target audience. There is a large body of work out there showing multiple ways to teachRDM skills to students but there is a consensus developing supporting using the team approachto teach credit courses. Author(s) Time Preparation Methodology Instruction approach Audience Team Member(s)J. Adamick et al. 2017 Focus group Workshop 90 min. GS LibrariansC. Borgman GS, MLIS Librarian - 2015 Course Syllabus Course – 4-credit hrs. PhD, Med. S PhD Library ScienceJ. CarlsonM. Sapp Nelson 2012 Environmental Scan (DIL) Embedded approach GS, L
. Retrieved from https://www.asee.org/papers-and-publications/publications/college- profiles/15EngineeringbytheNumbersPart1.pdf[5] S. E. James, J. L. Herman, S. Rankin, M. Keisling, L. Mottet, M. Anafi, “The Report of the 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey,” Washington, DC: National Center for Transgender Equality, 2016.[6] A. Phipps, Re-inscribing gender binaries: Deconstructing the dominant discourse around women’s equality in science, engineering, and technology, The Sociological Review, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 768-787, 2007.[7] Z. Nicolazzo, Trans* in College: Transgender Students’ Strategies for Navigating Campus Life and the Institutional Politics of Inclusion. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, 2017.[8] J. Barbour
Organization (UNESCO).References[1] W. Cobern. Socio-cultural perspectives on science education: An international dialogue. Dordrecht, TheNetherlands: Springer Publishing, 1998.[2] J. S. Eccles. Where are all the women? Gender differences in participation in physical science and engineering.In S. J. Ceci & W. M. Williams (Eds.), Why aren't more women in science? Top researchers debate the evidence(pp. 199-212). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2007.[3] M. Greene. Self-consciousness in a technological world. Retrieved 3 January 2008 fromwww.pocketknowledge.tc.edu. n/a 1965-2008.[4] L. Lee & D. Wilson. Empowering the engineering undergraduate in an era of economic globalization, Frontiersin Education Conference: Indianapolis
Technical College Jill Davishahl is a faculty member in the engineering department at Bellingham Technical College where she teaches courses ranging from Intro to Engineering Design to Engineering Statics. Outside of teach- ing, Jill is working on the development of a Bachelor of Applied Science in Engineering Technology and is currently PI on the NSF funded ATE project grant in renewable energy as well as PI on an NSF funded S-STEM project. She holds a Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Washington.Mr. Eric Davishahl, Whatcom Community College Eric Davishahl is faculty and engineering program coordinator at Whatcom Community College. His teaching and research interests include
Frequency Frequency (%) (n=12 projects) (n=10 projects) Health 20 37 85% increase Toilet(s) 61 83 36% increase Sewage 21 27 29% increase Sanitary 4 5 25% increase Sanitation 35 40 14% increase Urine 29 23 21% decrease Latrines 7 4
. National Academy of Engineering and American Society for Engineering Education, (2014). Surmounting the barriers: Ethnic diversity in engineering education: Summary of a workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2014.14. National Academy of Engineering; Grand Challenges for Engineering: Imperatives, Prospects, and Priorities. Washington: National Academies Press, 201615. Woolsey, S. A. & Shepler, D. K.; Understanding the early integration experiences of first- generation college students. College Student Journal. 45, 4, 700-714, 2011.16. Antonio, A.L., Chang, M.J., Hakuta, K, Kenny, D.A., Levin, S. & Milem, J.F. , Effects of racial diversity on complex thinking in college students. Psychological Science. 15, 8
. Bates, C. Allendoerfer, D. Jones, J. Crawford, and T. Floyd Smith, “The relationship between belonging and ability in computer science,” in Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education - SIGCSE ’13, 2013, p. 65.[4] R. M. Marra, K. A. Rodgers, D. Shen, and B. Bogue, “Leaving Engineering: A Multi- Year Single Institution Study,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 6–27, 2012.[5] B. Geisinger and D. R. Raman, “Why They Leave: Understanding Student Attrition from Engineering Majors,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 914–925, 2013.[6] J. L. Smith, K. L. Lewis, L. Hawthorne, and S. D. Hodges, “When Trying Hard Isn’t Natural: Women’s Belonging with and Motivation for
credits), and three electives (8 – 9 credits). The table also shows the studentlearning outcomes (see Appendix A for detailed definitions) created to fulfill the program’seducational objectives, and satisfy ABET accreditation requirements. The numbers in the tablerepresent the level of a course’s contribution to a given outcome (3 being the highest). Table 1: MCT Program StructureCredit MCT Curriculum Contribution to Student Learning Outcomes s (Total Credit Hours: 128) a b c d e f g h i j k M1 M2 M3 60 Lower Division Science/Technical Courses 27 General Education 25 Upper Division Technical Core 3 ET3030
improve differentfactors for students such as satisfactory, decent variety, and learning [1]. However, the cost israised, since it will need to have less student numbers in every section with expert facultymembers. This cost is nothing as compared to the experience and skills that students might gain[1]. With this, the department should enhance outline teaching method as their most noteworthyneed in any without bounds asset distribution choices. Six factors mainly affect the senior designcourse as shown in Figure 1, will be discussed in detail below.A. Periods of Capstone Howe, S. and J. Wilbarger recommended that a one-to-two semesters course with synchronousclass and venture segments stays well known [4]. However, some university like
Covert Visual Systems: A pilot study, SW Regional ASEE Conference, Provo, UT, Sept. 2017. 4. Linsey, Julie S., K. L. Wood, and A. B. Markman. "Increasing innovation: presentation and evaluation of the wordtree design- by-analogy method." ASME 2008 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, 2008. 5. Helms, Michael, Swaroop S. Vattam, and Ashok K. Goel. "Biologically inspired design: process and products." Design studies Journal, Design Research Society, Vol 30.5, 606-622, 2009. 6. Zahedi, Mithra, and Lorna Heaton. "Mind Mapping as a Tool, as a Process, As a Problem/Solution
this newly formed department he strives to creatively impact society through investigating the intersections of engineering, education, and social need through research on community engagement and collaborative processes within informal learning. He has obtained a Ph.D. in electrical engineering from Drexel University, in Philadelphia, USA and served as a Postdoctoral Fulbright Scholar at the Escola Polit´ecnica da Universidade de S˜ao Paulo. Dr. Delaine is a co-founder and past president of the Student Platform for Engineering Education Development (SPEED) and has served two terms as an executive member of the International Federation of Engineering Education Societies (IFEES) as a Vice President for Diversity &
research. Anemphasis on philosophical ethics will be integrated throughout each of these components.Table 1: Tentative Faculty Learning Community Meeting Schedule, Year 2 Date Meeting Topic Aug. 2018 Kick-off Meeting and Community-Engaged Service Project Sept. 2018 Reading(s) and Discussion on Community-Engaged Learning & Reflection Oct. 2018 Reading(s) and Discussion on Ethics Nov. 2018 Integrating Community-Engaged Learning & Ethical Reflection Jan. 2019 Community Partnerships Networking Session Feb. 2019 Course Development Workshop (e.g., Backwards Design, Syllabi) Mar. 2019 Course Development Workshop (e.g., Peer Review, Critiques) May 2019 Formal Presentations and Team-Building Activity Table 1
periods during the semester of study. 7class periods were not assigned any pre-class videos, including the first class of the semester andtwo classes following each of the three tests. The combined duration of all pre-class videos was30.8 hours (summary statistics are shown in Table 2). All videos were created by the instructorof the course (Dr. S. Savadatti).Table 2. Summary statistics of pre-class videos in the flipped sections of Engineering Statics. Mean Median Std.Dev Max Min † Number of videos assigned per class period 2.3 2 1.13 6 1 † Duration of videos per class
when the next homework assignment is due, he feels like he can easily rely on a TA to bring him back up to speed when that time comes [S-11].Figure 1. Ad-hoc persona with scenario narrative.Reflect on ad-hoc pre-work. The goals of the ad-hoc pre-work were to (1) develop and pilot ourpersona/scenario development processes and to (2) reflect on our assumptions and potentialbiases about STEM students before constructing the data driven usage model. In reviewing ourad-hoc personas and scenarios, our obvious bias toward engineering students was evident. Weagreed that two of our personas, persona 1 and persona 2, might be considered engineeringstereotypes. Persona 3, we felt, represented the more nontraditional engineering student that issomewhat
chemistry sets, kitchen chemistry Took care of or trained an animal Planted seeds, watched plants grow, watched animal behavior, collected things in nature (e.g., butterflies, rocks) Observed or studied stars and other astronomical objects Participated in science groups/clubs/camps Participated in science/math competition(s) Read/Watched non-fiction science Read/Watched science fiction Played computer/video games Wrote computer programs or designed web pages Talked with friends or family about scienceTable 5. Students’ intensity of experience with out-of-school experiences with follow up Tukey’sHSD for significant differences between groups. Tukey’s HSD Outcome
inthis material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. The authors wish to thank the STRIDE team and the interview participantsfor their participation in the study.References[1] The United States Department of Education, “Stem 2026 A Vision for Innovation in Stem Education,” U.S. Dep. Educ. Work., p. 55, 2016.[2] D. P. Giddens, R. E. Borchelt, V. R. Carter, W. S. Hammack, L. H. Jamieson, J. H. Johnson, V. Kramer, P. J. Natale, D. a. Scheufele, and J. F. Sullivan, Changing the conversation: messages for improving public understanding of engineering. 2008.[3] N. S. Foundation, “Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2017
= -0.38 logits; p = 0.003, one-tailed). Inaddition, participants had greater difficulty with class 3 levers (M = -0.03 logits) than class 1 levers (M = -0.41 logits; p = 0.08, one-tailed). Finally, those items composed of one or more intermediate link(s)between the input and output were more difficult (M = 0.43 logits) than those without intermediatelevers (M = -0.22 logits; p = 0.001, one-tailed). == Table 3 ==MNSQ. An item that has a mean-square statistic equal to 1 indicates perfect fit. In general, a valuebetween 0.75 and 1.33 indicates good fit. The mean-square statistic for all of the items is presented(Table 4). Wright and Linacre (1994) suggest that only one item (Sequential Tracing-D1’; MNSQ
outreach programs at WPI including Camp Reach and several other summer and academic year programs for students and parents.Mrs. Ryan Nicole Meadows, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Ryan Meadows holds a B.S. in Mathematics and Business from Fitchburg State University and an M.A. in Teaching from Sacred Heart University. She is currently the Associate Director of Pre-collegiate Outreach Programs at Worcester Polytechnic Institute. Meadows works with K-12 S STEM outreach programs during the summer and academic year. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 A Comparison of Changes in Science Interest and Identity and 21st Century Learning Skills in a Mixed-Gender and Single-Gender Robotics
, Communication three questions: 1.) Access for what 1999 Informatics purpose(s)? 2.) Access for whom? 3.) Access to what? Access is defined by five dimensions of health Levesque, Harris, care services including, approachability, Health Care Russell, 2013 acceptability, availability and accommodation, affordability, and appropriateness.As illustrated in Table 1, access can pertain to a broad range of barriers including social,educational (Carlson & Sullivan
high school technology education and test scores for algebra 1 and geometry. History, 54(69.7), 71-7. 5. Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008). Advancing engineering education in P‐12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 369-387. 6. Sheppard, S. D., Pellegrino, J. W., & Olds, B. M. (2008). On becoming a 21st century engineer. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 231-234. 7. National Academy of Engineering. (2008). Changing the Conversation: Messages for Improving Public Understanding of Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/12187. 8. Wilson‐Lopez, A., Mejia, J. A., Hasbún, I. M., & Kasun, G. S. (2016). Latina
Community in Introductory Engineering Classrooms”, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Engineering Education, Columbus, OH. 5 pp.[3] K. L. Tonso. 2014. “Engineering identity,” in Handbook of engineering education research, Cambridge University Press, pp. 267–282.[4] B. W. McNeill, L. Bellamy, and V. A. Burrows. 2000. “Team Norms and Communication,” in Introduction to Engineering Design, 9th ed., McGraw Hill Higher Education, pp. 1–13.[5] S. Gorman. 2014. Peering into the Culture of a Civil Engineering Discipline and Finding the White Rabbit, PhD Dissertation, Northern Arizona University. 285 pp.[6] E. Godfrey. 2007. “Cultures within cultures : Welcoming or unwelcoming for women ?,” ASEE, 19 pp.[7] S. J
, William Worley, Robin Matson, Madison Behringer, Annie Wong, Tori Bonagura, Karan Sahu,and Nick Graca for their contributions to the game development and testing. Finally, the authors would liketo thank the anonymous reviewers for their time and valuable suggestions that contributed to greatlyimproving the overall quality of this paper.References[1] CyberCiege, http://cisr.nps.edu/cyberciege/.[2] Forensic Toolkit (FTK), http://accessdata.com/solutions/digital-forensics/forensic-toolkit-ftk/.[3] Farmer, D., and Venena, W., Forensic Discovery, Addison-Wesley Professional Computing Series, 2004.[4] Gee, J., What Video Games Have to Teach Us About Learning and Literacy, Palgrave Macmillan, NY, 2003. 2.[5] Mathrani, A., Christian, S., and
, pp.305-308, Apr. 2013.[5] S. Freeman, S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. K. Smith, N. Okoroafor,, H. Jordt, and M. P. Wenderoth, “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics,” Proc. National Academy of Sciences, vol. 111, pp. 8410–8415, June 2014.[6] I. Han and J. B. Black, “Incorporating haptic feedback in simulation for learning physics,” Computers & Education, vol. 57, pp.2281-2290, Dec. 2011.[7] T. Wiesner, and W. Lan, “Comparison of student learning in physical and simulated unit operations experiments,” J. Engineering Education, vol. 93, pp.195-204, July 2004.[8] L. M. Triona and D. Klahr, “Point and click or drag and heft: Comparing the influence of
! Area-Moment !T EnergyMethod Singularity Function E !S&$ !S*T !T + !U !T − !U X ! = ± ( )X +PTU 2 2 Figure 3. Main Flow of the Knowledge Apps - Common Concept Map [17]To make the course materials more accessible
/ Flip w/ Blended Flip Quade’s Effect Blended Flip Adaptive Adaptive Test Size Dem Average Percentage (Adjusted) p d* Sample Size Group (s) All 63.0 65.1 63.5 0.949 0.13 126 88 83 (16.1) (16.1) (16.1) Female 65.5 60.5 61.2 0.513 -0.29 20
, thisintroduction included basic soldering iron safety rules. Students worked in groups of three: twohigh school students with one trained undergraduate or graduate student. These three studentsadapted one toy together, with the trained undergraduate or graduate student guiding the processbut allowing the high school students to do the hands-on work and problem solve through theprocess.Definition of racial and ethnic minority groupsIn regards to the definition of URM in high school enrollment (as listed above for two highschools), the Washington State Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction identifiesHispanic/Latino of any race(s), American Indian/Alaskan Native, Black/African American, andNative Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander [23]. Additionally
leadership theoryin engineers’ professional identities,” Leadership, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 351–373, 2015.[10] G. Warnick, J. Schmidt, and A. Bowden, “An experiential learning approach to developleadership competencies in engineering and technology students,” presented at the ASEE AnnualConference and Exposition, Indianapolis, 2014.[11] O. Pierrakos, M. Borrego, and J. Lo, “Assessing learning outcomes of senior mechanicalengineers in a capstone design experience,” in American Society for Engineering EducationAnnual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, HI, 2007.[12] K. S. Cameron, R. E. Quinn, J. DeGraff, and A. V. Thakor, Competing Values Leadership,2nd ed. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc., 2014.[13] K. A. Lawrence, P. Lenk, and R. E
research and to aid in thebetterment of engineering educator’s approach to teaching MOS courses.Current State of Research Data is currently being collected as per the above methodology. Preliminary data analysiswill be available in time for the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference. References[1] K. Ryan and A. Kirn, "Active learning and engagement in mechanics of solids," in 2015, .[2] J. Liu, "The Analogy Study Method in Engineering Mechanics," International Journal ofMechanical Engineering Education, vol. 41, (2), pp. 136-145, 2013. Available:http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.7227/IJMEE.41.2.6. DOI: 10.7227/IJMEE.41.2.6.[3] D. Montfort, S. Brown and D. Pollock, "An Investigation of Students