backgrounds than those of the actual job applicants [30]. This isespecially problematic when considering preferences in approaches and cultural differences thatmay further contribute to how each population best performs. For example, many design featuresof software are considered exclusionary for females, based on gender differences in motivationsto use the software or in willingness to accept risks [31]. There are also differences in technicalinterview performance (time to solve and correctness) when the setting is public versus private[23]. Post-hoc analysis in this study illustrated that women’s performance improved substantiallywhen problem-solving in a private setting.In this research, we sought to examine students’ perceptions of technical
AC 2012-5200: WOMEN OF WESTERN: THE VOICES OF WOMEN - AD-VANCE CATALYST AT A COMPREHENSIVE INSTITUTIONProf. Kathleen L. Kitto, Western Washington University Kathleen L. Kitto is currently the Special Assistant to the Provost for Strategic Initiatives and Acting Dean of the Graduate School and Vice Provost for Research at Western Washington University. Kitto has served WWU for more than 20 years and has played a number of roles within the university including eight years as the Associate Dean of the College of Sciences and Technology, seven years as the Chair of the Engineering Technology Department, and one year as the Director of the Advanced Materials Science and Engineering Center (AMSEC). She was actively
ofengineering, preparing students for a broad spectrum of roles in research, design, anddevelopment. These programs provide a strong theoretical understanding of engineeringprinciples, allowing graduates to contribute to cutting-edge innovations and theoreticaladvancements. Ultimately, ET in both community colleges and traditional engineering programsplays a crucial role in the engineering landscape, each attracting many students with uniqueinterests and career aspirations. Whether one chooses to pursue an ET program, geared towardsapplied skills and immediate industry integration, or a traditional engineering program, focusedon comprehensive theoretical knowledge and diverse engineering applications, they will findrewarding opportunities in their
issuesincluding the perceived value of licensure among faculty members, the relationshipbetween licensure and promotion/tenure, and the licensed faculty member as a role modelfor colleagues and future engineers.This paper details the research design, implementation of the study, and the resultingfindings. The findings and conclusions of this study will be of interest to a variety ofacademic and licensure stake-holders, including: civil engineering faculty members (bothlicensed and unlicensed), academic administrators, and licensing organizations such asthe National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying (NCEES).A Review of the LiteratureIn the realm of academics, what is the value of experience as a practicing engineer andthe value of
potential to influence the engineeringprofession for great benefit to society. As noted by Chan and Fishbein: “As the world becomes more complex and interrelated, so do the problems engineers face. The engineering profession and individual engineers need to adapt or else risk getting lost in these global changes, thus abandoning our social responsibilities.” 11The University of Wisconsin-Stout’s institutional mission encourages faculty and staff to“integrate applied learning, scientific theory, humanistic understanding, creativity and research tosolve real-world problems, grow the economy and serve a global society.” However, with thepolytechnic designation comes an increased focus on applied learning techniques and careerfocused
instructional practices linked to advanced manufacturing and materials and 21st centurySTEM skills.Program Design and ObjectivesThe Inspiring the Next Generation of a Highly-Skilled Workforce in Advanced Manufacturingand Materials program used materials and advanced manufacturing as the focus for the teacherresearch experiences in engineering. The advanced manufacturing and materials focus wasselected based on the aforementioned regional needs and strengths in addition to the fact that allthree participating universities have strengths in this area. Specifically the main objectives of thisprogram were to: Transfer the program’s team-based applied engineering research activities into the teacher participants’ classrooms through experience
Paper ID #6655Developing a Marketing High-Technology Products and Innovations Course:First Year ReviewDr. James V Green, University of Maryland, College Park Dr. James V. Green leads the education activities of Mtech at the University of Maryland as the Di- rector of Entrepreneurship Education with responsibilities for the Hinman CEOs Program, the Hillman Entrepreneurs Program, and the Entrepreneurship and Innovation Program. As a Senior Lecturer and Associate Director with Mtech, Dr. Green designs and teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in entrepreneurship and technology commercialization. Dr. Green’s research
challenges allows organizers toproduce a best-practice approach and enhance educational and personal performance amongparticipants. Opportunities for growth, learning and improvement lie within the obstacles andchallenges of innovation and pitch competitions. Further research will explore the best practicesorganizers utilize when dealing with these challenges while planning and running ICPs.AcknowledgmentThis research is sponsored by the National Science Foundation (NSF) Grant (DUE (2120936).Any opinions and findings expressed in this material are of the authors and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the NSF.References[1] D. P. Price, "Introducing University Pitch Competitions: An Analysis of the First Five Years," Journal of Higher
, Jackie Gray, Jennifer Holbrook, Sadhana Puntambekar (1998). Learning by Design from Theory to Practice. Proceedings of ICLS 98. Atlanta, GA, 16-22.LAWRENCE J. GENALOis Professor and Assistant Chair of the Department of Materials Science and Engineering at Iowa State University.He received a Ph. D. in Applied Mathematics with Systems Engineering emphasis in 1977, served as Chair forFreshman Programs and DELOS Divisions, and runs the Toying With TechnologySM Program at Iowa State.DENISE A. SCHMIDTis the Associate Director of the Center for Technology in Learning and Teaching within the Department ofCurriculum and Instruction at Iowa State University. Her research interests include technology use and integration in
connected inmy classroom was a big takeaway. Fostering connections for students- among each other, withfaculty, and with professionals in the field should be designed into our courses. The good news isthat this doesn’t demand a course re-design or any intense transformation- we can do it withminimal time but with intention and purpose- and it can make a big impact on our student’ssuccess.AcknowledgementsI would like to thank the TLDG (Teaching and Learning Development Grant) Program at SimonFraser University for providing funding for this work.References[1] S. L. Dika and M. M. D’Amico, “Early experiences and integration in the persistence of first‐generation college students in STEM and non‐STEM majors,” Journal of Research in Science
thatinterven�ons designed in harmony with organiza�onal norms are more likely to garner support fromleadership, increase employee engagement, and foster a culture that values diversity and inclusion. Byincorpora�ng these organiza�onally integrated interven�on tac�cs, organiza�ons can ac�vely contributeto the well-being of Black engineers, mi�ga�ng the impact of challenges such as Racial Batle Fa�gue andpromo�ng a more suppor�ve and inclusive professional environment.Our claims advocate for a deeper explora�on of Racial Batle Fa�gue in the professional context,recognizing that a more comprehensive understanding of the experiences of Black professionals isessen�al for addressing the mental health challenges associated with RBF throughout various stages
for Today’s Practicing Engineers”, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 1997 Conference •”Successful Model for Corporate-University Col- laboration”, International Association for Continuing Engineering education (IACEE), 2001 5th World Conference, in partnership with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor •”Designing Engineer Educa- tional Partnership Model”, IACEE 2001 5th World Conference, in partnership with Michigan Technolog- ical University •”Reengineering a Successful Graduate Program”, IACEE 2001 5th World Conference, in partnership with Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute •”Developing Product and Manufacturing Integra- tion Engineers”, IACEE 2001 5th World Conference, in partnership with
, Justin is a previous NSF Graduate Research Fellow and has won over a dozen awards for research, service, and activism related to marginalized communities, including the 2020 ASEE ERM Division Best Diversity Paper for their work on test anxiety. As a previous homeless and food-insecure student, Justin is eager to challenge and change engineering engineering education to be a pathway for socioeconomic mobility and broader systemic improvement rather than an additional barrier. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 An examination of the gender gap among Middle Eastern students in Engineering: A systematized reviewAbstract:This systematized literature
. Hope for those overlooked by engineers, and hope for academics to rejuvenate interest in engineering education, research, and practice. At University X multiple international sustainable development programs focused on developing communities have coalesced into the D80 Center, focused on providing hope to the 80% of the world’s population poorly served by engineered goods, services, and infrastructure. Based on ten years of experience, the programs clearly resonate with a more diverse student body and produce more well-rounded, global-minded engineers, as compared to traditional programs. Future obstacles include dealing with the demand of such programs with limited faculty, staff, and financial support
prevent most faculty from using them. For example, trying new educationalinnovations and updating courses while balancing an active research lab is a difficult endeavorfor faculty. Knowledge and familiarity with engineering education best practices is anothermajor barrier and it impacts young and established faculty in different ways. Most new educatorslearn to teach effectively through trial and error and have little or no formal training in bestpractices of education [3]. Studies in the U.S. show that for 95% of new faculty members ittakes four to five years of trial and error to become fully productive in research and effective inteaching [6]. Established senior engineering faculty on the other hand, due to burden ofadditional responsibilities
for students who have chosen to study at acommunity college or who were on our campus in another discipline and have not completed ourdaunting many-semester transfer requirements for calculus, chemistry and physics.These seemingly small adjustments in our admission practices and policies are having a strongpositive impact on creating multiple pathways for admission to engineering — all withoutputting our college at significant risk of reducing retention rates. And, while it is early, we arefinding women inordinately represented among students who migrate to engineering via thispathway.Finding GoldShirt Students — The GoldShirt strategy aims beyond the current US universityrecruitment “competition” to enroll from the limited pool of the best
ReadinessAbstractColleges of Engineering have increasingly emphasized the importance of engineering studentsobtaining professional skills relating to global readiness. This paper describes progress in a cross-sectional, longitudinal study to examine the impact that a College of Engineering at a large, mid-Atlantic public institution has on students’ global readiness and related constructs. Data werecollected from first-year and senior undergraduate engineering students for two years (2012-2013and 2013-2014). Research questions examined: 1) previous international experiences of incomingstudents, 2) international experiences that undergraduates have during their academic careers, 3)students’ perceived value of global readiness, 4) activities students perceive to be
, swarm-based multi-object tracking, and intelligent sensing systems. In addition to his research efforts, he is part of a senior design team developing UniMatch, a smart college recommendation system that leverages Elasticsearch and KNN-based algorithms for personalized university suggestions based on SAT scores, academic interests, and extracurricular profiles. This summer, Nandan will be expanding his research interests into the field of computational techniques in materials science, exploring how machine learning and simulation tools can be used to model, predict, and optimize material behavior at the nanoscale. He is on track to graduate in the current semester and will be joining Cornell University’s Master
fifty articles in this area, co-authored the book How Learning Works: 7 Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching, and developed several innovative, educational technologies, including StatTutor and the Learning Dashboard.Dr. Laura Ochs Pottmeyer, Carnegie Mellon University American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 A Combined Online Learning / In-Class Activity Approach to Teach Systems Thinking and Systems Engineering Skills to Freshman Engineering StudentsAbstractEngineering graduates from traditional disciplines (e.g., mechanical engineering) have feltincreasing pressure to develop holistic, systems thinking
members from other majors and other engineeringdisciplines. One reason for this trend is that engineering educators as well as professionals fromindustry have recognized the fact that practicing engineers are required to work with coworkersand clients that have a variety of educational backgrounds. Experiential learning is beingencouraged in engineering education because it has been recognized that students engaged in thistype of learning have better retention of technical knowledge and are better able to apply whatthey have learned in college courses to real life situations after graduation 1-3. Furthermore,industry and academia have identified the need for the development of soft skills in engineeringstudents. Among these soft skills includes
department envisioned the following broad goals when incorporating the centralizedengineering project platform within the curriculum.• Create the Modularly Integrated Curriculum Environment (MICE) for students and faculty to work on cross-functional teams in a lean workplace which includes pairing, swarming, agile, and scrum practices[1]-[3]• Train the students to think and work like engineers - emphasize concept to design across the curriculum through goal-oriented, project- driven instruction and self-directed learning - deliver enhanced laboratory and project experiences in all ECE courses• Mold our students into ‘successful engineering entrepreneurs’ – crucial in global business with uncertainty in
which perspective they are viewingresearch from: a technical one, when solutions are considered as the best way of doing somethingand/or a cultural one, when solutions are evaluated within a specific context. Bringing theseideas alongside the ideas of design-based research presented above, we can interpret phrasessuch as the “best way of doing something” and evaluating solutions “within a specific context”as pointing to the need to interrogate outcomes. In other words, what does it mean for somethingto work. In the following section, we provide details on the specific context in which theInclusivity Meter is used.ContextThe narrative of the Inclusivity Meter is specific to one classroom practice but is embedded in alarger department wide effort
-based learning (PBL) and general engineering industry concepts (problemsolving, professional practices, and quality control) to guide literary research and analysis andcontinuously improve students’ written, oral, and visual communication (WOV) skills, as well astheir abilities to understand new social, political, and economic contexts, an important criterionof EC 2000. In short, this strategy presents students with a problem: determine the best Americanfiction of a particular year. The faculty member then guides students through literary researchpractices, and a formal call for proposal process. She divides the class into teams, and each teamproposes a selection of texts to read during the semester. After the winning proposal is selected,the
systemapproach. Additionally, many colleges and universities are not providing all of their graduates withthe critical thinking, problem-solving, and sustainable practices required to meet the needs ofemployers. In order for companies to compete in the global marketplace, employers in the 21stcentury will require that their engineers couple traditional engineering design skills with newer,modern skills in sustainability, and eco-design as well as the ability to function in multi-disciplinary teams6-10.2. Overview of the Course DevelopmentThis course INDE t280 was offered at Drexel University for the first time as a special-topic courseduring the Fall quarter of 2015-2016. The INDE t280 Clean Energy and Energy Efficiency courseprovides the students with
often not a practical option.Program DescriptionThe CS/EE Online Program is comprised of three degree options. Based on past experience andcurrent career goals, a student can select which of the three will best serve his/her educationalneeds. Choices include master's degrees in Electrical Engineering, Computer Science, orComputer Science and Engineering. To emphasize the multidisciplinary nature of this program,students in one department will be required to take at least two major courses from the otherdepartment. All three degrees are conferred with the Graduate Telecommunications EngineeringCertificate. Entrance requirements for the online programs are the same as for traditionalcampus-based programs. Degree requirements are summarized in
International Engagement in the Department of Engineering Education and affiliate faculty with the Higher Education Program, Center for Human- Computer Interaction, and Human-Centered Design Program. His research tend to be at the macro-scale, focused on a systems-level perspective of how engineering education can become more effective, efficient, and inclusive. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Factors Related to Faculty Views Toward Undergraduate Engineering Ethics EducationAbstract This study focuses on faculty members’ views of how engineering ethics should fitwithin their own most frequently taught course and in the undergraduate engineering
abroad trip to Western Europe. This four-week program included 12intensive, 4-hour class meetings designed to teach students a full semester of Statics contentknowledge. The course was originally designed to include active, blended, and collaborativelearning elements in both its instruction and learning resources, bringing demonstrations, videos,and group activities into the students’ learning environment. The process of adapting this research-based Statics curriculum, built around a typical 16-week semester, to fit its new internationalsetting was impacted by the timeline, the student population, their social context, and the resourcesavailable abroad. For example, the weekly instructor office hours held during a typical semesterbecame daily
institutional context of UMBC STRIDE’screation, describes our four-part recruitment-focused conversation series, and reflects on ourprogress and lessons learned. Through this review of STRIDE’s peer education activities andapproaches, we hope to support the efforts of other institutions to design and implement theirown recruitment practices to foster faculty diversity and inclusion.Framing the Institutional ContextUMBC is a mid-sized institution that the Carnegie Foundation classifies as Doctoral University -Higher Research Activity. In 2017, the U.S. Department of Education designated UMBC as aMinority Serving Institution (MSI). We are renowned as a model for inclusive excellence inhigher education as a result of our success in preparing students from
to assess the impact of case-based instruction on conceptual understanding andtheir attitudes towards case studies.VI. Acknowledgements This research is funded by the National Science Foundation (Grant # DUE 1140109.Statements made in this paper are the opinions of the authors and may or may not reflect theviews of the National Science Foundation. We would also like to thank our graduate students,Verrol McLeary and Niya King, for their assistance during the lab courses.VII. References1. Howe, N. and W. Strauss, Millennials Rising: The Next Generation. 2000, New York: Vintage Books.2. Elam, C.L., T.D. Stratton, and D.D. Gibson, Welcoming a New Generation To College: The Millennial Students. Journal of College
therapeuticapplications, which are frequently referred to as BioMEMS or Biomedical Microsystems.Biomedical Microsystems research includes biological, biomedical, biochemical, andpharmaceutical analysis and synthesis using MEMS-based microsensors and microsystems. Atthe University of Cincinnati the state-of-the-art emerging MEMS and BioMEMS research wasintegrated within the graduate and undergraduate electrical engineering curricula. For the pastthree years a novel course Introduction to Biomedical Microsystems was offered. In these firstthree course offerings, enrollment has spread beyond the initial target audience of theDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, and now includes students from mechanicalengineering, environmental engineering, computer