be included in the FoP construct, loaded into PIin this analysis. The negative language “I do not connect my future career with what I amlearning in this course” lends itself to the PI construct and may have confused students. The itemshould be altered or reconsidered for future analysis.This work is particularly valuable as FTP has been shown, quantitatively and qualitatively, tohave an impact on goal-setting and metacognitive strategies in the present [2], [6], [10]–[13], asstated in the Background section. By clustering students into homogeneous groups, practitionerscan better understand students’ goals, perceptions of their future, and the perceived utility ofclass content. By understanding these aspects of FTP, practitioners can better
as more technical-based. This focus often attracts more young women,propelling them into potential engineering and computer science careers later in life bypromoting opportunities for early STEAM education which work to close this stark gender gap.Creativity and music were at the forefront of each element of the program. According to a 2013study completed at Drexel University, students consistently perform higher in their overalleducation when they are exposed to the arts (Gregorio, 2013). This finding was reinforced in astudy performed by Michigan State University. When reviewing education history of honorsgraduate students, the study found that nearly 93% of STEM honors students had participated inmusical education in the past (Brockmann
Programs. Throughouthis career he has continued to teach at a variety of colleges and universities. For the last 4 years he hasbeen a part time instructor and collaborator with researchers at the University of Maryland BaltimoreCounty (http://me.umbc.edu/directory/). He is currently an Assistant Professor at York College PA. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Take Flight Robotics: A STEM-Education Workshop for High School StudentsSummer activities and programs are important to attract students to careers inscience, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). Take Flight Robotics (TFR)was a youth outreach workshop and program that ran for one week during thesummer in 2015 and 2016 at the
Paper ID #25752Evolution of Activities in a Smart Grid Summer Camp for High School STEMStudents (Evaluation)Mr. Daniel Jonathon Douglas, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Daniel Douglas is a graduate student of Electrical and Computer Systems Engineering at Rensselaer Poly- technic Institute. He is interested in research opportunities involving machine learning, power systems, and software applications. His long term goal is a career in power and energy systems engineering.Mr. Ian Scott Steenstra, Rensselaer Polytechnic InstituteDr. Joe H. Chow, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Joe Chow obtained his MS and PhD degrees in
; Business Administration; Medicine and Engineering.Dr. Renata A. Revelo, University of Illinois, Chicago Renata A. Revelo is a Clinical Assistant Professor in the department of Electrical and Computer Engi- neering at the University of Illinois at Chicago. She earned her B.S. and M.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering and her Ph.D. in Education Organization and Leadership from the University of Illinois.Dr. Yeow Siow, University of Illinois, Chicago Dr. Yeow Siow has over fifteen years of combined experience as an engineering educator and practi- tioner. He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. from Michigan Technological University where he began his teaching career. He then joined Navistar’s thermal-fluids system
aboutstakeholders. First, they broadened their understanding of a technology’s stakeholders to includeemployees, communities impacted by their business, and suppliers and subcontractors (seebolded data in Figure 1). The largest increase was in “communities affected by their business,”which went from 66% of students ranking them “highest importance in the pre-survey to 86% inthe post-survey.The students also showed an increase in their belief that they would have to identify relevantstakeholders as a part of their future careers as engineers (Figure 2). Almost all students (93%)ended the course expressing a belief that engineers played a role in a company’s CSR efforts, upfrom 80% of students believing so at the beginning of the course
topursue her interest in culture, mindfulness, and motivation in cross-cultural and international contexts. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Social Networks Analysis of African American Engineering Students at a PWI and an HBCU – A Comparative StudyThe central objective of this interdisciplinary, inter-institutional PFE: Research Initiation inEngineering Formation (PFE: RIEF) project is to conduct a comparative study of the factorsaffecting the success and pathways to engineering careers of African American students at aPredominantly White Institution (PWI) and a Historically Black University (HBCU). The studyfocuses on investigating the criticality of the following three
was significantly andpositively influenced by participation in cocurricular activities, including cultural clubs,academic clubs, professional associations, and undergraduate research [20]. Additionally, forunder-represented students of color, intentions to work for social change were significantlygreater than for other students within STEM.Beliefs alone, however, are not sufficient to guarantee or empower action among students as theyembark on their careers. To complement measures designed to capture general beliefs regardingsocial responsibility, this study also includes additional measures related to global sustainabilityin order to understand whether or not beliefs and knowledge regarding a specific societalchallenge predict a student’s
selection patterns. This is an essential first step towardsunderstanding the perspectives of students as they select their intended major and potentialcareer. This idea of major and career selection relates to teaching and learning in the first yearwhile we have not studied it directly.This paper examines discipline selection and transfer for first-year engineering students. Throughthe use of a survey administered at three different points throughout at the first year (beginning,middle, and end), we were able to track students answers to two questions important to thiswork: 1) What was their current intended major, and 2) what was the student’s confidence in thischoice of discipline (using a Likert-type scale). These questions would allow us to
communication, ethics,professionalism, and an introduction to engineering design.Similar to first-year courses at other engineering schools1-3, the various disciplines have typicallybeen presented to the students through department seminars in which faculty from each of theengineering departments give presentations to students. Our department is currently re-vampingthe Introduction to Engineering course and has added some activities to see if it would helpstudents decide their choice of major within the first semester or year rather than later in thestudent’s engineering program. In addition to department presentations, 24 engineeringcompanies were invited to the school through a unique collaboration with the Engineering Co-opand Career Development
available enter college with very limited awareness of the excitingprojects and fulfilling careers the engineering profession offers as well as withapprehension about their ability to succeed in a demanding STEM curriculum. To thisend, the course covers academic success skills in engineering including mindset andmetacognition, academic pathways, career awareness and job functions in the engineeringprofession, team building and communications, the engineering design process, and abroad range of fundamental and engaging topics and projects in engineering includingelectronics, basic test equipment, programming in MATLAB and Arduino, robotics,bridge design, and materials science. The paper presents the results of a pilotimplementation of the teaching
“cooperation and partnerships among member institutions in the area of engineeringeducation, research, and technology advancement with emphasis on: • Faculty and student exchange • New and/or higher level academic programs • Dual/joint degree and certificate programs • Distance, continuing and e-education • Laboratory development, including higher degrees • Industry internship, cooperative programs and career development • Joint training and research programs, and solicitation of funds • Development, commercialization and transfer of technology • Dissemination of scholarly achievement and other accomplishments by member institutions”5.The LACCEI’s intensive program serves as a basis for
, she resigned from her faculty job and came to Connecticut for family reunion. Throughout her academic career in Australia and Sin- gapore, she had developed a very strong interest in learning psychology and educational measurement. She then opted for a second Ph.D. in educational psychology, specialized in measurement, evaluation and assessment at University of Connecticut. She earned her second Ph.D. in 2010. Li has a unique cross- disciplinary educational and research background in mechatronics engineering, specialized in control and robotics, and educational psychology, specialized in statistical analysis and program evaluation.Dr. Ronald S. Harichandran, University of New Haven Ron Harichandran is Dean of the
in Chemistry & Chemical Biology and Chemical En- gineering at Northeastern University. During his academic career at Carnegie Mellon University, Boston University, and Olin College he has been the recipient of the first Whitaker Young Investigator Award from the BMES, a Searle Scholar Award, and an Early Career Development Award from the NSF as well as a three-time recipient of the Omega Chi Epsilon Outstanding Faculty Award from the North- eastern Student Affiliate of AIChE. He also has led industrial R&D teams at Organogenesis Inc. and Polymerix Corporation developing tissue-engineered medical products and drug- generating biodegrad- able polymers, respectively, and has co-founded Automated Cell, Inc. In
of Tennessee at Chattanooga, along with its partners, has developed acomprehensive approach to addressing the workforce development needs of the power sector.Funded through a Department of Energy grant the partners are recruiting high school studentsinto power careers, providing two-year and four-year college training, and developinglaboratories and graduate curricula tailored to new power and energy technologies. Existingworkforce training takes the form of diverse workshop and seminar offerings. The paperdescribes these programs, their results, and lessons learned from expanding outreach andcurricula for power sector constituents.IntroductionThe power sector is dealing with the challenge of an aging workforce, with critical knowledgeand
design experiences throughout the four years, nurturing a solid foundation of professionalskills, such as teamwork and innovation.This research aims to discover if and how a learning community and group identity can beformed between engineering students with diverse career interests enrolled in a new, design-based multidisciplinary engineering degree program at a large public highly research-activeuniversity. Initial data indicates that students in this new GE+ degree program are still findingeach other and forming their community. Using mixed-methods analysis informed by educationresearch — including surveys and small focus groups — we explore the ways in whichcommunity is nurtured and hindered amongst the first-year and returning students
Paper ID #12972Implementation of a Novel Second-Year Mechanical Engineering Course tothe CurriculumProf. Sandra Anstaett Metzler P.E., Ohio State University Professor Sandra Anstaett Metzler received her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Purdue Univer- sity in 1983. Dr. Metzler received her M.S. in Mechanical Engineering and her D.Sc. in Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering from Washington University in St. Louis in 1997 and 2000, respectively. Dr. Metzler worked in the automotive industry for General Motors, beginning as a high-school intern in the Engineering Test Garage and continuing through her undergraduate career
career aspirations of the student. 2. ABET should allow accreditation of engineering programs of the same name at the baccalaureate and graduate levels in the same department to recognize that education through a “professional” master’s degree produces an AME, an accredited “master” engineer. 3. Engineering schools should more vigorously exploit the flexibility inherent in the outcomes-based accreditation approach to experiment with novel models for baccalaureate education. ABET should ensure that evaluators look for innovation and experimentation in the curriculum and not just hold institutions to a strict interpretation of the guidelines as they see them. 4. Whatever other creative approaches are taken
provide many students with important opportunities fromwhich they can take away what is important and relevant to them.IntroductionThe graduate student experience is multidimensional. Being a graduate student includes manysocialization experiences that encompass the academic, social, and professional aspects ofgraduate education. Socialization in the sense that it is discussed in this paper aligns with thedescription offered by Ann Austin1: Socialization for doctoral students is largely about making sense of graduate school and the academic career, developing one's interests and areas of strength, determining how one's values and commitments relate to those in the profession, and developing one's own sense of place and
becomingproficient in them may require inculcation throughout a student’s academic career. It may beinstructional for students to experience interdisciplinary courses and even projects for whichstudents could take full responsibility: from assessing requirements, designing an initial plan,assigning and managing workload, to creating a prototype and collaboration with other studentsand faculty.Badges as Competency Credentialing and Life-Long LearningThe challenges that emerge with teaching competencies required for the 21st century are alsoaligned with challenges of evaluating and credentialing those competencies in the classroomsetting and “selling” them to a potential employer. Recently, digital badges or microcredentialshave gained attention in the world
that any analysis that does nottake intersectionality into account does not adequately address the manner in which Blackwomen are subordinated16. Being sure to look at the Black woman as she is, both a woman and ablack person, is both powerful and insightful. The studies in this literature review use anintersectionality lens by looking specifically at African American women.For the African American woman faculty member oppressions take the form of invisibility,isolation, and other barriers that stand in the way of career advancement as faculty. Malcom,Hall, & Brown discovered in their analysis almost forty years ago that, “[t]he more an individualresembles the ‘typical scientist’ the lower are the costs. Each deviation from the norm raises
, re- spectively, from the University of Minnesota. His B.S., in Biochemistry and Neuroscience with a Com- puter Science minor, is also from the University of Minnesota (2003). His research interests include secure distributed systems, low-power computing and ad-hoc networking, and security usability. In 2013 he received the NSF CAREER award for work on secure next-generation medical systems.Dr. Eleanor C Sayre, Kansas State University Eleanor Sayre is a researcher in physics education, specializing in the intersection of undergraduate stu- dents’ epistemologies, identity development, and community participation. Her PhD in physics is from the University of Maine, and she is currently an Assistant Professor in the
engineering education. He was trained as a Manufacturing Process Specialist within the textile industry, which was part of an eleven- year career that spanned textile manufacturing to product development.Dr. Justin J HenriquesMr. Sancho Sequeira Page 26.509.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015Work in progress: Development and Implementation of a Cornerstone Course: Engineering Opportunities Abstract In response to the vision presented in the Engineer of 2020 Project, many engineeringeducators are redesigning courses
electrokinetics, predominantly di- electrophoretic characterizations of cells, and the development of biomedical microdevices. She earned a NSF CAREER award and was nominated for Michigan Professor of the Year in 2014. Research within her Medical micro-Device Engineering Research Laboratory (M.D. – ERL) also inspires the development of Desktop Experiment Modules (DEMos) for use in chemical engineering classrooms or as outreach activi- ties in area schools (see www.mderl.org). Adrienne is currently co-Chair of ASEE’s Diversity Committee and PIC I Chair; she has previously served on WIED, ChED, and NEE leadership teams and contributed to 37 ASEE conference proceedings articles.Dr. Ann Saterbak, Rice UniversityDr. Jennifer Cole
Page 26.643.8Table 3: Interview Questions - End of Sophomore Year 1. Are you still a _______ major? (If not: why did you switch? [Move to SWITCHER set of questions]) How is the second year going? What are some big events that occurred in the last year? What are some things you have enjoyed? Found difficult or frustrating? 2. Why do you like engineering? What is motivating you through the tough classes? a. What are your particular interests within _______ engineering? 3. What is your ideal career now? Why? 4. What are some specific qualities of a job and company that you are looking for? Why are these qualities important? a. Do you already know of companies where you’d like to work? If so, which ones? b. Which quality is the most
called AerosPACE. All authors are former students who took theAerosPACE course. The paper does not present a rigorous research approach, but rather,particular focus is placed on the first-hand student experience and consequent translation oflearned skills into the workforce. The evolution of the industry-sponsored program is outlinedincluding lessons-learned, student experiences and achievements. A methodology which otherindustry sponsors could use to replicate and scale similar projects in other fields is discussed. Toconclude the paper, the authors (all alumni of the program who are now working in industry)offer their thoughts on how the program has impacted their early careers in industry.IntroductionPrior to reviewing the project in
meet ever increasing societal demands. Nine of 24 outcomes are focused onprofessional skills, describe student skills needed to meet career challenges, and include targetlevels of cognitive development required to prepare students for professional practice.Based on this vision for future engineers set forth in ASCE BOK 2, faculty in The CitadelDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE) adopted 22 student outcomes, eightof which are directly focused on developing student professional skills and competencies. Theseoutcomes are mapped across a subset of the 34 courses offered in the civil engineeringcurriculum. Embedded indicators are used to measure student attainment of the material andresults are compared to established Department
of a capstone design instructor workshop forthe 2014 Capstone Design Conference.1. IntroductionEngineering capstone design projects are intended to provide a culminating experience forseniors where they solve a complex, open-ended design challenge that requires the integration ofmany of the engineering concepts mastered over their undergraduate careers. The students are intheir final year of study and are preparing to transition out to the workforce, graduate studies, orto the military or public service.According to the 2005 comprehensive national survey of capstone design programs conducted byHowe[1], 98% of the 444 engineering programs at the 262 responding institutions (representingabout 26% of all programs) included capstone projects as
underrepresented minority students, and her research in the areas of recruitment and retention. A SWE and ASEE Fellow, she is a frequent speaker on career opportunities and diversity in engineering.Dr. Armando A. Rodriguez, Arizona State University Prior to joining the ASU Electrical Engineering faculty in 1990, Dr. Armando A. Rodriguez worked at MIT, IBM, AT&T Bell Laboratories and Raytheon Missile Systems. He has also consulted for Eglin Air Force Base, Boeing Defense and Space Systems, Honeywell and NASA. He has published over 200 tech- nical papers in refereed journals and conference proceedings – over 60 with students. He has authored three engineering texts on classical controls, linear systems, and multivariable
course topics were developed.Student Learning OutcomesBy the end of the course, students should be able to: 1) Great each student in the class by their first and last name. 2) Convey to another person a broad notion of “What is engineering?” 3) Set both short- and long-term goals in their academic careers. 4) Create (and stick to) a personal schedule for studying. 5) Understand their preferred learning style and be aware of all learning styles. 6) Be aware of the resources available to them for tutoring, academic advice, personal advice, and professional advice. 7) Work cohesively and effectively as a member of a team. 8) Communicate their ideas in both verbal and written form. Table 1. ENGR 204