andhuman-interest articles to attract participants. A key factor in the success of this strategy has beencontracting with a professional writer who has in-depth knowledge of the NSF ATE Programalong with an existing working relationship with AACC for submission of articles for potentialpublication by the organization. In-person outreach augments print and online informationdissemination. Project personnel regularly speak at annual conferences that attract STEMfaculty; e.g., American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE), High Impact
with their time and expertise. The financialsupport of the USCGA Alumni Association is also gratefully appreciated!References[1] Miller, Paul, “Project-Based Coursework in a Naval Architecture Curriculum”, Proceedingsof the ASEE Conference, Nashville, TN, 2003[2] Wobbe, Kristin, and Stoddard, Elisabeth, eds., “Project-Based Learning In The First Year”,Stylus Publishing, Sterling, VA, 2019[3] www.teachingwithsmallboats.org, accessed 12Feb2022[4] Gougeon, Meade, “The Gougeon Brothers on Boat Construction – Wood and WEST SystemMaterials, 5th Edition”, Gougeon Brothers, Inc., Bay City, Michigan, 2005[5] Witt, Glen L, “Boatbuilding With Plywood”, Modified 3rd Edition, Glen-L Marine Designs,Bellflower, CA, 1989[6] www.thewoodenboatschool.com
. Sandra Brabb, Washington State University I have over 35 years of experience in higher education, primarily in student services program development. I am currently the Director of Internships and Career Services for the Voiland College of Engineering and Architecture at Washington State University and the chair-elect for the ASEE Cooperative and Experien- tial Education Division.Eleanor Dizon, Washington State University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Social Engagement of First-time Freshmen and Transfer Students One and Two Years Post-COVIDAbstractIn this research paper, we present results from a survey focused on student engagement withcollege, university
(RESPECT), Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2022, pp. 1–2.[5] A. Haverkamp, “The complexity of nonbinary gender inclusion in engineering culture,” presented at the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, Jun. 23–27, 2018.[6] P. H. Collins and S. Bilge, Intersectionality. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press, 2016.[7] P. H. Collins, “Intersectionality’s definitional dilemmas,” Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2015.[8] T. J. Weston, W. M. Dubow and A. Kaminsky, “Predicting women’s persistence in computer science- and technology-related majors from high school to college,” ACM Transactions on Computing Education, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2019.[9] A. Munson, B. Moskal, A
dynamics for high performance teamwork,” Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 378–394, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.06.002.[4] M. C. Paretti, J. J. Pembridge, S. C. Brozina, B. D. Lutz, and J. N. Phanthanousy, “Mentoring team conflicts in capstone design: Problems and solutions,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2013, doi: 10.18260/1-2--22284.[5] M. C. Paretti, K. J. Cross, and H. M. Matusovich, “Match or Mismatch: Engineering Faculty Beliefs about Communication and Teamwork versus Published Criteria,” 2014.[6] G. A. Callanan and D. F. Perri, “Teaching Conflict Management Using a Scenario-Based Approach,” Httpsdoiorg103200JOEB813131-139, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 131–139, 2010, doi
Studies: Methodological Briefs - Impact Evaluation No.9,” UNICEF-IRC, 2014, Accessed: Apr. 07, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/754-comparative-case-studies-methodological-briefs-impact-evaluation-no-9.html[19] B. J. Beatty, Z. Merchant, and M. Albert, “Analysis of Student Use of Video in a FlippedClassroom,” TechTrends, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 376–385, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s11528-017-0169-1.[20] B. K. Morris and S. Savadatti, “Analysis of Basic Video Metrics in a Flipped StaticsCourse,” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2018.[21] “ChatGPT.” OpenAI.
). Bielefeldt is active in the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), serving on the Civil Engineering Program Criteria Task Committee (2019-2022) and the Body of Knowledge 3 Task Committee (2016-2018). She is the Senior Editor for the International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering (IJSLE) and a Deputy Editor for the ASCE Journal of Civil Engineering Education. Her research focuses on engineering education, including ethics, social responsibility, sustainable engineering, and community engagement. Bielefeldt is also a Fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education.Laura MacDonald Managing Director, Mortenson Center in Global EngineeringCarlo Salvinelli Dr. Salvinelli is a Teaching Assistant
. Ellerbrock, “Contemporary STEM Issues: Engineering Training of Pre-Service Teachers for Middle School STEM Curriculum Development (Evaluation),” in 126th annual conference and exposition ASEE, 2019, pp. 1–10.[16] M. Aydeniz and K. Bilican, “The Impact of Engagement in STEM Activities on Primary Preservice Teachers’ Conceptualization of STEM and Knowledge of STEM Pedagogy,” Journal of Research in STEM Education, vol. 4, no. 2, 2018.[17] İ. Deveci and J. Seikkula-Leino, “A Review of Entrepreneurship Education in Teacher Education,” Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 105–148, 2018.[18] L. Bosman and S. Fernhaber, Teaching the Entrepreneurial Mindset to Engineers. Switzerland, Springer
, vol. 43, no. 5, Oct.2019, pp. 307–330, doi:10.1177/0193841X18807719.[5] K.L. Morgan, C. L. Bell-Huff, J. Shaffer, & J. M. LeDoux “Story-Driven Learning: APedagogical Approach for Promoting Students’ Self-Awareness and Empathy for Others,” Paperpresented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference. July2021. https://peer.asee.org/37730[6] A. Sundin, K. Andersson, & R. Watt. “Rethinking communication: integratingstorytelling for increased stakeholder engagement in environmental evidence synthesis.”Environmental Evidence, Issue 7, no. 6, Feb 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-018-0116-4[7] R.A. Mar, J. Li, A.T.P. Nguyen, & C.P. Ta. “Memory and comprehension of narrativeversus expository
Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2019). Science and Engineering for Grades 6-12: Investigation and Design at the Center. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi.org/10.17226/25216. Dr. Nathan is currently on the Advisory Board to the Editor, Journal of Engineering Education, of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) (2015 to date). Dr. Nathan served as an Advisory Board Member for the Stanford University College of Engineering, Pathways from School to Work. Advising on data collection, analysis andinterpretation of data from a longitudinal study of undergraduate engineering students from college into the workforce,with policy recommendations for national engineering education and advising
Argument: ATheoretical Framework for Studying how Faculty Arrive at Their Deeply-held Beliefs AboutInequity in Engineering. In 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access.[7] Haynes, C., & Patton, L. D. (2019). From racial resistance to racial consciousness: EngagingWhite STEM faculty in pedagogical transformation. Journal of Cases in EducationalLeadership, 22(2), 85-98.AppendicesAppendix I. Gender ProtocolBACKGROUND INFORMATIONOur goal today is to explore your beliefs about the causes of gender-based inequities inengineering. As you know, this project is investigating beliefs about both gender- and race-basedinequities, but today we will focus on gender. Gender inequity can be a tough topic to talk aboutopenly, so we may fumble at
2019 he is the Faculty Co-Director of the Bernard M. Gordon-MIT Engineering Leadership Program, and since 2021 the Apollo Program Professor of Astronautics at MIT.John M. Feiler (Engineering Leadership Specialist)Kyra Tan-Tiongco (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)Reza S Rahaman (Industry Co-Director, Gordon Engineering LeadershipProgram) Reza Rahaman is the Bernard M Gordon Industry Co-Director and Senior Lecturer for the MIT Technical Leadership and Communication Programs - the Undergraduate Practice Opportunities Program (UPOP), the Bernard M. Gordon-MIT Engineering Leadership Program (GEL), the Graduate Engineering Leadership Program (GradEL), and the School of Engineering Communication Lab. Dr. Rahaman returned to
instructor decisions and student support during COVID-19 and impact the pandemic is having on engineering students. She also recently won the prestigious CAREER award from the U.S. National Science Foundation to study increasing the fairness of engineering assessments. In total, she has been on the leadership of more than $24 million dollars in research awards. Her research on evaluation of online learning (supported by two NSF awards #1544259,1935683, ) has resulted in more than 20 peer-reviewed conference and journal publications related to engineering learners in online courses. She was a FutureLearn Research Fellow from 2017-2019; a 2018 recipient of the FIE New Faculty Fellow Award and was the 2021 Program Chair for the
in China 2025,” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Salt Lake City, Utah, Jun. 2018, p. 29787. doi: 10.18260/1-2--29787.[2] Y. Cao et al., “Visions of Engineers for the Future: A Comparison of American and Chinese Policy Discourses on Engineering Education Innovation,” p. 18, 2021.[3] “Beijing Guidance,” Jun. 09, 2017. http://education.news.cn/2017-06/13/c_129631611.htm (accessed Mar. 16, 2022).[4] Y. (Leaf) Zhang, “International Students in Transition: Voices of Chinese Doctoral Students in a U.S. Research University,” J. Int. Stud., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 175–194, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.32674/jis.v6i1.487.[5] M. Prince and R. Felder, “The Many Faces of Inductive Teaching and Learning,” p. 8.[6] M. R
, "Interactive-engagement vs traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey ofmechanics test data for introductory physics courses," Am. J. Phys. vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 64- 74,1998. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809[2] F. J. García-Peñalvo, H. Alarcón, & A. Dominguez, “Active learning experiences inengineering education,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 305-309, 2019.[3] L. E. Lara Ramírez, M. I. Pérez Vega, P. T. Villalobos Gutiérrez, V. Villa-Cruz, J. O. OrozcoLópez, & L. J. López Reyes, “Uso de laboratorios virtuales como estrategia didáctica para elaprendizaje activo.” Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 4211-4223, 2022. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v6i1.1794[4] D. R