Paper ID #13037Mechatronics Experential Learning for Broadening Participation in Engi-neeringMr. Ashley Guy, University of Texas at Arlington Ashley Guy is a doctoral student with the Robotics, Biomechanics, and Dynamic Systems Laboratory at the University of Texas at Arlington. He holds B.S. degrees in both Biology and Mechanical Engineering and is currently pursuing his Ph.D. with Dr. Alan Bowling. His research includes micro- and nano-scale dynamics.Prof. Alan Bowling, University of Texas at ArlingtonProf. Panayiotis S. Shiakolas, University of Texas, Arlington
Mechanical Engineering at NYU Tandon School of Engineering (NYU Tandon), where he directs a Mechatronics and Control Laboratory, a Research Experience for Teachers Site in Mechatronics and Entrepreneurship, a GK-12 Fellows project, and a DR K-12 research project, all funded by NSF. He has held visiting positions with the Air Force Research Laboratories in Dayton, OH. His research interests include K-12 STEM education, mechatronics, robotics, and control system technology. Under Research Experience for Teachers Site and GK-12 Fellows programs, funded by NSF, and the Central Brooklyn STEM Initiative (CBSI), funded by six philanthropic foundations, he has con- ducted significant K-12 education, training, mentoring, and
all of these experiences because that opened me up to look outside of the laboratory and outside of the engineering department because there [were] no blacks in the engineering departments besides me at that time. And so I went to other Page 15.1252.11 departments in pre-med and so forth and [graduate school] has a really great program for black grad students, a union where they meet once a month over dinner. So, I really got involved in that and that really was motivation. So, you got the chance to speak and support each other….It really made the world of difference and just to see them and to share
the necessary fundamentals, and laboratory and work- etc. attributes to succeed in their based experiences to formulate and solve chosen career. engineering problems. B. Graduates will be encouraged II. Graduates will have proficiency in 2. Communication MAE 1050, to pursue advanced degrees in computer-based engineering, including MAE 3050, engineering or other fields and modern numerical methods, software design etc. they will have the necessary and development, and the use of attributes to succeed. computational tools
the core of a course. VipinKumar’s Product Dissection course at the University of Washington6 sets the students down in“The Learning Factory”, a space filled with work benches, tools, and support staff, and leavesthem free to disassemble a camera, an engine, a handgun, and a product of their own choosing;their aim is to analyze and understand how these devices function and how they were made. TheLearning Factory itself, a collaborative innovation of ECSEL schools Penn State, University ofWashington, and the University of Puerto Rico and Sandia National Laboratories funded underthe ARPA Technology Reinvestment Program as well as NSF7, provides a broad base forundergraduates and faculty interested in design and manufacturing of industrial
fromVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Dr. Addington teaches courses and associated laboratories inelectronics and microelectronics, and is active in the area of engineering assessment. He is a member of ASEE,IEEE, and IMAPS, and also serves as faculty advisor to the student chapter of Eta Kappa Nu.ROBERT A. JOHNSON is a Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the Virginia Military Institute.He received a B.S. in Electrical Engineering, a M.S. in Systems Engineering and a PhD. in Electrical Engineeringfrom Clemson University. Dr. Johnson has taught in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering atVMI for eighteen years, teaching courses in digital signal processing, digital logic circuit design
, requirements for receiving the electric power engineeringconcentration, various statistics that project program growth for the future, as well as a briefingon a new state-of-the-art power systems laboratory sponsored by Eaton Corporation through thepartnership described previously.Undergraduate Student Opportunities: Courses, Research Opportunities, & CO-OPStarting in 2007, an electric power engineering concentration was developed at theundergraduate level. Prospective students must take two required core courses and have theoption of selecting two electives from a variety of options. The two required courses includePower System Engineering & Analysis I and Linear Control Systems. In power systemengineering & analysis I, students learn the
STEM educationkeeps students engaged and results in improved retention of knowledge on topics taught [2], [4].While traditional lectures are still the most common way of teaching, many universities arefocusing more attention on more student-centered activities.Engineering education highly relies on practical applications. Laboratories are the most commonway of practicing engineering theory. Knowledge gained from engineering laboratories is beingused for applying engineering applications to real life design of processes and development ofproducts [5]. Building bridges to transfer theoretical skills to industry applications is important interms of improving future employee quality for [6]. However, the most common pedagogicalmethod is to use
Paper ID #37470The Impact of a 16-Week Preparation Course on the TechnologicalPedagogical Content Knowledge of Graduate Teaching Assistants inEngineeringDr. Saadeddine Shehab, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Saadeddine Shehab is currently the Associate Director of Assessment and Research at the Siebel Center for Design (SCD) at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He works with a group of under- graduate and graduate SCD scholars at SCD’s Assessment and Research Laboratory to conduct research that informs and evaluates the practice of teaching and learning human-centered design in formal and in- formal
well aware of these novel technologies, we need to update our curriculum andcourse design. In this paper, I present some laboratories (labs) that the students conducted as apart of a course project in the ubiquitous computing class. This course is an elective forundergraduate Computer and Information Sciences or Information technology students. Thestudents who take this course are either juniors or seniors. Covid-19 has taught us how remoteteaching is useful to ensure proper education during the time of the pandemic. This project aimsto design different lab modules that the students can conduct without purchasing hardware. Idesigned this course at the time of covid pandemic to ensure student learning and success in aneconomical way. I devised
in the 21st century thanin the preceding timeframes. Engineering technology and the requirements from the globalworkforce are in constant evolution. This behooves engineering programs at universities acrossthe world to adapt their curricula to prepare the graduates for the challenges in the engineeringindustry. The engineering curriculum which adopts integrated projects on a centralizedengineering project platform [1] enables the student to become an active, intentional, and goal-oriented learner through problem-solving [2]-[3] in a project-based [4]-[6] and project-enhancedlearning [7] environment. Traditionally, core lecture and laboratory courses have been taught inrelative isolation of each other. This approach does not effectively
live and video recorded). This paper describes a new classroom observationprotocol intended to monitor the focus (e.g., solo, pair, team, or whole class) and action (e.g.,discuss, speak/present, watch/listen, or distracted) of both students and teachers (instructors).The paper summarizes relevant background on evidence-based learning, student engagement,and classroom observation protocols, describes the development and structure of FASTOP,presents results from different pedagogies (e.g., lecture, laboratory, POGIL), and describeslessons learned and future directions. Results show distinctive patterns of student and teacherbehaviors for different pedagogies.1. IntroductionThe ICAP model describes the benefits of interactive (I), constructive (C
-membrane technologies have the potential to deliversimilar performance as the RED and PRO technologies. However, these techniques have beendemonstrated in the laboratory to produce a net energy output and have not been demonstrated toproduce continuous power outputs.Energy generation through Capacitive MixingThe CAPMix cycle consists in charging a pair of “generalized electrodes” or “accumulators” toreach a given potential when submerged in one solution, and in discharging them at a lowerpotential while submerged in the other solution [17]. The terms generalized electrodes oraccumulators are used in order to include any kind of electrode or assembly that is able totemporarily store charge, either capacitively, with membranes, in redox reactions
-property relationship of polymeric materials. The course is a lecture course withlaboratory sessions to help students understand the fundamental concepts in which will beapplied in the laboratory with 3D printing. The course is offered in the spring semester servingapproximately 15 chemical engineering students. By introducing 3D printing as a class project,students will be able to 1. Think critically and analyze the literature in the 3D printing area. 2. Identify 3D model files, such as, STL files. 3. Modify 3D model files and understand design parameters regarding part quality. 4. Gain skillset to create new objects using the aid of computers, for example, TinkerCAD. 5. Compare finished products using different 3D printing and the
Paper ID #38093Learning Outside of the Classroom - Applying a Design,Development, and Testing Exercise to Augment the Early-Stage Undergraduate Aerospace and Mechanical EngineeringExperienceFrancisco Bueno Francisco Bueno is an undergraduate student majoring in Aerospace Engineering and a concentration in Mechanical Engineering. He studies at Parks College of Engineering, Aviation, and Technology of Saint Louis University. He has been a part of AirCRAFT laboratory since Spring 2021, where he is team captain for the AUVSI AUS competition. His current vision is to follow a Master's program after finishing his
, andteacher engagement [10]. Accordingly, several researchers in multiple engineering fields havebeen working on diverse applied learning techniques attempting to improve the engineeringcurriculum and thus enhance the students’ learning experience.Educators started incorporating hands-on teaching activities into STEM courses by utilizinginteractive educational tools like modular educational demonstrators to improve STEM educationand introduce students to engineering design concepts [11] [12]. Studies show that educationaldemonstrators, e.g., hydraulic remotely controlled vehicles, robotic cars, Etc., can reinforcestudents’ learning through integrating hands-on labs into the laboratory curriculum [13]. Sucheducational demonstrators have been
careerpath instead of completely dropping out of school. Therefore, the course pedagogy combinedlecture-type sessions with a learning activity. The learning activities could vary fromconstruction or industry site visits, lab practices, experiential learning, role-model activities,among others [37]–[41]. In general, the learning activities throughout this course aimed toprovide students with the opportunity to have hands-on experience with laboratories, connectwith the industry through site visits and role playing, understand the application of their theorylessons and their involvement with academic student chapters to connect with upper-levelstudents—tutoring and mentorship.ResultsThe following sections presents the outcome of the course design
work represents learningtools for IoT concepts that were intended for a traditional (non-remote) course. Although at thetime of its publication the laboratory was not yet implemented, its content shows hands-onexercises for the laboratory. Jones describes the design of a hardware kit and laboratoryexercises to offer students hands-on experiences with embedded systems as well as IoT [6].Remote learning was not targeted in this application. In their 2021 survey paper on IoT ineducation, Ronoh et al. recommend that IoT courses should have practical skills as one of thelearning outcomes, which can be successfully achieved via problem-based learning (PBL) [7].The authors’ findings support that IoT is conducive to cooperative learning, and can
Point he has continued his research on unmanned systems under ARL’s Campaign for Maneuver as the Associate Director of Special Programs. Throughout his career he has continued to teach at a variety of colleges and universities. For the last 4 years he has been a part time instructor and collaborator with researchers at the University of Maryland Baltimore County (http://me.umbc.edu/directory/). He is currently an Assistant Professor at York College PA.Dr. Stephen Andrew Gadsden, McMaster University Dr. S. Andrew Gadsden is an Associate Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Mc- Master University and is Director of the Intelligent and Cognitive Engineering (ICE) Laboratory. His research area includes
, effectiveness, and pedagogical value ofstudent-generated stories in a fluid mechanics course part of the mechanical engineeringtechnology curriculum. This application, which addressed Accreditation Board for Engineeringand Technology (ABET)’s Criterion 3 and Criterion 5c, was implemented in a four-credit hour(ch) senior-level applied fluid mechanics course, with a 3ch lecture and 1ch laboratorycomponent. The course is the second in fluid mechanics’ sequence and covers topics likepipeline systems design, pump selection, flow of air in ducts, lift and drag, etc. The originalinstructional design used a blend of traditional in-class lectures and problem-based learningfocused on project-based and other laboratory exercises.To further improve the students
engineering courses.Approximately 75 students take the course annually. Most are civil engineering majors atUSAFA, but approximately one-third of the students come from other military colleges andReserve Officer Training Corps programs from around the country. The course includes fieldtrips, lab exercises, and hands-on activities intended to give students a practical frame-of-reference that is helpful in subsequent analysis and design courses.Most activities consist of some pre-reading, a short classroom lesson, the hands-on portion, andfinally a quiz or laboratory practical exercise. Both the quizzes and practical exercises serve aslow stakes assessments. Faculty develop the course materials and teach the classroom lesson,but to execute the hands-on
before leaving the classroom. The second group participatedin this course also in person and after the face-to-face lecture they were assigned to complete thesame worksheets online and submit them electronically in the Canvas Learning ManagementSystem. The only changed factor between the two groups was the worksheet formats. Thecomparison between the two groups is based on the average grades in learning objectivesthrough assessment measures such as exams and laboratory experiments which was kept similarfor the two groups. The assessment measures and tools are explained in detail in the next section.2. Methodology and approachIn this section we have provided information about the Digital/Microprocessor Basics(EET2141) course and introduced
structural memberssubjected to axial, shear, and bending forces, connections, as well as diaphragms and shear walls.The new projects described in this paper took place in the subsequent course where students arefurther exposed to timber design, usually during senior year, which is the ARCE 451 – Timber &Masonry Structures Design and Constructability Laboratory. Instructors for ARCE 451 arelicensed engineers with many years of industry experience who provide lectures and projectadvising. In past offerings of the course, students designed a 3-story, mixed use wood buildingduring the 10-week quarter where they: conducted a structural analysis, produced calculationsfor the structural design of the gravity and lateral force resisting systems, and
author) for the mechanical engineering program, this forced me into an unexpectedsituation. As many other engineering professors can attest, teaching laboratory intensive classesand design courses adds additional layers of complexity within the online delivery mode.The co-author who taught two other sections of senior design and the first author had toimmediately devise a plan on how to continue to deliver a meaningful design experience tostudents online in the middle of the semester. While most programs in the country adjusted theircapstone programs to face the unexpected pandemic, our program had its own set of challengesto overcome. The first concern for the authors was how to continue to provide a meaningfuldesign experience to the students
homework,” Southern Economic Journal, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 1333–1345, April 2012.[6] J. A. Holdener and B. D. Jones, “Calculus homework: A storied approach,” PRIMUS, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 21–42, May 2019.[7] L. Pogačnik and B. Cigić, "How To Motivate Students To Study before They Enter the Lab," Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 83, no. 7, pp. 1094–1098, July 2006.[8] M. Rollnick, S. Zwane, M. Staskun, S. Lotz and G. Green, “Improving pre-laboratory preparation of first year university chemistry students,” International Journal of Science Education, vol. 23, no.10, pp. 1053-1071, Oct. 2001.[9] G. O’Brien and M. Cameron. "Prelaboratory activities to enhance the laboratory learning experience," in Proceedings of The Australian
5-wk duration.It’s to be noted that this is the first series of experimental 5-week sub-track courses with the importantresearch goal of assessing very preliminary student awareness , knowledge and attitude in the publicsector context. Laboratory programs (in class and out of class) were designed to provide an experientialexposure of the professional skill(soft skills) and interdisciplinary skills which are the many benefits ofproject managementsSurveys administered at the start and end of 3-weeks of instruction (N=42) covered awareness, knowledge,and student attitude for the public sector. Results revealed a 70% awareness increase, an unchanged 90 %agreement on the value of the engineers’ duty to welfare of society, and a marginal desire
integration, testing, and the use of developmentand verification tools.Lecture courses should be accompanied with a series of laboratory exercises and a semester longproject. Theses laboratory exercise will help student learn the basic concepts of designingembedded systems and mastering the lectured materials. Laboratory exercises and projects canutilize popular kits such as the ARM-based Rapid Embedded Systems Design Education Kit orlow-cost FPGA embedded systems development boards. Laboratory exercises and projectsshould leverage proficiency gained from other core engineering courses such as C/C++programming language, assembly language, and computer organization courses in designingreal-world embedded applications.c. Cyber Physical Systems Design
including the Air Force wide award for Outstanding Science and Engineering Educator. He has served as a Senior Area Editor and an Associate Editor for IEEE Signal Processing Letters and as a Guest Editor for The IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 On Student Collaboration and Competition in an Inquiry-Based Multiuser Communications and Jamming ExerciseAbstractThis paper describes an inquiry-based laboratory exercise used to introduce senior-level electricalengineering students to the concepts of multiuser communication systems. The exercise includesboth collaborative and competitive gaming elements, and requires students
levelelectrical engineering elective, Programmable Logic Controllers (EECS 5220).Perspectives on this course were obtained while taking the graduate course includingobservation of the instruction, participation in several laboratory experiments as well asexam questions.FINDINGSThe engineering science elective option, EECS 4220, Programmable Logic Controllers, isa newly developed course and as such may still require some modification of its courseconfiguration and student expectations. Upon conclusion of this course, this author spokewith several students and found that as far as the content and presentation of the coursematerial, most students seemed satisfied. Many commented that when this electivebecome available, the class was perceived as a great
day-long tour of renewable energy demonstration/research laboratories and engineeringmanufacturing facilities. TxState faculty and graduate students also provided information onSTEM career paths and an update of the Re-Energize program including research andscholarship opportunities.Objective 3: Design and develop a replicable renewable energy laboratory to carry out thetraining and hands-on activities proposed in the Re-Energize program. A replica of the lab willbe established at Eco Centro to operate independently once the training is completed. Activity 3.2: San Antonio College will nominate selected members of STEM faculty and encourage as well as support them to attend the designated Re-Energize professional development