engineering to thermal-fluid systemsdesign, that the students can have a platform to practice teamwork, professional and ethicalresponsibility, and that the reformed curriculum contributes to an increase in student’s interestsin thermal/fluid subjects, better retention rate, and more attraction to prospective students.Finally, the developed process ensures a favorable cooperative learning environment with astrong sense of accomplishment for the underrepresented student population. This presentationfocuses on the progress of the project in the following areas: (1) Planned activities, (2) studentdesign team’s efforts, and (3) pre-project evaluation serving as a benchmark for projectimplementation evaluation
credits each semester. The credit structureis designed to encourage long-term participation, and allows multi-year projects of significantscope and impact to be undertaken by the teams.Each student in the EPICS Program attends a weekly two-hour meeting of his/her team in theEPICS laboratory. During this laboratory time the team members will take care ofadministrative matters, do project planning and tracking, and work on their project. All studentsalso attend a common one-hour lecture each week. A majority of the lectures are by guestexperts, and have covered a wide range of topics related to engineering design, communication,and community service. The long-term nature of the program has required some innovation inthe lecture series since
system performance; and writing a report about the design of the system.Table 2 is an example of a task planning sheet for the Fireplace Heat Recovery Project. The planshows a completion date selected for each task. By the end of the fifth week of the semester, forexample, a CAD model is to be developed. Also included in the task planner (although not shownin Table 2) is the name/initials of the individual responsible for completing the task.Each group member maintains a notebook or diary of all tasks completed for the project. The diarycontains any and all details of the work done by that particular member on the project. This wouldinclude something as short as a phone call, or as detailed as calculations to predict when a pumpwill cavitate.The
Presentations: Each participant (or team) is required to present to the group a project description and a plan of work at the end of the second week. The presentations are conducted in a conference format. 3. REU Symposium: At the end of the REU program, a symposium is organized to expose the participants to the professional conference environment. Each participant (or team) is required to prepare and present a five-page conference paper according to a set of guidelines. The papers are published in a conference proceedings. 3.2 Professional Development Activities The program is designed to include a host of professional development activities that
a few engineers new to the profession. One of they key steps inprofessional development is that of succession planning. This involves looking to themajority group of engineers to develop the proficiencies required as the expertpractitioners retire or make career moves.The technical leadership of the department, perhaps working with a training director,must identify the combination of subject matter and proficiencies required of the expertpractitioner. A learning matrix can then be defined for the particular area of expertise.This matrix sets the expectations… In what topics or subjects must the engineer developproficiency? What level of proficiency is expected?The next step in supporting technical development is to provide guidance for the
generation of forward or inverse kinematic function s.Few suggestions are given for laboratory exercises in any of these standard textbooks, primarily dueto the wide variance in laboratory equipment and protocols typical in robotics education. Commonassignments such as the Towers of Hanoi focus on algorithm flow, while other standard labs focuson behavior or path planning. These are all easily implemented using vendor supplied movecommands. A shortcoming in these common laboratory strategies is that they do not build on theintroductory material that is emphasized in the classroom. This paper presents methods for utilizingthe capabilities of MATLAB to quickly engage undergraduate students in an introductory robotics
American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationof fundamental neurophysiological processes illustrated by the computer simulations andmodels.Course structureThe basis of the course is lectures on fundamentals of neuroscience delivered by recognizedspecialists in the topic. Five instructors teach the course in blocks of 3-5 lectures, with thecoordinator (D.E. Kourennyi) present at each lecture and planning the coverage of the topics.The lectures give the students deep understanding of the facts and theories behindneurophysiology of the cell – from molecular to cellular to intercellular level. The material iscovered at both quantitative
integrating parts, creating codes for Arduino microcontroller, and run their systems using samplecoding. After being exposed to hardware and software, they used a system featuring a 3D printedstructural substrate emulating a power plant with an electric/battery powered heater, temperature andpressure sensors, and LED lights changing intensity based on temperature levels, where they canautomate the system and shut down the plant to avoid issues.Educators in the region (approximately within 90 miles radius of Denton, TX) were contacted earlyin summer for proper planning, and points of contacts included school principals or science teachersUNT recently collaborated with during previous UNT summer camps. They were provided with aflyer describing the
purposes of soliciting feedback from others in our region. MethodologyFirst, for the benefit of the students, our faculty instructors engage with area industry by organizingclass field trips to chemical engineering industrial facilities and also bringing industry speakers tothe students. Our department strives to provide separate field trips to area industry sites for eachyear in the students’ academic career, and plans these visits for different classes that cover all levels Proceedings of the 2024 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference WestTexasA&MUniversity,Canyon,TX Copyright 2024, American Society for Engineering
was part of the planning committee for the environmental engineeringprogram).”By 2009 or so, faculty could see the need and the potential for an official, standalone college ofengineering. Proposals were created for degrees in mechanical, civil, and electrical engineering(“the holy grail,” as one long-time faculty member put it) plus the official creation of a Collegeof Engineering. The then-UGA president (and BAE Dept head) waited for the right time politi-cally to present these proposals to the state of Georgia’s Board of Regents. Finally, in late 2010,these proposals were approved. The Board of Regents vote was tied 8-8, so the Board Chairmade the deciding vote. Ironically enough, this person was a Georgia Tech grad and caught someflak for
satisfied and all safety and efficiency standards are met. Additionally,the Environmental Policy Act 1 (NEPA), requires governmental agencies to perform apublic scoping process that includes making plans available for public review, sponsoringdedicated time for public comment, and holding at least one public meeting. As such,engineering professionals who work for both government agencies and private firms areresponsible for facilitating and participating in public meetings at some point during theircareer. To prepare for this eventuality, civil engineers must be able to facilitate effective,productive public meetings. The research and curriculum development presented in thispaper is a first step to preparing new engineers for this important task
at Purdue University where he teaches courses in plan reading, estimating, and industrial construction. Bryan’s research interests include construction safety, industrial and nuclear construction, and workforce training. He has received numerous research grants from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) to further research in the area of construction safety and also from the Department of Labor to promote construction worker safety training. Prior to working in BCM, Bryan worked at Purdue in the Civil Engineering Department and the Construction Engineering and Management Program teaching and working with industry. Prior to coming to Purdue, Bryan worked as an engineer in industry, with
AC 2011-2082: ENGAGING K-12 TEACHERS IN TECHNOLOGY TOOLSTO SUPPORT ELECTRONIC AND MOBILE LEARNING THROUGH ANONLINE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COURSEMeltem Alemdar, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Meltem Alemdar is a Research Scientist in the Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics, and Computing (CEISMC) at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Dr. Alemdar has experience evaluat- ing programs that fall under the umbrella of educational evaluation, including K-12 educational curricula, after-school programs, and comprehensive school reform initiatives. Across these evaluations, she has used a variety of evaluation methods, ranging from multi-level evaluation plans designed to assess pro- gram impact to
one-pointvariation. Exact agreement ranged from a high of 60% to a low of 20%. Overall, the resultsindicated sufficient agreement for use with formative assessment (for enhancing teaching andlearning). For summative use, five of the assessments should prove adequate in documentingstudent growth, including the Team Contract, Team Member Citizenship, Growth Planning,Growth Progress, and Professional Development assessments. The remaining two, TeamProcesses and Growth Achieved, may need to be revised to improve agreement. Suggestions forimprovement include revisions to rubric descriptors for each level of performance, improvedFrame-of-Reference rater training to decrease rater errors and increase accuracy, and, lastly,incorporation of Behavior
AC 2011-1078: GATEWAY EXPERIENCES TO ENGINEERING TECH-NOLOGY: DEVELOPMENT OF AN INTRODUCTORY COURSEChad M Laux, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Chad Laux is an Assistant Professor in the Industrial Technology Department at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana. He teaches courses in Lean manufacturing, and Six Sigma quality, Production planning among others. His research interests include quality management, Lean manufacturing, Six Sigma, and agriculture biotechnology systems. He is a Six Sigma BlackBelt from General Electric Co, Caterpillar Inc, and the American Society for Quality. He is also a Certified Senior Technology Manager from the Association of Technology, Management, and Applied Engineering
AC 2011-205: ATTRIBUTES OF A GLOBAL ENGINEERStephen Hundley, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis Stephen P. Hundley is Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Undergraduate Programs and Associate Professor of Organizational Leadership in the Purdue School of Engineering and Technology at Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI).Ms. Lynn G. Brown, The Boeing Company Lynn Brown is the Boeing Corporate Program Manager for University Relations International for Strate- gic Workforce Planning and the Co-chair for the ASEE CMC Special Interest Group for International Engineering Education. Lynn was named as Boeing’s University Relations Program Manager in 2004 expanding her
, autonomous robots that require less mentor support than the FRC robots. At thetime of the latest published Botball statistics in 2008, “approximately 93,653 individualsincluding 40,280 students have been impacted by the Botball Program.” 7 The success ofBotball and FIRST is strong evidence that today’s students are interested in advancedengineering technologies, innovative demonstrations, and hands-on activities.Researching the source of motivation for students to choose engineering was anotherfactor contributing to the corrective action plan. The Center for the Advancement ofEngineering Education (CAEE) has published a wealth of information on this subject. Amotivator referred to as “intrinsic behavioral” was the largest contributor in the
; the strategies that firms use to benefit from innovation; and the process of formulating strategy. “ENES 464, International Entrepreneurship & Innovation”: The course focuses on the need for every entrepreneur and innovator to understand the global market in today’s hypercompetitive world, and to appreciate how to compete effectively in domestic markets by managing international competitors, suppliers, and influencers. Students develop skills to identify and manage opportunities on a global basis. “ENES 460, Fundamentals of Technology Start-Up Ventures”: With a focus on business plan development, students learn how to assess the feasibility of a startup venture, as well as how to apply
AC 2011-587: CREATING LINKAGES BETWEEN UNIVERSITY AND TECH-NOLOGY EDUCATION PROGRAMSJohn Marshall, University of Southern Maine John Marshall received his Ph.D. from Texas A&M University and is the Departmental Internship Co- ordinator at the University of Southern Maine. His areas of specialization include Power and Energy Processing, Applied Process Control Engineering, Automation, Fluid Power, and Facility Planning. Page 22.396.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Creating Linkages Between University and Technology Education
profile of students, though, tends to be different, with practice the clearimmediate professional objective. Graduates of our Bachelor of Science program with “B” orhigher career cumulative averages are offered automatic admission into the M.Eng. program.With proper planning, our undergraduates can develop a seamless transition betweenundergraduate and graduate programs culminating in the B.S. and M.Eng. degrees in 5 years.They have the advantage of being able to pace requirements better and to experience asomewhat less crowded 5th year. Page 4.386.1Additional characteristics of the M.Eng. program, include: • Emphasis on both individual and
leading high-technology Fortune 500 companies. The decision-makersto be studied are CPEEs and officers at Fortune-500 companies serving on the NationalTechnological University (NTU) Advisory Committee, all of whom are involved in planning andprogramming corporate engineering development programs. Dr. Lionel Baldwin describes NTUas a virtual university4, an accredited cooperative effort of 46 major engineering andmanagement colleges linked by satellite and using compressed digital-video technology toprovide 25,000 hours of instruction to 115,000 engineering and scientific participants annually.The questionnaire will be targeted to business-based managers and leaders such as thevice-president of human resources, director of human resource
Corporation (SAIC), we have offered night classesleading to our master degrees in the four of the company’s conference rooms at Tyson’s Corner,VA. Additionally, SAIC and our Department developed a six-course graduate certificate in the Page 4.474.2field of information security management, which was initiated in January and open to allqualified students. The faculty includes world-class experts in the field. Next year, SAIC isstarting to construct three additional buildings in northern Virginia. Plans include GWUoccupying a floor in one of the buildings in order to provide easy access for SAIC employeesand others in the area to our educational
matter is to be presented. This approach allows the professor toorganize and present what is to be learned in the course and demonstrates to the students how thecourse is organized. The advance organizer model is designed to strengthen students’ owncognitive structure. 2 Technology Administration ETI 4635Management Functions Managing Technology Personal Technology Planning Research Time Management Design Ethics Decision Making Production Career Organizing Quality
funded research work3. to demonstrate hands-on skills with a broad range of modern materials processing and characterization equipment and methods, with special in-depth concentration in two student-selected areas from among ceramic, electronic, metallic, and polymeric materials. These last three were selected due to the emphasis in our program on hands-onlaboratory work, our vertically-integrated design courses, and our strong emphasis onexperiential learning through placements in co-ops, internships, or national laboratories.3. Department Assessment Plan A matrix was created which mapped each of the new courses in the combinedcurriculum to the desired outcomes in order to see where the contributions were beingmade toward
animation award, and planning open houses for both parents and community members.FIRST provided an educational experience extending beyond that of a traditional project. Fromthe outset, it was understood that early development of a sense of team and a rapport amongpartners was essential. This was orchestrated by Mr. Scott Evans, a junior in electricalengineering. Prior to receiving instructions and parts for this year's competition, Scott organizedweekly meetings between the corporate engineers, high school, and university students. Duringthese meetings, team members were randomly divided into groups, with each given a relativelysimple problem to solve in a finite time. The solutions were shared with the entire group, anddiscussed. The groups
as ORCAD, Electronics Workbench, Altera,etc. These programs also perform some time of specialized simulation. However, ourstudents are not routinely exposed to commonly utilized general CAD programs. Thispaper presents the results of an AutoCAD Laboratory exercise completed and evaluated bya class of Advanced Digital Design students in an electrical engineering undergraduatecurriculum. In addition, a detailed list of students’ comments and future developments areincluded.Introductionthe engineering design process is a problem solving activity, and an end product is theformulation of a prototype for a finished product before its actual production. The actualdesign process has several similar definitions. ‘PDCA - plan, do, check, act’ is one
# 3518) project known initially as JACMET(Joint Arizona Center for Manufacturing Education and Training). It has now been officiallyestablished by the universities and industry sponsors as JACME2T (Joint Arizona Consortium -Manufacturing and Engineering Education for Tomorrow).What is JACME2T?The Consortium effort began in 1993 as a TRP planning grant (EEC-9310456) and is now a self-supporting group devoted to advancing university - industry interactions - especially in life longlearning areas. Overall direction is provided by a Policy Board of top industry, university andpublic sector leaders. Day to day direction is provided by the Technical Advisory Board, againcomprised of industry and university managers. A central office is maintained at
information from this assignment revealed student attitudes aboutcivil engineering. The course included additional assignments on sustainability (2009 only),ethics, a team West Point Bridge Designer project, a curriculum plan to graduation at CU with aB.S. in CVEN, a paper on a significant event or structure related to civil engineering (such as theThree Gorges Dam, the flooding in New Orleans from hurricane Katrina, etc.), and a shortsummary of a professional society meeting that they attended (such as ASCE or AGC). In thefinal assignment of the semester the students wrote a reflective essay that instructed them to statewhether or not they planned to remain a civil engineering major and why/why not. The studentswere also instructed to comment on
and Policy Studies at Virginia Tech. Her research interests include work-life spillover among faculty and issues confronting underrepresented groups in the STEM fields. Catherine has served as the Coordinator of Special Projects for the Office of the Provost at Virginia Tech focusing on faculty work-life issues, diversity efforts, excellence in undergraduate education, and coordinating university planning activities and served as a doctoral intern with the State Council of Higher Education.Sam Conn, Virginia Tech Prior to joining Virginia Tech's Institute for Distance and Distributed Learning as Director, Sam served as Assistant Professor and Chair of the Department of Computer Information
insaneramblings of a madman,” as well as to Dr. Rohit Dua for his ever-present mentorship.References[1] MIT OpenCourseWare, "Lec 1 | MIT 6.450 Principles of Digital Communications I, Fall 2006," 28 April 2009. [Online]. Available: https://tinyurl.com/4wsauunpNathaniel Van Devender will graduate in 2024 with a BS in Electrical Engineering. He plans towork in the Electrical Power industry for his career but favors a myriad of other disciplines ashobbies. He has been overheard saying “the day I stop learning is the day that I die.”Michael Hardesty is a first-generation college student and will be graduating in spring of 2024with a BS in Electrical Engineering, a Computer Engineering minor, and an Automation minor.He is currently working at John Deere