backgroundto become more formalized and easily shared with other universities.Apparently good results have been achieved through the following practices: step-by-stepcollaboration plans with selected top universities in the USA, Europe and Asia; focusedFederal Government funding for joint projects (research, guest lecturers and jointconferences) with top world scientists in approved development priority areas; success inAsia through personalized activities carried out by the University’s Honorary Professors fromChina, South Korea and other Asia-Pacific countries; training hundreds of University facultyin the top US and European universities; networking with regional, national and globalacademic and business partners. Another focus is given to the best
department at ABET. In this role, Warnock oversees the development, planning, production and implementation of the ABET Program Assessment Workshops, IDEAL and the assessment webinar series. He also directs activities related to the workshop facilitator training and professional development.Ms. Galyna Melnychuk, Mississippi State University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Strategies for Increasing Student Participation in International ProgramsAbstractThis paper describes the strategies utilized by the Bagley College of Engineering at MississippiState University, a tier one research university located in the southeastern US. In the
activity utilized the students’ newly gained knowledge ofthe campus and the GPS mapping tools (and their limitations), to develop a creative map graphic.Lab Period: • Submit project report, from activity in the first two weeks • Each team to hold a brainstorming session to discuss and select the route/graphic to be walked and recorded for presentation. Each team to also develop a safety plan, for approval before setting out. Particularly challenging for walking the route, was that the GPS signal would often be lost whilst indoors so that the mapped route would have jumps, and degrade the graphic quality. Another challenge for students was maintaining the correct path whilst walking. Both of these challenges
) (b)Figure 1- (a) CAD model demonstrating the 2D views that fully represent the design shown inthe isometric view (b) Image demonstrating the numerous views that are required to fullydescribe an entire system.[5]The system competencies defined by Schindel et al [3] include the following:1. Describing the target of innovation from a systems perspective;2. Applying a system stakeholder view of value, trade-offs, and optimization;3. Understanding system’s interactions and states (modes);4. Specifying system technical requirements;5. Creating and analyzing high level design;6. Assessing solution feasibility, consistency, and completeness;7. Performing system failure mode and risk analysis;8. Planning system families, platforms, and product lines
the large project, which I only dislike because it is a different type of learning than I’m used to. Even though it is difficult, I appreciate that I’m being pushed outside of my comfort zone. I would change the process just a little to be more structured at the beginning and have a place with examples of how and [sic] experiment should be planned and run. It was challenging because we had to trouble-shoot on our own, we had to figure out how fix the issues on our own, and I think that was the most challenging. This is not like anything we have experienced in any of our classes. Usually if there is a problem, somebody tells you how to fix it. Here we had to figure things out on our own
to build something and test it.” Other students, however, were frustrated by the lack offreedom in the design process: “I would have liked to have more creativity for the project (likecreating our own version of the converter). Additionally, several students noted that the manualcreation of the waves was challenging and frustrating. Several teams also had trouble with thedata acquisition using the myDAQs.Plans for the FutureFall 2015 was the first time this project was implemented. For the Fall 2016 implementation, weplan to make several changes. One such change is developing an automatic wave generator tocreate uniform waves, which will minimize the nuisance of manual wave generation and itsinfluence on the results. We plan to give students
potential for alignment between the goals of the Peck Scholars 4program and the school district’s sustainability plan, which has the following focus areas: sustainability for education, consumption and waste, healthy schools, green school years, and energy and efficiencies. In November 2015, initial collaboration began between the Peck Scholars program coordinator, Drexel University faculty and staff, and OEMS to clarify the objectives of this collaboration. OEMS wanted Peck Scholars students to design an irrigation system for one school’s garden, with the intention that the system could be easily replicated at schools throughout the district. This would require the Peck Scholars to also
significantly more time to explore programming and manufactur-ing. In addition, the student(s) should be able to implement assembly design modifications rela-tively quickly or test several designs during the course of the semester. The only fabricated com-ponent of this CNC machine is the modular block itself. All other components can be readilypurchased in bulk from a retailor thus reducing the cost for organizations that plan to use this inthe classroom. The remainder of this section discusses the design, development and manufactureof the modular block.The modular block (figure 3 a-f) is designed as a two-part symmetric clamshell. Each part iscomprised of an internal face (figure 3 a-c) and an external face (figure 3 d-f). The internal faceof the
actionable components 6. Guide students in refining problems X 7. Guide students in planning investigations to better understand X different components of problems 8. Provide opportunities for students to gather information about X problems or issues of importance 9. Provide students with opportunities to explore multiple X solution pathways for problems 10. Guide students in weighing the pros and cons of different X solution pathways 11. Provide opportunities for students to test their solution X pathways 12. Guide students in evaluating the results of their solution X pathways 13. Provide
both its content (Section 3.2) and form (Section 3.3). To illustrate theproposed typology, we also provide numerous examples of actual feedback comments providedby students and the instructor. We conclude this paper with a general discussion and a plan forhow the developed feedback typology will be used to categorize and analyze the rich feedbackdata collected thus far (Section 4).2. Review of existing typologies of feedback2.1 The design processDesign, as a high form of problem solving20, is generally regarded as essential knowledge for allof the professions. Indeed Simon21 reminds us that design is the core of all professionaltraining, and that “it is the principal mark that distinguishes the professions from thesciences”(p.111). It is
Advancing Engineering Education through Technology Driven Teaching InnovationsAbstractWith the proliferation of technologies that are able to overcome the obstacles of time and space,it is inevitable that change would transform and reshape the traditional ways of doing things. Inhigher education, the impact of educational technologies and their potential to enhance theteaching and learning experiences as well as improve learning outcomes is yet to be felt in anytangible way. This is mainly attributed to the lack of motivation by faculty to utilize newtechnologies in their classrooms. To further motivate faculty to introduce and integrate digitaltechnologies into the classroom as teaching aids, a comprehensive plan was
sixgroups by less than 5 degrees; much less than the control box. The winning group’s design wonbased on both temperature change and cost. Figure 1. Design specifications for the base Figure 2. Planning, measuring, and structural unit, a 6” by 12” box (part 1) beginning to build (part 2) Figure 3. Building a house prototype that Figure 4. Testing and gathering data (part 2 focuses solely on convection (part 2) & 3) Figures 5-7. Examples of final designs with data analysis (part 3)Participants. The study was conducted with a single teacher, Janice (pseudonym), whoparticipated in a one-day professional development (PD) workshop. During this PD workshopJanice was exposed to, interacted with, and learned
,professional insight was not limited to the explicit training provided by the workshops. Forexample, many Latina/o participants spoke of learning how to present themselves asprofessionals by observing and interacting with their peers.Participants spoke of organizational development training designed to help them learn theknowledge and skills related to the daily operation of the organization that would also translateinto the workplace. Through their membership and experiences within NSBE and SHPE, AfricanAmerican and Latina/o engineering students develop skills such as planning and businessmanagement skills. Furthermore, the responsibilities they shouldered in their leadership positionsfrequently put them in control of situations that challenged them
regular progress/status reports; schedules Plan/Manual 29 user manual or training manual; business plan; manufacturing plan General 17 varies; client determined deliverables; many deliverables; the usual Student peer evaluations; ethics assignments; individual reflections; classAccountability 16 attendance and participation Final report Interim reports Final recommendation Patent disclosure Conference or journal paper 0 50 100 150 200 250
to help coordinate the efforts of the other student assistants and to assist with development of supplemental materials. A set of supplemental learning materials was made available for purchase.The Spring 2015 MOOC was a success, meeting all goals and providing additional lessons abouthow to offer cost-effective MOOCs at a public PUI. In this paper, the authors provide a detaileddiscussion of the Spring 2015 MOOC offering, its results, and identifies lessons learned from theeffort. This paper, along with Nissenson and Shih (2015), could be used by other public PUIs asa blueprint for developing and delivering their own MOOCs.2. Course detailsStrategic planning is a critical element to implementing a MOOC successfully and costeffectively
)accepted the invitations. Camper participant selection was based on a personal statement on theapplication form: Please tell us about yourself including your interests (academic and nonacademic) and why you wish to attend this program. What do you expect to learn from attending (the camp)? We are also interested in your plans for college and career. Where do you intend to attend college and what major are you most interested in?Applicants whose personal statements showed a clear interest in computers, cyber security,programming, and technology as well as beginner- or intermediate-level experiences with suchareas were given preference.2015 was our second year co-designing and –implementing summer computer camps together
groups’ ensemble-based experimental planning. Yet the classensemble did indeed learn “correct” things about pendulums, along with firsthand knowledge ofthe process by which we generate knowledge through empirical means.Dr. Gross’s experience illustrates several themes that came up among our intervieweesconcerning accepting and building on offers in a STEM paradigm.1. A generous initial offer from the instructor.An offer that serves only to test or evaluate members of an ensemble is rarely a generous offer.Generous offers help the ensemble to succeed together. When offering prompts for activelearning, a certain generosity helps the activity to be educational and satisfying. As Dr. Grossremarked, “If your goal is ‘I want this set of undergraduate
research professor in instructionaldesign, had designed and taught the course for five previous semesters. In addition, a graduatestudent in human-centered design was present in each of the classes as well as in planningsessions with the instructors to observe and offer additional support. As the course also aimed toget students to engage in cross-disciplinary discussions, it was critical to offer a variety ofperspectives and areas of expertise. As such, the instructors created a list of guest speakers toperiodically visit class. These guests included representation from industry (strategy planning,user experience, design, marketing) as well as other departments (industrial design, business,library science).To help move through the design process
is "planningthe learning experience" through which instructors plan their instructional activities.A. Curricular PrioritiesAccording to Wiggins & McTighe (2005) the first stage of Backward Design is identifying thedesired results that are organized based on their priorities in the following three categories:1. Enduring outcomesAs described by Wiggins & McTighe (2005) this portion of the curricular priorities encompassesthe content and "big ideas that have enduring value beyond the classroom" as well as "reside inthe heart of discipline” and also those that “require uncoverage and offer potential for studentsengagement". Based on the research findings as explained by Condoor et al. (2008); Steif andDollar (2005) the main output of
field of engineering in order to predict the enduring engineeringattributes needed to support “success” and “relevance” in the profession. [10] As a collective theattributes are known as the “Attributes of Engineers in 2020.” Table 1 details the attributes andthe search terms used to find relevant literature. More detailed description of each attribute willbe presented in the results section. Table 1. Engineer of 2020 Attribute and synonyms used during literature search Engineer of 2020 Attribute Synonyms and Search Terms Strong Analytical Skills Analytical skills Practical Ingenuity Ingenuity, skill in planning, combining, and adapting to
=61) with a small percentage of freshmen and seniors(under 5 percent each). The planned major for 89 percent (n=62) of the students was in School ofEngineering. Underrepresented minority (URM) students made 31 percent (n=22) of the totalpopulation.3. Methods3.1 Wrapper Data Analysis Figure 2: Analysis OverviewTo explore the “impact” of wrappers on students’ learning, a qualitative analysis on open-endedresponses, descriptive and correlation statistics of quantitative responses, and a linear regressionmodel predicting exam performance improvement were undertaken, as detailed below. Theindependent and dependent variables are outlined in Figure 2 and Appendix A.A. Student Reaction to the AssignmentThe HW3 and HW4
pressure, heart rate, and breathing. • Accept and act on information received from our six senses, that is, vision, hearing, smell, taste, touch, and proprioception. The last term refers to sensing our body’s position, movement, and posture. Vision is the most dominant of the six senses, as stressed by biologist John Medina7 who says “vision trumps all other senses” by “taking up half of our brain’s resources.” • Manage physical motion such as walking, talking, standing, and sitting. • Enable us to dream, think, plan, create, and innovate.The first three categories of brain functions occur mostly without us having to think aboutthem. The last category, which we consciously initiate, often leads to amazing
changes to design without planning or Engaging in failure analysis thinking carefully Focusing on improvement Staying with the original failed design Working effectively as a team Engaging in negative team dynamics Seeking help from peers and looking at other Focusing on competition (worrying about teams’ designs performing less well than other teams) Using the EDP to guide next steps Ignoring background information that could inform Referencing background information to inform
the effect of its integration on theelectrical grid, and energy efficiency in systems engineering. Furthermore, the student-internswould demonstrate improvement in collaborative learning, project management, and engineeringdesign, in particular: communication, professional documentation, articulating milestones,reviewing and synthesizing relevant literature, analytic thinking, and iterative problem solvingusing “backwards design.” To accomplish this, the mentors planned to provide a combination ofparticipatory lectures introducing relevant STEM background and context with task-focusedexperiential activities that would engage multiple learning styles.Given the number of interns involved, a single project split into constituent and transitional
projects.Understanding that I maintained certain conditions of use for my work helped me integrate theideas from the different studies and disciplines in a manner that supported those conditions.Within our discussions about how we each approached our work, we noted how we all traverseddifferent disciplinary boundaries and tried to unpack whether our processes were inclusive,exclusive, or a bit of both. In my work, I believe it was my conditions of use that drove mydecisions on what to exclude and what to include. For example, I was exclusive in the sense thatultimately I planned to focus on the integration of stakeholder considerations as one aspect ofsystems thinking within the context of complex systems design, as opposed to more generalproduct design. Yet, I
scalable program in which diversity and multicultural awareness activities and measures are built into existing mentoring initiatives. As a result of this study, along with plans for future related studies, similar activities could be replicated at other universities and organizations to create more opportunities closer to one’s home for intercultural awareness. This type of programming can help address a gap for those engineering students who either choose not to study or work abroad and/or may encourage some to consider going abroad who wouldn’t have otherwise. Another gap which this study addresses is the paucity of research on the impact of culture on mentoring programs and relationships (Kent et al., 2013). Also, in having conducted this
further. For instance, participants suggested it would be useful to hear more about whatclasses to take and an overview of what classes are available on campus. They suggested this could bedone by having an advisor spend time reviewing their planned courses and provide feedback beforeclasses started. Participants explained it would be helpful to hear about fellowship opportunitiesavailable at the university, or through national organizations, so they were prepared to consider howthey might shape their first year to apply for them. Finally participants noted that it would be helpful ifthe summer bridge program could replace some of the discipline based lessons with a more generaltopic such as how to manage the amount of reading assigned in
efforts like Popular Mechanics magazine who demystified everyday stufffor hobbyists and the Whole Earth Catalog: Access to Tools 5 who surveyed everyday tools forthe counterculture movement of the 1960s. Additional real-world touchstones are the growth ofRadio Shack stores and the 1980s television program MacGyver where the lead character wouldresolve each episode’s predicament by fashioning an escape plan out of found objects.6Technology and sharing of information via the Internet has greatly increased the ability forsmaller communities with shared interests to coalesce and grow.The label “Maker” is a self-determined one assigned by affinity to or involvement in a largerMaker community. Both our interviewees as well as the founder of MAKE
planned to ask students to participate in a post-survey, we found thatthe journal entries, reports and presentations provided sufficient student feedback to gauge theirperceptions of the value of the service-learning module for their education, careers and livesmore generally. This feedback is summarized here.Overall, students were overwhelmingly positive about the service learning in this course, anddescribed it as a unique and foundational experience, as in this example: “I really enjoyed the entireday. We got to help out our fellow community and learn some new things on the way. I have never had anopportunity like this in a class before. Overall, this was an awesome experience.” Other responses included:“It was a completely different approach
begins, iteration through 12/201512/2015 first flightProject 3The Wheathawk project is one of the inter-university teams participating in the BoeingAerosPACE Design/Build/Fly competition. Competition and termination of the effortwill happen late April, when students will assemble at Paine Field, in Everett, WA, tocompete as one of five teams in a fly-off against well-specified mission plans that teamsdeveloped themselves and proposed to a review panel as part of the system developmentprocess. The team was assembled by the primary sponsoring university, though thatuniversity relied on recruitment of team members for the virtual teams on local facultyparticipants. All teams follow a two-semester long, gated design process that is a NASAprocess and