Conference Session

Statics and Dynamics in Mechanical Engineering

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shaobo Huang, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; John M. Mativo, University of Georgia

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

judgment on question #9. Here are two sets of answers from the eight students: Question #9 Student 1: “(Elastic potential energy) depends on our datum, and if you are pushing or pulling the spring.” Student 2: “(Elastic potential energy) depends on if spring is compressed or stretched. ” Question #10 1 Student 1: “It is the same PE, 𝑉𝑒 = 2 𝑘𝑠 2 ” Student 2: “the |change in position| (absolute value) is s in both cases.”Linear impulse and momentumFour questions with a focus on the conservation of linear momentum of a system ofparticles were involved for this section in the pilot study (Table 1). The two questions(#11-#12) were involved in this

Conference Session

Out-of-school-time Engineering: Implications for Underrepresented Students

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Armanda Gonzalez, University of Michigan; Joanna Mirecki Millunchick, University of Michigan

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

socialcapital, aid students in developing an engineering identity, and act to better integratetypically underrepresented groups in STEM fields.References1 A. Ludden, (2011). Engagement in school and community civic activities among rural ado- lescents.Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 40(9), 1254–1270.2. E. O’Brien, & M. Rollefson, (1995). Extracurricular participation and student engagement. NationalCenter for Educational Statistics Report 95-741. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs95/web/95741.asp3. S. D. Whitney, L. M. Renner, & T. I. Herrenkohl, (2010). Gender differences in risk/protection profilesfor low academic performance. Journal of Community Psychology, 38(4), 435–455.4. D. Wilson, D. Jones, M. J. Kim, C. Allendoerfer, R. Bates

Conference Session

Diversity in Community Engagement Implementation II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ziyu Long, Colorado State University; Sean Eddington, Purdue University; Jessica Pauly; Linda Hughes-Kirchubel, Purdue University; Klod Kokini, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Patrice Marie Buzzanell, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division

design was adopted in this project because of its ability to extendthe breadth and range of inquiry by using different methods, to clarify results from one methodwith the results from the other method(s), and to seek elaboration enhancement, convergence,and corroboration of results of different methods (Greene, Caracelli, & Graham, 1989). Weelaborate on our two-phase design as follows. In the first phase, the research team designed a survey based on existing scales andpractical insights from experienced NFLC facilitators and university administrators. The surveywas conducted with faculty members (n=49, with 29 participated in the NFLC) who were hiredsince 2004 with special attention to faculty who started after 2011 (the initiation of

Conference Session

PBL and Flipped Classrooms in Civil Engineering Education

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Laura Doyle, Santa Clara University; Tonya Lynn Nilsson P.E., Santa Clara University

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

sections as summarized in Table 1.Professor 1’s existing active-learning curriculum was used as the base curriculum for all fivesections. This curriculum uses interactive lecturing based on the ExCEEd teaching model andincludes group problem solving, physical models and student questioning techniques.9 Twelve ofthe thirty 65-minute class lessons were modified from the existing curriculum to includedflipped, flipped-flipped or hands-on physical activities. Fourteen lessons remained the same andthe remainder of the lessons were review or exams. Sections A, B, D and E included the twelvemodified lessons as summarized in Table 2 while section C used the existing curriculum. Table 1. Identification of term when taught and instructor of each section

Conference Session

Capstone Design Courses I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jheng-Wun Su, University of Missouri; Zhengwei Nie, University of Missouri; Jiamin Wang, University of Missouri - Columbia; Yuyi Lin P.E., University of Missouri

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Design Course Sequence,” Proceedings of 2003 ASEE Annual Conference.[4] Lumpp, J., J. Jacob, S. Smith and W. Smith, 2006, “BIG BLUE: A Multidisciplinary Capstone Engineering Design Project,” Proceedings of 2006 ASEE Annual Conference.[5] Abu-Mulaweh, H.I., H.M. Oloomi, D.W. Mueller Jr. and O.A. Thomas, 2012, “A Multidisciplinary Capstone Senior Project: Interactive Cooling System Demonstration Unit,” Proceedings of 2012 ASEE Annual Conference.[6] Jariwala, A.S., S. Vaish and D. Rosen, 2014, “Enabling Institute-wide Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone Design Experiences,” Proceedings of 2014 ASEE Annual Conference.[7] Magee, C.L., Kin Leong Pey, Jin Chen, Jianxi Luo and D.D. Frey, 2011, “Beyond R&D: What Design Adds to a

Conference Session

Make It!

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bart Taylor M.Ed., A&M Consolidated High School; Sheng-Jen Hsieh, Texas A&M University; Dezhen Song

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References1. 3D for Everyone. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.sketchup.com/2. Dezhen Song. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://faculty.cs.tamu.edu/dzsong/3. Dougherty, D. (2012). The maker movement. Innovations, 7(3), 11-14.4. Hartley, R., & Zisserman, A. (2003). Multiple view geometry in computer vision. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.5. Learn how to use 123d Catch. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.123dapp.com/howto/catch6. Peppler, K., Maltese, A., Keune, A., Chang, S., Regalla, L., & Initiative, M. E. (2015). Survey of Makerspaces, Part II. Open Portfolios Maker Education

Conference Session

Make It!

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

William H. Heeter, Porter High School Engineering Dept.; Sheng-Jen Hsieh, Texas A&M University; Jun Zou, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

tested them. An evaluation of the module indicated that a high level of learning wasachieved. In addition, the students all enjoyed the hands on experience.AcknowledgementsWe like to acknowledge the assistance of Mr. Craig Maddux in making this module possible.This material is based upon work supported by the Research Experiences for Teachers Programunder National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1300779. Any opinions, findings, andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References1. Piezoelectricity. (2014, June 19). Wikipedia. Retrieved July 2, 2014, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piezoelectricity2. Research: New

Conference Session

Works in Progress: Innovation Through Propagation

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susan M. Lord, University of San Diego; Denise Rutledge Simmons P.E., Virginia Tech; Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

/oradaptation of these examples and models. We further acknowledge the need to adapt knowledgetransfer models into practices for administrators and faculty that take into account uniqueorganizational contexts.ConclusionWe have highlighted and discussed four foci related to improving and diversifying engineeringpathways in college: structural issues, data driven research, academic leadership and knowledgetransfer. We look forward to receiving input from the community to advance the discussion.References1. Besterfield-Sacre, M., and L.J. Shuman (2016). Innovation through Propagation II: A Roadmap for Engineering Education. In Proceedings of the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, LA2 Foor, C. E., & Walden, S. E. (2009

Conference Session

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies: Classroom and Online Innovations

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dominik May, TU Dortmund University; Claudius Terkowsky, TU Dortmund University; Tobias R. Ortelt, TU Dortmund University; A. Erman Tekkaya, TU Dortmund University

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

ma-chines with different specimens a KUKA KR 30-3 robot is used for automated specimenhandling. Different grippers and concepts were developed to guarantee a safe remote speci-men handling11. In the following we will refer to the Zwick Z 250’s usage for performingtensile tests. This test is one of the most common and efficient tests for determining materialproperties12. The properties are important for designing manufacturing processes and can beused in forming applications like FEM-Simulations (e.g. simulation of forming processes orproduction processes). Hence, it is on the one hand a very basic but on the other hand an im-portant test in context of manufacturing technology. Figure 1: Tele-operative testing cell at TU Dortmund

Conference Session

Computers in Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christian Kreiter MSc, Carinthia University of Applied Sciences; Danilo Garbi Zutin P.E., Carinthia University of Applied Sciences; Michael E. Auer, Carinthia University of Applied Sciences

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

Austrian Federal Ministry of Science, Researchand Economy.References1. Kreiter, C.; Garbi Zutin, D.; Auer, M.E., "An HTML client for the Blackbody Radiation Lab," in RemoteEngineering and Virtual Instrumentation (REV), 2015 12th International Conference on , vol., no., pp.230-234,25-27 Feb. 20152. Mujkanovic, A.; Garbi Zutin, D.; Schellander, M.; Oberlercher, G.; Vormaier, M., "Impact of students'preferences on the design of online laboratories," in Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON),2015 IEEE , vol., no., pp.823-826, 18-20 March 20153. V. J. Harward, J. A. Del Alamo, S. R. Lerman, P. H. Bailey, J. Carpenter, K. DeLong, C. Felknor, J. Hardison,B. Harrison, I. Jabbour, P. D. Long, T. Mao, L. Naamani, J. Northridge, M. Schulz, D

Conference Session

Concurrent Paper Tracks Session II Skills Development

Collection

2016 ASEE International Forum

Authors

Rockwell Franklin Clancy III, University of Michigan-Shanghai Jiao Tong Joint Institute; Gang Zheng, University of Michigan-Shanghai Jiao Tong University Joint Institute; David L.S. Hung, University of Michigan-Shanghai Jiao Tong University Joint Institute

Tagged Topics

International Forum

concern to engineers exist; third,contexts specific to different fields of engineering, where ethical issues that are of particularconcern to these specific fields are present. Taking this approach allows educators to not onlyspecify the contents of “actions that have the potential to have a serious impact on the lives ofothers,” but also motivate the importance of ethical and reach better consensus among studentsregarding the nature of ethics in engineering.Towards these ends, in courses taught at SJTU, Shanghai, China and Purdue University, WestLafayette, IN, instructors have developed and used case studies on, for instance, the UeberlingenMid-Air Collision in Germany and Qihoo 360’s P1 Wireless Router in China. These cases arerelated to

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Charles Lam, California State University, Bakersfield; Melissa Danforth, California State University, Bakersfield; Ronald Hughes, California State University, Bakersfield

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.Bibliography[1] S. G.-O. a. E. O. Sheybani, "Retaining Minority Students in Engineering: Undergraduate Research in Partnership with NASA," in ASEE Annual Conference, San Antonio, Texas, June 2012.[2] C. a. Z. D. Alvarado, "Women in CS: an evaluation of three promising practices," in Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, 2010.

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephanie M. George PhD, East Carolina University; Nathaniel Paul von der Embse, Temple University; Zachary J Domire, East Carolina University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

., and S. Hu. 2001. The Effects of Student-Faculty Interaction in the 1990s. Review of Higher Education 24: 309-32.2. Lundberg, C. A., and L. A. Schreiner. 2004. Quality and Frequency of Faculty-Student Interaction as Predictors of Learning: An Analysis by Student Race/Ethnicity. Journal of College Student Development 45: 549- 65.3. Kim, Y. E., and L. J. Sax. 2009. Student-Faculty Interaction in Research Universities: Differences by Student Gender, Race, Social Class, and First-Generation Status. Review of Higher Education 50: 437-59.4. Sax, L. J. , A. N. Bryant, and C. E. Harper. 2005. The Differential Effects of Student-Faculty Interaction on College Outcomes for Women and Men

Collection

2016 ERC

Authors

Laura Palumbo

/story.asp?S=13833909• Failure! http://chronicle.com/blogs/wiredcampus/hazards-of-the- cloud-data-storage-services-crash-sets-back-researchersThese are not a backup:• Backing up your laptop to an SD Card in the same laptop is #notabackup• Backing up to a hard drive that is 6 inches away from your computer is #notabackup• Backing up your Gmail to another Gmail account is #notabackup• Backing up your book by copying it to another folder is #notabackuphttp://www.hanselman.com/blog/TheComputerBackupRuleOfThree.aspxYour goals as a researcher• Organize your data• Store and backup your data• Preserve data for the future• Share data with colleaguesFrom MIT Libraries websiteGood Data Management- OrganizingFile naming:• Keep it short if possible

Conference Session

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering Division: Fundamental: K-12 Student Beliefs, Motivation, and Self Efficacy

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer B. Listman, New York University ; Vikram Kapila, New York University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division

offering to hone theirpresentation skills. The NYU Tandon director of enrollment management, an NYU financial aidofficer, and the DSI instructor led one and a half hour sessions of college advisement to groupsof 5 to 6 students. The students received feedback on their draft college essays and advice on:choosing a college essay topic, creating a list of candidate schools, interacting with interviewers,and understanding college financial aid terminology and processes.Each mentor was assigned one to two mentees and a given lab was assigned between two to fourmentees. Mentors, typically advanced graduate students or post-doctoral researchers, begancontact with their assigned mentee(s) after the completion of the matching process. Participantswere

Conference Session

Software & Web-based Education

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tom J. Zajdel, University of California at Berkeley; Michel M. Maharbiz, University of California at Berkeley

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

of two online discussion TAs. Thanks go to National Instruments forsupplying the myDAQ, and to Newark element 14 for their efforts in sourcing parts for EE40LXworldwide.References[1] S. D. Sheppard, K. Macatangay, A. Colby, and W. M. Sullivan, Educating engineers: Designing for the future of the field. Jossey-Bass, 2008, vol. 2.[2] L. Yuan and S. Powell, “MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education,” White Paper, Mar 2013.[3] D. Lowe, “MOOLs: Massive open online laboratories: An analysis of scale and feasibility,” in Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation (REV), 2014 11th International Conference on. IEEE, 2014, pp. 1–6.[4] P. F. Mitros, K. Afridi, G. J. Sussman, C. J. Terman, J. K

Conference Session

Notable Topics in Civil Engineering Education

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adrian Owen Biggerstaff P.E., U.S. Military Academy; Brad Wambeke P.E., United States Military Academy

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

encourage students to spend more time assessing how well they understand the material (10).The conventional single-answer MC question can mask a student’s knowledge state from boththemselves and the educator (11). These assessments provide binary or dichotomous feedback:students get the right answer and full credit or the wrong answer and no credit. Students with lowknowledge states who randomly guess on a four-answer-choice question have an expected scoreequal to 25% of the total points. If the students can eliminate one or two answer choice(s), theirexpected score moves towards 50% of the total points. The downside for guessing is earningzero point while the upside is getting full credit. The mutually exclusive and collectivelyexhaustive nature

Conference Session

Labs & Hands-on Instruction II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Maria Lorelei Fernandez, Florida International University; Natalie Paul, Florida International University; Ismail Guvenc, Florida International University

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

researchexperience can provide quick and valuable information for faculty mentors. Faculty mentors canuse this feedback to address with participants issues that may be influencing their learning ortheir thinking about future educational or career goals, and make adjustments to improve thelearning environment before the end of the experience.References 1. Willis, D. A., Krueger, P. S., and Kendrick, A.(2013). The influence of a research experiences for undergraduates program on student perceptions and desire to attend graduate school. Journal of STEM Education, 14(2), 21-28. 2. Zydney, A. L., Bennett, J. S., Shahid, A., and Bauer, K. W. (2002). Impact of undergraduate research in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 91

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Learning Outcomes and Assessment

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kamran Iqbal, University of Arkansas, Little Rock; Gary T. Anderson, University of Arkansas, Little Rock

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

, or B to C, etc. Late progress report is not accepted. Midterm report: This report is a compilation of the weekly reports. It is to be submitted by the project team using the “Final Report” format. Each team member prepares his/her section(s) and submits it to the project leader so that s/he can email it to the project advisor(s) by the specified deadline. Midterm report counts as three progress reports. Late midterm report is not accepted. 2 Final report: The final report is to be submitted by the end of the semester before the project presentations. The final project report format requirements are same as the ones used in SYEN 4385, see appendix. Late final report is not accepted

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia; Douglas Muir, University of Virginia; Elizabeth P. Pyle, University of Virginia

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

) observing, (4)experimenting, and (5) networking. All of these, they argue, can be deliberately cultivated (asopposed to being innate). The broader category they use to describe the confluence of these skillsis "creative intelligence, which enables discovery yet differs from other types of intelligence[because it] engage(s) both sides of the brain.” Associating, which they define as “the ability tosuccessfully connect seemingly unrelated questions, problems, or ideas from different fields,” isthe culminating skill. They liken associating to “a mental muscle that can grow stronger by usingthe other discovery skills. . . .The more diverse our experience and knowledge, the moreconnections the brain can make.” The article is only seven pages long and is

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade - Reflections and Advice on the Educational Process

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christopher Emmanuel Early, The University of Houston-Clear Lake; Jose Daniel Velazco, University of Houston-Clear Lake; Miguel Rosales, University of Houston-Clear Lake; Edgar Cantu, AutoSol Inc.

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student

level of student engagement in our extracurricular activities.References1. Abeysekera, K., Davari, S., Yue, K., Brown, E., Kent, M., Betts, P., & Meeks, J., Success through AcademicRecognition (STAR): Sustaining and Expanding UHCL and SJC TWD Computer Science Scholar Program, thethird annual Texas Engineering and Technology Consortium Best Practices Conference, Dallas, Feb. 28, 2008, pp 7-9. www.thecb.state.tx.us/index.cfm?objectid=8828378A-D358-8867-5E14BDC65C9860B92. Chun-Mei Zhao and George D. Kuh, “ADDING VALUE: Learning Communities and Student Engagement”,Research in Higher Education, vol. 47, 2006, pp 89-1093. Jolly, Campbell, and Perlman, “Engagement, Capacity and Continuity: A Trilogy for Student Success” (GEFoundation

Conference Session

Faculty Development II: Building Community Among STEM Educators

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Katherine G. Nelson, Arizona State University; Ann F. McKenna, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Rocio C. Chavela Guerra, American Society for Engineering Education; Russ Pimmel, University of Alabama (Emeritus)

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

offer more evidence for the presence of differences for theawareness of, attitudes for, and adoption of research-based educational practices. Additional datafrom the participants would possibly offer more confirmation of our findings. Overall, our data provides preliminary evidence to support framing faculty developmentmodels around courses because it may lead to higher adoption rates of research-basededucational practices in engineering classrooms.References1. Singer, S. R., Nielsen, N. R., & Schweingruber, H. A. (Eds.). (2012). Discipline-based education research: understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering. National Academies Press.2. Henderson, C., & Dancy, M. H. (2011

Conference Session

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering Division Evaluation: Exploring the Impact of Summer Programs on K-12 Youth (Part 2)

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Victoria G. Bill, New York University; Yosef Skolnick, Cooper Union

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division

. Longitudinalsurveys should also be used to assess the long term success of the course in improving studentself-efficacy and interest in STEM majors and careers. The authors suggest that theseimprovements be made for the future across the entire program and analyzed in future papers.References[1] ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs,2016 – 2017. (2016). Retrieved from http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2016-2017/[2] NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: TheNational Academies Press.[3] Goldstein, M. H., Purzer, S., Adams, R. S., & Xie, C. (2015). High School

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David G. Alexander Ph.D., California State University - Chico

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

competitive at the event in New Orleans at the end of May 2016.Reference 1. Archibald, M., Clauss, M., and Dupree, J., “Entrepreneurship in Capstone Design Using Interdisciplinary Teams and a Business Plan Competition,” Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. 2. Trevisan, M., Davis, D., Beyerlein, S., McCormack, J., Thompson, P., Leiffer, P., Davis, H., Howe, S., LeBeau, J., Gerlick, R., Brackin, P., and Khan, M. J., “Integrated Design Engineering Assessment and Learning System (IDEALS): Piloting Teamwork and Professional Skills Development Instructional Materials,” (2012) American Society for Engineering Education. 3. Oladiran, M., Uziak, J

Conference Session

International Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Noe Vargas Hernandez, Carnegie Mellon University; Heidi A. Taboada, University of Texas, El Paso; Jose F. Espiritu, University of Texas, El Paso; Connie Gomez, Galveston College; Isaac Andres Azuz, CETYS University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

International

examples of community needs as well as success storieswhere sustainability was considered. The group visited 6 different wineries (see Figure 4) tolearn about their processes, best practices and current issues with respect to sustainability. Theproduction of wine in Ensenada dates back to the early 1900’s when Russians from the Molokangroup established in the Guadalupe Valley. The quantity and quality of the wines has increaseddramatically in the last decades; this has brought an economic boom as it attracts tourism anddetonates other activities such as arts, sports, gastronomy, culture, entertainment and education.This growth challenges the resource in the region, specifically water. Figure 4 Field trips to the Valley of

Conference Session

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering Division Evaluation: Exploring the Impact of Summer Programs on K-12 Youth (Part 2)

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jackie L. Foos, University of Oklahoma; Randa L. Shehab, University of Oklahoma; John K. Antonio, University of Oklahoma

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division

discipline were more intense (larger dosage) than the discipline-specificsessions associated with the residential camps of 2014. Thus, it is possible that this larger dose ofcontent generally helped students identify with each discipline as a possible major/profession forthem. The second factor that might (also) explain this difference is that the campers in 2014attended all discipline-specific sessions, whereas students that attended the 2015 day camps self-selected into those days (disciplines) that they wanted to attend. Thus, it is possible that the 2015campers that attended each day had more self-identification with the discipline(s) associated withthe day(s) they chose to attend. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree

Conference Session

Works in Progress: Classroom Practice

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bill D. Bailey, Kennesaw State University; Gregory L. Wiles P.E., Kennesaw State University; Thomas Reid Ball, Kennesaw State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

). Using blended learning to foster education in a contemporary classroom. Transformative Dialogues: Teaching & Learning Journal, 5(2), 1–11.2. Boyle, T. (2005). A dynamic, systematic method for developing blended learning. Education, Communication & Information, 5(3), 221–232.3. Bassett, E., & Gallagher, S. (2005). Students prefer hybrids to fully online courses. Recruitment & Retention in Higher Education, 19(8), 7–8.4. Gecer, A., & Dag, F. (2012). A blended learning experience. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 12(1), 438–442.5. Musawi, A. S. A. (2011). Blended learning. Journal of Turkish Science Education (TUSED), 8(2), 3–8.6. George-Palilonis, J., & Filak, V. (2009). Blended

Conference Session

Environmental Engineering Division: Engagement, Experiential Learning, and Balance

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Veera Gnaneswar Gude P.E., Mississippi State University

Tagged Divisions

Environmental Engineering

. 13References1. Bloom, B. S.; Engelhart, M. D.; Furst, E. J.; Hill, W. H.; Krathwohl, D. R. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Part I, Cognitive Domain; McKay: New York, 1956.2. Willingham, D. T. (2008). Critical thinking: Why is it so hard to teach?. Arts Education Policy Review, 109(4), 21-32.3. Jacquez, R., Gude, V. G., Auzenne, M., Burnham, C., Hanson, A. T., & Garland, J. (2006). 2006-2175: integrating writing to provide context for teaching the engineering design process. 113rd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago.4. Jacquez, R., Gude, V. G., Hanson, A., Auzenne, M., & Williamson, S. (2007, June). Enhancing critical thinking skills of civil engineering students through supplemental

Conference Session

Capstone and Collaborations in Civil Engineering

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kevin G. Sutterer, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; John Aidoo, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Jeremy R. Chapman, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; James H. Hanson P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Kyle Kershaw P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Matthew D. Lovell P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Michelle Marincel Payne, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Jennifer Mueller PE P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Michael Anthony Robinson P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

that are probably typical of many senior design programs. These included • A process that allowed some students to assume a large portion of the project system design while others minimized their contributions, resulting in variable learning, • A system that made it difficult to evaluate individual students’ work as a team member, • Inconsistent and sometimes untimely mentoring of technical design work because this occurred only as-requested by groups or after identification by another faculty member, also resulting in widely variable learning experiences, • A very heavy mentoring load for the year-long course instructor(s) that gave the course a reputation of being a highly undesirable assignment

Conference Session

ETAC/ABET-Related Issues

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Byron G. Garry, South Dakota State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

Assessment, 2009, Retrieved from http://www.learningoutcomeassessment.org/ occasionalpaperone.htm6 Baehr, M. and S. W. Beyerlein, “Overview of Assessment, “ In S. Beyerlein, C. Holmes & D. Apple (Eds.), Program Assessment Handbook, Pacific Crest. 2010, (pp. 3-6). Retrieved from http://www.pcrest2.com/institute_resources/PAI/PAI2010_020910.pdf7 Advisory Committee for Academic Assessment, Kent State, Six Steps to Continuous Improvement of Student Learning, no date. Retrieved from http://explore.kent.edu/aa/guide/fulltext.html8 Morest, V.S., “Accountability, Accreditation, and Continuous Improvement: Building a Culture of Evidence,” New Directions for Institutional Research, no. 143, Fall 20099 Suskie, L., “Understanding the Nature and